Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FINAL 2022 0913 Council Agenda Packet
Moses Lake City Council Don Myers, Deputy Mayor | Deanna Martinez, Council Member | Dustin Swartz, Council Member Mark Fancher, Council Member | David Eck, Council Member| Judy Madewell, Council Member Tuesday, September 13, 2022 Moses Lake Civic Center – 401 S. Balsam or remote access* 5:00 p.m. – Fire Apparatus Viewing – Parking lot behind Civic Center Presentation 6 p.m. – NCW Libraries Report – Amanda Lawson, Facilities Manager, and Kimberly Neher Deputy Director Regular Meeting Agenda Call to Order – 6:30 p.m. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approval of the Agenda Citizen’s Communications** Summary Reports: Mayor’s Report -Appoint Mayor and Deputy Mayor Motion x 2 -Appoint Council Members to Council Committees - Constitution Week Proclamation Additional Business City Manager’s Report -Employee New Hire -Council Vacancy Application Process pg 5 - Fire Survey & Ratings Report -CPI for Fees Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 1 of 43 September 13, 2022, City Council Meeting Page 2 _________________ Consent Agenda Motion All items listed below are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member requests specific items to be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion prior to the time Council votes on the motion to adopt the Consent Agenda. #1 pg 23 a.City Council Meeting Minutes Dated August 23, 2022 and September 6, 2022 b.Claims and Payroll Old Business – None Scheduled New Business #2 Motion pg 38 Northshore Lift Station Project Presented by Richard Law City Engineer Summary: Council to review and consider approval Administrative Reports -Sister City Anniversary Invitation – pg 41 -EPA Superfund Site Update - Mae Valley Transportation Analysis -Leadership Training -State of the Lake Meeting – 9/20 at 6 p.m. -1st and 2nd Quarter Homeless Housing Reports – pg 42 Council Committee Reports Executive Session - Review Performance of a Public Employee Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(g) Adjournment Next Regular Council Meeting is scheduled for September 27, 2022 NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the in-person meeting who require an interpreter or special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, need to contact the City Clerk at (509) 764-3703 or Deputy City Clerk at (509) 764-3713 at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. *Please click the link below to join remote access: First meeting: https://cityofml.zoom.us/j/81573286494 Or iPhone one-tap: US: +12532158782,,91539733610# or +13462487799,,91539733610# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):US: +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 9128 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 Webinar ID: 81573286494. International numbers available: https://cityofml.zoom.us/u/aelROcwuzZ ** Remote Citizen Comment or Public Hearings Remote speaker request forms must be completed by 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 2 of 43 MOSES LAKE COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS (2022) City Manager Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 Position 4 Position 5 Position 6 Position 7 2nd & 4th Tuesday 7:00 p.m.X X X X X X X X 2nd Tuesday at 2:00 p.m.X X X 4th Thursday of every month at Noon X X X 4th Tuesday at 2:00 p.m.X X X X A Set a Date & Time X X X X Varies 2nd Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. 2nd Friday at 12:00 p.m. Thurs. after the 1st Council mtg at 7:00 p.m. 2-3 times per year as needed X As Needed X X Quarterly X Quarterly X X X X X X X X As Needed As Needed X Planning Commission None Required Lodging Tax Advisory Committee ML LEOFF 1 Disability Board Civil Service Commission None Required AGCCT (association of grant county cities and towns) Firemen's Pension Board RCW 41.16.020 Yonezawa Sister City Student Exchange* Council Finance Committee Boards, Councils & Organizations Meets Allison Williams Deanna Martinez Mark Fancher Judy Madewell David Eck VACANT Council Meetings Dustin Swartz Don Myers Council Public Safety Committee None Required None Required Parks, Recreation, & Cultural Services Advisory Board None Required Council Comm. Dev./Municipal Svcs./Parks Committee Council Ad Hoc Homelessness Committee Wellness Committee Municipal Airport Advisory Board *voluntary attendance Updated 8/29/22 Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 3 of 43 MOSES LAKE COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS (2022) City Manager Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 Position 4 Position 5 Position 6 Position 7 3rd Wednesday at 7:00 a.m.X A X 3rd Thursday at 6:30 p.m.X 2nd Wednesday at 6:00 p.m.X 2-3 times per year as needed X 3rd Tuesday at 10:00 a.m.X 2nd & 4th Mondays at 10 am X A As Needed X X X X X David Eck GTA Mark Fancher GCHD ML Watershed Council Grant County Solid Waste Advisory Committee* Dustin Swartz Grant County Mosquito District #1 - Chris Blessing 2021-2022 GCEDC* Port of Moses Lake* Advisory Committee on Housing MLED - Moses Lake Economic Development Coordinating Committee Bridges Int'l Student Exchange VACANTBoards, Councils & Organizations Meets Allison Williams Deanna Martinez Don Myers Judy Madewell *voluntary attendance Updated 8/29/22 Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 4 of 43 P.O. Box 1188 Renton, WA 98057-1188 T: 206-217-9772 www.wsrb.com August 22, 2022 Fire Chief Brett Bastion Moses Lake Fire Department Fire Chief Bastion, Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau (WSRB) has completed its evaluation of the fire protection capabilities of your community as they relate to fire insurance rating. We’re pleased to inform you that the Protection Classification (PC) for City of Moses Lake has improved from PC 5 to PC 4, effective January 1, 2023. The new PC 4 rating will apply to dwelling and commercial properties located within five road miles of a responding fire station and having standard fire hydrant distribution and water supply. Properties in the community not meeting the above requirements will receive a different PC rating. Protection Class ratings for individual dwelling and commercial properties are available free of charge by calling WSRB Customer Service at 206-217-0101 or emailing customerservice@wsrb.com. We recommend residents of your community contact their insurance agents to determine the relative effect this new community PC will have on their insurance premiums. We wish to thank you and your staff for the cooperation during the evaluation. Accompanying this letter, you will find a copy of the new Protection Class Report. This report shows the various items evaluated and points associated with each item. The points total for all items determines the PC of the community. Please note that the WSRB survey was not conducted for property loss prevention or for life safety purposes. Rather, the purpose was to gather information needed to determine a fire insurance relevant Protection Class that may be used to develop fire insurance rates or Loss Costs. Our evaluation criteria incorporate many nationally recognized standards, such as those developed by NFPA, ICC and AWWA, and have been filed with and approved by the Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner. If you have any questions, please let us know. Sincerely, Daryl Girnus Fire Protection Analyst 206-273-7148 daryl.girnus@wsrb.com Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 5 of 43 Report Date: January 1, 2023 Protection Classification Report for: Moses Lake Copyright © 2022 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 6 of 43 WSRB: Who we are and what we do Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau (WSRB) is an independent, non-profit public service organization that has been serving Washington state since 1911. We produce data that helps insurance companies accurately evaluate risk and insurance consumers feel confident their fire premiums are set using objective data. One of the services WSRB provides is determining the Protection Class of communities and the Protection Class of individual properties in those communities. Insurance companies use Protection Class as one input when determining fire insurance premiums for properties. How we determine Protection Classes for communities and individual properties WSRB determines the Protection Class of cities and fire protection districts by evaluating their fire protection/suppression capabilities using a schedule approved by the Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner, called the WSRB Community Protection Class Grading Schedule. As a result of this evaluation the communities are assigned a Protection Class of 1 through 10, where 1 indicates exemplary fire protection capabilities, and 10 indicates the capabilities, if any, are insufficient for insurance rating credit. Additional criteria are then applied to determine the Protection Class for the individual properties in the community. We explain this process in more detail later. WSRB evaluates communities in four major areas: Water Supply:WSRB evaluates the capacity, distribution and maintenance of water systems and fire hydrants. Fire Department: WSRB evaluates the fire department, including fire stations, apparatus, equipment, personnel and their training. Emergency Communications: WSRB evaluates the emergency communication system used to dispatch the fire department. Fire Safety Control: WSRB evaluates the fire code enforcement and fire safety education activities in the community. 1 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 7 of 43 The Protection Class evaluation process recognizes the efforts of communities to provide fire- protection services for citizens and property owners. Insurance companies generally offer lower premiums in communities with better protection, creating an incentive for communities to improve and maintain fire protection. Water Supply 35% Fire Department 40% Emergency Communications9% Fire Safety Control16% Relative Values These four areas are evaluated and scored independently of each other. The scores are then combined in a final calculation to determine the Protection Class for the community. The following pages provide a summary of all the items evaluated,the percentage of credit attained for each item and the final calculation to determine the Protection Class for the community. The WSRB Community Protection Class Grading Schedule measures the fire protection capabilities of a community by means of a point system or, for communities without a recognized water supply, by comparison to minimum criteria. Under the point system, pertinent items are evaluated against the standards set forth in the schedule and items are scored, depending on the importance of the item and the degree of deviation from the standard. The four major areas considered under the point system, as well as the relative value allocated to each, are shown below. 2 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 8 of 43 The chart below shows the number of communities in each Protection Class across Washington state. QUESTIONS? For questions about how the Protection Class for the community was developed or for recommendations on how to improve the Protection Class for the community, please contact the WSRB Fire Protection Analyst that conducted the evaluation. Their contact information is located on the results letter that accompanied this report or contact WSRB at 206 -217-9772 or email us at publicprotection@wsrb.com 0 16 70 89 130 129 111 79 26 14 0 50 100 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Washington State Communities by Protection Class For questions on the Protection Class for individual properties in your community, please contact WSRB Customer Service at 206-217-0101. If the fire department or community officials are receiving Protection Class inquiries from insurance professionals or citizens of the community, feel free to refer these inquiries to WSRB Customer Service. The Protection Class produced by WSRB’s evaluation is the overall Protection Class for the community, not the Protection Class for all the properties located in the community Buildings and property located within the community are eligible for the Protection Class of the community, but no better, if they meet the distance-to-fire-station and applicable fire hydrant requirements. If these requirements are not met, the building will receive a different Protection Class than the Protection Class of the community. 3 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 9 of 43 Water Supply Fire Department Emergency Communication Fire Safety Control 73%48%70%72% 35%40%9%16% 3 6 3 3 6.26 0.08 3.82 (Unrounded Score) 4 Protection Class Unrounded Score Protection Class Unrounded Score 1 0.0 to 1.00 6 5.01 to 6.00 2 1.01 to 2.00 7 6.01 to 7.00 3 2.01 to 3.00 8 7.01 to 8.00 4 3.01 to 4.00 9 8.01 to 9.00 5 4.01 to 5.00 10 9.01 to 10.00 Community Protection Class (PC) Percent of Credit Relative Value of Area in Evaluation Relative Class of Evaluation Area FINAL CALCULATION Community Protection Class = Total Credit (sum of each area credit X relative value) Divergence Score Community PC = (10-Total Credit)+Divergence Score Evaluation Areas 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Water Supply Fire Department Emergency Communications Fire Safety Control Percent of Credit for each Evaluation Area Percent Credit Possible Remaining Credit 4 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 10 of 43 FINAL CALCULATION Water Supply 73% Fire Department 48% Emergency Communications 70% Fire Safety Control 72% Divergence Score 0.08 Community Protection Class (PC)Class:4 Evaluation Area Scores: The water supplies in the community providing fire hydrants are evaluated in this section. In communities with multiple water supplies, the water supplies are prorated by their size (number of fire hydrants). Water Supply Items 1 through 4 make up the total score for this section. The fire department servicing the community is evaluated in this section. The total service area of the fire department including incorporated and unincorporated area is considered. Fire Department Items 1 through 17 make up the total score for this section. Percent of Credit The Emergency Communication Center responsible for dispatching the fire department servicing the community is evaluated. This evaluation applies to all communities the communication center dispatches fire services to. Emergency Communication Items 1 through 3 make up the total score for this section. Fire Safety Control or fire prevention activities provided in the community are evaluated in this section. These activities may be provided by local, county or state authorities, all of which will be included in the evaluation. Fire Safety Control Items 1 through 4 make up the total score for this section. Excessive difference between the class of the Water Supply and the class of the Fire Department prevents the more effective feature from being utilized to its full relative value. Divergence between Water Supply and Fire Department of two classes or more shall be applied to the final score of the community. The Protection Class produced by this schedule is the overall class of the community, not the classification of all properties located in the community. Distance to fire station and fire hydrant criteria along with the other rules of the applicable Protection Class manual must be applied to the community Protection Class to determine the Protection Class of an individual property located within the community. 5 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 11 of 43 WATER SUPPLY 1. Adequacy of Water Supply 92% 2. Hydrants - Size, Type and Installation 100% 3. Hydrants - Inspection and Condition 63% 4a. Arrangement and Operation 66% 4b. Maintenance 28% Hydrants shall conform to American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standards for dry-barrel hydrants. Standard hydrants must have a minimum of one pumper outlet and two 2.5-inch outlets and be connected to at least a 6-inch water main. Hydrants should also have a quick-connect fitting on the pumper port. Hydrants must be inspected annually, including operating the hydrant with a flow or pressure check. Flow tests of hydrants must be conducted at least every five years. Fire hydrants shall be marked for available water flow, free of obstructions and kept in good condition. This item evaluates the frequency of visits to and inspections of water system components other than hydrants. Regular visits and inspections allow for timely maintenance and repair of components. Water system components including wells, pumps, water tanks and reservoirs, pressure-regulating, altitude, float control and isolation valves shall be regularly inspected. This item evaluates the water system's ability to deliver the required fire flow for properties in the community. The score for this item is determined by comparing the required fire flow for a building to the available fire flow. A building's required fire flow is calculated as indicated in the WSRB Community Protection Class Schedule using type of construction, square footage, occupancy, external exposure and whether the building is equipped with an automatic sprinkler system. Available fire flow is measured using hydrant flow tests and the capacity of the water system storage, pumps, filters and mains. Percent of Credit 4. Arrangement, Operation and Maintenance of Water System Components Arrangement of the water system components evaluates the location and number of water sources and water storage units. Multiple water sources and water storage locations provide redundancy in order to reduce the impact of failure of one part of the system. Operation considers how the system is monitored and controlled (telemetry), how water is delivered (pumps or gravity) and if backup power is provided for pumps. The water system shall be managed by a state-certified operator. 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% 1. Adequacy of Water Supply 2. Hydrants Size, Type and Installation 3. Hydrants Inspection and Condition 4a. Arrangement and Operation 4b. Maintenance Water Supply Items Percent of Credit Percent Credit Possible Remaining Credit 6 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 12 of 43 Fire Department 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% 1a. Pumpers in Service 1b. Reserve Pumpers 2a. Ladder Trucks in Service 2b. Reserve Ladder Trucks 2c. Ground Ladder Service 3. Distribution of Companies 4a. Pumper Capacity 4b. Reserve Pumper Capacity 5a. Preventative Maintenance 5b. Age of Apparatus 6a. Chief Officers 6b. Company Officers 7. Department Staffing 8. Engine and Ladder Company Unit Staffing 9. Stream Devices 10. Equipment for Pumpers and Ladder Trucks 11a. Total Amount of Supply Hose 11b. Total Amount of Attack Hose 11c. Total Amount of Pre-Connected Hose 12a. Hose Testing 12b. Hose Washing, Drying and Storage Facilities 13a. Supervision 13b. Company Training 13c. Training Center Training 13d. Officer Training 13e. Driver Training 13f. Recruit Training 13g. Pre-Fire Planning 14a. Commercial Districts 14b. Residential Districts 14c. Multiple Alarms 14d. Cover Plan 15. Fire Operations 16a. Fireboats in Service 16b. Other Needed Special Protection 17a. Fire Stations 17b. Fuel 17c. Delays in Response Fire Department Items Percent of Credit Percent Credit Possible Remaining Credit 7 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 13 of 43 Fire Department 1. Pumpers 1a. Pumpers in Service 55% 1b. Reserve Pumpers 55% 2. Ladder Trucks/Ladder Service 2a. Ladder Trucks in Service 100% 2b. Reserve Ladder Trucks 100% 2c. Ground Ladder Service 96% 3. Distribution of Companies 62% 4. Pumper Capacity 4a. Pumper Capacity 97% 4b. Reserve Pumper Capacity 80% The number of pumpers in service and regularly responding to incidents must be sufficient to properly protect the community. The number of pumpers required is determined by evaluating the number currently in service, the fire flow requirements for the community, response of engines outside the community and frequency of incidents. The required number of pumpers is compared to the number of pumpers in service. Pumper-ladder trucks will be credited under this item. Automatic aid will be considered in this item. Adequate pumper capacity must be provided on the first alarm to meet or exceed the basic fire flow of the community. All fire pumps must be tested annually to receive full credit. Automatic aid will be considered in this item. Percent of Credit The total pumper capacity, including reserve pumpers, with one for each eight required pumpers (but no fewer than one) and including the largest out of service, must be sufficient to maintain the total pumper capacity required. To maintain the required number of pumpers in service, one reserve pumper is required for every eight pumpers required to be in service, but no fewer than one. Reserve pumpers shall be fully equipped, tested and maintained for service. The number of ladder trucks in service and regularly responding to incidents must be sufficient to properly protect the community. A ladder truck is required when a community has at least five buildings with a required fire flow of 4,000 gallons per minute (gpm) or greater and/or three stories (35 feet) in height. The required number of ladders is compared to the number of ladders in service. Pumper-ladder trucks will be credited under this item. Automatic aid will be considered in this item. The height and type of ladder truck will also be evaluated in this item. To maintain the required number of ladder trucks in service, one reserve ladder truck is required for every five ladder trucks required to be in service, but no fewer than one. Reserve ladders shall be fully equipped, tested and maintained for service. Sufficient ground ladders to reach the roofs of buildings must be carried on apparatus. The number, type, height and testing of ground ladders will be evaluated in this item. Engine and ladder companies must be distributed to provide effective protection to the community. Structures should be within 1.5 road miles of a first-alarm engine company and 2.5 miles of a ladder company. As an alternative to using the above road-mile analysis, the results of a performance evaluation may be used. This type of evaluation would analyze computer-aided dispatch records of fire incidents to determine the percentage of time an initial engine company arrives within 320 seconds and an initial ladder company arrives within 480 seconds. Pumper-ladders and automatic aid will be considered in this item. 8 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 14 of 43 Fire Department (Cont.) 5. Maintenance and Condition of Apparatus 5a. Preventative Maintenance 57% 5b. Age of Apparatus 97% 6. Number of Officers 6a. Chief Officers 100% 6b. Company Officers 44% 7. Department Staffing 33% 8. Engine and Ladder Company Unit Staffing 88% 9. Stream Devices 82% A suitable preventive maintenance program must be in effect. This item evaluates how often apparatus are checked, inspected and who conducts the inspection. The testing frequency of pumps, aerial ladders, foam systems, Compressed Air Foam Systems (CAFS), breathing air systems, apparatus road test and weight verification are also evaluated. The number of pumpers, ladders and support vehicles older than 15 years, older than 25 years and the number of reserve apparatus will be considered in determining condition of apparatus. A chief officer in charge of the department must be on duty at all times but need not sleep at a fire station to be considered on duty, provided there are adequate means for notification and response to incidents. Departments with more than eight companies, in addition to the chief and assistant chief, must have sufficient battalion or district chiefs to provide one on duty in a fire station at all times for each eight companies required. Two active volunteer officers may be considered equivalent to one full on-duty officer, up to half the number of officers required. There must be sufficient company officers to provide one on duty at all times with each required engine or ladder company. Two active volunteer officers may be considered equivalent to one full on-duty officer, up to half the number of officers required. Percent of Credit There must be six firefighters on duty for each of the required engine and ladder companies. Only personnel who participate in actual structural firefighting operations will be credited. Personnel staffing ambulances or other units serving the general public may be credited depending on the extent to which they are available for firefighting duties. Three call and/or volunteer firefighters will be considered equivalent to one on-duty firefighter. Call or volunteer firefighters may not exceed half the required staffing of required companies. If adequate records of response are not kept, credit may be limited to one on-duty for each six call or volunteer firefighters. Call or volunteer firefighters working defined shifts at fire stations may be considered equivalent to on-duty firefighters. Response of firefighters on automatic aid apparatus will also be considered in this item. Unit staffing for engine and ladder companies only considers companies with apparatus in service credited in Items 1 and 2. The amount by which the required six on-duty firefighters per company exceeds the on- duty strength (as determined in Item 7), divided by the number of in-service companies, equals the average member deficiency per company. Turrets, nozzles, foam equipment and, where required, elevated stream devices must be provided. This item evaluates the required stream devices to the devices provided. Credit will be limited if annual testing is not conducted and maintenance records are not provided. 9 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 15 of 43 Fire Department (Cont.) 10. Equipment for Pumpers and Ladder Trucks 92% 11. Hose 11a. Total Amount of Supply Hose 98% 11b. Total Amount of Attack Hose 80% 11c. Total Amount of Pre-Connected Hose 100% 12. Condition of Hose 12a. Hose Testing 100% 12b. Hose Washing, Drying and Storage Facilities 100% 13. Training 13a. Supervision 100% 13b. Company Training 40% 13c. Training Center Training 25% 13d. Officer Training 20% The requirement for pre-connected, 1.5-inch+ hose on each pumping apparatus is 300 feet. All hose, in service and reserve, must be maintained in good condition and tested annually in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1962: Standard for the Care, Use, Inspection, Service Testing and Replacement of Fire Hose, Couplings, Nozzles and Fire Hose Appliances. Suitable facilities and procedures must be provided for washing, drying and storing hose. This is to prevent mildew in the hose jackets and rust/corrosion in apparatus hose compartments. Training must be under the guidance of a qualified training officer. Maximum credit is achieved when the training officer has at least 10 years of direct incident command experience and certification as a Fire Instructor II. Personnel in charge of training sessions must be certified as fire instructors. Firefighters are required to have a minimum of 20 hours of structural firefighting training per firefighter per month. This amount can be reduced by 25%, to 15 hours, for firefighters that are certified Firefighter I and by 50%, to 10 hours, for firefighters that are certified Firefighter II. Training should include topics outlined in NFPA 1001: Standard for Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications. This item evaluates the quantity of training at a training center and the features of the training center. A minimum of six half-day (three hour) drills per year, including two drills at night and two multiple-company drills, shall be provided for all firefighters. Training centers shall be provided with a drill tower that is three stories in height, a structure to support live fire simulation, including a smoke room, training aids and props and an area of at least two acres and equipped with fire hydrants. This item will consider equipment for existing pumpers and ladder trucks, except for such equipment considered in Items 2c (ground ladders), 9 (stream devices) and 11 (hose). Credit for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) will be limited if inspection and testing is not conducted and maintenance records are not provided. This Item considers whether adequate hose is carried on each pumper and whether adequate reserve hose is provided. The requirement for large-diameter hose (3.5 inches or larger) for each pumping apparatus is 800 feet on the apparatus and 400 feet in reserve for every three pumpers in service. The requirement for 2.5-inch+ hose is 600 feet on the apparatus and 300 feet in reserve for every three pumpers in service. The requirement for 1.5-inch+ hose on each pumping apparatus is 400 feet with 300 feet in reserve for every three pumpers in service. Percent of Credit A minimum of two days per year (16 hours) is required for all officers. This amount can be reduced by 25%, to 12 hours, for officers that are certified Fire Officer I and by 50%, to 8 hours, for officers that are certified Fire Officer II. Officer training should include topics outlined in NFPA 1021: Standard for Fire Officer Professional Qualifications that focus on leadership, fire tactics and incident command. 10 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 16 of 43 Fire Department (Cont.) 13e. Driver Training 80% 13f. Recruit Training 100% 13g. Pre-Fire Planning 0% 14. Response to Alarms 14a. Commercial Districts 35% 14b. Residential Districts 80% 14c. Multiple Alarms 90% 14d. Cover Plan 30% 15. Fire Operations 48% Adequate response to residential fires must be established. At least one chief officer, two engine companies and adequate ladder equipment are required to respond to residential districts. Engine and ladder company response to each additional alarm for the same fire should be the same as the number of engine and ladder companies required for the first alarm. Response areas in the community must have a cover plan for when the first-due companies are out of service. Consideration will be given to the ability of the department to operate effectively at fires. Effectiveness is primarily depends on staffing and training; however, others factors can also affect fire operations. Percentage for this item will be determined by taking the average of the percentages from Items 3, 7, 8 and 13 and adjusting as conditions warrant. As an alternative to using the above analysis, the results for a performance evaluation may be used. A performance evaluation would analyze computer-aided dispatch records of fire incidents to determine the percentage of time an initial full alarm assignment arrives at a fire incident within 560 seconds (690 seconds for a high-rise building). Personnel shall participate in a minimum of one day (eight hours) of driver training per year. Training should include topics outlined in NFPA 1002: Standard for Fire Apparatus Driver/Operator Professional Qualifications. Current state-approved Emergency Vehicle Incident Prevention (EVIP) certification can serve in lieu of annual training. New fire department members shall receive a minimum of 240 hours of recruit training before becoming active firefighters. Training should include topics outlined in NFPA 1001: Standard for Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications. An annual update is required of pre-fire plans for all commercial or similar buildings. Pre-fire information shall be readily available on responding apparatus. Pre-fire plans should be in accordance with NFPA 1620: Recommended Practice for Pre-Incident Planning. Adequate response to commercial fires must be established. At least one chief officer and the required number of engines and ladder trucks or ladder service companies based on the community basic fire flow are required to respond. Percent of Credit 11 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 17 of 43 Fire Department (Cont.) 16. Special Protection 16a. Fireboats in Service 100% 16b. Other Needed Special Protection 93% 17. Fire Stations and Community Conditions 17a Fire Stations 83% 17b. Fuel 100% 17c. Delays in Response 84% A suitably staffed, equipped and maintained fireboat will be required where at least one mile of wharf frontage necessitates firefighting operations from the water side. Such frontage must be within 1.5 miles of a fireboat. Conditions in the community that require special fire department protection in addition to that covered elsewhere in this schedule will be considered in this item. Conditions considered include but are not limited to: waterfront properties needing some special protection but not requiring a conventional fireboat, wildland urban interface areas, extensive bulk oil and other hazardous storage. Percent of Credit This item considers the suitability of fire stations, including construction, communication equipment and the presence of a secondary power source. Communication equipment should be provided at fire stations and include two-way radios, spare portable radios and means for public reporting to the dispatch center. Firefighters must have two separate means for receiving alarms from the communication center that are under the control of the communications center. At least one means must be supervised. If fire stations are not staffed with on-duty personnel, firefighters must be equipped with the means to receive dispatching calls. Fuel must be available at all times and in sufficient quantities. Suitable arrangements must be made for delivery of fuel to apparatus at fires of long duration. The possibility of delays due to poor condition of roads, including snow and ice, steep grades, vehicle parking, traffic, railroad crossings and similar features are considered in this item. 12 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 18 of 43 1. Communication Center 1a. Building Construction 90% 1b. Fire Protection 80% 1c. Security 50% 1d. Emergency Lighting 100% 2. Communications Center Equipment 2a. Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Telephone Equipment 81% Communication centers must be provided with emergency lighting that will be placed in service immediately after a power loss so operations can continue uninterrupted. Features and capabilities of the Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) system and telephone equipment are evaluated. Maximum credit is achieved when the following features are provided: enhanced 911, wireless and VoIP capabilities, redundant backup system with automatic switchover to backup, ability to transmit caller information to fire departments and other communication centers, ability to select and recommend units to be dispatched, automatic vehicle locating, geographic information system (GIS) capabilities and management information system. This item evaluates the building where the communication center is located. Communication centers should be in fire-resistive, separate buildings without internal or external exposures. This item evaluates the adequacy of fire protection provided for the communication center, including portable fire extinguishers, fire alarms, automatic sprinkler systems and suppression systems in computer and data-processing equipment rooms. Percent of Credit Emergency Communications Communication center security is meant to protect against vandalism, terrorism and civil disturbances. Access controls, door and window security and any vulnerabilities of the area surrounding the center are considered. 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% 1a. Building Construction 1b. Fire Protection 1c. Security 1d. Emergency Lighting 2a. CAD & Telephone Equipment 2b. Recording 2c. Telephone Service 2d. Supervision 2e. Dispatch Circuits 2f. Emergency Power 3a. Training 3b. Number of Telecommunicators on Duty Emergency Communications Items Percent of Credit Percent Credit Possible Remaining Credit 13 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 19 of 43 Emergency Communications (Cont.) 2b. Recording 100% 2c. Telephone Service 83% 2d. Supervision 0% 2e. Dispatch Circuits 0% 2f. Emergency Power 100% 3. Telecommunicators 3a. Training 100% 3b. Number of Telecommunicators on Duty 61% All incoming and outgoing voice transmissions shall be recorded, including the date and time. All telecommunicators should have access to immediate playback of recordings. The number of required telephone lines for emergency and business calls is determined by the population served by the communication center. Additional lines may be required if emergency calls other than fire are received or if central station alarms are received. One outgoing-only line must also be provided. All components of the primary dispatch circuit shall be monitored for integrity, including transmitters, repeaters and primary and secondary power. Fault conditions detected shall actuate an audible and visual trouble signal to the telecommunicators on duty. Percent of Credit The communication center must have separate primary and secondary circuits for dispatching. Maximum credit is obtained when dual circuits are provided, primary circuit is supervised, there is automatic switchover to a secondary circuit and all components of the system are owned by the communication center. The Communication Center shall be provided with an emergency power source. An uninterruptible power supply (UPS) shall be provided along with an automatically starting generator. The generator shall have a 72- hour fuel supply and be tested on a weekly basis. A minimum of 480 hours of initial training is required for telecommunicators. General dispatch training and fire dispatch training should be a minimum of 240 hours each. Non-certified telecommunicators should receive 40 hours of continuing education per year. Certified Telecommunicator I personnel and certified Telecommunicator II personnel shall receive 30 hours and 24 hours of continuing education, respectively. The number of required telecommunicators on duty is based on the total number of calls received per year at the communication center. If the communication center is meeting the call-answering and dispatching times set forth by NFPA 1221: Standard for the Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Emergency Services Communications Systems, then full credit will be applied in this item. 14 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 20 of 43 1. Fire Code Enforcement 1a. Fire Marshal 90% 1b. Fire Plan Review 90% 1c. Fire Code Inspections 96% 1d. Fire Code Inspections of Existing Occupancies 68% 1e. Confidence Testing of Fire Protection Systems 100% FIRE SAFETY CONTROL Review of plans for fire code compliance must be done by experienced, certified personnel. The plan reviewer shall have five or more years of plan review experience, be a registered design professional and receive at least 16 hours of plan-review-related continuing education per year. The plan review department needs to have adequate staffing to ensure comprehensive plan reviews. New and renovated occupancies must be inspected prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy. Fire inspectors shall be certified with five or more years of experience in inspections and receive at least 16 hours of fire-inspection-related continuing education per year. Adequate department staffing levels must be maintained to ensure comprehensive inspections. Fire Code Inspections of existing occupancies shall be conducted. The frequency of inspections will be evaluated using Table 7 in the WSRB Community Protection Class Grading Schedule. Fire code inspectors should be certified with five or more years of experience and receive at least 16 hours of fire-inspection- related continuing education per year. Staffing levels must be sufficient to ensure comprehensive inspections. Fire protection systems must be inspected and tested in accordance with the applicable NFPA standards. A program shall be in place to ensure these inspections are done, monitor the inspections' results and ensure deficiencies found with the systems are corrected. The fire marshal shall oversee fire code enforcement. The fire marshal shall have 10 or more years of code enforcement experience, be certified as a fire marshal and receive at least 16 hours of fire-code-related continuing education per year. Percent of Credit 15 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 21 of 43 2a. Children's Programs 29% 2b. Adult Programs 48% 67% Commercial Class:4 Dwelling Class:4 70% FIRE SAFETY CONTROL (Cont.) Fire investigations must be done to determine the cause and origin of all fires. Fire investigator shall have five or more years of experience, be a commissioned law officer, be certified as a fire investigator and receive at least 16 hours of fire-investigation-related continuing education per year. In addition, sufficient staff levels are required to ensure adequate response to fires, and all fires should be reported to National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). 4. Building Code Enforcement Current building codes must be adopted and effectively enforced. The community is evaluated on the administration of codes, plan review and field inspection activities in relation to building code enforcement. The score for this item is based on the Building Code Classifications developed by WSRB for the community. The classifications for commercial and dwelling properties in the community are shown above. 2. Public Fire Education Fire safety education must be provided to the general public. Fire educators should be Certified Public Educator, have five or more years of experience, and receive at least 16 hours of public-education-related continuing education per year. All education programs and events should be documented and should include date, instructor, topics taught, length of class and number of attendees. Children's programs should include age-appropriate subjects for all students, preschool to 12th grade. Adult education should include programs for all segments of the adult population in the community. 3. Fire Investigations Percent of Credit 16 Copyright © 2021 Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau - All Rights Reserved Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 22 of 43 MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL August 23, 2022 STUDY SESSION Grant County Trends in 2022 Dr. Patrick Jones from the Eastern Washington University’s Institute for Public Policy & Economic Analysis reviewed online data at www.grantcountytrends.org. The site contains over 60 categories of data compared at national, state, county, and city levels. Dr. Jones emphasized on the City’s great graduation rates, unprecedented sales tax income, decreased water consumption since initiation of water conservation, and unfortunate increase in crime that is an impact from recent state legislation. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Moses Lake City Council was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Hankins with audio remote access. Special notice for remote attendance and citizen comment were posted on the meeting agenda. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Hankins, Deputy Mayor Myers; Council Members Martinez, Fancher, Madewell, and Swartz. Absent: Council Member Eck. Action taken: Mayor Hankins moved to excuse Council Member Eck, second by Council Member Fancher. The motion carried 6– 0. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Former Mayor David Curnel led the Flag Salute. AGENDA APPROVAL Action taken: Council Member Swartz moved to approve the Agenda as presented, second by Council Member Fancher. The motion carried 6 – 0. PRESENTATIONS LTAC Recipient Presentations Recipients of the Lodging Tax funding gave brief presentations on their events and how the funding was used. Those that presented were: Visit WA (Moses Lake Airshow), BMX Group, Brews n Tunes/Sip n Stroll, Columbia Basin Community Concert Association, Columbia Basin Allied Arts, City of Moses Lake Tourism, Columbia Basin Cancer Foundation, Grant County Fairgrounds and The Sand Scorpions. Advisory Council on Housing Chair David Curnel gave an update of the Advisory Council on Housing. The report was provided in the meeting packet. SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR’S REPORT Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 23 of 43 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES – August 23, 2022 pg. 2 Tai Shin Events and Donation Resolution 3913 Mayor Hankins thanked all staff and citizens involved in facilitating the groups visit. They volunteered their time to paint picnic tables for the City and taking care of trash at the fairgrounds for the County during fair week. The Tai Shin Group donated $1,000 to the City and the Tsubaki family donated $3,000. The program has been administered in the past by former Mayor Rimple’s family and will be led by the West Family in the future. Action taken: Council Member Swartz moved to adopt Resolution 3913, as presented, second by Council Member Martinez. The motion carried 6 – 0. Childhood Cancer Month Proclamation Council Member Martinez read the proclamation declaring September as Childhood Cancer Month. Columbia Basin Cancer Foundation (CBCF) spoke to childhood cancer locally. CBCF has 208 clients and of those, there are five under ten years of age. They will break ground for their new radiation treatment facility later this month with Confluence Health. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT New Hires Chief Fuhr introduced and administered the oath of office to Police Officer Darrik Gregg. CLOSED HEARINGS The City Clerk read the procedures, asked conflict of interest questions to Council and all Council Member participated in the proceedings. #1 Pure Country Harvest Non-Conforming Use Expansion Staff provided an overview of the procedural actions taken and the request before Council: On August 1, 2022, the Hearings Examiner rendered a decision of approval for the Pure Country Harvest Non-Conforming Use Expansion. The Recommended Findings of Fact, Recommended Conclusions of Law, Recommended Conditions of Approval and Recommended Decision allow the specific addition and remodel identified within the recommendation on property located at 2721 W Peninsula Dr, Moses Lake, Washington, 98837 and identified as Assessor’s Parcel No. 090304000. Mayor Hankins opened the hearing at 7:35 p.m. Applicant/owner/facility manager Turrel Smith shared the improvements made for odor and sewer issues in response to complaints from neighbors and responded to Council Member questions. There being no other comments, the hearing was closed. Action taken: Council Member Fancher moved to approve the Hearing Examiner Recommended Findings of Face, Recommended Conclusions of Law, Recommendation Conditions of Approval and Recommended Decision for the Pure Country Harvest Non-Conforming Use Expansion (PLN 2022-0042) except for the bond and continued monitoring of the new chemical to help the odor with the sewer treatment, allowing the specific addition remodel identified within the recommendation on property located at 2721 W Peninsula Dr, Moses Lake, WA 98837 and identified as Assessor’s Parcel No. 090304000, second by Council Member Swartz. The motion carried 6 – 0. Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 24 of 43 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES – August 23, 2022 pg. 3 CONSENT AGENDA #2 a. City Council meeting minutes dated August 9, 2022 b. Claim ACH 184-186 in the amount of $661,934.16; Claim Checks 157327 – 157481 in the amount of $2,268,844.73; Payroll Checks 64595 through 64643 in the amount of $30,455.20; and Electronic Payments in the amount of $580,239.29. c. Perteet Municipal Services Director Amendment d. Sabedra Deferral Request Covenant e. Accept Lauzier Infield Project f. Police Services Extra Duty Contract Action taken: Council Member Martinez moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, second by Mayor Hankins. The motion carried 6 – 0. NEW BUSINESS #3 Favored Farmhouse Variance Request A request for a deviation pursuant to MLMC 12.10.020 involving driveway set back and separation was submitted to Council. City Attorney Katherine Kenison reviewed the rules of procedure applicable to quasi-judicial land use decisions and clarified that the Conditional Use Permit application for the drive through window was a different land use permit process. Citizens Rebecca Johnson, Peter Josef Steffens, and Owner Derek Martinez spoke in favor of the request for the driveway set back and separation deviation. Mayor Hankins, Deputy Mayor Myers, and Council Member Madewell dislcosed ex parte contacts with the applicants and recused themselves based on appearance of fairness. Council Member Martinez also disclosed multiple ex parte conversations with the owners/applicants and recused herself. Due to a lack of remaining quorum, Mayor Hankins, Deputy Mayor Myers, and Council Member Madewell elected to participate in the vote. Action taken: Council Member Swartz moved to approve the request for deviation to the driveway setback standard per the findings as described, second by Council Member Madewell. The motion carried 5 – 0. #4 1116 W Abbey Rd. Weed Abatement Resolution 3911 Code Enforcement Officer Tina Jewell was sworn in and provided testimony regarding the nuisance violation at 1116 W Abbey Rd, a property that has Bonnie J. Dial, Supplemental Care Trust for Donald L. Blann listed as owners. There was no other testimony, and the hearing was closed. Action taken: Council Member Martinez moved to adopt Resolution 3911, as presented, second by Council Member Swartz. The motion carried 6 – 0. #5 Maple Landing Release of Easement Maple Landing LLC is the owner of Parcel 110002003 and requests that the City release interest in the public easement outlined in AFN 107069. Action taken: Council Member Fancher moved to approve the Quit Claim Deed for Release of Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 25 of 43 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES – August 23, 2022 pg. 4 Easement regarding release of the public easement outline in AFN 107069 for Parcel No. 110002003 (known as Maple Landing), as presented, second by Council Member Madewell. The motion carried 6 – 0. #6 Pure Country Harvest Build on Unplatted Resolution 3912 With the approval to expand the non-conforming use, the applicant needed approval to get a building permit for construction on unplatted property. The applicant would like to get permits for new addition, remodel, freezer loading area, and cover with sides. Action taken: Council Member Martinez moved to adopt Resolution 3912, as presented, second by Council Member Swartz. The motion carried 6 – 0. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS AWC Worker’s Comp Annual Report Human Resources Director Shannon Springer provided the report in the meeting packet and shared that the City is doing well. Nelson Path Bid Results City Engineer Richard Law said there were a few bids higher than anticipated and that JM Pacific was the low bidder at around $90,000. They will begin work next week and plan to complete in two weeks. The agreement with the school district is to match up to $50,000. Valley Rd. Construction Staff spoke with Mitch Molitor and the contractor about the sidewalk on Valley Rd. There was positive feedback but there needs to be easements in place to place a sidewalk. Hotelier Memo The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee is still short a representative of a tax generating entity. Letters were sent to all the hotels in the area regarding the vacancy as well as a request to partner with our homeless programs that would offer rooms for HopeSource. Grant Application The State reached out that they have Small Business Innovation funds that could help with incubators going on downtown. Council supported staff to move forward with an application for a partnership grant. Schedule Budget Workshop City Manager Williams asked Council to think about Saturdays in October that would work for the Budget Workshop. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS AND REPORTS Council Member Fancher had a good meeting with the Council Community Development, Municipal Services, and Parks Committee and is looking forward to budget discussions. Council Member Martinez attended a Columbia Basin Groundwater Management Association meeting and believes we need to start looking at water as an infrastructure rather than just water. Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 26 of 43 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES – August 23, 2022 pg. 5 Deputy Mayor Myers provided an update for Grant Transit Authority. First, the electric bus project got pushed back due to clearance issues, but they are working through them. Next, the state legislature recently passed legislation to provide fare free rides for ages 18 and under, but GTA is expanding that and doing fare free rides for all. Finally, the General Manager is resigning due to health reasons. Brandy Heston has been appointed as interim and they are looking for a new General Manager. Mayor Hankins wanted to express that entrepreneurship is not just for the young. ADJOURNMENT The regular meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. ______________________________________ Don Myers, Deputy Mayor ATTEST____________________________________ Debbie Burke, City Clerk Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 27 of 43 MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL – SPECIAL MEETING September 6, 2022 CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Moses Lake City Council was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Deputy Mayor Myers in Conference Room 225 of the Civic Center. ROLL CALL Present: Deputy Mayor Myers; Council Members Swartz, Fancher, Eck, Madewell, and Martinez. EXECUTIVE SESSION Deputy Mayor Myers called an Executive Session to be held for 90 minutes pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(b) to discuss property acquisition with Council, City Manager Allison Williams, Community Development Director Kirsten Sackett, Development Engineering Manager Rob Harris, Housing, Grants Manager Cari Cortez and Police Chief Kevin Fuhr. ECONorthwest virtual presenters were Sarah Emmans, Project Director and Lee Ann Ryan, Project Manager. Deputy Mayor Myers extended the Executive Session for 15 minutes. ADJOURNMENT The special meeting was adjourned at 5:45 p.m. ______________________________________ Don Myers, Deputy Mayor ATTEST____________________________________ Debbie Burke, City Clerk Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 28 of 43 Council Staff Report To:Agenda Item Number: From Department For Agenda of:Proceeding Type Subject Reviewed and Approved by: Expenditure Required:Amount Budgeted:Appropriation Required: Action Requested Packet Attachments (if any) Allison Williams, City Manager 1 Madeline Prentice Finance 9/13/2022 Consent Agenda Disbursement Report since August 23, 2022 Council Meeting City Manager Finance Fire City Attorney Community Development Police Human Resources Municipal Services Parks, Rec, & Cultural Services 2,604,562.30$2,604,562.30$0.00$ Approve payment of claims as presented. The following amounts were budgeted and sufficient funds were available to cover these payments: Electronic Transfer: #187-188 $ 178,224.86 Checks: #157482-157698 $ 1,235,394.27 Payroll Checks: #64644-64735 $ 51,937.51 Electronic Payments: Direct Deposit 8/19/22 & 9/2/22 $ 1,139,005.66 Vouchers - 9.13.2022.pdf 234.32KB Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 29 of 43 Overview Fiscal and Policy Implications Approve, Authorize, or Adopt: Provide Amended Direction: No Action Taken: Summary RCW 42.24 governs the process for audit and review of claims and payroll payments for the City. RCW 42.24.180 requires the review and approval of all payments at a regularly scheduled public meeting on at least a monthly basis. The State Budgeting, Accounting and Reporting Systems (BARS) Manual outlines the above format for approval by the City Council. RCW 42.24.080 requires that all claims presented against the City by persons furnishing materials, rendering services, or performing labor must be certified by the appropriate official to ensure that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described, and that the claims are just, due and unpaid obligations against the City. RCW 42.24.180 allows expedited processing of the payment of claims when certain conditions have been met. The statute allows the issuance of warrants or checks in payment of claims before the legislative body has acted to approve the claims when: (1) the appropriate officers have furnished official bonds; (2) the legislative body has adopted policies that implement effective internal control; (3) the legislative body has provided for review of the documentation supporting the claims within a month of issuance; and (4) that if claims are disapproved, they shall be recognized as receivables and diligently pursued. The City meets all these conditions. To comply with the requirements above, Finance staff schedule payment of claims and payroll for semi-monthly Council approval on the Consent Agenda. The payments listed in the schedule cover all claims and payroll payments during the period prior to the date of the Council meeting. All payments made during this period were found to be valid claims against the City. Details are attached and any questions should be directed to the City Manager or Finance Director. The City’s internal controls include certification of the validity of all payments by the appropriate department prior to submission for payment. The Finance Director has delegated authority for the examination of vouchers and authorization of payments to the Finance, Accounts Payable, and Payroll staff. All payments are reviewed and validated. The Finance Division regularly reviews its processes to ensure appropriate internal controls are in place. Options and Results Approve N/A Staff would recognize claims as receivables and pursue collection. Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 30 of 43 Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 31 of 43 Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 32 of 43 Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 33 of 43 Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 34 of 43 Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 35 of 43 Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 36 of 43 Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 37 of 43 Council Staff Report To:Agenda Item Number: From Department For Agenda of:Proceeding Type Subject Reviewed and Approved by: Expenditure Required:Amount Budgeted:Appropriation Required: Action Requested Packet Attachments (if any) Overview Fiscal and Policy Implications Approve, Authorize, or Adopt: Allison Williams, City Manager 2 Richard Law, PE Municipal Services 9/13/2022 New Business Northshore Lift Station Project City Manager Finance Fire City Attorney Community Development Police Human Resources Municipal Services Parks, Rec, & Cultural Services 2,148,092.34$2,000,000.00$148,092.34$ Staff recommends that City Council motions to award the Northshore Lift Station project to the apparent low bidder for $2,148,092.34. Staff makes this recommendation in light of the importance to replace aging infrastructure and the high costs associated with attempting to maintain equipment that is now serving past its normal life expectancy. The last major upgrade to this facility was completed in 1989. GC2021-035 Northshore Lift Station Tabulated Bid Results.pdf 228.53KB The Sage Bay Lift Station is an important component within the City's wastewater infrastructure. It pumps an estimated 900,000 gallons of wastewater every day. However, the pumps and electrical controls are old and need to be replaced. Planning and preliminary steps for this project have been ongoing for several years and have included sewer improvements in the area, the construction of the temporary Northshore Lift Station, securing temporary construction easements, purchasing the property where lift station is planned to be built, completing a cultural resource survey, and installing electrical power service to the property. The temporary Northshore Lift Station located nearby on Pine Drive was always meant to be a temporary aid until the new North Shore Lift Station could be built. All of the pieces needed to begin this project are now in place. The City is now ready to construct the new Northshore Lift Station and decommission both the aging Sage Bay Lift Station and the temporary Northshore Lift Station. This project will require funds to be spent in the amount of $2,148,092.34. The engineer's estimate for the project was $1,683,849.61. The cost difference is likely due to ongoing inflationary pressure as well as expected supply chain uncertainties for some equipment and materials. Options and Results City staff will execute the contract with the apparent low bidder.Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 38 of 43 Provide Amended Direction: No Action Taken: Staff will develop options for recommended changes. Staff will wait for further instructions. Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 39 of 43 PROJECT NAME: Northshore Lift Station Project BID RESULTS 1 Mobilization 1-09 1 LS $116,500.00 $116,500.00 $155,000.00 $155,000.00 $220,000.00 $220,000.00 $240,000.00 $240,000.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $260,000.00 $260,000.00 2 Traffic Control 1-10 1 LS $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.003 Sawcut Asphalt or Concrete 2-02 415 LF $4.00 $1,660.00 $3.00 $1,245.00 $0.75 $311.25 $10.00 $4,150.00 $5.00 $2,075.00 $10.00 $4,150.00 4 Remove Curb and Gutter 2-02 30 LF $12.00 $360.00 $15.00 $450.00 $12.00 $360.00 $15.00 $450.00 $50.00 $1,500.00 $13.00 $390.00 5 Remove Pavement 2-02 405 SY $45.00 $18,225.00 $15.00 $6,075.00 $12.00 $4,860.00 $15.00 $6,075.00 $7.00 $2,835.00 $12.00 $4,860.00 6 Remove Concrete Sidewalk 2-02 20 SY $45.00 $900.00 $20.00 $400.00 $35.00 $700.00 $25.00 $500.00 $60.00 $1,200.00 $25.00 $500.007 Decommission Sage Bay Lift Station 2-02 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $34,000.00 $34,000.00 8 Decommission Temporary Northshore Lift Station 2-02 1 LS $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $16,500.00 $16,500.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 9 Roadway Excavation 2-03 1 LS $54,500.00 $54,500.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 10 Water 2-07 150 TGal $28.00 $4,200.00 $30.00 $4,500.00 $100.00 $15,000.00 $160.00 $24,000.00 $2.00 $300.00 $210.00 $31,500.0011 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B 2-09 2000 SF $2.00 $4,000.00 $15.00 $30,000.00 $12.00 $24,000.00 $30.00 $60,000.00 $44.00 $88,000.00 $28.00 $56,000.0012 Trimming and Cleanup 2-11 1 LS $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 13 Crushed Surface Top Course 4-04 650 TON $55.00 $35,750.00 $40.00 $26,000.00 $47.00 $30,550.00 $55.00 $35,750.00 $88.00 $57,200.00 $50.00 $32,500.00 14 Crushed Basalt Rock 4-04 65 TON $65.00 $4,225.00 $100.00 $6,500.00 $77.00 $5,005.00 $110.00 $7,150.00 $124.00 $8,060.00 $60.00 $3,900.0015 HMA Cl 1/2 Inch PG 64-28 5-04 350 TON $191.00 $66,850.00 $150.00 $52,500.00 $150.00 $52,500.00 $140.00 $49,000.00 $140.00 $49,000.00 $190.00 $66,500.0016 HMA Patch Cl 3/8 Inch PG 64-28 5-06 50 SY $100.00 $5,000.00 $75.00 $3,750.00 $140.00 $7,000.00 $60.00 $3,000.00 $114.00 $5,700.00 $215.00 $10,750.00 17 Adjust Manhole 5-07 7 EA $800.00 $5,600.00 $400.00 $2,800.00 $500.00 $3,500.00 $1,000.00 $7,000.00 $925.00 $6,475.00 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 18 Adjust Valve Box 5-07 12 EA $500.00 $6,000.00 $200.00 $2,400.00 $90.00 $1,080.00 $450.00 $5,400.00 $300.00 $3,600.00 $800.00 $9,600.00 19 Drain Pipe 4 In. Diameter 7-01 130 LF $18.00 $2,340.00 $35.00 $4,550.00 $40.00 $5,200.00 $80.00 $10,400.00 $11.00 $1,430.00 $25.00 $3,250.0020 Manhole 48 Inch Diameter 7-05 7 EA $7,500.00 $52,500.00 $7,500.00 $52,500.00 $7,500.00 $52,500.00 $12,000.00 $84,000.00 $19,000.00 $133,000.00 $7,000.00 $49,000.00 21 Manhole Additional Height 48 Inch Diameter 7-05 16 VF $90.00 $1,440.00 $150.00 $2,400.00 $275.00 $4,400.00 $150.00 $2,400.00 $115.00 $1,840.00 $1,500.00 $24,000.00 22 Drop Manhole Connection 8 Inch Diameter 7-05 1 EA $4,900.00 $4,900.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 $3,100.00 $3,100.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 23 Connect to Existing Manhole 7-05 2 EA $950.00 $1,900.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $6,500.00 $13,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.0024 Plug Existing Manhole Connection 7-05 1 EA $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $350.00 $350.00 $375.00 $375.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $400.00 $400.00 25 Abandon Existing Manhole 7-05 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $475.00 $475.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 26 Plugging Existing Pipe 7-08 15 EA $100.00 $1,500.00 $350.00 $5,250.00 $285.00 $4,275.00 $475.00 $7,125.00 $300.00 $4,500.00 $400.00 $6,000.00 27 PVC Pipe Water Main 2 Inch 7-09 145 LF $50.00 $7,250.00 $60.00 $8,700.00 $42.00 $6,090.00 $70.00 $10,150.00 $18.00 $2,610.00 $125.00 $18,125.0028 PVC Pipe Water Main 8 Inch 7-09 255 LF $80.00 $20,400.00 $120.00 $30,600.00 $95.00 $24,225.00 $140.00 $35,700.00 $83.00 $21,165.00 $200.00 $51,000.00 29 Connect to Existing 6 Inch Water Main 7-09 1 EA $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $2,900.00 $2,900.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 30 Hydrant Assembly 7-14 1 EA $6,875.00 $6,875.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $8,300.00 $8,300.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 31 Tapping Sleeve and Valve Assembly 6 Inch 7-12 1 EA $3,950.00 $3,950.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.0032 Gate Valve 2 Inch 7-12 2 EA $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $350.00 $700.00 $800.00 $1,600.00 $1,050.00 $2,100.00 $5,200.00 $10,400.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 33 Service Connection 2 Inch Diameter 7-15 1 EA $5,200.00 $5,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $3,400.00 $3,400.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,300.00 $5,300.00 34 Service Connection Pipe 2 Inch Diameter 7-15 14 LF $55.00 $770.00 $700.00 $9,800.00 $90.00 $1,260.00 $140.00 $1,960.00 $105.00 $1,470.00 $600.00 $8,400.00 35 RPBA and Non-Freeze Post Hydrant 7-15 1 EA $2,900.00 $2,900.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,600.00 $3,600.00 $13,700.00 $13,700.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.0036 PVC Sewer Pipe 12 Inch Diameter 7-17 471 LF $121.00 $56,966.80 $85.00 $40,035.00 $155.00 $73,005.00 $140.00 $65,940.00 $167.00 $78,657.00 $360.00 $169,560.0037 PVC Sewer Pipe 15 Inch Diameter 7-17 220 LF $168.00 $36,960.00 $100.00 $22,000.00 $450.00 $99,000.00 $160.00 $35,200.00 $194.00 $42,680.00 $355.00 $78,100.00 38 Ductile Iron Sewer Pipe 4 Inch Diameter 7-17 12 LF $50.00 $600.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 $150.00 $1,800.00 $125.00 $1,500.00 $208.00 $2,496.00 $290.00 $3,480.00 39 Ductile Iron Sewer Pipe 18 Inch Diameter 7-17 20 LF $140.00 $2,800.00 $350.00 $7,000.00 $360.00 $7,200.00 $750.00 $15,000.00 $838.00 $16,760.00 $550.00 $11,000.0040 Sewer Gate Valve 18 Inch 7-17 1 EA $18,250.00 $18,250.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $26,000.00 $26,000.00 $25,500.00 $25,500.0041 PVC Sewer Pipe 4 Inch Diameter 7-18 30 LF $70.00 $2,100.00 $60.00 $1,800.00 $140.00 $4,200.00 $32.00 $960.00 $228.00 $6,840.00 $120.00 $3,600.00 42 Ductile Iron Sewer Force Main, 10 Inch Diameter 7-20 110 LF $108.00 $11,880.00 $150.00 $16,500.00 $245.00 $26,950.00 $220.00 $24,200.00 $363.00 $39,930.00 $300.00 $33,000.00 43 Tapping Sleeve and Valve Assembly 10 Inch 7-20 1 EA $9,650.00 $9,650.00 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 $7,900.00 $7,900.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 44 Air Release Valve Assembly 7-20 1 EA $16,100.00 $16,100.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $22,500.00 $22,500.00 $17,500.00 $17,500.00 $29,500.00 $29,500.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.0045 Temporary Bypass Pumping 7-20 1 LS $68,000.00 $68,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $135,000.00 $135,000.00 $135,000.00 $135,000.00 $155,000.00 $155,000.00 46 Sewer Bypass Assembly 7-20 2 EA $8,950.00 $17,900.00 $50,000.00 $100,000.00 $12,000.00 $24,000.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $8,500.00 $17,000.00 $12,000.00 $24,000.00 47 Sewer Gate Valve 10 Inch 7-20 5 EA $6,200.00 $31,000.00 $3,500.00 $17,500.00 $9,500.00 $47,500.00 $3,800.00 $19,000.00 $8,700.00 $43,500.00 $4,500.00 $22,500.00 48 Connect to Existing 10-inch Diameter Force Main 7-20 1 EA $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,700.00 $8,700.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.0049 Valve Vault 7-21 1 LS $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $108,000.00 $108,000.00 $89,000.00 $89,000.00 50 Wet Well 7-21 1 LS $162,000.00 $162,000.00 $182,000.00 $182,000.00 $366,078.00 $366,078.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $550,000.00 $550,000.00 $394,000.00 $394,000.00 51 Biofilter 7-21 1 LS $25,750.00 $25,750.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $43,000.00 $43,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $31,500.00 $31,500.00 52 Lift Station Electrical 7-21 1 LS $275,000.00 $275,000.00 $336,000.00 $336,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $420,000.00 $420,000.00 $401,000.00 $401,000.00 $372,000.00 $372,000.0053 Project Painting 7-21 1 LS $14,500.00 $14,500.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $26,000.00 $26,000.00 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 54 Protective Coating 7-21 1 LS $17,500.00 $17,500.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 55 Rigid Conduit 7-21 670 LF $40.00 $26,800.00 $10.00 $6,700.00 $75.00 $50,250.00 $40.00 $26,800.00 $50.00 $33,500.00 $85.00 $56,950.00 56 Silt Fence 8-01 200 LF $15.00 $3,000.00 $6.00 $1,200.00 $4.00 $800.00 $10.00 $2,000.00 $13.00 $2,600.00 $5.00 $1,000.0057 Sod Installation 8-02 300 SY $32.00 $9,600.00 $20.00 $6,000.00 $17.00 $5,100.00 $22.00 $6,600.00 $22.00 $6,600.00 $35.00 $10,500.00 58 Repair Irrigation System 8-03 1 L.S. $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $6,800.00 $6,800.00 59 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter 8-04 30 LF $55.00 $1,650.00 $65.00 $1,950.00 $180.00 $5,400.00 $72.00 $2,160.00 $145.00 $4,350.00 $60.00 $1,800.00 60 Chain Link Fence 8-12 210 LF $28.00 $5,880.00 $101.00 $21,210.00 $70.00 $14,700.00 $95.00 $19,950.00 $116.00 $24,360.00 $135.00 $28,350.0061 Singe 4-Foot Chain Link Gate 8-12 2 EA $800.00 $1,600.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $900.00 $1,800.00 $2,700.00 $5,400.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.0062 Double 5-Foot Chain Link Gate 8-12 1 EA $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 63 Double 8-Foot Chain Link Gate 8-12 1 EA $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 64 Cement Concrete Sidewalk 8-14 20 SY $190.00 $3,800.00 $56.00 $1,120.00 $370.00 $7,400.00 $200.00 $4,000.00 $150.00 $3,000.00 $160.00 $3,200.0065 Cement Concrete Slab 8-14 270 SY $220.00 $59,400.00 $85.00 $22,950.00 $170.00 $45,900.00 $180.00 $48,600.00 $100.00 $27,000.00 $110.00 $29,700.0066 Backfill for Gravity Block Wall 8-24 30 TON $35.00 $1,050.00 $80.00 $2,400.00 $110.00 $3,300.00 $130.00 $3,900.00 $103.00 $3,090.00 $55.00 $1,650.00 67 Gravity Block Wall 8-23 315 SF $29.00 $9,135.00 $50.00 $15,750.00 $42.00 $13,230.00 $75.00 $23,625.00 $105.00 $33,075.00 $44.00 $13,860.00 68 Dewatering 7-21 1 LS $48,400.00 $48,400.00 $198,000.00 $198,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 $130,000.00 $130,000.00 $235,000.00 $235,000.00 1,553,366.80$ $1,981,635.00 $2,086,554.25 $2,416,320.00 $2,677,898.00 $2,756,775.00 8.4%130,482.81$ $166,457.34 $175,270.56 $202,970.88 $224,943.43 $231,569.10 1,683,849.61$ $2,148,092.34 $2,261,824.81 $2,619,290.88 $2,902,841.43 $2,988,344.10 UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PROJECT NUMBER: GC2021-035 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE A SALES TAX Total Schedule A ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION SECTION APPROX. QUANTITY Bellingham, WA UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Engineers Estimate POW Contracting Pasco, WA Rotschy Inc. Vancouver, WASchedule A: Sewer Improvements Strider Construction Co. Bellingham, WA UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Bayshore Construction Company LLC Arlington, WA UNIT PRICE AMOUNTUNIT PRICE AMOUNT Razz Construction Inc. Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 40 of 43 The Moses Lake Mayor andThe Moses Lake Mayor andThe Moses Lake Mayor and Council cordially invite you toCouncil cordially invite you toCouncil cordially invite you to the online celebration of ourthe online celebration of ourthe online celebration of our 40-year Sister City Relationship40-year Sister City Relationship40-year Sister City Relationship with Yonezawa, Japanwith Yonezawa, Japanwith Yonezawa, Japan C o m m e m o r a t i v e T r e e P l a n t i n g , R i b b o n - C u t t i n g C e r e m o n y Yonezawa City Hall Courtyard Civic Center Auditorium in Moses Lake Tuesday, October 4, 2022, 4:30 p.m.-5:15 p.m. Details to access the event on Zoom will follow. Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 41 of 43 Bed Nights 1089 Unique Guests 172 From Grant County 172 Veterans 12 Chronically Homeless 53 Aged < 24 13 Admin Shelter Operations HopeSource Management RRH January Febrary March $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 ESG-CV 100% Households w/o minors Households w/minors Households with only minors Total Persons 223 Persons 63 Persons 0 Persons 286 Households 217 Households 21 Households 0 Households 238 FIRST QUARTER SLEEP CENTER GUESTS Guests who are chronically homeless 30% COUNCILMANIC ACTIONS The City was allocated $331,851 from Grant County through the Consolidated Homeless Grant for rapid re- housing and hotel leasing. APPROVE CHG CONTRACT AUTHORIZE RFP FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY City Council authorized a request for proposals to conduct a feasibility study of homeless services and the Sleep Center relocation. RESOLUTION 3889 City Council approved the creation of the Advisory Council on Housing to provide community input on the Housing Action Plan implementation. FINANCIAL REPORT Grant Administration, Sleep Center Operations, HopeSource Management, and RRH HIGHLIGHT FUNDING EXPENSES The City of Moses Lake continued operations of the Sleep Center as well as the Rapid Re-housing and Hotel Voucher program. The City's continued partnership with HopeSource allows for the ability to quickly identify and engage people experiencing homelessness. To further fund efforts of effective and efficient homeless crisis response and housing services in Grant County, the City applied for and received funding through the Emergency Food and Shelter Program. This funding will be used for Sleep Center Operations. The City of Moses Lake partnered with HopeSource to conduct the annual Point-In-Time Count for Moses Lake. Thank you to City staff and representatives who volunteered their time, as well as the department directors who authorized staff to participate. Deanna Martinez Don Myers Allison Williams Brett Bastian Pete Kunjara Jim Reyna Erika Ribble Cari Cortez EFSP: $27,700 GRANT COUNTY 2022 PIT RESULTS Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 42 of 43 Bed Nights 1550 Unique Guests 191 From Grant County 191 Veterans 9 Chronically Homeless 53 Aged < 24 10 Admin Shelter Operations HopeSource Management RRH April May June 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 ESG-CV 99.8% REC FEE 0.2% HIGHLIGHT 14 Number of families who received assistance through RRH or Homeless Prevention Programs. SECOND QUARTER SLEEP CENTER GUESTS Guests who are chronically homeless 28% COUNCILMANIC ACTIONS City Council approved the members for the Advisory Council on Housing who applied through an application process. APPROVE ADVISORY COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP AUTHORIZE CONTRACT WITH ECONORTHWEST City Council authorized a contract with ECONorthwest to conduct a feasibility study of the Homeless Housing program, focusing on the Sleep Center relocation. APPROVE ESG-CV BUDGET AMENDMENT Grant County allocated additional funding for the City's ESG-CV contract for shelter operations, case management, and rapid re- housing. FINANCIAL REPORT Grant Administration, Sleep Center Operations, HopeSource Management, and RRH FUNDING EXPENSES The City of Moses Lake hired ECONorthwest through the RFP process to conduct a feasibility study of the Homeless Housing program with the primary goal of identifying where the Sleep Center will be relocated and long-term operational costs and funding sources if the Sleep Center was open 24/7 or overnight. City Council frequently hears community concerns regarding how Moses Lake can improve its response to addressing homelessness in our community. Based on public input when a previous site was considered, City Council felt an objective analysis would allow for better informed decisions to address the needs of all residents. Market Analysis Site Analysis Operational Analysis Development Analysis Financial Analysis Feasibility Analysis - Final Report + Stakeholder interviews What will the study include? Thank you to the Moses Lake Public Library for donating books for the Sleep Center's own library for guests. With funding through ESG-CV, Rapid Re- housing and Homelessness Prevention programs managed by HopeSource are helping clients to become permanently housed with rental assistance and case management services. Moses Lake Council Packet 9-13-22, Page 43 of 43