The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFinal 2025 1112 Council Agenda PacketMoses Lake City Council Dustin Swartz, Mayor | Judy Madewell, Deputy Mayor | Don Myers, Council Member | Mark Fancher, Council Member Deanna Martinez, Council Member | David Skaug, Council Member | Victor Lombardi, Council Member Wednesday, November 12, 2025 Moses Lake Civic Center – 401 S. Balsam or remote access* Special Meeting Agenda Executive Session – 6:00 p.m. Potential Litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) Regular Meeting Agenda Call to Order – 6:30 p.m. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of the Agenda Citizen’s Communications ** Presentation - MLHS Mavs State Softball Champions Public Hearings #1 #2 2026 Budget Ordinance – First Public Hearing pg 94 - slide deck added 11-11 Presented by Finance Director Madeline Prentice Summary: Council to hear from public, review, and continue hearing 2026 Draft Budget link to COML site for budget docs) (document updated 11-10) Property Tax Levy Resolution 4027 pg 4 Motion (resolution updated 11-11) Presented by Finance Director Madeline Prentice Summary: Council to hear from public, review, and consider adoption #3 Consent Agenda pg 16 Motion All items listed below are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member requests specific items to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion prior to the time Council votes on the motion to adopt the Consent Agenda. a.City Council Meeting Minutes Dated June 3, 2025 b.Claims and Payroll COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 1 of 93 November 12, 2025, City Council Meeting Page 2 Consent Agenda cont. c.Flexible Spending Account Plan Amendment d.Sustainable Water Strategy Plan e.October 28 Town Hall Notes Old Business #4 Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Funding Recommendations pg 49 Motion Presented by Parks, Recreation, & Cultural Services Director Doug Coutts Summary: Council to review and consider approval New Business #5 #6 Motion #7 Motion #8 Motion #9 Motion 2025 Code Amendments Group 1 – First Presentation pg 54 Presented by Acting Community Development Director Vivian Ramsey Summary: Discussion Limited Use Shallow Wells for Irrigation Ordinance 3079 pg 73 Presented by Assistant Public Works Director Leigh Ramsey Summary: Council to review and consider approval IAFF Labor Memorandum of Agreement pg 78 Presented by Human Resources Director Shannon Springer Summary: Council to review and consider approval AFSCME Memo of Agreement for Position Change pg 83 Presented by Human Resources Director Shannon Springer Summary: Council to review and consider approval Bilingual Compensation Policy pg 87 Presented by Human Resources Director Shannon Springer Summary: Council to review and consider approval Staff Reports - Museum Opening Membership Exhibit – PRCS Director Doug Coutts -Other City Council Member Reports Future Business Requests: MLMC 2.08.050 states that an item may be placed on a Council meeting agenda, in advance of posting an agenda, by any of the following methods: majority vote of the Council; Council consensus; any three (3) Council members; the City Manager; a Council Committee; or the Mayor. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 2 of 93 November 12, 2025, City Council Meeting Page 3 Information Item -Upcoming Agenda Items pg 91 Adjournment Future Council Meetings: Special Meetings November 18, Regular Meetings November 25, and December 9 Council Notices of Potential Quorum – link to separate webpage NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the in-person meeting who require an interpreter or special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, need to contact the City Clerk at (509) 764-3703 or Deputy City Clerk at (509) 764-3713 at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. *Remote Options: #1 MS Teams App or Online Join the meeting now Meeting ID: 267 593 751 902 10 Passcode: ND6VV2Ku Or #2 MS Teams by phone (audio only) Dial in by phone +1 509-707-9401,,148293404# Or #3 YouTube Live https://www.youtube.com/@MosesLakeCityCouncil/streams ** In person Citizen Comment or Public Hearing Comments form needs to be given to the Clerk by 6:25 p.m. The 5-minute time per speaker may be reduced to allow a maximum period of 30 minutes for citizens who have signed up to speak. Click this link for remote speaker request forms which must be completed by 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting and join using one of the Teams options above. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 3 of 93 Council Agenda Bill Subject '26 Budget, 1st Public Hearing Department Finance Presenter at the Meeting Madeline Prentice, Finance Director Packet Attachments (if any) Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Agenda Item Number: 58129 Proceeding Type Public Hearing Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion Conduct the first Public Hearing for the 2026 Budget. Summary/Background The budget provides for the financial planning, control, and evaluation of all funds. The City Manager and all Department Directors met to review budget proposals, and a proposed 2026 budget was presented to City Council on September 30, 2026. A series of budget workshops were held on October 7, October 14, October 22, and November 6, 2025 to discuss each funds' proposed budget and to get City Council recommendations on changes to the budget. Recommended changes and updates from the budget workshops have been included in the preliminary budget. This is the first presentation of the 2026 Preliminary Budget. The budget requires two public hearings be held before adoption of the budget ordinance establishing the authorization and spending plan for the 2026 fiscal year for all City operations. Any further recommendations resulting from the first presentation of the budget from Council will be made and incorporated into the 2026 Preliminary Budget. A second public hearing is scheduled to be held on November 25, 2025. For the 2026 Preliminary Budget, all funds are balanced within available resources. Additional explanation and summaries of revenues and expenditures by fund will be provided in a separate 2026 Preliminary Budget document. A link to the 2026 Preliminary Budget document will be provided prior to the public hearing. Fiscal Consideration The total proposed 2026 preliminary expenditure budget is roughly $125.5 million with the General and Street operating budgets equal to $41.8 million of that amount. The total proposed 2026 preliminary revenue budget is $118.3 million, with the General and Street funds amounting to $40.9 million of the total. All funds are balanced within available resources (i.e., new revenues and reserves). City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed Preamble: The City’s top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City’s finances. #1 - Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 - Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 - Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 - Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 - New Police Station #6 - Second Lake Crossing #7 - WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake Reviewed and Approved by: COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 4 of 93 City Manager - Rob Karlinsey on 11/6/2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 5 of 93 Council Agenda Bill Subject Property Tax Levy Resolution Department Finance Presenter at the Meeting Madeline Prentice, Finance Director Packet Attachments (if any) Levy Limit worksheet w_0% levy limit increase.pdf 214.63KB Levy Limit worksheet w_1% levy limit increase.pdf 214.68KB Property tax calculation worksheet w_0% levy limit increase.pdf 440.65KB Property tax calculation worksheet w_1% levy limit increase.pdf 437.41KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Agenda Item Number: 58127 Proceeding Type Public Hearing Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion Staff recommends City Council motion to adopt the resolution for staff to certify the property tax levy to the Grant County Board of Commissioners before the November 30, 2025, deadline. Summary/Background Council has an opportunity to consider the estimated amount to be received by the City from taxes on assessed valuations for property located within the City of Moses Lake. State law under RCW 84.52.020 and 84.52.070 require the governing board of the City of Moses Lake to fix the estimated amount to be raised by taxation on assessed valuation on the property within the City of Moses Lake. Property taxes are a substantial revenue source for the City. The City is allowed to increase its levy by the lessor of one percent (1%) or the percentage increase in the implicit price deflator (IPD) index on its highest levy since 1985. The IPD for 2024-2025 exceeds the 1% limit at 2.44%. The legislative body is required by RCW 35A.33.135 to adopt a resolution establishing the amount to be raised by property taxes for the ensuing fiscal year. Fiscal Consideration Fixing the amount that can be raised by taxation assures the city that they will collect on assessed values greater than in 2025 and allows the City to collect the maximum allowed under state statute in supporting the general fund. As of 11/5/2025, the City has not received the 2025 assessed valuations, amounts for new construction, improvements, tax increment finance area incremental values, state assessed property value increases or refund levy amounts to calculate the 2026 property tax levy amount from the Grant County Assessor and Treasurer. As a result, the 2026 property tax levy calculation is using 2024 amounts used to calculate the 2025 property tax collections. The property tax levy for 2025 was $10,206,863.77. The City could receive a maximum of $10,568,744.26 for 2026 based on the 1% of the highest regular tax levy, plus an estimated increase of $234,106.57 for new construction/improvements and $16,852.36 for increases in tax increment finance area incremental value. The total levy being requested is $10,457,822.70, which is below the State constitutional limit and does not include the 1% levy limit increase. Calculations of the estimated levy including and excluding the allowable 1% levy limit are attached for consideration. The 2026 budget is estimated to be $10,400,000 to take into consideration the collection rate, i.e. the entire levy is not collected 100% in the year it is levied. The rate per thousand of assessed valuation is estimated to be $2.56483, which is an increase of $0.06 from the 2025 rate of $2.50328. A household with an assessed valuation of $300,000 will have paid $751 in 2025 and would increase by approximately $18 annually to $769 in 2026, assuming there is no change in the assessed valuation. Increases or decreases in the assessed valuation will have an impact the rate per thousand of assessed valuation. Until we received updated assessed valuation amounts from Grant County, the levy rate is an estimate only and will change based on the 2025 assessed valuation amount, new construction/improvements and increases in the tax increment finance area incremental values in addition to any refund amounts. City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed Preamble: The City’s top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City’s finances. #1 - Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 - Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 - Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 - Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station Resolution 4027 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 6 of 93 #5 - New Police Station #6 - Second Lake Crossing #7 - WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake Reviewed and Approved by: City Manager - Rob Karlinsey on 11/6/2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 7 of 93 2025 2026 A. Year 2024 × B. × ÷ $1,000 C. × ÷ $1,000 A.V. D. -= × ÷ $1,000 E.A+B+C+D F. ÷ × $1,000 Assessed Value Less Annexed AV G. × ÷ $1,000 H.E+G I. Only enter fire/RFA rate, library rate, & firefighter pension fund rate for cities annexed to a fire/RFA or library, or has a firefighters pension fund. --+ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, × ÷ $1,000 J. K. L. Excess Levy Rate Computation - Excess levy amount divided by the assessed value in Line L4 above. ÷ × $1,000 Bond Levy Rate Computation - Bond levy amount divided by the assessed value in Line L4 above. × $1,000 Page 1 Instructions for electronic version of form - Fill in highlighted cells all other self populate. $0.00 $4,077,394,653 =0.000000000000 Levy Amount A.V. from Line L4 above $4,050,266,000.00 $4,077,394,653 =993.346571693756 Levy Amount A.V. from Line L4 above 3. Plus Timber Assessed Value (TAV) ………………………………...……….. 4. Tax base for excess and voted bond levies ………………………...…..…… (1-2+3)$4,077,394,653 boats, timber assessed value, and the senior citizen exemption for the regular levy)$4,077,394,653 2. Less assessed value of the senior citizen exemption of less than $40,000 income or 65% of the median household income for the county based on lower of frozen or market value. Tax Base For Excess Levies 1. Regular levy taxable value (including state-assessed property, and excluding $4,077,394,653 3.571384346500 =$14,561,943.44 A.V. of District Statutory Rate Limit Statutory Amount $11,437,184.23=New highest lawful levy since 1985 (Lesser of I & H minus C, unless A (before limit factor increase) is greater than I or H minus C, then A before the limit factor increase) District base levy rate Fire or RFA Rate Library Rate Firefighter Pension Fund Statutory Rate Limit Highest lawful Levy For This Tax Year (Lesser of H and I) …………………………………… =$11,454,036.59 Statutory maximum calculation Total in Line E Annexed area's current assessed value including new construction and improvements, times the rate in Line F. 2.809155739088 =0 3.600000000000 0.253615653500 0.225 3.571384346500 Parts F through H are used in calculating the additional levy limit due to annexation. To find the rate to be used in G, take the levy limit as shown in Line E above and divide it by the current assessed value of the district, excluding the annexed area. $11,454,036.59 $4,077,394,653 =2.809155739088 Annexed Area's A.V.Rate in Line F Regular property tax limit including annexation …………………………………=$11,454,036.59 Tax increment finance area increment AV increase (RCW 84.55.010(1)(e)) (value included in B & D cannot be included in C) Last Year's Levy Rate 2.503280805100 =$16,852.36$6,732,109 Regular property tax limit: …………………………………….………….=$11,454,036.59 =$0.00 Remainder from Line D Last Year's Levy Rate Current year's state assessed property value less last year's state assessed property value. The remainder is to be multiplied by last year's regular levy rate (or the rate that should have been levied). $16,226,938 $16,226,938 -$ Current Year's A.V.Previous Year's A.V.Remainder LEVY LIMITATIONS WORKSHEET TAXING DISTRICT City of Moses Lake Levy for Taxes Current year's assessed value of new construction, improvements, and wind turbines, solar, biomass, and geothermal facilities in original districts before annexation occurred times last year's levy rate (if an error occurred or an error correction was made in the previous year, use the rate that would have been levied had no error occurred). $93,519,901 2.503280805100 =$234,106.57 A.V.Last Year's Levy Rate Highest regular tax which could have been lawfully levied beginning with the 1985 levy (refund levy not included). $11,092,156.10 101.000%=$11,203,077.66 Highest Lawful Levy Since 1985 Limit Factor/Max Increase 101% $0 2.503280805100 REV 64 0007 10/17/2024 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 8 of 93 2025 2026 A. Year 2025 + Year 2025 × B. C. D. E. F. G. + H. I. + J. ― K. L. M. N. O. Use this rate in next year's levy calculations unless it's changed due to levy error, other limitation, or there's a road levy shift. ÷ × $1,000 Amount on line L1 on page 1 P. Use this rate for the current year's tax roll unless it is changed due to another levy limitation such as the $5.90 limit. ÷ × $1,000 = Q. R.OR Amount shifted FROM this taxing district S.÷ × $1,000 = REV 64 0007 (10/17/2024)Page 2 2. Plus amount under levied (if applicable) …………………………………………. Total: L +/- M ………………………………………………………………………….$10,457,822.70 Regular Levy Rate Computation Without Levy Error Correction Lesser of J & K ……………………………………………………………………$10,457,822.70 1. Minus amount over levied (if applicable) ………………………………………….. Lesser of G, H, or I Amount Held in Abeyance Total Statutory limit from line I on page 1 (dollar amount, not the rate) …………………=$14,561,943.44 Line H, Page 1 Amount to be Refunded Total Amount of taxes recovered due to a settlement of highly valued disputed property (RCW 84.52.018). $10,457,822.70 Regular Levy Rate Computation: Lesser of K and N divided by the assessed value in line L1 on page 1. $10,457,822.70 $4,077,394,653 2.564829649812 Lesser of K & N Amount on line L1 on page 1 rate before aggregate check $10,457,822.70 $4,077,394,653 =2.564829649812 Lesser of K and L rate w/o error correction =$10,457,822.70 Levy Corrections Year of Error: Did the taxing district cause the error? (yes or no) Levy limit from line H on page 1, plus amount refunded or to be refunded (RCW 84.55.070). $11,454,036.59 $0.00 = Total from Line F Amount to be Refunded Amount allowable per Resolution/Ordinance Total amount certified by county legislative authority or taxing district as applicable. (RCW 84.52.020 and RCW 84.52.070) ……………………………………………..=$10,457,822.70 $11,454,036.59 =$10,457,822.70 Total levy amount authorized by resolution (F) plus amount refunded or to be refunded (RCW 84.55.070). $10,457,822.70 =$10,457,822.70 Total levy amount authorized, including the annexation ……………………………Lesser of A+(B+C+D+E) Amount for increase in value of state-assessed property (Line D, page 1)=$0.00 Amount for increase in annexation (Line G, page 1) …………………………………………..=0 Previous Year's Actual Levy Resolution Percentage of Increase Amount for increment value increase (Line C page 1)=$16,852.36 Amount for new construction, improvements, & certain green energy (Line B page 1)=$234,106.57 Previous Year's Actual Levy Plus Resolution Increase Amount $10,206,863.77 0.000000000000%=$10,206,863.77 Was a second resolution/ordinance adopted authorizing an increase over the IPD? If so, what was the percentage increase? Previous year's actual levy adjusted by the increases as stated in ordinance or resolution (RCW 84.55.120). $10,206,863.77 0.00 =$10,206,863.77 Yes No N/A Calculated % Increase Was a resolution/ordinance adopted authorizing an increase over the previous year's levy? Yes No Amount on line L1 on page 1 $4,077,394,653 2.564829649812$10,457,822.70 Amount shifted TO this taxing district Post Shift Levy RatePost Shift Levy Amount Road Levy Shift Rate Computation - (Do not enter a shift amount in both shift fields.) Population: Less than 10,000 10,000 or more 0.000000000000% TAXING DISTRICT City of Moses Lake Levy For Taxes COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 9 of 93 2025 2026 A. Year 2024 × B. × ÷ $1,000 C. × ÷ $1,000 A.V. D. -= × ÷ $1,000 E.A+B+C+D F. ÷ × $1,000 Assessed Value Less Annexed AV G. × ÷ $1,000 H.E+G I. Only enter fire/RFA rate, library rate, & firefighter pension fund rate for cities annexed to a fire/RFA or library, or has a firefighters pension fund. --+ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, × ÷ $1,000 J. K. L. Excess Levy Rate Computation - Excess levy amount divided by the assessed value in Line L4 above. ÷ × $1,000 Bond Levy Rate Computation - Bond levy amount divided by the assessed value in Line L4 above. × $1,000 Page 1 Instructions for electronic version of form - Fill in highlighted cells all other self populate. $0.00 $4,077,394,653 =0.000000000000 Levy Amount A.V. from Line L4 above $4,050,266,000.00 $4,077,394,653 =993.346571693756 Levy Amount A.V. from Line L4 above 3. Plus Timber Assessed Value (TAV) ………………………………...……….. 4. Tax base for excess and voted bond levies ………………………...…..…… (1-2+3)$4,077,394,653 boats, timber assessed value, and the senior citizen exemption for the regular levy)$4,077,394,653 2. Less assessed value of the senior citizen exemption of less than $40,000 income or 65% of the median household income for the county based on lower of frozen or market value. Tax Base For Excess Levies 1. Regular levy taxable value (including state-assessed property, and excluding $4,077,394,653 3.571384346500 =$14,561,943.44 A.V. of District Statutory Rate Limit Statutory Amount $11,437,184.23=New highest lawful levy since 1985 (Lesser of I & H minus C, unless A (before limit factor increase) is greater than I or H minus C, then A before the limit factor increase) District base levy rate Fire or RFA Rate Library Rate Firefighter Pension Fund Statutory Rate Limit Highest lawful Levy For This Tax Year (Lesser of H and I) …………………………………… =$11,454,036.59 Statutory maximum calculation Total in Line E Annexed area's current assessed value including new construction and improvements, times the rate in Line F. 2.809155739088 =0 3.600000000000 0.253615653500 0.225 3.571384346500 Parts F through H are used in calculating the additional levy limit due to annexation. To find the rate to be used in G, take the levy limit as shown in Line E above and divide it by the current assessed value of the district, excluding the annexed area. $11,454,036.59 $4,077,394,653 =2.809155739088 Annexed Area's A.V.Rate in Line F Regular property tax limit including annexation …………………………………=$11,454,036.59 Tax increment finance area increment AV increase (RCW 84.55.010(1)(e)) (value included in B & D cannot be included in C) Last Year's Levy Rate 2.503280805100 =$16,852.36$6,732,109 Regular property tax limit: …………………………………….………….=$11,454,036.59 =$0.00 Remainder from Line D Last Year's Levy Rate Current year's state assessed property value less last year's state assessed property value. The remainder is to be multiplied by last year's regular levy rate (or the rate that should have been levied). $16,226,938 $16,226,938 -$ Current Year's A.V.Previous Year's A.V.Remainder LEVY LIMITATIONS WORKSHEET TAXING DISTRICT City of Moses Lake Levy for Taxes Current year's assessed value of new construction, improvements, and wind turbines, solar, biomass, and geothermal facilities in original districts before annexation occurred times last year's levy rate (if an error occurred or an error correction was made in the previous year, use the rate that would have been levied had no error occurred). $93,519,901 2.503280805100 =$234,106.57 A.V.Last Year's Levy Rate Highest regular tax which could have been lawfully levied beginning with the 1985 levy (refund levy not included). $11,092,156.10 101.000%=$11,203,077.66 Highest Lawful Levy Since 1985 Limit Factor/Max Increase 101% $0 2.503280805100 REV 64 0007 10/17/2024 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 10 of 93 2025 2026 A. Year 2025 + Year 2025 × B. C. D. E. F. G. + H. I. + J. ― K. L. M. N. O. Use this rate in next year's levy calculations unless it's changed due to levy error, other limitation, or there's a road levy shift. ÷ × $1,000 Amount on line L1 on page 1 P. Use this rate for the current year's tax roll unless it is changed due to another levy limitation such as the $5.90 limit. ÷ × $1,000 = Q. R.OR Amount shifted FROM this taxing district S.÷ × $1,000 = REV 64 0007 (10/17/2024)Page 2 2. Plus amount under levied (if applicable) …………………………………………. Total: L +/- M ………………………………………………………………………….$10,568,744.26 Regular Levy Rate Computation Without Levy Error Correction Lesser of J & K ……………………………………………………………………$10,568,744.26 1. Minus amount over levied (if applicable) ………………………………………….. Lesser of G, H, or I Amount Held in Abeyance Total Statutory limit from line I on page 1 (dollar amount, not the rate) …………………=$14,561,943.44 Line H, Page 1 Amount to be Refunded Total Amount of taxes recovered due to a settlement of highly valued disputed property (RCW 84.52.018). $10,568,744.26 Regular Levy Rate Computation: Lesser of K and N divided by the assessed value in line L1 on page 1. $10,568,744.26 $4,077,394,653 2.592033678227 Lesser of K & N Amount on line L1 on page 1 rate before aggregate check $10,568,744.26 $4,077,394,653 =2.592033678227 Lesser of K and L rate w/o error correction =$10,568,744.26 Levy Corrections Year of Error: Did the taxing district cause the error? (yes or no) Levy limit from line H on page 1, plus amount refunded or to be refunded (RCW 84.55.070). $11,454,036.59 $0.00 = Total from Line F Amount to be Refunded Amount allowable per Resolution/Ordinance Total amount certified by county legislative authority or taxing district as applicable. (RCW 84.52.020 and RCW 84.52.070) ……………………………………………..=$10,568,744.26 $11,454,036.59 =$10,568,744.26 Total levy amount authorized by resolution (F) plus amount refunded or to be refunded (RCW 84.55.070). $10,568,744.26 =$10,568,744.26 Total levy amount authorized, including the annexation ……………………………Lesser of A+(B+C+D+E) Amount for increase in value of state-assessed property (Line D, page 1)=$0.00 Amount for increase in annexation (Line G, page 1) …………………………………………..=0 Previous Year's Actual Levy Resolution Percentage of Increase Amount for increment value increase (Line C page 1)=$16,852.36 Amount for new construction, improvements, & certain green energy (Line B page 1)=$234,106.57 Previous Year's Actual Levy Plus Resolution Increase Amount $10,206,863.77 1.086734990292%=$10,317,785.33 Was a second resolution/ordinance adopted authorizing an increase over the IPD? If so, what was the percentage increase? Previous year's actual levy adjusted by the increases as stated in ordinance or resolution (RCW 84.55.120). $10,206,863.77 110,921.56 =$10,317,785.33 Yes No N/A Calculated % Increase Was a resolution/ordinance adopted authorizing an increase over the previous year's levy? Yes No Amount on line L1 on page 1 $4,077,394,653 2.592033678227$10,568,744.26 Amount shifted TO this taxing district Post Shift Levy RatePost Shift Levy Amount Road Levy Shift Rate Computation - (Do not enter a shift amount in both shift fields.) Population: Less than 10,000 10,000 or more 1.086734990292% TAXING DISTRICT City of Moses Lake Levy For Taxes COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 11 of 93 2025 Tax 2026AssessedRateLevyValuesAppliedDollars (Dollars in Thousands)(estimate) Prior Year (2025) = Base *4,077,395$ 2.50328$ 10,206,864$ Levy Limit-1.0% increase from 2025 levy **- Base-101%10,206,864 Valuation Change - New Construction *93,520 2.50328 234,107 TIF Increment value increase *6,732 2.50328 16,852 Tax Limit Before Annexation 4,077,395 2.50328 10,457,823 Add for Annexation - - Limit for Subsequent Year 4,077,395 2.56483 10,457,823 0 Plus: Banked Capacity - Total Ordinance 2.56483 10,457,823$ Assessed Valuation 4,077,395$ 3.82500$ 15,596,035$ Less: Library Levy (Estimate 0.2536 1,034,091 Maximum 2024 Levy for Collection in 2025 (Estimate)3.5714$ 14,561,943 Total Levy Calculation 10,457,823$ Less: Potential uncollectible levy (estimate)285,000 Plus: REC Silicon tax distribution - 2025 291,227$ Estimate to collect 10,464,050$ Budget Estimate **10,400,000$ ** This calculation/amount does not include the 1% levy limit increase allowable by State law State of Washington Constitutional Limit City of Moses Lake Property Tax Limitation Calculation (w/out 1% levy limit increase) Budget Estimate * 2024 assessed value, new construction & TIF increment value increase amounts 2025 amounts have not yet been provided by Grant County Assessor COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 12 of 93 2025 Tax 2026AssessedRateLevyValuesAppliedDollars (Dollars in Thousands)(estimate) Prior Year (2025) = Base *4,077,394.65$ 2.50328$ 10,206,863.8$ Levy Limit-1.0% increase from 2025 levy 110,921.56 Base-101%10,317,785 Valuation Change - New Construction *93,519.90 2.50328 234,107 TIF Increment value increase *6,732.11 2.50328 16,852 Tax Limit Before Annexation 4,077,394.7 2.59203 10,568,744 Add for Annexation - - Limit for Subsequent Year 4,077,394.7 2.59203 10,568,744 0 Plus: Banked Capacity - Total Ordinance 2.59203 10,568,744$ Assessed Valuation 4,077,394.7$ 3.82500$ 15,596,035$ Less: Library Levy (Estimate 0.2536 1,034,091 Maximum 2024 Levy for Collection in 2025 (Estimate)3.5714$ 14,561,943 Total Levy Calculation 10,568,744$ Less: Potential uncollectible levy (estimate)285,000 Plus: REC Silicon tax distribution - 2025 291,227$ Estimate to collect 10,574,971$ Budget Estimate 10,400,000$ ** Budget estimate does not include 1% levy limit increase State of Washington Constitutional Limit City of Moses Lake Property Tax Limitation Calculation Budget Estimate * 2024 assessed value, new construction & TIF increment value increase amounts 2025 amounts have not yet been provided by Grant County Assessor COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 13 of 93 REVISED 11-12-25 RESOLUTION NO. 4027 A RESOLUTION FIXING AND LEVYING THE AMOUNT OF AD VALOREM TAXES NECESSARY TO DISCHARGE THE EXPECTED EXPENSES AND OBLIGATIONS FOR THE 2026 BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE Whereas, the City Council of the City of Moses Lake has considered its budget for calendar year 2026 as part of its 2026 Budget development process; and Whereas, RCW 84.52 requires the governing body of the City of Moses Lake to fix the estimated amount to be raised by taxation on assessed valuation on property within the City of Moses Lake; and, Whereas, the Grant County Assessor has submitted a preliminary estimated assessed value of all taxable property situated within the boundaries of the City equal to $4,077,394,653; and Whereas, pursuant to chapter 84.55 RCW a taxing jurisdiction may levy property taxes in an amount no greater than the highest regular tax which could have been lawfully levied beginning with the 1985 levy multiplied by a limit factor; and Whereas, the limit factor for taxing jurisdictions with a population of 10,000 or greater is the lesser of 101% or 100% plus inflation, which as of September 26, 2025, has been determined to be more than 101% for 2026; and Whereas, the City has determined to maintain the City’s 2026 general property tax levy at 100% of the amount of the 2025 general property tax levy; and Whereas, the City desires to protect the City’s future levy capacity pursuant to RCW 84.55.092; and Whereas, the property tax levy set out in Section 1 is intended to included additional amounts, if any, that may be allowed under the new construction, increases in assessed value due to improvements to property, increases in assessed value of real property within an increment area and state-assessed property provisions of RCW 84.55.010, and as provided in RCW 84.55.070, the refund provisions of Chapters 84.68 and 84.69 RCW; and Whereas, the City of Moses Lake City Council finds that the levy of general fund property taxes set forth in this resolution is in the best interests of the City, and Whereas, as required by State laws, a public hearing on the City’s property tax levy authorization was properly noticed and held on November 12, 2025; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL: Section 1. Estimated Amount to be Collected by Ad Valorem Taxation. The amount of revenue to be collected by the City in the fiscal year 2026 by taxation on the assessed valuation of all taxable property situated within the boundaries of the City is estimated to be the sum of $10,613,642.12. REVISED 11-12-25 Section 2. Increase in Property Tax Revenue From the Previous Year. The 2026 regular levy amount includes increases from (1) new construction and improvements to property, (2) increases in the assessed value of real property within an increment area, (3) increases in the value of state-assessed property, (4) amounts authorized by law as a result of any annexations that have occurred, as well as applicable refunds ($0.00) already made and (5) an increase in the regular property tax levy from the previous year of zero ($0), or zero percent (0.0%). Section 3. Any unused general property tax levy capacity for the 2026 tax year is reserved for future levy as provided by RCW 84.55.092. Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to transmit and file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Grant County Commissioners and the Grant County Assessor on or before November 30, 2025. Section 5. This resolution shall take effect January 1, 2026. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL and signed and approved this 12th day of November 2025. __________________________________________ Dustin Swartz, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Debbie Burke, City Clerk MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL TOWNHALL June 3, 2025 CALL TO ORDER The special meeting of the Moses Lake City Council was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Swartz in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center with audio remote access. Special notice for remote attendance were posted on the meeting agenda. Sleep Center Closure Transition Plan Roundtable Opening Remarks: Mayor Swartz acknowledged the community’s care and shared values to see the community thrive despite challenges of crime, drug activity, and homelessness. The new plan includes stricter enforcement of laws, increased police presence, and stronger private-public partnerships. Sleep Center Background: Housing and Grants Manager Liz Murillo summarized costs since inception in 2020, partnership with HopeSource for services, and the timeline of events leading to the Townhall and the goals of tonight’s Townhall. There were eight roundtables of residents facilitated by staff and Council. Summary of all discussions: 24-7 comprehensive and flexible services for those willing to accept assistance, collaboration with other communities, central communications, community outreach, police relations, and associated cost burden to the city. Closing: City Manager Rob Karlinsey thanked all of the participants for the input provided to assist Council in their decisions going forward to build on local solutions that keep Moses Lake strong, safe, and resilient on these complex issues. ADJOURNMENT The regular meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. ______________________________________ Dustin Swartz, Mayor ATTEST____________________________ Debbie Burke, City Clerk COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 16 of 93 Council Agenda Bill Subject Distribution report from 10.28 Department Finance Presenter at the Meeting Madeline Prentice, Director of Finance Packet Attachments (if any) Vouchers-11.12.25.pdf 82.94KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Agenda Item Number: 58128 Proceeding Type Consent Agenda Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion Staff recommends City Council approve payment of claims as presented. Summary/Background The following amounts were budgeted, and sufficient funds were available to cover these payments. Electronic Transfer: N/A Checks: 172161 – 172290 - $2,790,091.95 Payroll Checks: 10-24-2025 PR #67172-67177 - $2,518.96 Electronic Payments: 10-24-2025 Direct Deposit - $676,250.44 Total expenditure required and budgeted: $3,468,861.35 RCW42.24 governs the process for audit and review of claims and payroll payments for the City. RCW 42.24.180 requires the review and approval of all payments at a regularly scheduled public meeting on at least a monthly basis. The State Budgeting, Accounting and Reporting Systems (BARS)Manual outlines the above format for approval by the City Council. RCW42.24.080 requires that all claims presented against the City by persons furnishing materials, rendering services, or performing labor must be certified by the appropriate official to ensure that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described, and that the claims are just, due and unpaid obligations against the City. RCW42.24.180 allows expedited processing of the payment of claims when certain conditions have been met. The statute allows the issuance of warrants or checks in payment of claims before the legislative body has acted to approve the claims when: (1) the appropriate officers have furnished official bonds; (2)the legislative body has adopted policies that implement effective internal control; (3) the legislative body has provided for review of the documentation supporting the claims within a month of issuance; and (4) that if claims are disapproved, they shall be recognized as receivables and diligently pursued. The City meets all these conditions. Fiscal Consideration To comply with the requirements, Finance staff schedule payment of claims and payroll for semi-monthly Council approval on the Consent Agenda. The payments listed in the schedule cover all claims and payroll payments during the period prior to the date of the Council meeting. All payments made during this period were found to be valid claims against the City. Details are attached and any questions should be directed to the City Manager or Finance Director. The City’s internal controls include certification of the validity of all payments by the appropriate department prior to submission for payment. The Finance Director has delegated authority for the examination of vouchers and authorization of payments to the Finance, Accounts Payable, and Payroll staff. All payments are reviewed and validated. The Finance Division regularly reviews its processes to ensure appropriate internal controls are in place. City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 17 of 93 Preamble: The City’s top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City’s finances. #1 - Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 - Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 - Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 - Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 - New Police Station #6 - Second Lake Crossing #7 - WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake Reviewed and Approved by: City Manager - Debbie Burke on 11/6/2025 Finance - Madeline Prentice on 11/6/2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 18 of 93 TOTALS BY FUND: FUND NO FUND NAME Est. Fund Bal. @ 10/28/2025 AMOUNT Est. Fund Bal. @ 11/12/2025 001 GENERAL FUND 7,103,369 80,720.09 7,022,649 005 RAINY DAY FUND 509,410 - 509,410 102 TOURISM 2,483,982 35,000.00 2,448,982 103 GRANTS AND DONATIONS 1,515,829 14,578.09 1,501,251 105 ARPA 1,924,142 - 1,924,142 110 HOMELESS SERVICES 764,715 - 764,715 111 OPIOID ABATEMENT 241,718 - 241,718 112 PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM 97,285 - 97,285 114 PATHS/TRAILS 178,604 - 178,604 116 STREET 1,213,370 3,999.80 1,209,370 119 STREET REPR/RECON 7,807,983 1,216,991.40 6,590,992 170 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 1,793,928 - 1,793,928 282 LOCAL BORROWING 1,275,231 - 1,275,231 286 REFUNDING GO BONDS 2015 184,680 - 184,680 314 PARK & RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS 243,283 - 243,283 315 PARK MITIGATION CAPITAL PROJECTS 6,104 221.52 5,882 320 FIRE MITIGATION FUND 1,284,342 - 1,284,342 411 WATER 9,775,747 52,587.64 9,723,159 412 WASTEWATER 4,487,699 26,916.04 4,460,783 450 2011 BOND FUND 10,304 - 10,304 452 2004 BOND FUND 5,732 - 5,732 471 WATER RIGHTS 2,234,887 - 2,234,887 472/322 WATER REMEDIATION 431,248 3,589.57 427,659 473/393 STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION 107,706 - 107,706 477 WATER CONSTRUCTION 6,579,148 309,112.40 6,270,036 478 WASTEWATER CONSTRUCTION 576,641 2,967.63 573,674 485 PWTF WATER-WASTEWATER DEBT SVS 20,196 - 20,196 487 2015 GO BONDS REDEMPTION 9,551 - 9,551 490 SANITATION 2,916,824 68,574.09 2,848,250 493 STORM WATER 809,583 1,743.53 807,840 495 AIRPORT 69,690 - 69,690 498 AMBULANCE 1,656,939 25,631.09 1,631,308 501 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION INSURANCE 267,818 25,709.20 242,108 503 SELF-INSURANCE 587,106 - 587,106 517 CENTRAL SERVICES 1,755,325 40,619.15 1,714,706 519 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 4,271,739 562,980.30 3,708,759 528 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,922,351 388,037.92 1,534,313 611 FIRE PENSION 645,571 1,482.37 644,089 623 DEPOSIT 746,287 (71,369.88) 817,657 631 STATE 15,174 - 15,174 TOTAL 68,531,242$ 2,790,091.95$ 65,741,150$ City of Moses Lake Tabulation of Claims Paid-Summary by Fund Council Meeting Date-11/12/2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 19 of 93 Check Name Check Amount Check Date Invoice Description 172161 Abc Hydraulics 341.10 10/24/2025 Hose 172162 Acme Construction Supply Co Inc.694.19 10/24/2025 Sawhorses 172163 Amazon Capital Services, Inc.368.32 10/24/2025 Amazon - September 2025 172164 Anatek Labs, Inc.195.00 10/24/2025 Sample Testing 172165 AT&T Mobility II, LLC 1,813.43 10/24/2025 First Responder Lines/Cell Phones 172166 Bruckner Truck & Equipment 544,455.72 10/24/2025 2025 Mack Md74 Dump Truck Eq #236 172167 C & E Trenching LLC 309,112.40 10/24/2025 Turnkey Watermain Replacement 172168 Cascade Natural Gas Corp 165.28 10/24/2025 Natural Gas Services 172169 Central Manufacturing Inc 160.80 10/24/2025 Asphalt Patches 172170 Centurylink 92.27 10/24/2025 Telephone Services 172171 Certified Folder Display Service, Inc 7,888.80 10/24/2025 LTAC Advertising 172172 Civicplus Inc 23,373.28 10/24/2025 Annual Renewal 172173 Coaxsher, Inc.2,811.74 10/24/2025 Pants, Jacobs, Nygard, Ellinger 172174 Columbia Basin Herald 560.98 10/24/2025 Advertising 172175 Columbia Basin Water Works Inc 9,581.95 10/24/2025 Large Meter Testing 172176 Commercial Tire Inc 3,373.75 10/24/2025 Tires/Labor 172177 Copiers Northwest Inc 154.27 10/24/2025 Equipment Contract Fees 172178 Databar Inc 1,797.55 10/24/2025 Utility Billing Invoices 172179 Dell Marketing 2,053.93 10/24/2025 Dell Pro & Dock 172180 Doolittle Holdings LLC 1,146,284.81 10/24/2025 Seal Coat 2025 #Gc2025-240. 172181 Equipment Simulations LLC 1,195.00 10/24/2025 Computer Software 172182 Faber Industrial Supply 266.63 10/24/2025 Parts/Supplies 172183 Forum Consulting LLC 3,038.00 10/24/2025 Confined Space Training 172184 Garland/DBS, Inc 205,245.53 10/24/2025 Ops 2 Re-Roof #Pw2025-007. 172185 Genuine Parts Company, Inc.596.79 10/24/2025 Equipment Parts 172186 Grainger Parts Operations 1,651.58 10/24/2025 Bulb Recycling Kits 172187 Grant County Fairgrounds 35,000.00 10/24/2025 LTAC Reimbursement- Fair 2025 172188 Gray & Osborne, Inc.247.57 10/24/2025 Well 29 FPAS Investigation GC2023-154 172189 Haglund's Trophies, LLC 25.23 10/24/2025 Planning Comm. Name Plate 172190 Home Depot Pro (Supplyworks)3,801.18 10/24/2025 Custodial Supplies 172191 Jims Lock Service LLC 129.06 10/24/2025 Lock 172192 Keller Associates 2,185.00 10/24/2025 Wastewater Facility Plan Study 172193 Kent D. Bruce Co LLC 227.93 10/24/2025 Expansion Mod - Eq # 237 172194 Kottkamp & Yedinak, P.L.L.C.350.00 10/24/2025 Planning Pro Services 172195 L N Curtis & Sons 129.34 10/24/2025 Uniform, Atkins 172196 Life -Assist, Inc.401.08 10/24/2025 Medical Supplies 172197 Marten Law LLP 16,754.88 10/24/2025 PFAS Omni: Matter No. 40583-1 172198 McKinstry Essention, LLC 156,808.06 10/24/2025 Museum Solar Lighting Project 172199 Moon Security Services Inc 336.36 10/24/2025 Security Services 172200 Morrison-Maierle, Inc.2,900.00 10/24/2025 Structural Evaluation 172201 Norco Enterprises Inc 804.78 10/24/2025 Medical Supplies 172202 North 40 Outfitters 202.23 10/24/2025 Parts/Supplies 172203 Oreilly Auto Parts 108.77 10/24/2025 Equipment Parts 172204 Owen Equipment Company 126.53 10/24/2025 Parts/Supplies City of Moses Lake Checks Issued with Summary Description For November 12th, 2025 Council Meeting COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 20 of 93 Check Name Check Amount Check Date Invoice Description City of Moses Lake Checks Issued with Summary Description For November 12th, 2025 Council Meeting 172205 Pasco Tire Factory, INC 913.69 10/24/2025 LT265/70R17 Tires 172206 Platt Electric 120.75 10/24/2025 Batteries/Splice 172207 Pud Of Grant County 19,063.10 10/24/2025 Electric Services 172208 Racom Corporation 55.76 10/24/2025 Antenna Repair/Connectors/Cables 172209 Renew 3,750.00 10/24/2025 3Rd Qtr 2025 172210 RH2 Engineering Inc.2,967.63 10/24/2025 On-Call Electrical Engineering Services 172211 Schindler Elevator Corp 401.45 10/24/2025 Elevator Maintenance - Civic Center 172212 SCL Fence and Supply, LLC 217.80 10/24/2025 Fencing Supplies - Valley Road 172213 Skaug Brothers Carpet One 171.43 10/24/2025 VCT Tile 172214 Systems Design West, LLC 5,434.70 10/24/2025 Ems Billing September 2025 172215 Titan Machinery, Inc.56.82 10/24/2025 Spray Gun 172216 Toole Design Group 10,315.95 10/24/2025 Sr17/Stratford Rd Gc2023-115 172217 Trilogy Medwaste West, LLC 42.00 10/24/2025 Medical Waste Disposal 172218 Tyler Technologies, Inc.8,800.00 10/24/2025 HRM Implementation Costs 172219 Ups Freight 10.54 10/24/2025 Weekly Service Fees 172220 Util Undrgrnd Location Center 180.90 10/24/2025 Locates - September 2025 172221 Washington State Patrol 120.00 10/24/2025 Training, Thomas 172222 Weinstein Beverage Company 198.75 10/24/2025 Water/Restroom Supplies 172223 Curt Ledeboer 14,523.84 10/27/2025 Replenish Buy Moneys 10.2025 172224 Judy Madewell 25.20 10/27/2025 Mileage Reimbursement 10.2025 172225 Mike Ganz 1,325.90 10/27/2025 Hotel Reimbursement September 2025 172226 Mike Ganz 865.90 10/27/2025 Mileage Reimbursement Sept. 2025 172227 Premera Blue Cross 401.45 10/27/2025 Overpayment Refund 172228 Janelle Sword 892.31 10/30/2025 Leoff Retiree Pension October 2025 172229 Luther Stowers 590.06 10/30/2025 Leoff Retiree Pension October 2025 172230 2M Company Inc 88.86 10/31/2025 Misc. Parts **Prompt Pay Discount** 172231 AAA Readymix Inc 2,030.59 10/31/2025 Concrete Deliveries 172232 Abc Hydraulics 333.10 10/31/2025 Pallet Jack 172233 Acme Construction Supply Co Inc.1,109.91 10/31/2025 Misc. Parts 172234 Anatek Labs, Inc.780.00 10/31/2025 Sample Testing 172235 Aspect Consulting 3,342.00 10/31/2025 Aquifer Storage And Recovery Grant 172236 Axon Enterprise Inc 270.52 10/31/2025 Cameras 172237 Baker Tilly US, LLP 11,496.00 10/31/2025 Bank Rec. Consultation Services 172238 Basin Refrigeration & Heat Inc 1,412.67 10/31/2025 LRC VFD Programming 172239 Basin Septic Services Inc 2,690.80 10/31/2025 Septic services 172240 Becker Arena Products Inc 3,309.37 10/31/2025 Jet Ice White, Vinyl Kit 172241 Bud Clary Ford LLC 540.59 10/31/2025 Equipment Parts 172242 Building Code Solutions, Inc.11,928.25 10/31/2025 Permit Reviews- Fire 172243 Cascade Natural Gas Corp 163.65 10/31/2025 Natural Gas Services 172244 Central Machinery Sales Inc 2,101.60 10/31/2025 Equipment Parts 172245 Centurylink 1,492.71 10/31/2025 Telephone Services 172246 Centurylink 3,624.76 10/31/2025 Telephone Services 172247 Code Publishing Co.830.00 10/31/2025 Annual Web Fees 172248 Columbia Basin Herald 239.33 10/31/2025 Advertising COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 21 of 93 Check Name Check Amount Check Date Invoice Description City of Moses Lake Checks Issued with Summary Description For November 12th, 2025 Council Meeting 172249 Commercial Tire Inc 6,055.77 10/31/2025 Tires/Tire Disposal 172250 Copiers Northwest Inc 1,086.51 10/31/2025 Equipment Contract Fees 172251 Databar Inc 2,345.07 10/31/2025 Utility Billing Invoices 172252 Employment Security Department 25,709.20 10/31/2025 Unemployment Claims Q3 2025 172253 Faber Industrial Supply 79.09 10/31/2025 Parts/Supplies 172254 Ferguson Enterprises Inc #3007 1,202.64 10/31/2025 Parts/Supplies 172255 Fishingmagician.com 1,000.00 10/31/2025 LTAC Advertising 172256 Genuine Parts Company, Inc.724.12 10/31/2025 Parts/Supplies 172257 Grant Co Solid Waste 68,574.09 10/31/2025 Landfill Dumping Fees 172258 Grant County District Court 720.00 10/31/2025 Q3 Municipal Filing Fees 172259 H D Fowler Company 16,377.96 10/31/2025 Misc. Parts 172260 JTI Colfax LLC 277.65 10/31/2025 Clamps 172261 Kelley Create 317.54 10/31/2025 Equipment Contract Fees 172262 Lake Bowl Inc 2,908.72 10/31/2025 Wellness Bowling Event 172263 Life -Assist, Inc.1,348.48 10/31/2025 Medical Supplies 172264 Lowes 5,451.17 10/31/2025 Lowes Parts Statement September 2025 172265 McKesson Medical-Surgical 247.75 10/31/2025 Medical Supplies 172266 Megan Gregor 2,861.60 10/31/2025 Admin Consulting Services 172267 Moses Lake Steel Supply 48.75 10/31/2025 Cable, Rope Clip 172268 Multi Agency Comm Center E911 16,378.54 10/31/2025 EMS/Fire Calls 172269 Norco Enterprises Inc 26.13 10/31/2025 Leak Detector 172270 North 40 Outfitters 1,160.75 10/31/2025 Recip Blade 172271 North Central Laboratories 2,615.86 10/31/2025 Lab Supplies 172272 Northstar Chemical Inc 5,172.95 10/31/2025 Sodium Hypochlorite 172273 Pacwest Machinery LLC 164.42 10/31/2025 Solenoid Switch 172274 Pasco Tire Factory, INC 2,826.51 10/31/2025 255/60R18 Tires 172275 Platt Electric 2,042.00 10/31/2025 Parts/Supplies 172276 Rdo Equipment Co.59.17 10/31/2025 Equipment Parts 172277 Samaritan Healthcare 550.00 10/31/2025 Registration And Memberships 172278 SHI International, Inc 12,401.56 10/31/2025 Sophos Switches 172279 State Department of Natural Resources 90.10 10/31/2025 Operating Supplies 172280 Summit Law Group 600.00 10/31/2025 HR Pro Services 172281 Teresa C. Allen 54.25 10/31/2025 Kindermusic Toys 172282 Turf Star Western 387.19 10/31/2025 Idler Asm Kit 172283 UPS Store 2469 133.51 10/31/2025 Postage, Medical Supplies 172284 Waytek Inc 50.77 10/31/2025 Cross-Link Wire 172285 Ziggys 99.33 10/31/2025 Misc. Parts 172286 Zoll Medical Corp 635.06 10/31/2025 Medical Supplies 172287 Dean McPherson 31.00 11/04/2025 Conference Per Diem 172288 Derek Lebacken 31.00 11/04/2025 Conference Per Diem 172289 Derek Perez 102.00 11/04/2025 Conference Per Diem 172290 Diego Rangel 102.00 11/04/2025 Conference Per Diem 2,790,091.95$ COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 22 of 93 Council Agenda Bill Subject FSA Plan Amendment Department Human Resources Presenter at the Meeting Shannon Springer Human Resources Director Packet Attachments (if any) FSA medical expense amendment.pdf 87KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Agenda Item Number: 58060 Proceeding Type Consent Agenda Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion Staff SFDPNNFOET$JUZ$PVODJMUPBVUIPSJ[Fthe City Manager to execute the plan amendment. Summary/Background A Dependent Care Flexible Spending Account (DCFSA) is an employer-sponsored, pre-tax beneﬁt that enables working individuals to set aside funds to cover eligible dependent care expenses. By contributing pre-tax dollars, participants reduce their taxable income and overall tax liability, making dependent care more affordable. This addendum updates the City’s Flexible Spending Plan to reﬂect an increased annual contribution limit for DCFSA accounts. Effective January 1, 2026, the maximum allowable contribution will rise from the current $5,000 to $7,500, aligning with federal limits and enhancing support for employees managing dependent care costs. Fiscal Consideration N/A City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed Preamble: The City’s top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City’s finances. #1 - Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 - Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 - Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 - Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 - New Police Station #6 - Second Lake Crossing #7 - WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake Reviewed and Approved by: City Manager -bRob Karlinsey onb11/3/2025 Finance -bMadeline Prentice onb11/3/2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 23 of 93 City of Moses Lake FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN AMENDMENT ARTICLE I PREAMBLE 1.1 Adoption and effective date of amendment. The Employer Name adopts this Amendment to City of Moses Lake Flexible Benefits Plan (the “Plan”). The Employer Name intends this Amendment as good faith compliance with the requirements of these provisions. This Amendment shall be effective on or after the date the Employer elects in Section 2.1 below. 1.2 Supersession of inconsistent provisions. This Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of this Amendment. 1.3 Construction. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, any reference to "Section" in this Amendment refers only to sections within this Amendment and is not a reference to the Plan. The Article and Section numbering in this Amendment is solely for purposes of this Amendment, and does not relate to any Plan article, section, or other numbering designations. ARTICLE II ELECTIONS 2.1 Effective Date. T he provisions of this Amendment, unless otherwise indicated are effective as of 1/1/2026 2.2 Plan Amendment. Dependent Care Flexible Spending Arrangement – Increase in Maximum The Dependent Care Flexible Spending Arrangement (DCFSA) enables you to pay for out-of-pocket, work- related dependent day-care costs with pre-tax dollars. The amount paid from a Participant's DCFSA for any tax year cannot exceed the lesser of the Earned Income limitation described in Code Section 129(b) or the amount specified under Code Section 129. If a married Participant files a separate tax return, the amount is determined according to the rules of Code Section 21(e). Effective for the Plan Year beginning 1/1/2026, the Dependent Care Flexible Spending Arrangement maximum is $7,500.00. The maximum amount available for married individuals filing separately is $3,750. This amendment has been executed this 12th day of November, 2025. Name of Employer: City of Moses Lake Name:Rob Karlinsey, City Manager Signature: _____________________________________ COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 24 of 93 CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTING RESOLUTION The undersigned authorized representative of City of Moses Lake hereby certifies that the following resolutions were duly adopted on November 12, 2025 (date) and that such resolutions have not been modified or rescinded as of the date hereof; RESOLVED, that the Amendment to the FSA Plan is hereby approved and adopted, and that an authorized representative of the Employer is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Administrator of the Plan one or more counterparts of the amendment. The undersigned further certifies that attached hereto is a copy of the Amendment approved and adopted in the foregoing resolution. Date: Signed: [print name/title] Rob Karlinsey COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 25 of 93 SUMMARY OF MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS for the City of Moses Lake Flexible Benefits Plan I INTRODUCTION This is a Summary of Material Modifications regarding the City of Moses Lake Flexible Benefits Plan (the “Plan”). This is merely a summary of the most important changes to the Plan and information contained in the Summary Plan Description (“SPD”) previously provided to you. It supplements and amends that SPD so you should retain a copy of this document with your copy of the SPD. If you have any questions, contact the Administrator. If there is any discrepancy between the terms of the Plan, as modified, and this Summary of Material Modifications, the provisions of the Plan will control. II SUMMARY OF CHANGES Effective Date. The provisions of this Amendment, unless otherwise indicated are effective as of 1/1/2026. Plan Amendment. Dependent Care Flexible Spending Arrangement – Increase in Maximum The Dependent Care Flexible Spending Arrangement enables you to pay for out-of-pocket, work-related dependent day-care costs with pre-tax dollars. Effective for the Plan Year beginning 1/1/2026, the Dependent Care Flexible Spending Arrangement maximum is $7,500.00. The maximum amount available for married individuals filing separately is $3,750. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 26 of 93 Council Agenda Bill Subject Sustainable Water Strategy Department Public Works Presenter at the Meeting Brian Baltzell, Public Works Director Packet Attachments (if any) 2025-11-05_SustainableWaterRedlined.pdf 465.65KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Agenda Item Number: 58119 Proceeding Type Consent Agenda Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion Staff recommend that City Council motion to adopt the updated plan for Search for Sustainable Water Sources as presented. Summary/Background Staff are requesting that City Council motion to adopt the updated Search for Sustainable Water Source Plan as presented. Staff previously presented this plan to City Council on September 16, 2025, and October 14, 2025. Direction was provided by council to update the plan and bring it back to adoption at a later date. The attached, red-lined, document shows the edits that were made based on council feedback from the October 14th meeting. Fiscal Consideration While there are no immediate budget implications to adopting the Plan, development of actionable projects in support of these strategies may require additional budget amendments or allocations. Staff will bring those forward for consideration as projects are further developed. City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed Preamble: The City’s top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City’s finances. #1 - Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 - Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 - Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 - Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 - New Police Station #6 - Second Lake Crossing #7 - WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake Reviewed and Approved by: City Manager - Rob Karlinsey on 11/6/2025 City Attorney - Katherine Kenison on 11/6/2025 Public Works - Brian Baltzell on 11/6/2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 27 of 93 City of Moses Lake Search for Sustainable Water Sources Richard Law, Brian Baltzell, Leigh Ramsey, Chad Strevy September 2, 2025October 28, 2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 28 of 93 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 2 Background .................................................................................................................. 5 The Two-Fold Challenge ................................................................................................ 6 The Goal and Actions to Get There .................................................................................. 6 The Main, Measurable Goal ..................................................................................... 7 Proposed Actions ................................................................................................... 8 Timeline for Next Steps ............................................................................................ 1514 Currently In Progress ........................................................................................... 1514 Reporting and Accountability ................................................................................... 1615 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 29 of 93 2 Executive Summary City of Moses Lake Search for Sustainable Water Sources Executive Summary September 2025 Introduction The City of Moses Lake has long depended on a deep basalt aquifer for its municipal water supply. This aquifer, formed over tens of thousands of years, has historically provided clean and abundant water with minimal treatment. However, the City now faces a two-fold challenge: increasing strain on its water infrastructure during peak usage periods and the long-term depletion of the aquifer due to overuse, particularly by agricultural operations. This executive summary outlines the City’s strategic plan options to transition toward a sustainable water system that supports future growth while preserving its existing water source. The Challenge The first challenge is operational. During peak summer months, several wells experience a drop in static water levels, causing pumps to struggle to provide adequate water to meet the demands of our existing service connections. The second challenge is structural. The deep basalt aquifer is being depleted at an unsustainable rate. Although the City holds senior rights to 13,104 acre-feet of water annually, agricultural users—who were granted temporary and junior rights—now consume over 90% of the deep basalt aquifer’s output. Studies and well data confirm a consistent annual decline in water levels, with several wells dropping more than 180 feet since their initial installation. Strategic Goal To secure a sustainable water future, the City aims to acquire 12,700 acre-feet of water rights from sources other than the deep basalt aquifer by 2056. This long-term goal supports projected growth while reducing dependence on a declining resource. To achieve this, the City will follow a phased approach with milestone targets: acquiring new water sources by 2036 and 2046, while also reducing reliance on the deep basalt aquifer by 8,000 acre-feet – or 100% of the current deep aquifer water right portfolio – by COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 30 of 93 3 2046. These benchmarks will guide planning, infrastructure development, and funding eƯorts over the next three decades. Short-Term Actions In the near term, the City will continue implementing water conservation measures, including tiered pricing and irrigation restrictions, to reduce demand by 500 acre-feet annually. Additionally, the City may drill new wells in hydraulically rich areas of the basalt aquifer to alleviate pressure on existing infrastructure. While not a permanent solution, this approach may provide buycritical time to develop long-term alternatives. In 2026, City staƯ will explore possible locations and cost estimates of drilling additional deep basalt wells. Long-Term Solutions The City’s long-term strategy focuses on two key areas: acquiring new sustainable water sources and extending the life of the deep basalt aquifer. New Water Sources EƯorts are underway to bring shallow aquifer wells online. Well 29, which requires PFAS treatment, is expected to contribute 900 acre-feet annually. Well 34 in Mae Valley, once operational, will provide 1,600 acre-feet annually. In cooperation with the State Department of Ecology, the City is also pursuing the conversion of deep aquifer rights to more replenishable and sustainable shallow rightsIn addition, the City should engage the State to make the City whole by transferring shallow water rights to the City and constructing the accompanying wells. The City is also exploring purchases of shallow water rights on the open market, though availability and cost remain challenges. To further reduce reliance on the open market, the City could evaluate a policy change that would require new developments in the Urban Growth Area (UGA) to acquire and transfer shallow water rights needed to serve their projects, rather than paying a fee-in-lieu. For in-City development, the City should require a transfer or water rights or a fee-in-lieu that reflects market conditions. Surface water from the Columbia River is another promising option. The City has applied for a 5,200 acre-foot Municipal and Industrial (M&I) contract with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Potential delivery methods include tapping into existing canals, constructing a direct pipeline to the Columbia River, or accessing the Lake (Moses Lake) directly through partnership with Moses Lake Irrigation District. Each option requires significant infrastructure investment but could provide the City a more sustainable long-term water source. Preserving the Basalt Aquifer To protect its senior water rights, the City will advocate for the completion of the Columbia COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 31 of 93 4 Basin Irrigation Project and the Odessa Groundwater Replacement Project. These initiatives aim to transition agricultural users away from the basalt aquifer, thereby reducing overall deep aquifer depletion. Advocacy and Collaboration Achieving these goals will require coordinated advocacy at the state, federal, and regional levels. The City currently contracts with Gordon Thomas Honeywell for state lobbying and plans to hire a federal lobbyist in by the end of 2026. Regional collaboration is also essential. The City participates in several coalitions and is exploring the formation of a Council of Governments with other Grant County cities to align resources and strategies. Progress and Next Steps Several initiatives are already in motion. Applications for Quincy Basin groundwater rights for irrigation-only water have been submitted, and the City is in discussions with Department of Ecology on a precedent-setting conversion of deep to shallow rights. Design work for Wells 29 and 34 is substantially complete, and funding is being pursued. The City is also advancing completing the design of Reservoir 10 (to serve Well 34) and monitoring the status of its M&I application with USBR. In addition to these current projects, City staƯ will pursue the long-term and short-term strategies identified in this strategy paper. Accountability To ensure transparency and sustained progress, the City proposes quarterly project updates to the Council and annual reports to track progress toward conservation and sustainability goals. These reports will help evaluate the eƯectiveness of current strategies and guide necessary adjustments. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 32 of 93 5 Background For more than 60 years, the City of Moses Lake has relied on natural water found in deep and ancient underground basalt rock formations for our water supply. These basalt formations form a very deep and large aquifer. An aquifer is water trapped in underground pockets that can send water to the surface through either man-made wells or natural springs. The deep basalt aquifer that provides water for Moses Lake covers a vast area in central Washington, and it accumulated its water over tens of thousands of years. Moses Lake’s wells in this basalt aquifer are drilled up to 1,200 feet below the surface. This water historically has been very clean with little or no treatment needed to serve it to our citizens. The City has acquired water rights specific to the basalt rock aquifer in the amount of 13,104 acre-feet per year of capacity (4.27 billion gallons per year). The City has senior, first-in-line rights to the water in this basalt aquifer. Of the City’s 13,104 acre-feet capacity, it is currently using approximately 8,000 acre-feet per year. In addition to the deep basalt aquifer, water for drinking and irrigation can also come from shallow aquifers that are above the basalt layer and are contained within the gravel and sand material closer to the surface. Because these shallow aquifers are closer to the surface, they are more easily replenished and sustained by rainfall and irrigation. The City currently has two shallow wells for drinking water, providing 1,800 acre-feet of water per year, and one shallow irrigation well for the Larson Playfield complex. A majority of our large parks are irrigated out of Moses Lake. The overwhelming majority of Moses Lake’s municipal water comes from the deep basalt aquifer. In addition to deep and shallow aquifers, surface water from the Columbia River is a potential source of municipal water. In fact, the Columbia Basin Irrigation project is only using about 65% (approximately 671,000 acres of the 1,029,000 acres authorized) of the water it has been allocated (Columbia Basin Project, n.d.) Much of the water in the Lake comes from the Columbia River via the Columbia Basin Irrigation Project as it passes through to feed the Potholes Reservoir. Both the City and private property owners along the lake use lake water for irrigation of City parks and private property. The management of the lake’s water for irrigation is provided by the Moses Lake Irrigation and Rehabilitation District (MLIRD). Water from the Columbia River can also come from nearby canals, including the “East Low Canal” on the east side of the City. The “West Low 20” canal, a few miles west of the City, may also be a potential canal to draw from. It may be possible to get water from the Columbia directly from the river via a pipeline. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 33 of 93 6 The Two-Fold Challenge The challenge we are up against is two-fold. First, the City’s water system is experiencing strain on its existing wells in certain pressure zones and during peak summertime water usage. Well pumps that have already been lowered several times are not able to bring up the volume of water at the rate needed for summertime irrigation. At peak usage, these wells are experiencing a depression in the static water level that causes the pumps to suck in air. Water from the surrounding, larger basalt aquifer cannot replenish these wells fast enough to keep up with demand. This strain on the system is hard on the City’s pumping equipment and the integrity of the wells. The second problem we are facing is that in addition to municipal use, the deep basalt aquifer has also been the source for large scale agricultural operations in the Columbia Basin for 60 plus years. As a result, the deep basalt aquifer is being depleted at a much faster rate than was originally planned or anticipated. The agricultural rights to the basalt aquifer were originally issued as temporary and secondary to the City’s rights. Why? Because the State granted agricultural users temporary rights to the basalt aquifer until such time another major canal was built from the Columbia River to serve these locations. This canal has never been built, and agricultural users are using more than 90% of the water coming out of the basalt aquifer. Several scientific studies completed in the last 20 years show that the water level in the basalt aquifer is consistently dropping several feet every year and there is no evidence of significant recharge happening. In Moses Lake’s water system, we have four deep basalt wells where the water level has dropped by more than 180 feet since the City started using them (wells # 10, 11, 24 & 28). At this rate of decline, a number of the City’s existing basalt aquifer wells may not be able to produce water in the next 20 to 30 years. Because of this decline in the basalt aquifer, the City is actively looking for alternative sources of water to use to serve our community for future generations. There are multiple options, each with its own challenges to gain legal permission to use and costs associated with treatment and distribution in our system of pipes and pumps. The Goal and Actions to Get There To solve this two-fold problem of strain on the system and depletion of the basalt aquifer, we are developing both short-term and long-term options to achieve measurable goals. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 34 of 93 7 The Main, Measurable Goal Not including its access to Lake water for irrigation purposes, the City currently uses 9,500 acre-feet per year of potable drinking water. These uses come from two main sources: Deep Basalt Aquifer: ≈8,000-acre feet (of the 13,104 acre-feet the City has rights to) One Shallow Well: ≈1,800 acre-feet (1,804 total allotment of shallow rights) Total: 9,500 acre-feet currently in use As we look ahead: Total Acre-Feet Needed for the Next 30 Years: 17,200 acre-feet1 Reduction in Basalt Aquifer Usage: 8,000 acre-feet Net New Water Rights that need to be acquired in the next 30 years: 12,700 acre-feet The Main Goal: To ensure a resilient and sustainable water future for the City of Moses Lake, the long-term objective is to acquire 12,700 acre-feet of water rights from sources other than the deep basalt aquifer by the year 2056. This target reflects the City’s commitment to reducing dependence on a declining resource while supporting projected population and economic growth over the next three decades. Achieving this ambitious goal requires a phased approach, with clearly defined milestones that allow for strategic planning, infrastructure development, regulatory coordination, and 1 Calculation based on proposed 2025 Water System Plan projected growth rate of approximately 2% annually. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 35 of 93 8 funding acquisition. By breaking the 2056 target into two intermediate benchmarks – 2036 and 2046 – the City can monitor progress, adapt to changing conditions, and ensure that each phase builds momentum toward the final objective. The graphic below details the milestone goals for acquisition of additional water rights and simultaneously reducing our reliance on the deep basalt aquifer by approximately 100% of our current water rights portfolio (≈ 8,000 acre-feet). Proposed Actions The short-term options will help resolve the first problem (strain on the system) and buy time to develop and execute long-term options. The long-term options will permanently resolve both strain on the system and moving away from the basalt aquifer to more sustainable and reliable sources of water. Short-Term Options To address strains on our existing wells and pumps, the City should continue the water conservation measures that have already been implemented, including watering restrictions and tiered rates on water usage. These measures should continue until the City has secured more sources and drilled more wells to take pressure oƯ of existing wells, 2025 •9,500 acre-feet in use 2036 •5,200 acre-feet acquired and in production 2046 •-8,000 acre-feet deep basalt water right use •Additional 7,000 acre-feet acquired and in production 2056 •Additional 3,500 acre-feet acquired and in production Net New •12,700 acre-feet in new acquisition; grand total of 17,200 acre-feet in production COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 36 of 93 9 especially wells in struggling pressure zones. The sub-goal here is to maintain 500 acre-feet of water saved per year through conservation eƯorts, which is approximately 5% of 2025 water usage. The City may also want to consider drilling more wells in more hydraulically rich parts of the deep basalt aquifer to take pressure oƯ existing wells, buy more time for a long-term solution, and ease the burdens of the tiered rates and restrictions on irrigation. The City has only utilized about 9,500 acre-feet of the 13,104 acre-feet of its basalt water rights. Of the remaining 3,500 acre-feet, 2,500 acre-feet of new basalt wells would suƯice in buying more time for a long-term solution. The City has all of the permissions it needs to drill more wells in the basalt aquifer. The downside of drilling more basalt wells is that they are not considered a long-term solution. While they may ease the strain on existing wells and buy the City more time to figure out a long-term solution, new basalt wells may only last about 20 years. The City would need to evaluate the cost-benefit of drilling more deep basalt wells. In 2026, staƯ will obtain cost estimates for drilling additional deep aquifer wells and proposed locations. Long-Term Options Long-term solutions will address both the strain on our existing water infrastructure and the need for sustainable, long-lasting water sources. These long-term actions can be put into two main categories: 1. Acquiring New Sustainable Water Sources for the Long-Term, and 2. Extending the Life of the Deep Basalt Aquifer 1. Acquiring New Sustainable Water Sources for the Long-Term The City will need to reduce its reliance on the deep basalt aquifer and acquire more sustainable and replenishable sources of water. Options for other sources of water in our area include the following: Shallow Aquifers Shallow ground water is water in the gravels and soils above the basalt layers. The main advantage of shallow groundwater is that, unlike the deep basalt aquifer, they are rechargeable and replenishable. Shallow aquifers are fed by two main sources: annual rainfall and snow melt seeping into the ground, and water from agricultural irrigation from the canals passing through the plants into the ground. In and around Moses Lake, it is known that there are areas where shallow ground water is prolific and can potentially be COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 37 of 93 10 available for municipal use. The following eƯorts to access water from shallow aquifers are either currently underway or are being considered:  Design and construct PFAS treatment for Well 29, which draws from the shallow aquifer. The City already has full rights to use this well. Well 29 is near the regional airport where “PFAS,” also known as the “forever chemical,” was used in airport operations such as fire retardant. PFAS has infiltrated the nearby groundwater, including the water accessed by Well 29. To bring Well 29 back into use, the City will need to install a system at the well to filter out the PFAS. Once Well 29 resumes production, it will contribute 900 acre-feet at 700 gallons per minute and can pump at 20 hours per day. Partial funding for Well 29’s PFAS treatment system has been acquired from Washington State through a direct appropriation grant, and additional funds have been requested as a federal earmark. Another potential funding source includes settlement funds from the PFAS class action lawsuit against chemical companies (Moses Lake is a plaintiƯ in this class action lawsuit).  Bring Well 34 in Mae Valley Online. A new, shallow well in Mae Valley will bring a sustainable new water source to this growing area and decrease Mae Valley’s reliance on the Peninsula Pressure Zone which brings water across the I-90 bridge from the Peninsula. Once Well 34 can be put into production it will utilize approximately 1,600 acre-feet of shallow water rights and can pump 1,200 gallons per minute for 20 hours per day. Water rights have not been acquired for this well, and a treatment solution for the high Manganese levels will also need to be included with this well.  Work with Department of Ecology to make the City whole by transferring shallow aquifer rights to the City of Moses Lake and constructing shallow wells at the State’s expense. determine a process to exchange Deep Basalt water rights for Shallow Gravel water rights. We have initiated discussions on this topic with DOE. The City has a strong case to be made for this option given DOE’s granting of temporary, junior basalt aquifer rights to agricultural users which is responsible for more than 90% of the basalt aquifer’s depletion. The RCW governing state water rights requires DOE to administer ground water rights based on seniority—new water rights cannot impair senior water rights as senior water rights users have priority. (RCW 90.40.130: “As between appropriators of public groundwater, the prior COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 38 of 93 11 appropriator shall as against subsequent appropriators from the same groundwater body be entitled to the preferred use of such groundwater to the extent of his or her appropriation and beneficial use, and shall enjoy the right to have any withdrawals by a subsequent appropriator of groundwater limited to an amount that will maintain and provide a safe sustaining yield in the amount of the prior appropriation. The department shall have jurisdiction over the withdrawals of groundwater and shall administer the groundwater rights under the principle just set forth, and it shall have the jurisdiction to limit withdrawals by appropriators of groundwater so as to enforce the maintenance of a safe sustaining yield from the groundwater body.”) The City can reasonably argue that, in order to compensate the City for the State allowing temporary, junior users to deplete the City’s permanent, senior right in the basalt aquifer, the State should grant shallow aquifer rights to the City and pay for the construction of the new shallow wells and associated infrastructure. The US Bureau of Reclamation will also need to be included in this strategy, given that some shallow aquifers are fed by agricultural runoƯ which originates from the Columbia Basin Irrigation Project.  Purchase more Shallow Gravel water rights on the open market. Water rights can be purchased and transferred to the City’s portfolio, requiring purchase and sale agreements, legal assistance from those specialized in water rights, and approval of the appropriate regulatory bodies. Recently, the availability of shallow water rights on the open market is limited. Additionally, the price can change quickly. The last acquisition of deep aquifer rights the City purchased were approximately $3,500 per acre-foot, not including the administrative and legal costs associated with the purchase and transfer. A local owner had previously discussed selling us some of their shallow rights, but was asking significantly more than market rate, $5,000 per acre-foot. Discussions did not progress due to the asking price.  Shallow water rights can also be acquired by requiring unincorporated new developments in the UGA to transfer the shallow water rights needed to serve their development rather than allowing the payment of the fee-in-lieu. For development within the city limits, the City should allow either a transfer of water rights to the City or a fee-in-lieu. A fee-in-lieu should be priced to keep pace with the cost of purchasing water rights on the open market. This These approaches would help the City build its shallow water rights portfolio more predictably and reduce exposure to fluctuating market prices. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 39 of 93 12 Columbia River Sources The Columbia River provides water to local agricultural operations via a system of canals that are managed by regional irrigation districts with authority from the United States Bureau of Reclamation. The construction of the canal system was part of the Columbia Basin Project, which was authorized by the US Congress in 1943, with construction of project conveyance beginning after World War II and continuing for approximately 30 years. The work of the project has not yet been completed and there are some extensions that are significant to the future of the Columbia Basin and City of Moses Lake – extension of the east low canal and completion of the east high canal. Completion of these would allow additional agricultural use to transition to project water and away from deep and shallow aquifer usage. As previously shared, of the original 1,029,000 acres originally authorized by Congress, the project currently serves approximately 671,000 acres. The City recognizes that gaining access to Columbia River water for municipal use is a viable option as a future source. City staƯ submitted an application for a 5,200-acre-foot Municipal and Industrial Use (M&I) contract in 2023, and that application is with the USBR for consideration. Once legal access is obtained, the below options for surface water from the Columbia River will require construction of a treatment facility, or facilities, and pipes and pumps to convey the water into the City’s water system.  Tap into the Canals (East Low or W20), which would include executing a Municipal and Industrial (M&I) water contract with the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) and the associated irrigation district. A 2020 report for the Moses Lake Irrigation District concluded that the W20 canal (several miles west of the regional airport) could potentially deliver 30,000 acre-feet for MLIRD use each year. The amount available for a potential M&I contract would require additional research.  Direct Pipeline to the Columbia River, which would include developing a regional water authority (or a County-wide water utility) and acquiring a Columbia River Water Right. The access location would need to be studied and determined. Options for the the pipeline path would also need to be explored, including easements alongside existing canals.  Tap directly into Moses Lake, either in partnership with USBR through an M&I contract or through Moses Lake Irrigation and Rehabilitation District (MLIRD) delivery contract. Further evaluation of legislative restrictions and possible changes in State law for M&I use through MLIRD is required. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 40 of 93 13 Accessing surface water seems like the most viable long-term solution, but like all possible solutions there are pros and cons of gaining access through an M&I contract. Pros:  High quality surface water that is reliable and generally available during the highest demand months,  less demand to buy water rights,  and depending on access location, there could be lower conveyance costs to get the treated water into our existing system. Cons:  Agricultural uses take precedence and our access to water may be curtailed during severe draught conditions. A direct pipeline from the Columbia River would be less aƯected (or not aƯected at all) by this restriction.  Constructing a surface water treatment facility, or multiple small facilities, can be very expensive.  Water will only be available during irrigation season, which would result in our surface water treatment plant being left unused during the winter months, which could result in more repair and maintenance requirements. Water provided by a direct pipeline from the Columbia River would be less aƯected (or not aƯected at all) by this restriction. 2. Extending the Life of the Deep Basalt Aquifer The City has been given original, senior rights to the deep basalt aquifer. Even though this water source is declining and is not measurably replenishable, it remains a primary right for the City and should continue to be preserved and extended as much as possible. To protect and prolong the City’s access to this primary right, the City should advocate for the following:  The completion of the Columbia Basin Irrigation Project and construction of the East High Canal to transition agricultural operations away from deep basalt aquifer wells.  The continuation of the Odessa Groundwater Replacement Project. This project provides funding to connect agricultural users to the existing East Low Canal. Doing so will also transition those users from deep basalt aquifer. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 41 of 93 14 Advocacy for Long-Term Actions All of the long-term strategies described in this paper would need strong advocacy and coordination at regional, state, and federal levels. As result, contracting with government aƯairs firms will be helpful in advancing toward the City’s water resource goals. The City currently contracts with Gordon Thomas Honeywell (GTH) for lobbying services at the State level. GTH can help the City with funding water infrastructure as well as with working with the legislature and state agencies to advocate for the City’s water resource strategies. The City should also re-engage a federal lobbying firm to advocate for both funding and policy changes with the USBR and other federal agencies. Funding for a federal lobbyist is included in the 2026 budget, and the City will launch a request for proposals (RFP) process to select a federal lobbyist. At the regional level, the City should consider engaging the assistance of a regional professional with water rights experience who can help the City collaborate with tribes, irrigation districts, cities, and the county to achieve water source sustainability, not only for the City, but also the region. As we seek long-term solutions for local sustainable water sources, identifying partners who are also seeking regional solutions is paramount. City staƯ attend and participate in local and regional advocacy and work groups. These groups include the Columbia Basin Sustainable Water Coalition, Columbia River Policy Advisory Group, Columbia Basin Development League, and the Washington Water Utility Council (WWUC). StaƯ continue to seek ways to network with other regional contacts to address the declining aquifer and actively work towards solutions that have a regional benefit. Lastly, the City of Moses Lake and other Grant County cities are considering the formation of a regional Council of Governments, which would provide a formal structure for Grant County cities to unite on common goals and allocate resources accordingly. Proposed formation documents will be presented at the next Association of Grant County Cities meeting in November 2025. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 42 of 93 15 Timeline for Next Steps Currently In Progress While we are seeking council’s direction on future plans for water sources, staƯ continue to work on the following:  Quincy Basin Groundwater Rights: In June of 2024, staƯ submitted applications for Quincy Basin Groundwater Rights (which can only be used for irrigation) for use in parks without direct lake access (Knolls Vista Park, Dano Park, Yonezawa Park, and Paul Lauzier Ballfield). These applications include partnership with nearby schools to assist with reducing their reliance on potable water for irrigation of parks and fields. Our applications are in the queue.  Conversion of Rights: With the assistance of Aspect Consulting, staƯ have been in preliminary discussions with Department of Ecology on a non-additive change request to convert some of the City’s existing deep aquifer rights to shallow aquifer rights. This conversion would be the first of its kind in Washington state.  USBR M&I Application: An application was submitted in 2023 to USBR for 5,200 acre-feet annual M&I contract. City Engineer, Richard Law, checks on status at least monthly with our local USBR contacts. The application is currently being reviewed by USBR.  Well 29: The Well 29 treatment feasibility study was completed in 2025. Partial design and construction dollars have been secured through a direct appropriation grant administered by the Department of Commerce and additional funding sources are being sought. While we are actively looking for outside funding, staƯ are working with Commerce to execute the grant contract and begin the request for qualifications to begin design with an outside firm.  Well 34: Well 34 design, including treatment for manganese, is substantially complete. Once suƯicient shallow water rights have been obtained and funding source secured, the project can go out to bid.  Reservoir 10: Reservoir 10 is needed to support Well 324, and design of this reserviorreservoir is substantially complete. A conditional use permit has been obtained from Grant County. StaƯ are actively looking at both internal and external funding sources, and once funding has been secured, the project can go out to bid. Construction is expected to begin in 2027. Of everything presented in this strategy paper, we would like Council’s direction on what to focus on and what strategies not to pursue. In addition to the above current eƯorts, City COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 43 of 93 16 staƯ will move forward with a multi-pronged approach, including the short-term and long- term strategies described in this document. Reporting and Accountability StaƯ are committed to finding solutions and working towards the strategies identified in this paper. We recognize that a number of the options outlined are not quick fixes and will require long-term commitment of resources, time, and eƯort. Long-term projects and initiatives can get lost amongst the other more immediate needs of the city. As such, staƯ believe that reporting regularly on our eƯorts will ensure timely communication with both the council members and the community at large. We propose quarterly updates to Council on short-term and long-term actions identified as priorities, including summaries of work being done with/by partner organizations. We also believe that annual reporting on our progress towards our sub-goals and The Main Goal will allow us to review if identified actions are moving us in the right direction or if course correction is required. This annual report will continue to include the results of our the City’s annual conservation eƯorts as well as overall water usage, water levels in wells, system leakage, and updated projections for longevity of system (with population and industry growth built into the projections). COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 44 of 93 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 45 of 93 City of Moses Lake, Washington 401 S. Balsam St. · PO Box 1579 · Moses Lake, WA 98837 Office: 509 764-3701 · Fax: 509 764-3739 · www.moseslakewa.gov October 28, 2025 City Council Town Hall Meeting Notes City Council, City Manager, and Directors facilitated discussions on the following topics 1. Budget: Madeline Prentice, Finance Director and Council Member Lombardi • Get younger kids involved in activities in the community 2. Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services: Doug Coutts, PRCS Director • Water Aerobics-No indoor pool o Survey-mailed out-Large % of people wanted indoor pool o YMCA in Moses Lake o Pools for people of all ages o Use of High School Pool?? • Good job ripping out the islands/planter strips o Watering parks from lakes • Peninsula Park o Create a beach??? • Longview Park • Long term plans on interior pocket parks-Water o What are plans o Answered questions • Number 3-image and reputation o Create a sense of Pride o Incentivize those who are doing well o Always talking about potential o Reimage who we are o Pick up trash o Social Media Negativity-Need to be vocal against it  All different platforms-TikTok • Live music scene o Connelly park-Platform-example COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 46 of 93 City of Moses Lake, Washington Page 2 401 S. Balsam St. · PO Box 1579 · Moses Lake, WA 98837 Office: 509 764-3701 · Fax: 509 764-3739 · www.moseslakewa.gov o Band-gets kids involved o Letting the kids know possibilities • Wrestling Mats @ LRC o All about the kids o Number of facilities is impressive-Fields etc. o Reverse the social media negativity reverse the trend o Volunteer based people to help-Dumpster program 3. Public Safety: Dave Sands, Police Chief and Art Perilll, Fire Chief Group 1 – Council Member Martinez • Questions about police and fire buildings and general operations questions Group 2 – Mayor Swartz • Homeless issues: Addressed the park, talked about dealing with behaviors and the new codes, jail opening and potential outcomes. • Juvenile crime: Specifically talked about violent crime, new programs at the PD, and potential changes to laws that have negatively impacted our ability to deal with this. • Fire: Talked about new stations/GC 5 cooperation and use of their buildings. 4. Water: Leigh Ramsey, Assistant Public Works Director • Citizen wanted access to all our water stats; shared the stats we had at hand. • Recommended we go after grants for conversion of green lawns to draught resistant landscaping. • Recommended that the City showing they are serious about conservation, and holding our citizens accountable for conservation, will make us more desirable for grants. • Recommended a rebate for turf replacement with draught resistant landscaping. • Thinks a community planning group for water might be beneficial. • Recommend using Excess Use Charge (EUC) proceeds for lawn conversion program. 5. Transportation: Brian Baltzell, Public Works Director and Deputy Mayor Madewell, Council Member Skaug • Would like to see a parking garage located near downtown. • Alleys in the downtown are too small for large delivery trucks • Speeding vehicles on 9th and Balsam. • Recommended speed dips for traffic calming devices. • New bike lanes downtown are not good. People are having to maneuver in and out of parking stalls. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 47 of 93 City of Moses Lake, Washington Page 3 401 S. Balsam St. · PO Box 1579 · Moses Lake, WA 98837 Office: 509 764-3701 · Fax: 509 764-3739 · www.moseslakewa.gov • New lane configuration on Hill Street is amazing and they love it. • Deputy Mayor Madewell mentioned that when a car parks in the diagonal parking on 3rd Ave correctly so they don’t block the bike lane the rear of the car sticks out into the traveled way if they are getting something out of their trunk. 6. Land Use: Vivian Ramsey, Acting Community Development Director and Council Members Fancher and Myers • Setup meeting for Zone change request. • Ideas for drought resistant landscaping and alternate irrigation methods. 7. Community Vision/Engagement: Rob Karlinsey, City Manager and Mayor Swartz, Council Member Fancher • Never had the sense that ML was a pretty place. There's a lot of trash/litter on sides of roads. • Need to have a conversation with the community about "this is who we are and this is who we want to be." • ML has an inferiority complex. We need to gain more of a sense of pride in our city. We need to improve our view of ourselves as a city. • Would like to see more volunteerism, including incentives for people to come to volunteer events. Food? Picture in the paper? • Highlight a business, a street, or a part of downtown that is doing well. • For those of us who are picking up litter, would like to see more places to drop off garbage. • Conversations about ML start with negative comments. Negative news travels fast. Positive news is slow. • Mob mentality, especially on social media, increases negativity. • ML is friendly and welcoming. There are lots of things to do. • Create a family fun guide for the locals. • Vocal minority runs the negativity. • We need to help members of the community feel valued and recognized— especially our A players. Don't treat A players the same as B and C players. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 48 of 93 Council Agenda Bill Subject LTAC Funding Approval Department Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Presenter at the Meeting Doug Coutts, Director Packet Attachments (if any) LTAC 2025 Initial Agenda Bill.pdf 212.55KB LTAC Applicants 2017 forward 2024 meeting copy.xlsx 54.55KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Agenda Item Number: 58122 Proceeding Type Old Business Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion Staff recommends Council move to authorize the LTAC recommendations that they agree with and send any additional requests back to LTAC for further consideration and a recommendation. Summary/Background City council sent back requested changes to the LTAC recommendations. On Monday November 3rd, LTAC Committee met and reviewed Council's requested changes. LTAAC Committee reviewed the requested changes and is putting forth the following recommendations: $75,000 forMLIRD-Do not fund. They received detail but feel the functions are not closelyrelated enough to tourism $40,000 for City StaffSpecial EventSupport-Do not fund. They did not want to transfer money to the general fund for stafftime. $200,000 for Surf N SlideOperations-Supported funding $200,000 for Surf N Slide Capital Projects with the provisothat the kids structures in the zero-depth area should be replacedfirst/Nothing for operation Staff reviewed the RCW for Lodging Tax and the LTAC committee is restricted to selecting from the candidates that have applied and council is restricted to approval of the list of candidates and recommended amounts of funding by the LTAC Committee. In staff understanding, this means that the LTAC committee does not have the authority to modify the proposed usage of an application. Since LTAC explicitly stated that the approval of the $200,000 was for Capital improvements only and the request was for operations which was specifically excluded, the LTAC recommendation for Surf N Slide operations is effectively null and void. At this point it is recommended that council authorize the LTAC recommendations that they agree with and send any additional requests back to LTAC for further consideration and a recommendation. Fiscal Consideration The LTAC funding amounts are sufficient to cover the requests as presented with approximately $320,000 additional available. City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed Preamble: The City’s top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City’s finances. #1 - Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 - Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 - Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 - Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 - New Police Station #6 - Second Lake Crossing #7 - WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 49 of 93 Reviewed and Approved by: City Manager - Rob Karlinsey on 11/6/2025 City Attorney - Katherine Kenison on 11/6/2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 50 of 93 Council Agenda Bill Subject* LTAC Application Approval 30 Character Limit Department * Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Presenter at the Meeting* Doug Coutts Name, Title Packet Attachments (if any) Upload final version(s) in order of exhibit with identifiable file names LTAC Application Allocation recommendations 2026.xlsx 53.4KB Meeting Date:* 10/28/2025 Proceeding Type * New Business Proposed Council Action/Motion:* Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion * Staff is bringing forward two recommendations for Council review and approval for Allocation of the LTAC funds in 2026. The recommendations from the LTAC committee, and the amended recommendations from the City Manager. Should council choose to go with the LTAC recommendation they may vote to approve. Should Council choose to go with the City Manager's amended recommendation, the recommended changes would be returned to the LTAC committee for comment and resubmission. To be reviewed by:* City Manager City Attorney Community Development Finance Fire Human Resources Parks, Rec, & Cultural Services Police Public Works Technology Services Instructions: Punchline First – Lead with the key takeaway or decision. Background – Brief history of the situation, including triggers and analysis. Options Considered – Compare alternatives with pros and cons. Final Recommendation – Reinforce why the chosen path is best. Summary/Background* The LTAC committee recommends funding the projects and events as listed on the attached spreadsheet for the 2026 Lodging tax revenues. The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee has reviewed all of the applications for lodging tax revenues in 2026. A total of 38 applications were received with one ineligible for funding as it did not meet the program requirements. The requests from the remaining 37 applications totaled $1,405,112 in requested funds. The total budget for the projects and events in 2026 was determined to be $1,100,000. After presentations from each of the applicants, the committee met and recommended that all but 4 of the applications receive some level of funding. The four applications that are not recommended for funding are as follows: City of Moses Lake-Museum and Surf N Slide Operations-$300,000-Funds to help offset operations expenses for the City's two tourism facilities City of Moses Lake-Staff time for Special Events-$40,000-Funding to cover City Staff costs associated with the running of Special Events Moses Lake Spring Festival-Amphitheater Bathroom Remodel-$60,000-Funds to be used to remodel bathrooms at the McCosh Amphitheater MLIRD-Moses Lake Water Quality Program-$75,000-Funds for the MLIRD Water Quality Program for Moses Lake COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 51 of 93 The LTAC Committee funding recommendations total $779,612 with the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee recommending that the remaining $320,388 be moved to the LTAC 15% Future Capital Fund for future Tourism related Capital Projects. The City Manager recommends amending the LTAC committee's recommendation to alleviate pressure on the City's General Fund budget for 2026. His recommendation includes all of the LTAC Committee's recommended funding and adds back in two of the items not recommended by the LTAC committee. The City Manager recommends adding in the $40,000 funding to cover City Staff costs associated with the running of special events by outside organizations and allocating the remainder of the $320,388 (or $280,388) to the Surf n' Slide and Museum operations, effectively reducing the currently proposed General Fund budget deficit from $1,036,558 to $716,170. This would allocate the $320,388 that the LTAC committee recommends be set aside into the Future Capital Projects Fund to the City's general fund to support tourism facilities and events, an allowable expense for LTAC funds, while not impacting any of the funds recommended to support special events or projects by the LTAC Committee. Looking forward to future cycles, the pressure on the General Fund will need to be addressed and the cost for supporting special events will continue to increase as costs for staff will continue to increase. If Council does not elect to use LTAC funds for these expenses going forward, the City may need to consider passing these costs on to the groups running the events in future years. Additionally, the LTAC committee has agreed that the 15% carve out taken out of the annual revenues from Lodging tax is confirmed as being for any Future Capital Projects, not specifically for a Convention/Conference Center. As such, staff will be putting together a separate process for municipalities to apply for funding from these funds. This will be on a case-by-case basis with project review and recommendation by the LTAC committee to the City Council for final review/approval. Instructions: Discuss if the expense is budgeted or what is the funding source. If there are no Fiscal Considerations, please enter N/A. Fiscal Consideration * The LTAC recommended funding levels would be $320,388 below budgeted amounts for Lodging Tax Revenue so the recommendations easily fit within the budget. The City Manager's recommendation allocates the remaining $320,388 to the general Fund to support tourism facilities and Special Event staffing by the City, reducing the 2026 General Fund Budget Deficit from$1,036,558 to $716,170. City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed * Preamble: The City’s top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City’s finances. #1 - Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 - Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 - Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 - Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 - New Police Station #6 - Second Lake Crossing #7 - WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake Submitted by: Is this a Template for a Future Agenda Bill?* No, proceed with reviews Yes, save a template and assign to a fellow staff member to complete Name* Doug Coutts Email * dcoutts@cityofml.com Submitter Comments This is informational only for the approver reviews. This will NOT be included in the final version. Submitted Date 10/22/2025 Is this being submitted by the City Manager or a Department Director?* Yes No Selecting 'Yes' will bypass the initial draft review. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 52 of 93 Organization Name Event Name & Date 2025 Funded* 2026 Request 2026 LTAC Recommendati on (LTAC's 2%) City's 2% - 2026 Comments: Billed to City (LTAC's 2%) Billed to City (City's 2%) Billed to City Total Remainder available DMLA Brews and Tunes $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Marketing and Entertainment expenses DMLA Harvest Festival $ - $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $2,000 Candy/$500 Marketing DMLA Sip & Stroll $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Marketing and operations for the event-Work with City on marketing and use money for Bands at Sinkiuse-Work with CBAA Columbia Basin Allied Arts Art on Third/Busiest Day Downtown 3,000$ 5,000$ 3,000$ Sip & Stroll Funding/Art on 3rd/Busiest day downtown-Artists contracts and production of Art on Third/Rentals and Marketing 3,000$ Columbia Basin Allied Arts UMANI Fest 5,000$ 15,000$ 5,000$ Umani Festival Funding-Artist contracts/Marketing/Production costs-No tents 5,000$ Columbia Basin Allied Arts Premier Performances 7,500$ 8,000$ 7,500$ Concert season Funding-Artist contracts/Marketing/Production costs 7,500$ Central Basin Community Concert Series 2024 Concerts 7,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ Musician fees/production fees/advertising to tourist regions/general operations that support tourists -$ 7,500$ Columbia Basin Rodeo Association Moses Lake Roundup Rodeo and Demo Derby 59,000$ 100,000$ 59,000$ Advertising-$22,000/t-shirts with ads-$9,000/Website revamp $15,000/Social Media-$7,000/Rodeo Program Project-$6,000-Second Event next year?-$ 59,000$ City of Moses Lake Frosty Finds Flea Market and Appraisal Fair 2,000$ 3,000$ 3,000$ Print, radio, and social media advertising of the concert series in Tri-cities, Wenatchee, and Spokane areas -$ 3,000$ City of Moses Lake Creative District Conveneing -$ 2,000$ 2,000$ Creative Distrcit Covening support City of Moses Lake Placer AI Renewal 18,500$ 24,590$ 24,590$ Renewal of the Placer AI Software -$ 24,590$ City of Moses Lake Surf N Slide Operations -$ 300,000$ 200,000$ Funds to help offset operations expenses for the City's two Tourism facilities-Surf N Slide Water Park and Moses Lake Museum and Arts Center -$ 200,000$ City of Moses Lake Staff time for Special Events -$ 40,000$ -$ Funding to cover City Staff costs associated with the running of Special Events downtown. City of Moses Lake Music Licensing Services 3,000$ 3,000$ 3,000$ Funds will be used to pay music licensing fees for the City facilities -$ 3,000$ City of Moses Lake Red, White and BOOM!31,000$ 37,000$ 37,000$ Fireworks and Advertising -$ 37,000$ City of Moses Lake Summer Concert Series Advertising 6,000$ 7,000$ -$ -$ Print, radio, and social media advertising of the concert series in Tri-cities, wneatchee, and Spokane areas-Funded in Tourism advertising campaign -$ -$ City of Moses Lake Visitor Information Center Seasonal Staffing -$ 15,600$ 15,600$ Funding to staff the Visitor Information Center in Civic Center with seasonla staff from May to September -$ 15,600$ City of Moses Lake Tourism Marketing Campaign 109,789$ 116,013$ 116,013$ Tourism campaign-Full report of 2026 to date/summary of 2025 prior to 2027 Request -$ 116,013$ Grant County Fairgrounds MoraVida Fest 10,000$ 25,000$ 10,000$ Marketing, entertainment and cultrual enhancement of the event -$ 10,000$ Grant County Fairgrounds Grant County Fair 40,000$ 100,000$ 40,000$ Supplement marketing and entertainment budget -$ 40,000$ Grant County Fairgrounds 90's Flannel Fest 13,000$ 45,000$ 30,000$ Marketing, Entertainment and operations -$ 30,000$ City of Moses Lake Surf n' Slide Climbing wall -$ 65,294$ 65,294$ Replacement of the High Diving board at Surf N Slide with a three panel climbing wall removable for swim meets -$ 65,294$ Manta Rays Christmas Open 1,900$ 3,250$ 3,250$ Custodial Services and facility Rental -$ 3,250$ Manta Rays IES Junior Champs 14,350$ 15,340$ 15,340$ Custodial services, awards, hospitality expenses, and facility Rental -$ 15,340$ Manta Rays Sizzlin Summer Splash 12,900$ 14,680$ 14,680$ Custodial services, awards, hospitality expenses, and facility Rental -$ 14,680$ Manta Rays Sprint Shootout 3,550$ 4,075$ 4,075$ Custodial services, awards, hospitality expenses, and facility Rental -$ 4,075$ Manta Rays Swim Clinic with and Olympian 9,250$ Clinician appearnace fee, custodial services and facility Rental -$ -$ Manta Rays Thankswimming Open 7,475$ 8,075$ 8,075$ Custodial services, awards, hospitality expenses, and facility Rental -$ 8,075$ Manta Rays Tony St. Onge Memorial Open 5,750$ 6,450$ 6,450$ Custodial services, awards, hospitality expenses, and facility Rental -$ 6,450$ Moses Lake Chamber of Commerce Support to City of Moses Lake VIC 4,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ Mailings to tourists/Welcome packet-All new materials to be designed or approved by L. Lynch-Branding reasons -$ 6,000$ Moses Lake Spring Festival Bathroom Renovation -$ 60,000$ -$ -$ Not enough information/Traffic/usage issue not remodel issue/Recommended bringing in more porta-potties Moses Lake Spring Festival Moses Lake Spring Festival 50,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ Advertising/artists fees -$ 80,000$ Moses Lake BMX Association Capital Projects and State Qualifier Race 41,966$ 43,045$ 43,045$ Mylaps System (~$32,330)/Track Surface Glue and Application Equipment (~$7,725)/State Qualifier Promotion and Awards (~$3,000)-$ 43,045$ Moses Lake Youth Hockey Association Current and Future Winter Youth Hockey 51,500$ 44,700$ 44,700$ $22,000 Replacement Speakers/$2,500 Laptop/$19,000 Tournament Fees/$1,200 Heaters-Work with City on Replacement cost for speakers -$ 44,700$ Sand Scorpions Bounty Hole & Freestyle Mud Trucks 45,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ Materials/operating costs/increasing entertainment*next year address how the additional $15,000 was spent -$ 60,000$ Moses Lake Irrigation and Rehbilitation DistrictMoses Lake Water Quality Program -$ 75,000$ -$ Water Quality Program-No specifics on budget-No breakdown Northwest Powerboat Association Moses Lake Vintage Test and Tune -$ 3,000$ 3,000$ advertising Visit WA Moses Lake Airshow 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ Offset Operating Costs -$ 50,000$ TOTALS:612,930$ 1,405,112$ 699,422$ 280,190$ Total -$ -$ -$ 962,112.00$ 578$ 119,810$ 120,388$ Capital Improvements-15% Carve out fund A= Non-profit/IRS documents attached Manta Rays 55,175$ 51,870$ 979,612$ B= Application Complete C= Budget - Expenses D= Budget - Revenue Total LTAC's 2%City's 2% 2026 Available-(Beyond budget)$110,013 $13,128 $96,885 2026 actual available $230,401 $13,706 $216,695 15% set aside $156,000 78,000$ 78,000$ $386,401 $91,706 $294,695 Budget remainder COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 53 of 93 Council Agenda Bill e Subject 2025 Dev Reg Codes Department Community Development Presenter at the Meeting Vivian Ramsey Acting Community Development Director Packet Attachments (if any) Draft Group 1 Code Amendments.docx Summary/Background 204.58KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Proceeding Type New Business Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/ Approve Authorize Other No motion necessary. Agenda Item Number: 58063 I. On August 26, 2025, the City Council created and set the "2025 Code Amendment Final Docket," a list of 52 text amendments to the City of Moses Lake Unified Development Code. Placement on the "Final Docket" is not approval of the proposal. Rather, it means the City Council deten11ined the proposal is worthy of devoting resources and time to complete the amendments. 2. Due to the large number of amendments, the 52 proposed amendments were divided into four groups to review. The first group (Group I) presented in this report were prioritized because citizens are awaiting code amendments for soon to be active permits and/or development. 3. On October 16, 2025, held a public hearing on the Group I amendments, (pursuant to Chapter 15.240 Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulation Amendments). The Planning Commission reviewed, deliberated, edited, and made recommendations for the final text changes (amendments). During the duly notice public hearing of October 16, 2025, the Planning Commission Recommended the following Docket items for amendment: a. Docket No. 3. Amendment to 15.640.040 to allow 95% compacted gravel for parking and loading regarding Mini Storage Development Standards within the Industrial Zones (L-1 and 1-1-1), and amendment for an allowance to use engineered product for "low trip volume" areas regarding mini storage. This is combined with Docket No. 4. Amendment to Chapter 15.105 to add definition of engineered product for "low trip volume" areas. The engineered product definition should include porous/ pervious materials. b. Docket No. 11. Amendment to 15.405.070 to allow drive through for restaurants, coffee stands, banks, phannacies and other similar and customary uses within differing zones, and amendment 15.715.020 (E) to include standards I revisions and criteria for stacking of vehicles. c. Docket No. 15. Amendment to 15.405.070 adding Auto Repair and Auto Bodyshop to the land use table (not listed) and amend Chapter 15.105 to clarify and add definitions (paint and without paint). d. Docket No. 30. Amendment to 15.425.040 and 15.427.040 to add a new Flight Zones compatibility, prohibition and density to the Airport Overlay Districts. The draft amendments and ordinance are attached for your review and consideration. You will be asked to consider adoption at the next meeting November 25, 2025. Fiscal Consideration None foreseen. City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed Preamble: The City's top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City's infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City's finances. #1 -Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 -Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 -Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 -Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 -New Police Station #6 -Second Lake Crossing #7 -WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 54 of 93 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 55 of 93 Page 1 of 17 ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 15.640.040 TO ALLOW 95% COMPACTED GRAVEL FOR PARKING AND LOADING REGARDING MINI STORAGE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONES (L-I AND H-I); AND 15.405.070 TO ALLOW DRIVE THROUGH FACILITIES FOR RESTAURANTS, COFFEE STANDS, BANKS, PHARMACIES AND OTHER SIMILAR AND CUSTOMARY USES WITHIN DIFFERING ZONES, AND AMENDMENT 15.715.020 (E) TO INCLUDE STANDARDS / REVISIONS AND CRITERIA FOR STACKING OF VEHICLES AT DRIVE THROUGHS; AND AMENDMENT TO 15.405.070 ADDING AUTO REPAIR AND AUTO BODYSHOP TO THE LAND USE TABLE; AND 15.427.040 TO ADD A NEW FLIGHT ZONES COMPATIBILITY, PROHIBITION AND DENSITY TO THE AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Recitals: 1. The City of Moses Lake adopted the Title 15 – Unified Development Code (MLUDC) October 4, 2024; and 2. City of Moses Lake MLUDC Chapter 15.240 Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulation Amendments governs the process for development regulation amendments; and 3. On August 26, 2025, the City Council created and set the “2025 Code Amendment Final Docket” which is a list of 52 City of Moses Lake Unified Development Code text amendments. Placement on the “Final Docket” is not approval of the proposal. Rather, it means the City Council has determined the proposal is worthy of devoting resources and time to complete the amendments, and the City Council is being asked to consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation, and may adopt, reject, or change the recommendation to create the “Final Docket.”; and 4. Due to citizens awaiting code amendments for soon to be active permits and/or development, Community Development Department asked that the Final Docket be broken into four “Groupings” for the Planning Commission actions; and 5. On October 16, 2025, the Planning Commission completed its first round of processing Group 1 that included workshops on August 28, 2025 and September 25, 2025 with a Public Hearing on October 16, 2025 (pursuant to Chapter 15.240 Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulation Amendments). Whereby, the Planning Commission reviewed, deliberated, edited and made recommendations for the final text changes (amendments); and COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 56 of 93 Page 2 of 17 6. During the duly noticed hearing of October 16, 2025, the Planning Commission Recommended the following amendments: a. Docket No. 3. Amendment to 15.640.040 to allow 95% compacted gravel for parking and loading regarding Mini Storage Development Standards within the Industrial Zones (L-I and H-I), and amendment for an allowance to use engineered product for “low trip volume” areas regarding mini storage. This is combined with Docket No. 4. Amendment to Chapter 15.105 to add definition of engineered product for “low trip volume” areas. The engineered product definition should include porous / pervious materials. b. Docket No. 11. Amendment to 15.405.070 to allow drive through facilities for restaurants, coffee stands, banks, pharmacies and other similar and customary uses within differing zones, and amendment 15.715.020 (E) to include standards / revisions and criteria for stacking of vehicles. c. Docket No. 15. Amendment to 15.405.070 adding Auto Repair and Auto Bodyshop to the land use table (not listed) and amend Chapter 15.105 to clarify and add definitions (paint and without paint) d. Docket No. 30. Amendment to 15.425.040 and 15.427.040 to add a new Flight Zones compatibility, prohibition, and density to the Airport Overlay Districts. 7. During the duly noticed hearing of October 16, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended the following overall findings of fact: a. The City of Moses Lake has adopted the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the Growth Management Act (GMA), which has been found to be consistent with each other. b. The City of Moses Lake adopted the Title 15 - Unified Development Code October 4, 2024 c. The City of Mose Lake Planning Commission is responsible for long range planning matters and providing implementation recommendations to assure compliance with the Growth Management Act. These measures include updates and amendments to the comprehensive plan; development regulations, environmental regulations, and any other rules, actions or regulations deemed necessary to implement the Growth Management Act. d. RCW Chapters 36.70 and 36.70A authorize the adoption of development regulations, and amendments to the City of Moses Lake Unified Development Code (MLUDC) are required to comply with state statues. e. The Planning Commission conducted workshops on parts of the proposed amendments on August 28, 2025, and September 25, 2025 f. The amendments are not a part of the Growth Management Act Periodic Update (RCW 36.70A.130) - Comprehensive Plan / Code update g. On October 16, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted an advertised public hearing. The Planning Commission entered into the record the files on these amendments, accepted public testimony, and deliberated the merits of the amendments. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 57 of 93 Page 3 of 17 h. The Planning Commission has reviewed the entire record and public testimony as it relates to the proposed amendments to the City of Moses Lake Unified Development Code (MLUDC). i. The amendment has been processed in compliance with State and Local regulations and standards. j. The proposed amendments are consistent with both the statue and supporting sections of the MLUDC. k. The intent of the amendments are to strengthen and improve project review and permitting for construction and land use project permits. l. The City of Moses Lake Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies encourage efficient, straightforward, easy to understand, regulations to ensure openness of government and efficiency of permit processing. m. According to the City of Moses Lake Comprehensive Plan, the following Goals and Policies support the amendments overall: Land Use i. Goal 3.1 Provide for coordinated, logical, orderly growth of the city. ii. Policy 3.1.7 Adopt user-friendly development regulations that implement Moses Lake's land use vision while offering flexibility for creative solutions. Examples of this may include: iii. Use of simple language and easy-to-read charts and graphics in the development code; iv. Monitoring of development trends and refinement of the development code over time to facilitate preferred development character and land use patterns; and v. Inclusion of flexible development standards and incentive programs that offer multiple options for meeting development requirements. Menu-based options provide choice and flexibility to developers while ensuring new development meets the City's policy goals. n. The amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 8. During the duly notice hearing of October 16, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended specific amendment Findings of Fact, and are attached within the PC Staff Report. 9. On September 19, 2025, Pursuant to 15.240.050 Public Notice, the City of Moses Lake duly noticed the amendments. Notice of the proposed amendments was sent to the Department of Ecology SEPA Register. Additional notice was provided to local and regional agencies for the 14-day review and comment period/environmental determinations 10. On September 19 2025, the City of Moses Lake issued a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance; and 11. On November 12, 2025, the City Council conducted First Reading of the Planning Commission recommended amendments for review and deliberation, and 12. Pursuant to 15.240.100 Review of Amendments to Development Regulations (D), COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 58 of 93 Page 4 of 17 The City Council will review the Planning Commission recommendations and the criteria set forth in MLUDC 15.240.080(B) and take action on each proposed amendment to the development regulations. Council may reject or accept in whole or part the Planning Commission’s recommendations. All amendments shall be approved by ordinance by the City Council.; and 13. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation, concurs with the recommendation, and hereby adopts the Findings within the recommendation. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The Recitals set forth above are hereby adopted and incorporated as Findings of Fact of the City Council. Section 2. Additional Findings. The Council may adopt further additional findings after the public hearing is held and evidence presented to the City Council. Section 3. The attached City of Moses Lake Unified Development Code amendments are hereby adopted. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court, board or tribunal of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 5. Enforcement. Violations of this ordinance are enforceable to the same extent as other violations of Title 15 MLUDC and are equally subject to injunctive and other forms of civil relief that the City may seek. Section 6. Conflict. In the event that there is a conflict between the provisions of this ordinance and any other City ordinance, the provisions of this ordinance shall control. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days after its passage and publication of its summary as provided by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Moses Lake, WA and signed by its Mayor on _____________, 2025. ________________________________________ COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 59 of 93 Page 5 of 17 Dustin Swartz, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Debbie Burke, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Katherine L. Kenison, City Attorney Martinez Swartz Myers Fancher Madewell Lombardi Skaug Vote: Date Published: <Monday after Council> Date Effective: (Saturday/5 days later unless otherwise regulated) COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 60 of 93 Page 6 of 17 Attachment A Docket No. 3 & 4. Amendment to 15.640.040 to allow 95% compacted gravel for parking and loading regarding Mini Storage Development Standards within the Industrial Zones (L-I and H-I), amendment for an allowance to use engineered product defined, and for “low trip volume” areas (apron and drive distention) regarding mini storage. Proposed Amendment 15.640.040 Mini Storage Development Standards – Industrial Zone (L-I) and (H-I): A. All The first 30 feet of entrance (accessway including the apron connecting to public right-of-way and driveway / access aisle), travel surfaces, loading areas, and building aprons shall be surfaced with asphalt or, concrete hard surface pavement. The remaining travel surfaces, loading areas, and parking shall be surfaced with asphalt, concrete, and/or 95% compacted engineered gravel product which is per porous / pervious, or other similar hard surface pavement as approved by the Director. (Subsequent Section Remains unaltered) 15.105.007 G Definitions: (Previous definition remains unaltered) Gravel, 95% compacted means engineered gravel product which is per porous / pervious meeting 95% compaction rating. 95% compaction means the compacted material has reached 95% of its maximum possible dry density as determined by a ASTM D1157 Proctor test. (Subsequent definition remains unaltered) 15.715.080 Development and Maintenance (Previous section remains unaltered) A. 1. Surfacing. a. Excepting for 15.640.040 (A), Parking areas shall be surfaced with an asphaltic or cement binder pavement or other approved material. Parking areas shall be built on a suitable base so as to provide a durable and dustless surface and shall be so graded and drained as to properly dispose of all surface water on site. (Subsequent section remains unaltered) COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 61 of 93 Page 7 of 17 Attachment B Docket No. 11. Amendment to 15.405.070 to allow drive through for restaurants, coffee stands, banks, pharmacies and other similar and customary uses within differing zones, and amendment 15.715.020 (E) to include standards / revisions and criteria for stacking of vehicles. Proposed Amendment Table 15.405.070. Non-Residential Land Uses by Zone Land Use Zones MLDUC Reference Residential Commercial and Mixed Use Industrial Public R-1 R-2 R- 3 C-1 C-1A C-2 L-I H-I P Restaurant, Fast Food (Drive through restaurants, coffee stands, and other high volume drive through (7)) C C P P 15.715.020 Drive through banks, pharmacies, and other low volume drive through P P P P 15.715.020 (Subsequent section remains unaltered) Development conditions (footnotes) (Previous section remains unaltered) 7 Drive through requiring a Conditional Use Permit shall only be allowed when the applicant demonstrates the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan’s Downtown pedestrian goals, policies and objectives. Such demonstration may include a combination of, but not limited to, a separate walk up window, sufficient area to accommodate service stacking lane without conflicting with pedestrian access, a maximum service stacking lane of five (5), only one service / stacking lane is allowed, COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 62 of 93 Page 8 of 17 pedestrian/traffic safety analysis, and/or other design element which encourages pedestrian use and enjoyment. (Subsequent section remains unaltered) 15.715.020 General Standards: (Previous section remains unaltered) E. Drive Through Windows. The service / stacking lane(s) shall be on-site. For each service lane of a drive-through coffee stand or restaurant, a minimum of seven (7) stacking spaces shall be provided. For high volume drive-through restaurants up to 12 stacking spaces may be required. For low volume drive-through (for example: financial institution, pharmacies, gas stations, or other similar use), a minimum of three stacking spaces shall be provided. Stacking lanes must be designed so that they do not interfere with parking, parking access / aisle, fire lanes, sidewalks, and vehicle circulation. All stacking lanes must be clearly identified with striping, landscaping and signs. Service areas and stacking lanes must be set back 10 feet from all lot lines which abut residential zones. The setback must be landscaped or fenced for view obscuring separations from intersections. An applicant may provide alternative stacking spaces, such as surveys of existing similar drive-throughs stacking lane, documenting that specific features of a proposal would result in a stacking lane lower than that of the above. Acceptance of such evidence shall be at the discretion of City of Moses Lake Director. Drive through windows shall have a stacking lane of a minimum of one hundred twenty feet (120') and shall be designed to not block access, parking aisles, or fire lanes. (Subsequent section remains unaltered) COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 63 of 93 Page 9 of 17 Attachment C Docket No. 15. Amendment to 15.405.070 adding Auto Repair and Auto Bodyshop to the land use table (not listed) and amend Chapter 15.105 to clarify and add definitions (paint and without paint) Proposed Amendment Table 15.405.070. Non-Residential Land Uses by Zone Land Use Zones MLDUC Reference Residential Commercial and Mixed Use Industrial Public R-1 R-2 R- 3 C-1 C-1A C-2 L-I H-I P Fueling or service stations P P P Auto Repair P P P P Auto Repair, Paint P P P (Subsequent section remains unaltered) 15.105.001 A Definitions: (Previous definition remains unaltered) “Auto Repair” means a building or portion thereof designed and used for storage, repair or servicing of motor vehicles or boats as a business. “Auto Repair, Paint” means a building or portion thereof designed and used for storage, repair or servicing of motor vehicles or boats as a business including painting operations. (Subsequent definition remains unaltered) 15.105.006 F Definitions: (Previous definition remains unaltered) “Fueling or Service Stations” means any area of land, including the structures thereon, that is used for the sale of gasoline or other motor fuels, oils, and lubricants and auto COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 64 of 93 Page 10 of 17 accessories (including areas for storage) and which may or may not include, lubricating and other minor servicing but no painting operation. (Subsequent definition remains unaltered) COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 65 of 93 Page 11 of 17 Attachment D Docket No. 30. Amendment to 15.425.040 and 15.427.040 to add a new Flight Zones compatibility, prohibition and density to the Airport Overlay Districts Proposed Amendment (Below figures are unaltered and used for ease of reference) COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 66 of 93 Page 12 of 17 (Previous section remains unaltered) 15.427.040 Prohibited Uses Prohibited uses are the same as for the underlying zoning district as listed in Tables MLUDC 15.405.060 and 15.405.070, except no permit shall be granted in the Overlay District that would: A. No Airport Hazards. Allow the establishment or creation of an airport hazard, including but not limited to: COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 67 of 93 Page 13 of 17 1. Electrical interference with navigational signals or radio communications at the airport or with radio or electronic communications between the airport and aircraft. 2. Emission of fly ash, dust, vapor, gases, or other forms of emissions that may conflict with any planned operations of the airport. 3. Foster an increase in bird population and thereby increase the likelihood of a bird-impact problem. 4. Erection or placement of any structure, device, or other object that makes it difficult for pilots to distinguish between airport lights and other lights, results in glare in the eyes of pilots using the airports, impairs visibility in the vicinity of the airport, or otherwise endangers the landing, taking off, or maneuvering of aircraft. B. No Incompatible Uses. Authorize any use or activity that would result in the siting of an incompatible use adjacent to an airport pursuant to RCW 36.70.547, as amended. This section aligns with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook. C. Other Prohibited Uses. Additional prohibited uses within the Moses Lake Municipal Airport include: 1. Kennels; 2. Automobile wrecking yards; 3. Residences; 4.2. Storage of any waste not generated within the municipal boundaries of the City of Moses Lake as a result of a business licensed within the City; and 5.3. The treatment or storage of any hazardous or nuclear waste. 4. Residential developments, multi-family housing, schools, hospitals, nursing homes, and public assembly uses (e.g., stadiums, concert venues) that attract large concentrations of people not meeting 15.427.045 D. No Increase in Nonconforming Structures or Use. Permit a nonconforming structure or use to be made larger or to become higher or become a greater hazard to air navigation than it was when the MLUDC was adopted. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 68 of 93 Page 14 of 17 E. These prohibitions shall be enforced through the Airport Overlay Zoning Ordinance and integrated into the development review process, including but not limited to, site plan reviews, subdivisions, and conditional use permits, to ensure compliance with compatibility criteria. 15.427.045 Density and intensity limitations for new development. A. Residential Development Density Criteria. Any subdivision of property for the purposes of residential development within the land use compatibility zones shall comply with the following density criteria: 1. Land Use Compatibility Zones 1, 2 and 5. No new residential land divisions are permitted. No new residential dwellings permitted. 2. Land Use Compatibility Zones 3 and 4. No multifamily, except as permitted in subsection B of this section. Residential land divisions for single-family development are limited to the underlying Zoning District and must comply with usage intensity (this section) and deed notification (subsection - I Deed Notification) requirements. Infill development is allowed as provided in subsection H of this section. B. Mixed Use Development. If residential uses are proposed to be located with nonresidential uses in the same or nearby buildings on the same site, they shall be treated as nonresidential development provided the residential development does not exceed thirty percent of the overall square footage of the structures. The occupancy of the residential portion shall be added to that of the nonresidential portion and evaluated with respect to the nonresidential usage intensity criteria defined in subsection D of this section. C. Special Function Land Use. Special function land uses as defined as land use for which the significant common element is the relative inability of the people occupying the space to move out of harm’s way; this includes schools (K—12), hospitals, nursing homes, day care centers, and other similar uses involving occupants that require personal assistance in vacating the premises shall be prohibited in the land use compatibility zones 1, 2, 3, and 4. D. Nonresidential Development Usage Intensity Criteria. Any proposed nonresidential construction or use of land within the land use compatibility zones shall not be permitted if they exceed the following usage intensity limitations. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 69 of 93 Page 15 of 17 1. Zone 1. No people other than aircraft occupants, airport personnel, and other persons authorized by airport regulations. 2. Zone 2. No more than five people in buildings and per acre average over the site. 3. Zone 3. No more than twenty-five people in buildings and per acre average over the site. 4. Zone 4. No more than four people per acre in buildings and no more than seventy-five people per acre outside of buildings. 5. Zone 5. No more than one hundred people per acre average over the site. E. Usage Intensity Calculation Factors. The maximum number of people permitted on a site within the land use compatibility zones shall be calculated based on the following factors: 1. All people (e.g., employees, customers, visitors, etc.) who may be on the property are to be included in the calculations. 2. The calculations must reflect the total number of people on the site at any time, except temporary special events. 3. All usage intensities are calculated on a gross acreage basis including streets within a site, half-streets abutting a site, and permanently open lands. 4. Intensity on the property under review shall be calculated for each acre of the site by a site plan identifying each one acre area and the respective use and density. The one-acre areas indicated are to be generally square or rectangular in shape; provided, that rectangles shall be no longer than twice their width. To the extent that the parcel is irregularly shaped, the site plan shall show the best fit of the one acre or portion of one acre areas consistent with the intent of this chapter. F. Usage Intensity Data Sources. The usage intensity of all individual uses highly depends upon the specifics of the proposed land use and its design. Where necessary to determine the acceptability of a particular proposal within the land use compatibility zones, the anticipated number of people per acre can be calculated based upon any of the following methods: 1. The Number of Automobile Parking Spaces Required on the Site. Unless a substantial number of people would arrive at the site by means other than automobile (or would park off-site), the anticipated number of people on COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 70 of 93 Page 16 of 17 the site can be estimated to be at least equal to the number of automobile parking spaces required for the use. A higher number shall be assumed for uses that typically attract more than one person per vehicle. 2. International Building Code (IBC) Occupancy Levels. The anticipated maximum number of people occupying indoor facilities on a site can be assumed to be no higher than the total floor area of the proposed use divided by the minimum square feet per occupant requirements listed in the IBC. Because the IBC criteria represent highly intensive levels of usage, the number obtained through this calculation can normally be divided in half for the purposes of the usage intensity criteria in this section. 3. Documented Survey or Analysis Results. A project applicant may provide evidence, such as surveys of existing uses similar to the type proposed, documenting that specific features of a proposal would result in a usage intensity lower than that assumed using the methods indicated above. Acceptance of such evidence shall be at the discretion of City of Moses Lake Director. G. Parcels Lying within Land Use Compatibility Zones. If a parcel proposed for residential subdivision is split by land use compatibility zone boundaries, the total number of dwelling units permitted shall be calculated as if the parcel were multiple parcels divided at the compatibility zone boundary line. Similarly, if a parcel proposed for nonresidential use is split by compatibility zone boundaries, the usage intensity shall be calculated as if the parcel were divided at the compatibility zone boundary line. In both cases, however, the development density or intensity allowed within the more restricted portion of the parcel can (and is encouraged to) be transferred to (clustered on) the less restricted portion even if the resulting development in the latter area then exceeds the criteria for that compatibility zone. This transfer of development is also allowed with respect to multiple parcels proposed to be developed as a single project. The area within the land use compactivity zone shall be allowed a Transfer of Development or Density to lands within the same parcel for a density bonus of 150%. Additionally, such property shall be allowed, as applicable, upzone regarding dimensional standards which include, but are not limited to, lot area, lot width, lot density and setbacks from the underlying zoning to the next more intense same zoning district (for example from R1 to R2) H. Infill Development. Where development not in compliance with this chapter already exists adjacent to the site of the proposal, additional infill development of similar or less intensive land uses may be allowed to occur even if such land uses are not allowed elsewhere in the land use compatibility zones. This COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 71 of 93 Page 17 of 17 exception does not apply within land use compatibility zone 1. A parcel can be considered for infill development if it meets all of the following criteria: 1. The parcel size is no larger than two acres. 2. The site is at least sixty-five percent bounded (excluding roads) by existing uses similar to, or more intensive than, those proposed. 3. The proposed project would not extend the perimeter of the area defined by the surrounding, already developed, incompatible uses. 4. In the case of a nonresidential use, the proposed project would not have a usage intensity more than fifty percent above the intensity permitted in accordance with subsection D of this section. 5. The proposed project will not otherwise increase the intensity and/or incompatibility of use through special use permits, density transfers, or subdivisions. 6. The proposed project complies with all other land use and development regulations applicable in the underlying zone. A.I. Deed Notification. As a condition for approval of new development within the approach surfaces shown on the airspace protection areas map, or land use compatibility zones 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6; a notice shall be recorded with the county auditor prior to final approval of new subdivisions, short subdivisions, building permits, conditional use permits, special use permit or other similar permits, unless said notice is already recorded on the property. Said notice shall state: “This property is located adjacent to an airport and routinely subject to overflight activity by aircraft using the airport. Residents and tenants may experience inconvenience, annoyance, or discomfort from noise, smell or other effects of aviation activities.” (Subsequent definition remains unaltered) COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 72 of 93 Council Agenda Bill Subject Limited Use Shallow Wells Department Public Works Presenter at the Meeting Leigh Ramsey, Assistant Public Works Director Packet Attachments (if any) 2025-11-05_DRAFTShallowWell.docx 28.82KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Agenda Item Number: 58120 Proceeding Type New Business Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion Motion to adopt Ordinance 3079 revising Moses Lake Municipal Code 13.07.010 to allow for permitting of limited use shallow irrigation wells within City limits as proposed. Summary/Background Staff are requesting the adoption of an ordinance that will revise MLMC 13.07.010 to allow for permitting of limited use shallow irrigation wells within City limits. On September 16, 2025, staff brought forth a proposal to City Council and requested direction on the creation and implementation of a permitted exemption that would allow for the drilling and use of shallow irrigation wells for limited use with city limits. Staff and Council recognize that public and semi-public entities with large green spaces function as gathering places, sports fields, and benefit our residents. As such, we want to encourage cultivation of these spaces while being good stewards of the available water resources. Allowing shallow irrigation wells on a limited basis may help reduce the strain on our water system and deep aquifer for irrigation of large public/semi-public parcels. There is also the added benefit of reducing the monthly water bills of these customers who serve our community with their public/semi-public spaces during the irrigation season. Fiscal Consideration An application fee will need to be implemented to allow for cost recovery of staff time in processing applications and issues permits. There may also be a reduction in overall revenue generated by the utility accounts that choose to permit and drill a limited use shallow irrigation well. City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed Preamble: The City’s top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City’s finances. #1 - Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 - Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 - Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 - Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 - New Police Station #6 - Second Lake Crossing #7 - WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake Reviewed and Approved by: City Manager - Rob Karlinsey on 11/6/2025 City Attorney - Katherine Kenison on 11/6/2025 Public Works - Brian Baltzell on 11/6/2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 73 of 93 ORDINANCE NO. 3079 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 13.070.010 TITLED “WATER CONSERVATION, RESTRICTIONS, AND RATIONING”. Recitals: 1. The City of Moses Lake City Council has adopted water conservation and rationing measures which include restrictions on irrigation watering schedules. 2. The water conservation and rationing restrictions allow for limited exemptions. 3. The City Council desires to amend Section 13.07.010 to include an exemption for the drilling and use of Limited Use Shallow Irrigation Wells within the City’s retail service area. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Moses Lake Municipal Code Section 13.07.010 titled ‘Water Conservation, Restrictions, and Rationing,” is amended to read as follows: 13.07.010 Water Conservation, Restrictions, and Rationing. A. Conservation. All odd numbered addresses shall be allowed to irrigate on Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday. All even numbered addresses shall be allowed to irrigate on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. All irrigating shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 a.m. through 7:00 p.m. All irrigating shall be prohibited on Mondays. New sod, turf, or grass seed may be irrigated irrespective of these provisions provided an unrestricted irrigation allowance is first obtained from the City of Moses Lake Public Works allowing fourteen (14) days of unrestricted water use to irrigate installation of new sod, turf, or grass seed. Only three (3) unrestricted irrigation allowances shall be permitted per address per calendar year, except when a change in property ownership occurs, allowing for potential repermitting during the same year. Additional allowances may be requested and will be issued at the discretion of the Municipal Services Director or their designee. Water conservation measures will be revisited every two (2) years, beginning February 2025, following a review of water resource availability. After a written warning for the first offense, the second offense will incur a C-13 penalty pursuant to Chapter 1.08. A third offense will be subject to a C-7 penalty. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 74 of 93 B. Exemptions for City Parks. City parks irrigating on City’s potable water system will be limited to watering three (3) days each week with a specific schedule to be determined by the Parks Superintendent. No zone of a City park irrigation system connected to the City potable water system will be irrigated more than three (3) days each week with the following exceptions: 1. Paul Lauzier Park and Yonezawa Park have high tourism value, and currently an alternative source is not available so in the interim there will be an exemption. This exemption will be revisited annually as resources are identified. 2. City parks without timers or remote watering capabilities will be exempt from the time-of-day watering restrictions. City park staff will maintain a current list of these parks. As park infrastructure is updated and timers are added to these parks, they will be removed from the exemption list. 3. Upon written request of the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services, the City Manager may approve a one (1) day exemption to watering restrictions to promote turf recovery following a special event held at the park. C. Notice to Begin Water Restrictions. The Public Works Director will place a notice in the local newspaper and provide a public announcement on the City’s social media as well as to the radio stations that are in the area. The notice will state the requirements for individuals or organizations for irrigating and washing vehicles. Water restrictions will be effective immediately upon publication and broadcast. After a written warning for the first offense, the second offense will incur a C-13 penalty pursuant to Chapter 1.08. A third offense will be subject to a C-7 penalty. Further infractions will be subject to a C-4 penalty. D. Rationing. Water rationing will be implemented during emergency conditions as determined by the City Manager and Public Works Director. E. Notice to End Water Restrictions and Rationing. The Public Works Director will place a notice in the local newspaper and provide a public announcement on the City’s social media as well as to the radio stations that are in the area that states water rationing is no longer required. F. Exemptions for School District Sports Fields. School-district-owned sports fields irrigating on the City’s potable water system are exempt from the watering restrictions and shall be permitted to irrigate as necessary to preserve the fields. This exemption shall expire on November 15, 2025, unless otherwise extended by the City Council. G. Limited Use Shallow Irrigation Wells. Parcels owned by public or semi-public entities and operated for public or semi-public use within City limits may apply for a permit to allow for the installation of a limited use shallow aquifer irrigation well. 1. Definitions: COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 75 of 93 • Public Parcel: A parcel owned and operated by a public entity and open to all members of the public without restriction or fee (e.g., public parks, libraries, public schools, government buildings). • Semi-Public Parcel: A parcel owned and operated by a semi-public entity, open to some members of the public with possible restrictions or fees (e.g., private schools, churches, recreational facilities). • Shall Irrigation Well: A well that draws water from a shallow aquifer for the purpose of irrigating green spaces; water is not used for potable water. • Shallow Aquifer: An aquifer that is located near the land surface and is often unconfined; typically allows groundwater to flow freely and is usually replenished more quickly than deeper aquifers. Wells that access this type of aquifer are typically drilled to less than 100 ft deep. 2. Eligibility Requirements. A parcel may be eligible for a shallow irrigation well permit if it meets all the following criteria: a. The parcel is owned and operated by a public or semi-public entity. b. The parcel is a minimum of three (3) acres in size. c. The parcel does not have access to alternative irrigation sources, including but not limited to water from the Moses Lake Irrigation and Rehabilitation District or nearby canal systems. d. The applicant provides proof of legal access to shallow groundwater. e. The proposed well location complies with all applicable cross- connection control, sanitary control zone, and wellhead protection zone requirements. 3. Permit Required. a. No person shall install or operate a shallow irrigation well within city limits without first obtaining a permit from the City. b. A non-refundable permit application fee shall be assessed to recover the cost of staff time for review and processing. c. The City shall establish a permit application process, including required documentation and review procedures. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court, board or tribunal of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are unauthorized by the Moses Lake City Council to make necessary clerical corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener’s/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 76 of 93 section/subsection numbers, and any references thereto which do not change the substantive meaning of the ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days after its passage and publication of its summary as provided by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Moses Lake, WA on November 12, 2025. ________________________________________ Dustin Swartz, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Debbie Burke, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ Katherine L. Kenison, City Attorney Martinez Swartz Myers Fancher Madewell Lombardi Skaug Vote: Date Published: November 17, 2025 Date Effective: November 22, 2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 77 of 93 Council Agenda Bill Subject IAFF Labor Agreement MOA Department Human Resources Presenter at the Meeting Shannon Springer Human Resources Director Packet Attachments (if any) COML_IAFF MOA _ Reorganization 10.31.25.docx 186.13KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Agenda Item Number: 58061 Proceeding Type New Business Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion Staff recommends City Council approve MOA between City of Moses Lake and IAFF Local #1258 regarding Fire Department restructure. Summary/Background The City is currently facing a budget deficit in 2025 and is actively working to present a reduce the budget deficit for fiscal year 2026. With the scheduled conclusion of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding and the SAFER Grant program, the City has identified the need for a strategic reorganization of the Fire Department. This reorganization includes a reallocation of duties and services both within the line and across other City departments. As part of this effort, the City is striving to preserve SAFER Grant-funded firefighter positions, which are set to expire in July 2026. Maintaining these positions is critical to sustaining current fire and EMS response levels and enabling the operational readiness of a third fire station using existing line staffing. Labor Considerations and Operational Shifts The Local has expressed interest in expanding line staff responsibilities to include duties historically assigned to MSO and prevention roles. Additionally, the Local supports funding line firefighter positions to ensure adequate coverage and service continuity. Strategic Objectives of the Reorganization 1. Enhance Customer Service and Permit Coordination The City aims to improve the efficiency and responsiveness of permit processing by streamlining workflows and enhancing interdepartmental coordination. 2. Realign Fire Marshal Services To support operational efficiency and clarify role delineation, the City proposed relocating Fire Marshal functions—including plan review and new construction inspections— outside of the fire suppression bargaining unit. Summary of MOA: Medical Services Officer (MSO): The MSO position will not be backfilled. Associated duties will be reassigned to Local line staff, as reflected in updated job descriptions. Fire Marshal: This role will be removed from the bargaining unit. The City may contract with external agencies for fire investigations. Battalion Chiefs and other Local members will receive training to provide investigatory support as needed. New construction inspections and plan reviews will transition to another City department or external provider. Fire Inspector: This position will also be removed from the bargaining unit. Routine inspections and public education responsibilities will remain within the Local’s scope of work. SAFER Grant Positions: The City will make every effort to retain SAFER-funded positions to support fire/EMS response and potential future expansion (e.g., third fire station). Snap Back Clause: If the City proposes a new job classification that overlaps with duties currently or previously performed by bargaining unit members, the Union may request a review. If agreement cannot be reached, the matter will be referred to the Washington State Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) for resolution. Pay negotiations will follow if inclusion is affirmed. Fire Inspector Certification: Employees assigned by the City to perform ICC basic fire inspector-certified duties will receive a 2% incentive. Fire Investigator Certification: Employees assigned by the City who hold both basic and intermediate fire investigator certifications and perform related duties will receive a 2% incentive. Fiscal Consideration These adjustments are reflected in the 2026 budget and align with broader efforts to prioritize core services while maintaining fiscal sustainability. City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 78 of 93 Preamble: The City’s top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City’s infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City’s finances. #1 - Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 - Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 - Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 - Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 - New Police Station #6 - Second Lake Crossing #7 - WSDOT Highway Projects in Moses Lake Reviewed and Approved by: City Manager - Rob Karlinsey on 11/3/2025 City Attorney - Katherine Kenison on 10/31/2025 Finance - Madeline Prentice on 11/3/2025 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 79 of 93 Memorandum of Agreement by and between the City of Moses Lake and IAFF Local #1258 Recitations: A.The City of Moses Lake (City) and the IAFF Local #1258 (Local) are parties to a collective bargaining agreement; and B.The City is facing a budget deficit in 2025 and striving to present a balanced budget for 2026. With the ending for ARPA funding and SAFER Grant funding, theCity has identified a reorganization of the Fire Department and the resulting reallocation of duties and services to the line and to other City departments. Inthis reorganization, the City is striving to maintain nine (9) SAFER Grant positions which will expire in July of 2026; and C.The City and the Local entered into a prior Memorandum of Understanding on March 21, 2023, regarding the MSO and Fire Marshal positions, in which it agreedto the following: a.The City would keep the MSO duties in the bargaining unit by vesting them in the Medical Services Officer position; andb.The City would utilize a budgeted position to hire a Fire Marshal to perform the Fire Marshal duties in the bargaining unit; and D.The current incumbent in the MSO position will retire 7/31/2025; and E. The City wants to maintain fire and EMS call response levels on the line and the ability to open a third fire station with current line staffing levels; and F.The Local has interest in bringing responsibilities to the line staff that have previously been included in MSO and prevention positions as well as funding linefire fighter positions; and G.The City would like to improve customer service and coordination of permit processing; and H.The City wishes to move Fire Marshal services (plan review and new construction inspections) outside of the fire suppression bargaining unit; and COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 80 of 93 I.The City and Local have discussed these matters in detail. Therefore, the following agreement was reached. Agreement: A.The City and the Local agree to:a.Not fill the MSO position, at this time, and assign the Local line staff members the duties of the MSO (see attached updated job description for Firefighter/Lieutenant/Captain/Battalion Chief which are incorporatedherein by reference). b.Remove the Fire Marshal position from the Local. The City will bepermitted to contract with an agency to provide investigatory duties and the Local’s Battalion Chiefs/ member/s will be trained to fill-in fire investigation services as needed (see attached updated job descriptionfor Battalion Chief). New construction inspections and plan review services will be moved over to another City department. Such servicesmay be contracted out to another government agency and/or to a private sector firm, or they may be performed by a City employee(s) in another bargaining unit or unrepresented division.c.Eliminate the Fire Inspector position from the Local. The Local will keep the routine inspections and education as part of their scope of work (seeattached updated job description for Firefighter incorporated herein by reference). d.The City will strive to maintain the SAFER grant funded positions tomaintain staffing levels for fire/EMS call response as well as staffing of third fire station, if approved in the future.e.As time and resources allow as determined by the Fire Chief and shift commanders, members of the Local will conduct follow-up communications (e.g., phone calls or visits) with frequent callers toappropriately reduce the number of unnecessary calls for service. This effort may also include coordinating with health care and other agenciesand connecting frequent callers to the appropriate resources. f.Snap Back clause-- To article 3 “Bargaining Unit”, add: “If the City creates a new job classification and the new classification contains a significantpart of the work now being or previously done by any of the classifications covered by this Agreement, or if functions are similar to employees in thisbargaining unit, and the Union notifies the City of a desire to meet within ten (10) days of its receipt of the City’s notice, the parties will meet to review the proposed classification. If both parties are unable to reachagreement to its inclusion or exclusion from the unit, they shall submit the question to the Washington State Public Employment RelationsCommission (PERC). If the inclusion of the proposed classification is agreed to by the parties or found appropriate by PERC, the parties shall COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 81 of 93 then negotiate as to the proper pay for the classification, the City being free to assign a temporary rate pending the resolution of negotiations.” g.To article 13 “Incentive Pay”, add 2% incentive for employees assigned bythe City to perform ICC basic fire inspector certified work. h.To article 13 “Incentive Pay”, add 2% incentive for employees assigned bythe City to hold both basic and intermediate fire investigator certification and perform the associated work. i.To article 20 “Hours of Work” add 20.07, defining that on-duty personnelthat the city requires to perform basic inspections are required to complete basic annual inspections will do so Monday through Friday, from08:00 to 16:30. Inspections that are delegated to on-duty crews will not be scheduled outside of these hours. B.The parties agree that this document is the result of bargaining and fulfilled all bargaining obligations between the Local and City as to the changesreferenced herein. C.Disputes regarding this agreement shall be handled through the parties’grievance procedure. D.This is the complete agreement of the parties, which supersedes any previous contrary agreement on the subject matter contained herein (including but not limited to the March 21, 2023 MOU referenced above) and does not otherwisealter the collective bargaining agreement between the parties. For the IAFF Local #1258 ______________________________ ____31 OCT 2025_____ Garrett Fletcher, President Date For the City of Moses Lake _____________________________ ______________________ Rob Karlinsey, City Manager Date COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 82 of 93 Council Agenda Bill e Subject AFSCME MOA -Position Changes Department Human Resources Presenter at the Meeting Shannon Springer -Human Resources Director Packet Attachments (if any) MOA City_AFSCME Permit Center Final.docx Recommended Motion Staff recommends City Council to Authorize City Manager to execute MOA with AFSCME. Summary/Background 26KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Proceeding Type New Business Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/ Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Agenda Item Number: 58114 To improve customer service, enhance coordination across departments, and clarify responsibilities related to permit processing and development review, the City is implementing several organizational changes involving both represented and non-represented positions. To streamline the lifecycle management of Planning, Building, Fire, and Engineering permit applications, the City has created a Permit Coordinator position. This lead role within the Community Development Department is designed to improve interdepartmental coordination and customer service throughout the permit process. The Washington State Council of County and City Employees AFSCME AFL-CIO Local 3045 (AFSCME) represents Community Development Department employees, excluding supervisors and confidential employees. The City and AFSCME have negotiated the inclusion of the Permit Coordinator position into the bargaining unit, with placement at Bank K. As part of this agreement, the City and AFSCME have also acknowledged the removal of two previously represented roles that will retain work formerly performed within the bargaining unit: •Housing and Grant Manager •Development Review Program Manager The City will establish an Assistant to the City Manager position within the Administration Department. This role will serve as a confidential advisor and analyst to city management. The position will report directly to the City Manager and will assume certain duties previously assigned to the Grants and Contracts Manager in Community Development. To further support development review and engineering coordination, the City will create a Civil Review Manager position within the Public Works -Engineering Department. This will be a supervisory role responsible for retaining and managing work previously shared between Engineering and the Development Review Program Manager in Community Development. Fiscal Consideration These changes are designed to improve service delivery, clarify role responsibilities, and support interdepartmental collaboration. All position adjustments have been reviewed for budgetary impact and alignment with strategic staffing goals and are reflected in the 2026 budget. City Council Priorities or Budget Objectives Addressed Preamble: The City's top priority will always be fulfilling its core mission, which includes ensuring public safety, maintaining the City's infrastructure, complying with state and federal mandates, and safeguarding the City's finances. #1 -Achieve Financial Sustainability #2 -Secure Sustainable and Reliable Municipal Water Sources #3 -Improve the City's Image and Reputation #4 -Fire Department Service Delivery Model and Third Fire Station #5 - New Police Station COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 83 of 93 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 84 of 93 Memorandum of Agreement by and between the City of Moses Lake and The Washington State Council of County and City Employees Whereas the Washington State Council of County and City Employees (“Union”) has a preexisting collective bargaining agreement with the City of Moses Lake (“City”) with a duration of January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2027 (“CBA”); and Whereas the City would like to improve customer service and coordination of permit processing; and, Whereas the City wishes to create a Permit Coordinator position which will be a lead position within the Community Development Department that assists in the management of the full lifecycle of Planning, Building, Fire and Engineering permit applications; and, Whereas the City wishes to remove two roles that will retain work that was previously done by positions within the bargaining unit; and, Whereas the City wishes to create an Assistant to the City Manager, which will serve as a confidential advisor and analyst to city management on personnel and other matters. This position will be in Administration and report to the City Manager. The role of the Assistant to the City Manager will perform some duties previously under the Grants and Contracts Manager position in the Community development Department, such as: •Manage housing initiatives, including oversight of the Multi-Family Tax Exemption(MFTE) program and coordination with the Grant County Housing Authority tosupport affordable housing development. •Manage and strategically allocate document recording fee revenues and 1406 salestax funds to advance affordable housing goals in alignment with local and state policy objectives. •Oversees human services contracts, if funded by the City. Manage the human services funding application process and distribution of funds, if approved by the City Council. Ensuring compliance, performance monitoring, reporting, and alignment with community needs. •Serve as the primary liaison with the county coalition to coordinate the strategicplanning and equitable distribution of opioid settlement funds. Ensure alignmentwith public health priorities, community needs, and state guidelines to maximize theimpact of funding on prevention, treatment, and recovery initiatives. COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 85 of 93 Whereas the City wishes to create a Civil Review Manager position that will reside in Public Works – Engineering Department. This position will be a supervisory role and will retain prior shared work with the Engineering Department performed by the Development Review Program Manager position in the Community Development Department. Whereas the parties met and bargained in good faith regarding the matter; Therefore, the following agreement was reached. Agreement: The City and Washington State Council of County and City Employees agree to: A.The creation of a Permit Coordinator position within the bargaining unit (job description attached). The Permit Coordinator will be placed at Band K of Appendix A in the current CBA. B.The position of Housing and Grants Manager will sunset and no longer be a bargaining unit position. The position will be removed for Appendix A of the CBA. C.The position of Development Review Program Manager will sunset and no longer be a bargaining unit position. The position will be removed for Appendix A of the CBA. This is the complete agreement of the parties, which supersedes any previous contrary agreement on the subject matter contained herein and does not otherwise alter the collective bargaining agreement between the parties. For WSCCE ____________________________________ _________________________ Jamie Lamb Date ____________________________________ ______________________ Tom Cash Date For the City of Moses Lake ____________________________________ ______________________ Rob Karlinsey, City Manager Date COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 86 of 93 Council Agenda Bill e Subject Bilingual Compensation Policy Department Human Resources Presenter at the Meeting Shannon Springer, Human Resources Director Packet Attachments (if any) COML_AFSCME MOA _ Bilingual Pay Incentive 11.3.25.docx 23.29KB Meeting Date: 11/12/2025 Proceeding Type New Business Proposed Council Action/Motion: Information Only Receive and File Discuss Provide Direction Public Hearing Adopt/ Approve Authorize Other Motion required. Recommended Motion Staff recommends City Council to authorize the City Manager to execute the attached MOA with AFSCME to exp and the bilingual pay incentive. Summary/Background Overview Agenda Item Number: 58114 Moses Lake inconsistently offers incentive pay among public-facing employees across the organization who demonstrate bilingual proficiency. A review of the bilingual pay personnel policies of 16 comparison jurisdictions provided data in how competitive the City is in its current incentive rates and highlights a gap among represented civilian employees. Background The City of Moses Lake consists of both represented and unrepresented staff. Represented staff are members of a union. Within the City, there are three unions: IAFF Local 1258, generally representing non-executive fire and ambulance personnel; Moses Lake Police Guild, generally representing non-executive police personnel; and AFSCME Local 3045, representing the non-executive employees within departments such as Parks & Recreation, Public Works, and Community Development. All other staff are unrepresented and are subject to the city's general personnel policies. Currently, the City of Moses Lake offers a financial incentive to bilingual employees who can demonstrate proficiency by passing a standardized civil service test, and who work in a public-facing role (i.e., only those who would be using another language in the course of their duties would qualify). Represented Fire and Police employees who qualify receive 2% of their base pay. Unrepresented employees who qualify receive $75.00 per month. Represented AFSCME employees are not compensated for bilingual proficiency. At this time, the City has four unrepresented employees who receive $75/mo. The annual cost is $3,600.00. This was approved by the City Council Resolution 3993 in November, 2024. There are 14 PD staff represented by the Police Guild who receive 2% of their base wage. Of the Police staff receiving the 2% incentive, 9 are police officers, 2 are sergeants and 3 are corporals. The annual cost for the Police Department staff is $19,281.60. This is an incentive for the Police Guild in their current collective bargaining agreement. Presently, the Fire Department has language in their current collective bargaining agreement for this stipend, but there are presently no staff receiving the stipend. Findings To determine whether the City's pay structure was comparable to other similar jurisdictions, a review and analysis was conducted of 16 comparison jurisdictions across the state. These jurisdictions were selected based on their similar geographic location (Eastern Washington) or similar populations size. Jurisdictions consisted of the cities of Othello, Ellensburg, Kennewick, Pasco, Richland, Wenatchee, East Wenatchee, Quincy, Ephrata, Spokane Valley, Yakima, Oak Harbor, Port Orchard, Pullman, and Walla Walla, and Grant County. Reriresented Fire Emrilo)'ees Across the comparison jurisdictions, bilingual premium pay for represented fire employees ranged from none to 5% of base salary. The average was 1% of base pay, although it should be noted six jurisdictions do not offer fire services ( often contracting or receiving services from another city or respective county). This is in comparison COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 87 of 93 COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 88 of 93 Memorandum of Agreement by and between the City of Moses Lake and Washington State Council of County and City Employees AFSCME – AFL-CIO Local 3045 Recitations: A. The City of Moses Lake (“City”) and the Washington State Council of County and City Employees AFSCME – AFL-CIO Local 3045 (“AFSCME”) are parties to a current collective bargaining agreement. B. In November 2024, the City adopted Resolution 3993, establishing a bilingual pay incentive for non-represented employees (see attached). C. The City now seeks to extend the bilingual pay incentive established by Resolution 3993 to AFSCME-represented employees who meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the City’s current bilingual pay policy. Therefore, the following agreement was reached. Agreement: A. The City and AFSCME Local hereby agree to extend the bilingual pay incentive, as authorized by Resolution 3993, to represented employees who meet the criteria specified in the attached policy. B. This document constitutes the full and final agreement of the parties regarding the subject matter herein. It supersedes any prior or conflicting understandings and does not modify any other provisions of the existing collective bargaining agreement. For AFSCME ______________________________ __________________ Tom Cash Date COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 89 of 93 ______________________________ __________________ Jamie Lamb Date For the City of Moses Lake _____________________________ ______________________ Rob Karlinsey, City Manager Date COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 90 of 93 Administrative planning document only. Today's Date: All items are tentative and subject to constant change. Nov 12 due dates: PW 10/27, Attorney 10/29, Director 10/31, City Manager 11/3, Final Agenda Noon Wed, 11/5 Standard Public Hearing Notices for November 25 are due Nov 5 end of day. Date/Time Proceeding Subject - 30 Character Limit in LF, abbrev. will be spelled out on agenda Action Presenter*LF Status City of Moses Lake Agenda Forecast - Nov 18 '25 to Jan 29 '26 #/ltr/pg 11/6/2025 Tue, Nov 25 Exec 6 pm Potential Litigation 30 min x PH Continued 2026 Budget Ordinance xxxx Motion Prentice (recur) Consent Western Ave Vacate Ordinance xxxx <motion>V Ramsey start 11-12 ""Grant County Recording Fee Annual Agreement <motion>Murillo (recur) ""Accept Water Reservoir 5 Painting Project <motion>Baltzell done ""Lakemont PDD Amendments <motion>V Ramsey ""Maple Landing PDD Amendments <motion>V Ramsey Old Business 2025 Code Amendments Group 1 Ordinance xxxx Motion V Ramsey New Business Moses Point Development Agreement Ordinance xxxx Motion Kenison ""Paradise Pointe Development Agreement Ordinance xxxx Motion Kenison ""2025 Budget Amendment Ordinance xxxx Motion Prentice ""Water System Plan - First Presentation Discussion Baltzell done ""Mobile Outreach/Transportation Contract Motion Murillo ""4th of July Celebration Fireworks Contract (July 3rd)Motion Coutts Staff pg 3rd Quarter Financial Report (include in packet)Prentice (recur) ""pg Transportation Grant Summary Baltzell ""pg Fleet Division Remaining 2025 Funding Baltzell pend CCO New Business 2025 Budget Amendment Ordinance xxxx Prentice (recur) Tue, Dec 9 Presentation Council Member Madewell Recognition Mayor (recur) 6:30 PM Consent Old Business Water System Plan Motion Baltzell start 10-30 New Business Camping & Shopping Cart Amendment Ordinance xxxx Motion Murillo ""2025 Code Amendments Group 2 - First Presentation Discussion V Ramsey ""North Central Regional Library Building Use Agreement Extension Motion Karlinsey ""2026 Fee Schedule Res xxxx (Includes Water & Sewer Rates)Motion Prentice (recur) ""Council Agenda, Committee, Misc Update MLMC Title 1&2 Ord xxxx Motion Burke COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 91 of 93 Administrative planning document only. Today's Date: All items are tentative and subject to constant change. Nov 12 due dates: PW 10/27, Attorney 10/29, Director 10/31, City Manager 11/3, Final Agenda Noon Wed, 11/5 Standard Public Hearing Notices for November 25 are due Nov 5 end of day. Date/Time Proceeding Subject - 30 Character Limit in LF, abbrev. will be spelled out on agenda Action Presenter*LF Status City of Moses Lake Agenda Forecast - Nov 18 '25 to Jan 29 '26 #/ltr/pg 11/6/2025 2026: Tue, Jan 13 Ceremonial Oaths of Office by Superior Court Judge Anna Gigliotti (recur) 6:30 PM Selection of Mayor & Deputy Mayor (Mayor's Traditional Oath at this meeting or next)Nomination Form (recur) Presentation Reappoint all LTAC and 1 Park Board Members Motionx2 Mayor (recur) Consent Moses Lake 2026 Council Meeting Calendar Motion Karlinsey (recur) Old Business 2025 Code Amendments Group 2 Ordinance xxxx Motion V Ramsey New Business Annual Review of Council Committee Assignments Motion Burke (recur) Tue, Jan 27 Presentation 6:30 PM Consent Old Business New Business . Staff pg Prior year 4th Quarter Financial Report Prentice (recur) Thurs, Jan 29 at 6 pm AGCCT Location tbd AGCCT meets 4x/year - Months with 5 weeks Future Items not assigend a meeting date: 5:30 start Study Session **Stormwater Rate Structure Presentation Baltzell<<formal setup - pres from podium and youtube stream> Study Session Legislator Dinner Meeting Networking: Ybarra, orig set for 6pm 7-15 but Warnick, Dent unable to attend May 2026 Presentation Human Services Funding Recommendations (FIN, CDD, POL, PRCS)Murillo Presentation Irrigation for Private Wells (purple pipe)9-18-24 related to new subdivisions and conflict with wellhead protection Presentation Semi quincentennial Commemoration Proclamation Museum and Tourismlorraine.rolston@wshs.wa.gov Presentation Yonezawa-SR-17 Roundabout Construction Funding - Design Engineer Levi Bisnett Public Hearing Eastlake Dr Vacate Ordinance xxxx Motion V Ramsey Consent Amend STBG Grant for Yonezawa Round-a-bout <motion>Baltzell LR-LB Consent Accept Lakemont Planned Development Deeds <motion>V Ramsey COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 92 of 93 Administrative planning document only. Today's Date: All items are tentative and subject to constant change. Nov 12 due dates: PW 10/27, Attorney 10/29, Director 10/31, City Manager 11/3, Final Agenda Noon Wed, 11/5 Standard Public Hearing Notices for November 25 are due Nov 5 end of day. Date/Time Proceeding Subject - 30 Character Limit in LF, abbrev. will be spelled out on agenda Action Presenter*LF Status City of Moses Lake Agenda Forecast - Nov 18 '25 to Jan 29 '26 #/ltr/pg 11/6/2025 Consent Accept LKQ Improvements <motion>Baltzell Consent Public Works Contract Project Acceptance Authority Res or Ord xxxx <motion>Karlinsey Consent Simplot Rope Rescue Contract <motion>Perillo Old Bus Airport Commission Duties Resolution xxxx Motion Baltzell Old Bus Multi Modal Trails Team and Plan Exhibit D (ref Res 3997 12-10-24) Old Bus Private Property Burn Regulations Ordinance xxxx Motion Perillo Old Bus **Stormwater Rate Structure Ordinance xxxx Motion Baltzell Old Bus WSDOT Administrative Settlement Policy Resolution xxxx Motion Baltzell New Bus/Old Bus Airport Operations Manual Update 1st Pres/MotionBaltzell New Bus/Old Bus Building Permit Recovery Fund Ordinance 1st Pres/MotionV Ramsey New Bus/Old Bus Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket 1st Pres/MotionV Ramsey Feb 2026 New Bus/Old Bus Employee Handbook Update Resolution 1st Pres/MotionSpringer (recur) New Bus/Old Bus Water General Plan Update (Prior to W/S Rate Study)1st Pres/MotionBaltzell New Bus 2025 Community Street and Utility Standards Resolution xxxx Motion Baltzell (recur) New Bus Airport Property Owner Access Agreement (Through the Fence)Motion Baltzell New Bus Federal Lobbyist Agreement (following RFP process)Motion Baltzell New Bus Future Land Use Map Update (fr Study Session 6/11/24)Motion Ramsey (after Plan Comm) July 2026 New Bus Graffiti Regulation First Year Review (as stated in Code) Motion V Ramsey New Bus Grant County Council of Governments Motion Karlinsey 2026 New Bus Mobile Outreach Transportation Quarterly Report (Sleep Center Transition Plan Plus One)(recur) New Bus New Cingular Lease Amendment Motion Baltzell New Bus Shopping Cart Collection Volunteer Group Discussion V Ramsey New Bus Write-off Uncollectible Accounts Authorization Ord or Res Motion Prentice New Bus ML School District Playfield Watering Exemption Ordinance xxxx Motion Baltzell Staff COML Federal Legislative Agenda 2026 Motion Karlinsey (recur) COML Council Packet 11-12-25, Page 93 of 93 11/11/2025 1 CITY OF MOSES LAKE 2026 Proposed Annual Budget Public Hearing November 12, 2025 Timeline November 12: •First Public Hearing for 2026 Annual Budget •Adopt 2026 Property Tax Levy Resolution November 25: •Final Public Hearing for 2026 Annual Budget •Adoption of 2026 Annual Budget 2 1 2 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 94 of 105 11/11/2025 2 Major Highlights •Funds existing municipal services. •Supports and implements City Council’s top priorities •$1.0 million deficit in a $41.0 million General and Street Funds •Meets the City’s reserve policies •Increases reserves in the City’s Rainy-Day Fund •Funds a new Strategic Opportunities fund 3 Total proposed budget All Funds Revenue REVENUES 2025 Budget 2025 Forecast YTD 9/30/2025 2026 Proposed Budget General Fund 39,538,298 40,373,684 39,020,054 Street Fund 3,642,633 3,680,066 1,830,125 Rainy Day Fund 500,000 508,417 287,000 Other Operating Funds 5,985,200 6,558,341 5,709,954 Enterprise Funds 29,149,733 32,504,793 32,237,070 Internal Service Funds 9,618,018 10,292,326 7,534,193 Capital Improvement Funds 17,929,434 12,454,788 28,054,834 Risk Mgmt./EE Benefit 2,637,613 2,656,404 2,174,723 Debt Service Funds 1,450,540 1,450,539 1,452,664 TOTAL REVENUES 110,451,469 110,479,359 118,300,617 - - - PRELIMINARY BUDGET 118,245,315 DIFFERENCE 55,302 4 3 4 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 95 of 105 11/11/2025 3 Total proposed budget Revenue Changes •The revenue changes of $55,302 from the preliminary budget consist mainly of updates in the per capita estimates for cities in the State Shared Revenues programs for: •Liquor Profits •Liquor Excise •Criminal Justice – Population •Criminal Justice – Special Programs •Gas Tax (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax - MVFT) •Multi-Modal Distribution 5 Total proposed budget General Fund & Rainy-Day Fund Revenue 6 New Department/Fund 2023 Actual Revenues 2024 Actual Revenues 2025 Budgeted Revenues Forecasted Revenues @ 9/30/25 2026 Proposed Budget Rev. % Chg. 2026 vs 2025 GENERAL FUND City Council (Legislative)- - - - - 0.0% City Manager (Executive)134 251 109,789 63,388 - -100.0% Finance 1,202,866 1,916,632 1,539,815 2,332,216 1,350,640 -12.3% Community Development 2,089,070 1,908,960 1,390,850 1,400,836 1,192,000 -14.3% Legal 4,402 9,494 4,000 3,972 4,500 12.5% Miscellaneous Services 26,551,165 27,620,344 28,600,249 28,735,119 30,133,359 5.4% Library 43,193 47,792 47,792 47,792 47,792 0.0% Human Resources - 111 125,000 112,913 25,000 -80.0% City Clerk - - - - - 0.0% Engineering 2,762 10,517 206,000 164,154 101,000 -51.0% Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services 1,824,813 1,882,849 1,853,730 1,913,124 1,874,205 1.1% Police 3,308,471 3,459,270 4,306,103 3,795,782 3,353,178 -22.1% Fire 630,330 1,719,406 1,354,970 1,804,390 938,380 -30.7% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 35,657,205 38,575,625 39,538,298 40,373,684 39,020,054 -1.3% General Fund plus Street Fund 37,809,942 41,985,087 43,180,931 44,053,750 40,850,179 -5.4% Rainy Day Fund - - 500,000 508,417 287,000 -42.6% REVENUES 5 6 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 96 of 105 11/11/2025 4 Total proposed budget Other Operating & Enterprise Funds Revenue 7 New Department/Fund 2023 Actual Revenues 2024 Actual Revenues 2025 Budgeted Revenues Forecasted Revenues @ 9/30/25 2026 Proposed Budget Rev. % Chg. 2026 vs 2025 OTHER OPERATING FUNDS Tourism Activities 1,211,790 1,355,616 1,000,000 1,188,663 1,040,000 4.0% Grants & Donations 421,157 501,194 273,126 566,271 304,954 11.7% Local Fiscal Recovery (ARPA)- 1,196,242 - - - 0.0% Strategic Opportunities - - - - - 0.0% Homeless Services 972,957 2,020,844 759,074 577,820 160,000 -78.9% Opioid Abatement 17,062 259,834 25,000 77,058 55,000 120.0% Public Art Program 50,130 42,504 151,000 6,337 100,000 -33.8% Paths & Trails 20,908 89,329 277,000 13,727 - -100.0% Street Operations 2,152,737 3,409,462 3,642,633 3,680,066 1,830,125 -49.8% Transportation Benefit District 2,737,771 3,676,706 3,500,000 4,128,465 4,050,000 15.7% TOTAL OTHER OPERATING FUNDS 7,584,510 12,551,732 9,627,833 10,238,407 7,540,079 -21.7% ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Operations 10,342,980 11,790,239 10,249,332 11,635,994 10,918,000 6.5% Wastewater Operations 6,715,344 7,562,621 7,238,250 8,374,952 8,333,000 15.1% Sanitation 6,522,136 7,326,719 5,688,750 6,367,137 7,055,000 24.0% Stormwater 1,398,532 1,356,858 1,315,500 1,439,376 1,510,000 14.8% Airport 32,168 210,561 77,952 69,847 67,525 -13.4% Ambulance 4,437,488 5,568,858 4,579,949 4,617,487 4,353,545 -4.9% TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 29,448,649 33,815,856 29,149,733 32,504,793 32,237,070 10.6% REVENUES Total proposed budget Internal Service and Capital Imp. Funds Revenue 8 New Department/Fund 2023 Actual Revenues 2024 Actual Revenues 2025 Budgeted Revenues Forecasted Revenues @ 9/30/25 2026 Proposed Budget Rev. % Chg. 2026 vs 2025 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Information Technology Services 2,733,927 2,130,525 2,510,730 2,592,436 2,276,879 -9.3% Equipment Rental 3,499,989 4,279,801 3,643,690 3,892,868 2,415,422 -33.7% Building Maintenance 2,163,873 2,753,188 3,463,598 3,807,023 2,841,892 -17.9% TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 8,397,789 9,163,513 9,618,018 10,292,326 7,534,193 -21.7% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS Street Repair & Reconstruction 3,797,872 3,987,470 12,176,934 5,863,530 17,615,499 44.7% Park Improvement 6,279 95,294 20,000 312,316 100,000 400.0% Community Services Center 565,019 75,656 - - - 0.0% Fire Mitigation Fund 438,575 576,176 357,500 349,414 187,500 -47.6% Water Rights 507,856 161,495 425,000 401,174 525,000 23.5% Water/Well Remediation 2,015,287 116,103 - 578,354 785,700 0.0% Stormwater Construction - - 150,000 150,000 53,125 -64.6% Water Construction 669,996 2,100,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 4,555,700 38.1% Wastewater Construction 2,499,996 2,200,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 4,232,310 182.2% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 10,500,880 9,312,193 17,929,434 12,454,788 28,054,834 56.5% REVENUES 7 8 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 97 of 105 11/11/2025 5 Total proposed budget Risk Mgmt. & Debt Service Funds Revenue 2023 Actual Revenues 2024 Actual Revenues 2025 Budgeted Revenues Forecasted Revenues @ 9/30/25 2026 Proposed Budget Rev. % Chg. 2026 vs 2025 RISK MGMT./EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RSVRS. Unemployment Compensation 91,341 158,518 106,373 120,161 70,483 -33.7% Risk Management 1,548,825 2,236,144 2,471,240 2,421,945 1,999,240 -19.1% Firemen's Relief & Pension 87,595 119,847 60,000 114,297 105,000 75.0% TOTAL RISK MGMT./EMPLEE. BEN. RSVRS. 1,727,761 2,514,510 2,637,613 2,656,404 2,174,723 -17.5% DEBT SERVICE LOCAL Borrowing 21/22 1,008,635 994,573 995,740 995,739 994,664 -0.1% GOB 2016 Refunding Bonds 376,200 380,000 379,000 379,000 381,600 0.7% Water-Sewer 2011 Bond - - - - - 0.0% Water-Sewer 2004 Bond 1,224,000 1,228,500 - - - 0.0% PWTF W/S Debt Service - - - - - 0.0% 2015 GO Bond Redemption 75,408 76,000 75,800 75,800 76,400 0.8% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 2,684,243 2,679,073 1,450,540 1,450,539 1,452,664 0.1% TOTAL CITY BUDGET 96,001,035 108,612,502 110,451,469 110,479,359 118,300,617 7.1% REVENUES 9 Total proposed budget All Funds Expenditures EXPENDITURES 2025 Budget 2025 Forecast YTD 9/30/2025 2026 Proposed Budget General Fund 43,425,727 40,773,502 39,444,960 Street Fund 3,537,769 3,281,211 2,370,545 Rainy Day Fund - - - Other Operating Funds 8,876,129 7,312,671 9,843,923 Enterprise Funds 29,721,094 27,581,202 33,885,105 Internal Service Funds 10,152,142 9,001,213 8,905,000 Capital Improvement Funds 17,500,512 3,972,164 27,371,826 Risk Mgmt./EE Benefit 2,551,240 2,313,430 2,157,976 Debt Service Funds 1,450,540 1,456,273 1,452,614 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 117,215,153 95,691,667 125,431,949 - - - PRELIMINARY BUDGET 127,443,942 DIFFERENCE (2,011,993) 10 9 10 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 98 of 105 11/11/2025 6 Total proposed budget Expenditure Changes •The expenditure reductions of $2,011,993 from the preliminary budget consist of the following: •Capital Expenditure – Water Construction – the preliminary budget included an incorrect amount of capital construction costs. The preliminary budget was reduced by $1,875,585, from $5,446,285 to $3,570,700. •Other Operating Funds were reduced by $105,388 due to reductions in proposed Lodging Tax award amounts ($120k), offset by increases in the Homeless Services budget for the Mobile Outreach and Transportation Services contract ($15k) •General Fund reduction of $46,474 is mainly the result of decreases in employee benefits. Employee medical premium amounts were reduced 0.8% ($42k) over the preliminary budgeted amount, while dental premiums were reduced 1.7% ($6k) over the preliminary budget. 11 Total proposed budget General Fund Expenditures & Fund Balance New Department/Fund BEG. FUND BAL. 2023 Actual Expenditures 2024 Actual Expenditures 2025 Budgeted Expenses Forecasted Expenses @ 9/30/25 2026 Proposed Expenses Exp. % Chg. 2026 vs 2025 01/01/2026 Est. Beg. Fund Bal. 2026 Est. Gain/(Use) of Fund Balance 12/31/2026 Estimated GENERAL FUND City Council (Legislative)155,702 132,782 200,418 186,175 140,688 -29.8% City Manager (Executive)1,035,455 868,897 1,033,551 879,842 847,471 -18.0% Finance 1,092,904 1,671,540 2,160,740 1,882,960 1,893,556 -12.4% Community Development 2,275,110 2,361,493 2,887,057 2,366,811 2,458,972 -14.8% Legal 235,660 286,961 352,840 271,642 332,300 -5.8% Miscellaneous Services 2,394,149 2,445,789 3,255,282 2,971,440 1,349,270 -58.6% Library 61,007 65,156 68,700 64,330 70,815 3.1% Human Resources 575,924 587,519 790,098 771,107 843,009 6.7% City Clerk - - - - 360,270 0.0% Engineering 2,287,147 2,112,942 2,904,757 2,072,287 2,338,093 -19.5% Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services 7,004,219 8,060,461 8,693,898 8,812,575 8,670,133 -0.3% Police 11,920,158 12,656,284 13,297,990 13,136,376 13,058,559 -1.8% Fire 5,737,159 7,202,188 7,780,397 7,357,957 7,081,824 -9.0% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 34,774,595 38,452,012 43,425,727 40,773,502 39,444,960 -9.2% 10,816,948 (424,906) 10,392,042 General Fund plus Street Fund 37,232,182 41,298,036 46,963,496 44,054,713 41,815,505 -11.0% 12,195,252 (965,326) 11,229,926 Rainy Day Fund - - - - - 0.0%508,417 287,000 795,417 EXPENDITURES END. FUND BAL. 12 11 12 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 99 of 105 11/11/2025 7 Total proposed budget Other Operating Expenditures & Fund Balance New Department/Fund BEG. FUND BAL. 2023 Actual Expenditures 2024 Actual Expenditures 2025 Budgeted Expenses Forecasted Expenses @ 9/30/25 2026 Proposed Expenses Exp. % Chg. 2026 vs 2025 01/01/2026 Est. Beg. Fund Bal. 2026 Est. Gain/(Use) of Fund Balance 12/31/2026 Estimated OTHER OPERATING FUNDS Tourism Activities 797,461 905,352 1,039,660 1,002,471 1,369,162 31.7% 2,241,376 (329,162) 1,912,214 Grants & Donations 209,909 538,028 262,500 255,526 750,500 185.9% 1,283,144.66 (445,546) 837,599 Local Fiscal Recovery (ARPA)2,833,414 1,801,710 2,098,014 915,878 1,495,557 -28.7% 1,862,997 (1,495,557) 367,439 Strategic Opportunities - - - - 85,000 0.0%346,787 (85,000) 261,787 Homeless Services 966,542 1,690,208 641,950 459,331 86,000 -86.6%755,653 74,000 829,653 Opioid Abatement - - 6,205 168,356 103,604 1569.7%218,894 (48,604) 170,290 Public Art Program - 487 50,800 371 66,600 31.1%98,113 33,400 131,513 Paths & Trails - 40,000 277,000 10,739 - 0.0%196,627 - 196,627 Street Operations 2,457,586 2,846,025 3,537,769 3,281,211 2,370,545 -33.0% 1,378,303 (540,420) 837,884 Transportation Benefit District 2,175,000 2,922,367 4,500,000 4,500,000 5,887,500 30.8% 2,061,887 (1,837,500) 224,387 TOTAL OTHER OPERATING FUNDS 9,439,912 10,744,177 12,413,899 10,593,882 12,214,468 -1.6% 10,443,781 (4,674,389) 5,769,392 EXPENDITURES END. FUND BAL. 13 Total proposed budget Enterprise & Internal Service Fund Expenditures & Fund Balance BEG. FUND BAL. 2023 Actual Expenditures 2024 Actual Expenditures 2025 Budgeted Expenses Forecasted Expenses @ 9/30/25 2026 Proposed Expenses Exp. % Chg. 2026 vs 2025 01/01/2026 Est. Beg. Fund Bal. 2026 Est. Gain/(Use) of Fund Balance 12/31/2026 Estimated ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Operations 6,648,439 8,409,813 10,241,328 9,307,368 12,149,052 18.6% 10,477,750 (1,231,052) 9,246,698 Wastewater Operations 7,887,402 7,424,121 7,218,941 6,459,981 8,252,731 14.3% 4,818,416 80,269 4,898,685 Sanitation 5,966,940 6,229,573 5,973,390 5,888,151 6,999,549 17.2% 2,921,010 55,451 2,976,461 Stormwater 1,302,619 1,558,738 1,469,518 1,234,613 1,798,813 22.4%814,962 (288,813) 526,149 Airport 72,804 223,016 71,677 53,812 59,437 -17.1%62,091 8,088 70,179 Ambulance 4,356,588 4,351,053 4,746,239 4,637,276 4,625,524 -2.5% 1,628,275 (271,979) 1,356,296 TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 26,234,792 28,196,313 29,721,094 27,581,202 33,885,105 14.0% 20,722,505 (1,648,035) 19,074,469 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Information Technology Services 2,475,258 1,596,478 2,482,581 1,965,863 2,529,565 1.9% 1,870,416 (252,686) 1,617,730 Equipment Rental 4,086,811 3,126,645 3,358,391 3,072,241 3,310,078 -1.4% 3,845,615 (894,656) 2,950,958 Building Maintenance 2,266,646 2,644,522 4,311,170 3,963,109 3,065,356 -28.9% 2,053,448 (223,464) 1,829,984 TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 8,828,714 7,367,645 10,152,142 9,001,213 8,905,000 -12.3% 7,769,479 (1,370,807) 6,398,672 EXPENDITURES END. FUND BAL. 14 13 14 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 100 of 105 11/11/2025 8 Total proposed budget Capital Improvement Funds Expenditures & Fund Balance BEG. FUND BAL. 2023 Actual Expenditures 2024 Actual Expenditures 2025 Budgeted Expenses Forecasted Expenses @ 9/30/25 2026 Proposed Expenses Exp. % Chg. 2026 vs 2025 01/01/2026 Est. Beg. Fund Bal. 2026 Est. Gain/(Use) of Fund Balance 12/31/2026 Estimated CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS Street Repair & Reconstruction 1,273,881 3,180,839 11,750,412 1,410,904 18,034,251 53.5% 8,671,818 (418,752) 8,253,066 Park Improvement - 862,601 70,000 26,375 105,175 50.3%363,441 (5,175) 358,266 Community Services Center 640,675 - - - - 0.0%- - - Fire Mitigation Fund - - - - 40,000 0.0% 1,364,165 147,500 1,511,665 Water Rights 823,192 - 750,000 - 500,000 -33.3% 2,318,010 25,000 2,343,010 Water/Well Remediation 164,697 1,727,010 45,000 290,640 850,000 1788.9%541,501 (64,300) 477,201 Stormwater Construction - - 95,000 19,429 10,000 -89.5%130,571 43,125 173,696 Water Construction 1,960,659 2,355,902 3,618,250 1,314,602 3,570,700 -1.3% 5,015,089 985,000 6,000,089 Wastewater Construction 3,061,421 361,201 1,171,850 910,215 4,261,700 263.7% 2,609,580 (29,390) 2,580,190 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 7,924,525 8,487,552 17,500,512 3,972,164 27,371,826 56.4% 21,014,175 683,008 21,697,183 EXPENDITURES END. FUND BAL. 15 Total proposed budget Risk Mgmt. & Debt Service Expenditures & Fund Balance BEG. FUND BAL. 2023 Actual Expenditures 2024 Actual Expenditures 2025 Budgeted Expenses Forecasted Expenses @ 9/30/25 2026 Proposed Expenses Exp. % Chg. 2026 vs 2025 01/01/2026 Est. Beg. Fund Bal. 2026 Est. Gain/(Use) of Fund Balance 12/31/2026 Estimated RISK MGMT./EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RSVRS. Unemployment Compensation 30,707 50,623 50,000 66,071 75,000 50.0%271,785 (4,517) 267,268 Risk Management 1,818,322 1,962,394 2,471,240 2,228,587 2,062,976 -16.5%568,199 (63,736) 504,464 Firemen's Relief & Pension 22,005 22,224 30,000 18,772 20,000 -33.3%646,463 85,000 731,463 TOTAL RISK MGMT./EMPLEE. BEN. RSVRS. 1,871,035 2,035,241 2,551,240 2,313,430 2,157,976 -15.4% 1,486,447 16,747 1,503,195 DEBT SERVICE LOCAL Borrowing 21/22 1,000,652 994,573 995,740 995,740 994,664 -0.1%984,872 - 984,872 GOB 2016 Refunding Bonds 376,133 379,967 379,000 382,789 381,700 0.7%180,891 (100) 180,791 Water-Sewer 2011 Bond - - - - - 0.0%10,304 - 10,304 Water-Sewer 2004 Bond 1,224,350 1,228,560 - - - 0.0%5,732 - 5,732 PWTF W/S Debt Service - - - - - 0.0%20,196 - 20,196 2015 GO Bond Redemption 75,217 75,983 75,800 77,744 76,250 0.6%7,539 150 7,689 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 2,676,352 2,679,083 1,450,540 1,456,273 1,452,614 0.1% 1,209,535 50 1,209,585 TOTAL CITY BUDGET 91,749,926 97,962,023 117,215,153 95,691,667 125,431,949 7.0% 73,971,287 (7,131,332) 66,839,955 EXPENDITURES END. FUND BAL. 16 15 16 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 101 of 105 11/11/2025 9 CITY OF MOSES LAKE 2026 Regular Property Tax Levy November 12, 2025 Property Tax Levy Annually, the City Council must set the Regular Tax Levy Begin with prior year 2025 levy Allowable increase is lower of 1%* or IPD** 2.44% ++Plus Banked Capacity (if any)+ New Construction / Increment value increase =2026 Proposed Levy * - 1% of highest regular tax which could have been lawfully levied – City of Moses Lake’s highest lawful levy since 1985 is $11,092,156.10 or 1% = $110,921.56 ** IPD – Implicit Price Deflator 18 17 18 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 102 of 105 11/11/2025 10 Property Taxes & Assessed Valuation Proposed tax levy for 2026 (w/out 1% levy limit increase) Proposed tax levy 2026 $10,613,642 3.99% ($406,778) increase over 2025 levy Does not include 1% increase of highest lawful levy 3.99% increase from new construction & increment value only Amount % Increase 2025 Levy 10,206,864$ - 1% increase - 0.0% New Construction 389,926 3.82% Increment Value*16,852 0.17% 2026 Levy 10,613,642$ 3.99% (* - 2025 amount - 2026 amount not yet provided) 19 Property Taxes & Assessed Valuation Proposed tax levy for 2026 (with 1% levy limit increase) Proposed tax levy 2026 $10,724,563 5.07% ($517,700) increase over 2025 levy $110,922 is from the 1% increase $406,778 is from new construction & increment value = 3.99% increase Amount % Increase 2025 Levy 10,206,864$ - 1% increase 110,922 1.09% New Construction 389,926 3.82% Increment Value*16,852 0.17% 2026 Levy 10,724,563$ 5.07% (* - 2025 amount - 2026 amount not yet provided) 20 19 20 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 103 of 105 11/11/2025 11 Tax Effect on Homeowner City of Moses Lake Taxes Only Assume 2025 home value of $300,000 $751 –taxed at 2025 rate of $2.50328/$1,000 AV* Assume 2026 NO CHANGE in value of home at $300,000 (no 1% levy limit increase) $781 –taxed at 2026 rate of $2.60305/$1,000 AV (3.99% levy increase) $30 annual increase over 2025 (new construction & increment value increases only) Assume 2026 NO CHANGE in value of home at $300,000 (with 1% levy limit increase) $789 –taxed at 2026 rate of $2.63025/$1,000 AV (5.07% levy increase) $38 annual increase over 2025 (1%, new construction & increment value increases) (Levy rate based on 2025 assessed valuation. As of 11/10/2025, the 2026 estimated AV has not been provided by the Grant County Assessor. If assessed valuation increases, the levy rate will decrease, resulting in a smaller levy increase.) * AV -Assessed Value 21 Next Steps City Council Direction Staff is requesting City Council direction on the proposed 2026 property tax amount to certify with the Grant County Assessor. Staff is also requesting City Council direction on the property tax amount to be included in the 2026 Final Budget. 22 21 22 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 104 of 105 11/11/2025 12 Madeline Prentice Finance Director mprentice@cityofml.com 509 764 3732 For comments and questions: 23 23 COML 11-12-25 Pkt Add On, Page 105 of 105