1995 03 28u
^
4973
MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL
March 28,1995
Council Present:Wayne Rimple,Dick Collier,Chet Paine, Bob Chapman,Bill Reese,Daryl Jackson,and
Richard Pearce
MINUTES:Mr.Chapman moved that the minutes of the March 14 meeting be approved as submitted,
seconded by Mr.Jackson,and passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF BILLS.CHECKS.AND PREPAID CLAIMS
Action Taken:Mr.Reese moved that the bills,checks,and prepaid claims issued be approved,seconded
by Mr.Paine, and passed with Mr.Rimpleabstaining from voting forthat portion ofthe bills to Moses Lake
Steel Supply and Faber Industrial Supply.
Vouchers audited and certified by the Finance Director as required by RCW42.24.080,and those expense
reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW42.24.090,have been recorded on a listing which has
been made available to the City Council.
Claims:The vouchers included on the below list as modified by the Council and noted upon said list for
the Council meeting of March 28,1995 for the funds listed below are approved in the amount of
$707,960.53.
GENERAL FUND $115,594.97 WATER/SEWER LEASES 816.94
PATHS AND TRAILS '97.08 SANITATION FUND 5.06
STREET 14,098.83 AIRPORT 33.65
STREET REPR/RECON 244.35 CENTRAL SERVICES -EXEC 717.32
EQUIPMENT LEASES 13,156.47 CENTRAL SERVICES 15,686.76
STREET IMPROVEMENT 464.45 EQUIP RENTAL-OPERATIONS 21,835.01
PARK &REC.IMPROVEMENT 45,083.00 BUILD MAINT-OPERATIONS 7,749.1958
WATER/SEWER FUND 21,833.59 FIREMANS PENSION 450,000.00
WATER/SEWER CONSTRUCTION 543.86 TOTAL $707,960.53
Prepaid Claims:Prepaid claims approved by the City Manager according to the process established by
Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.030 and the internal control policy approved by the City Council have
been recorded on a listing which has been made available to the City Council.The claims listed below
are approved in the amount of $2,628.47 for all funds.
GENERAL FUND $1,442.01 WATER/SEWER FUND 1,111.50
STREET 2.59 CENTRAL SERVICES 7.18
STREET REPR/RECON 48.00 EQUIP RENTAL-OPERATIONS 17.91
TOTAL $2,628.47
Checks: Checks 44318 through 446600 issued on March 15,1995 were approved for payment at the
Council meeting held on March 28,1995 in the total amount of $1,042,899.63.
Payroll:The payroll issued on March 24,1995 having been approved pursuant to the rule of the City
Council set forth in Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.040,was paid by checks 88299 through 99464 in
the amount of $244,508.71.
PROCLAMATIONS
The proclamation declaring April 22, 1995 as Earth Day25 was read in its entirety.,,,.
I.CITIZEN INPUT -None
II.EMPLOYEE PRESENTATIONS
Police Department:Joseph Frey, Police Officer,was introduced to the Council.
III.CONSENT AGENDA
^)Resolution -Create New Funds and Accounts:A resolution was presented which creates additional debt /Q/O
service funds for the ballfield land contract and the Crestview Drive LID.
Resolution -Accept Street &Utility Improvements -Desert Point Short Plat #1:A resolution was presented /A L?
which accepts the street and utility improvements installed as part of the Desert Point Short Plat #1.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that the Consent Agenda be approved,seconded by Mr.Collier,and
passed unanimously.
4974
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:2 March 28, 1995
IV.CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
>QjCf CURBS AND HANDICAP RAMP PROJECT
Staff requested authorization to awardthe bid forthe curb and ramp project to Marchand Construction.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved thatthe bid be awarded to Marchand Construction,seconded by Mr.
Collier,and passed unanimously.
V.PETITIONS.COMMUNICATIONS.OR PUBLIC HEARINGS f~}
JAPANESE GARDEN^
)tfO
o$t
The Japanese Garden Committee requested the City Council review the possibility of placing a Japanese
Garden in the 3-Pond Area.
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,wentoverwhatthe Japanese Garden Committeehas requestedorhad
questions about.He requested direction from the Council on whether or not the Council wished a
Japanese Garden in this areaandwhatwould be the commitments from the city for this project.
There was some discussion and it was the consensus of the Council that the area should be looked at as
the location for a Japanese Garden and the preliminary site plan should include a Japanese Garden.
ORDINANCE -SUN CITY ZONE CHANGE -2ND READING/PUBLIC HEARING
An ordinancewas presented which provides for a zone change of propertyadjacent to Evelyn Drive;from
R-1, Single Family Residential, to C-2, General Commercial and Business,and from R-3,Multi-family
Residential,to C-2,General Commercial and Business.
Ron Baker,representing Sun City and Park Place Investors,explained the proposal.
George Twigg, 816 N. Evelyn,stated that a neighborhood meeting was held and the consensus was that
the people in this area are opposed to any zone change.They wish the property to stay R-1. He felt that
any zone change would devalue their property.He was opposed to the proposed zone change.
The following people were opposed to the zone change -Al Browning,607 Village,Stephanie Biallas,513
Village, Jim Golly, 502 Village,Debbie Golly, 502 Village, Mrs.Wentz,610 Village,Genevieve Thompson,
604 Village, Elwood &Betty Dart,owners of 616 Village, Frank Stacker,816 Vista, Darlene Ruff, 702
Village,Ann Sporsich,841 Vista,John Ponti,824Vista,Gina Doremus,514 Crest,Paul Blazer,510 Crest,
and Bob Black,522 Crest.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that the public hearing be closed,seconded by Mr.Jackson,and passed
unanimously.
Mr.Pearce was opposed to the zoning being changed to C-2. He felt that an R-2 zone would be more
acceptable since there is a need to buffer the existing residential area.
There was considerable discussion by the Council.
The ordinance amending Section 18.09.020 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code was read by title only.
Action Taken:Mr.Chapman moved that the second reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by
Mr.Paine, and failed with Mr.Chapman and Mr.Paine in favor and Mr.Pearce,Mr.Collier,Mr.Reese,
Mr.Jackson,and Mr.Rimple opposed.
VI.ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
ORDINANCE -LONGVIEW TRACTS/GREGORICH ANNEXATION 1ST READING
An ordinance was presented which provides for the annexation of64.2 acres of property which includes ^^^
Longview Tracts and property owned by Mathew Gregorich.(S
Charlie Pearson,owner of property in the area,stated that there are senior citizens in the area who cannot
afford to pay for any improvements in this area.
Connie Wright,owner of property on Highland,stated that she is opposed to the annexation.She felt the
improvements would cost more than most of the residents could afford.
Albert Conner,Olympic Drive,stated that he is in favor of the annexation.
Wilda Denton,owner of property,stated that she is in favor of the annexation and is hopeful of obtaining
grant funds to help with the necessary improvements.
D
u
4975
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:3 March 28,1995
The ordinance annexing certain specified territoryto the City of Moses Lake,Washington,and incorporat
ing the same within the corporate limits of the City of Moses Lake, and which provides forthe assumption
of existing indebtedness and establishes the zoning was read by title only.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that the first reading of the ordinance be adopted and a public hearing
be set for April 11,seconded by Mr.Collier,and passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION -VACATE LAUREL DRIVE
Midstate Land Co.has requested the vacation of the portion of Laurel Drive located east and south of
Riviera Street and adjacent to the proposed Moses Lake Retail Center Short Plat.
The resolution initiating the procedure forvacating right-of-way dedicated forthe development of a Laurel
Drive was read by title only.
There was some discussion by the Council.
Action Taken:Mr.Collier moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Jackson, and passed
with Mr.Chapman and Mr.Pearce opposed.
RESOLUTION -LID &ULID -CENTRAL DRIVE ^IjhaJ
Resolutions were presented which would establish a public hearing date for consideration of an LID and /--0
ULID for improvements of Central Drive between Grape Drive and Valley Road, and Central Place and
Evelyn Drive between Crest Drive and Central Drive by constructing and installing full width street
improvements including curb, gutter, storm drainage,sidewalks,landscaping,street lighting,electrical
transmission and distribution alterations, traffic signalization, and sanitary sewer and water system
extensions.
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that this will start the process forthe improvements through local
improvement districts. He mentioned that the Moses Lake Mall people have requested some direction on
the alignment of Central Drivesince the proposed LID changes the alignment significantly from the original
layout.
Phil Bloom,representing the Moses Lake Mall,stated that any further development in the Moses Lake Mall
K^_J will require the Moses Lake Mall developers toconstruct Central Drive.The Moses Lake Mall developers
are not opposed to the LIDor the proposed realignment of Central Drive but need some clarification on
what to do if the lots along Stratford Road request development before Central Drive can be constructed
through an LID.
Itwas pointed out that the Council could construe the start of construction of Central Drivethrough the LID
process as sufficient to allow construction to begin on the lots in the Big Bend Center Binding Site Plan.
The resolution ofthe City Council of the City of Moses Lake declaring its intention to improve the Central
Drive between Grape Drive and Valley Road,Grape Drive between Central Drive and Highway 17, Central
Place, and Evelyn Drive between Crest Drive and Central Drive area by constructing and installing full
width street improvements including paving,curbs,gutters,storm drainage,sidewalks,landscaping,street
lighting, electrical transmission and distribution alterations,and traffic signalization and to create a local
improvement district to assessthe cost and expense of said improvements against property in such district
specially benefitted thereby,and to notify all persons who may object to said improvement to appear and
present their objections at a regular meeting of the City Council to be held on April 25,1995 at 7 p.m.was
read by title only.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Collier, and passed
unanimously.
The resolution ofthe City Council of the City of Moses Lake declaring its intention to improve the Central
Drive between Grape Drive and Valley Road,Grape Drive between the end of existing water and sewer
mains in Grape Drive and Highway 17, Central Place, and Evelyn Drive between Crest Drive and Central
Drive area by constructing and installing sanitary sewer and water system mains and/or extensions,and
^)connecting with the existing water and sanitary sewer systems and to create a utility local improvement
district to assess the cost and expense of said improvements against property in such district specially
benefitted thereby,and to notify all persons who may object to said improvement to appear and present
their objections at a regular meeting of the City Council to be held on April 25,1995 at 7 p.m.was read
by title only.
Action Taken:Mr. Collier moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Jackson,and passed
unanimously.
JOf 7
4976
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:4 March 28,1995
^L\h RESOLUTION -ACCEPT GIFT -CARPENTER
"^y<9 Aresolution was presented which accepts property from Paul and Eunice Carpenter which is to be used
/^-^for a city park.The property is adjacent to the existing Lee Park in the Sunset Park Addition.As part of
0 /the conditions for accepting the property,the park will be named Carpenter Park.
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that a "statement of value" will be provided to the Carpenters
in the future.
Dick Deane,Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission,stated that this property will be f^
incorporated into the existing park and it is a wonderful contribution from the Carpenters.A larger park
in this neighborhood has been needed for a number of years.
The resolution accepting property from Paul and Eunice Carpenter was read in its entirety.
Action Taken:Mr.Collier moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Pearce,and passed
unanimously.
VII.REQUESTS TO CALL FOR BIDS
Yf\f[^SLURRY SEAL
Staff requested authorization to call for bids for the slurry seal project.
Action Taken:Mr.Collier moved that staff be authorized to call for bids,seconded by Mr.Pearce,and
passed unanimously.
||/7 TRAFFIC LIGHT -NELSON &PIONEER
Staff requested authorization to call for bids for the traffic signal for the intersection at Nelson and Pioneer
Way.
Action Taken:Mr.Jackson moved that staff be authorized to call for bids,seconded by Mr.Reese,and
passed unanimously.
VIII.REFERRALS FROM COMMISSIONS
]j£{j>COVE WEST PHASE 2 FINAL PLAT
Ron Baker,Boundary Engineering,has submitted a final plat for the Cove West Phase 2 residential
subdivision consisting of 13 lots.The area is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential.
Mr.Reese stated that he had a conflict of interest and would not participate in this item.
Action Taken:Mr.Jackson moved that the Cove West Phase 2 Final Plat be approved provided the City
Engineer's comments are addressed,and the Findings of Fact be accepted,seconded by Mr.Paine, and
passed with Mr.Reese abstaining.
IX.OTHER ITEMS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
MOSES LAKE SENIOR CENTER -REQUEST FOR FUNDING
The Moses Lake Senior Center has requested an increase in the amount paid to the Senior Center for
programs provided to the seniors.
Rosemary Fowler,Executive Director,requested that the City of Moses Lake increase the amount it
provides to the Senior Center.The additional funds are needed to maintain the recreational activities that
are currently being provided.She requested that the city increase its amount by $15,000.
Mr.Williams requested that the Council consider increasing its support of the recreation activities forthe
seniors. Since funding has decreased for the food program,the Senior Center may need to divert funds
to that program to the detriment of the recreational activities for the seniors./~\
Mr.Jackson wanted to know if the membership fee could be raised.
Mrs.Fowler stated that the membership fee is $5 per year and it is felt that some seniors cannot even
afford that.
Mr.Pearce stated that he is opposed to giving funds to special interest groups.He pointed out that the
seniorsdo make use ofthe city's recreational facilities including the aquatic center,parks,boat ramps,etc.
He felt that the dues should be increased and they should also approach the county for funds.He
mentioned that the Senior Center has never provided a report to the city, as is required by the contract,
on how the funds are spent.
n
u
4977
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:5 March 28,1995
Mr.Paine felt that they were asking for very little and felt that the city does give to special interest groups.
Mr.Chapman pointed out that the contract was originally done in the early 1980's and the senior
population has increased since that time.The recreational opportunities that the Senior Center provides
is important and he would be in favor of increasing the contract amount to a total of $10,000.
Mr.Reese felt that the dues should be increased but would be in favor of increasing the contract amount.
He also felt that the county should be approached about providing some funding.
Mr.Rimple pointed out that the city does not have an endless supply of money and felt that the contract
should stipulate that the if additional funds are approved,the Senior Center should be required to meet
any conditions stipulated by the Council.
There was some discussion by the Council.
Action Taken:Mr.Jackson moved that the contract with the Senior Center be increased for 1995 by
$5,000 based on a dollar per dollar match by county or other agencies to December 31, 1995,seconded
by Mr.Reese,and passed unanimously.
DRIVEWAY VARIANCE -TIME OIL CO.
The Time Oil Co.has requested a variance to the driveway standards in order to allow another 30'
driveway in addition to the 3 existing driveways serving the Jackpot Food Mart.The Community Street
and Utility Standards permit only 2 driveways per business.
Gary Harer,Municipal Services Director,stated that staff has no objections to the new driveway location
but suggested that the existing drivewayclosest to the intersection of Broadway and Gibbybe eliminated.
Chris Tomlinson,managerof the Jackpot Food Mart,stated that he was notawarethat the citystaff was
goingto suggest the closing of one of the driveways and had not discussed that optionwith the Time Oil
Co.
Mr.Chapman felt that closing the driveway on Broadway would create additional traffic congestionat the
first driveway on Gibby Road.
^J After some discussion itwas felt that the existing driveways should remain.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce movedthatthe driveway variance requestbe granted,seconded by Mr.Reese,
and passed unanimously.
COPS FAST GRANT
Authorization was requested for the City Manager to signthe grants underthe COPS FAST program.
Mr.Chapman pointed outthatthe grant will not pay 100%of the costs for new police officersand thatthe
grant funds are fora three year period only.
Action Taken:Mr.Chapman moved that the City Manager be authorized to sign the grant documents,
seconded by Mr.Jackson, and passed unanimously.
X.COUNCIL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
With the concurrence of the Council,Mr.Rimple appointed Denise Schmidt to the Park and Recreation
Commission.
1/9*
/n?
/07/
PLANNING COMMISSION
Mr.Rimple pointed out that there isstill a position open on the Planning Commission./OOJ^
\^J XI.CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
AGCT MEETING
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that the AGCT Meeting will be Thursday in Ephrata.//=?/
SALES TAX/TRANSIENT RENTAL
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that the city will receive $189,691.96 on March 31 in sales tax./&<?'&
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that the city will receive $10,060.03 on March 31 in transient //ff -£
rental income.^
\QP$
4978
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:6
BRYAN ANNEXATION
March 28,1995
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that staff has contacted property owners in the Wiser Addition
to determine ifthey are interested in annexing.Annexation requires approval by property ownersof60%
of the assessed valuation of the property involved.To annex the area as suggested by Council would
require that property owners of at least $850,000 in assessed valuation be in favor of the annexation.
Those property owners interested in annexing have a total valuation of $805,755.He mentioned that the
boundaries of the annexation can be adjusted in orderto get the 60%valuation needed.
Itwas the consensus of the Council that staff bring back a map for the area to be annexed.
The meeting was recessed at 10:15 p.m.andthe Council met in anexecutivesession todiscuss personnel
and real estate matters.The executive session was adjourned at 11 p.m.andthe regular meeting was
reconvened. The regular meeting was adjourned at 11 p.m.
ATTEST:
2_
n
n
o
^J
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON
)
IN THE MATTER OF PARKPLACEZONE CHANGE )NO.94-4
)
) FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS,
)AND DECISION
)
1.HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
1.1 Date.A public hearing was held upon proper notice before the Commission on July 14,
1994.
1.2 Proponent.Parkplace Investors is the proponent of this zone change.
1.3 Purpose.The proponent had requested azone change of property illustrated onthe map
on file inthe Finance Director's office from R-1,Single Family Residential,and R-3,Multi-
family Residential,to C-2,General Business and Commercial.The request was tabled
at the July 14 Planning Commission meeting. The request for the zone change was
considered at the March 2, 1995 meeting.
1.4 Evidence.The Commission consideredthe following materials in reaching its decision.
A. The application of the proponent for the zone change.
B.Testimony by the proponent.
C.Testimony from the public.
2.FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Based upon the evidence presented to them, the Planning Commission made the following
findings of fact:v
{^_J 2.1 The proponent isthe owner of property legally described above.
2.2 The property is unplatted.
2.3 The zone change is in the public interest
2.4 The zone change is conducive to the area with the proposed street locations
2.5 The zone change is more appropriate than what is currently existing
2.6 The zone change is consistent with the comprehensive plan
3.CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
From the foregoing findings of fact the Commission made the following conclusions:
3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to
recommend to the City Council the advisability of the proposed change in zoning.
3.2 The rezone request of the proponent is properly before the Commission forits recommen
dation.
3.3 It is proper at this time for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation on this
rezone request.
\^J 3.5 It is in the best interests and welfare of the city's citizens to rezone the property as
proposed.
4.RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
On the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions,it is the recommendation of the
Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake to the City Council of the City of Moses Lake that
the request for a rezone of this property from R-1 and R-3 to C-2 be granted.
5.FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL.
5.1 Date. A public hearing was held upon proper notice before the City Council on March 28,
1995.
5.2 Proponent.Parkplace Investors is the proponent of this rezone.
5.3 Purpose.The City Council considered the request for a rezone.
5.4 Evidence.The City Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The application of the proponent for the rezone.
B.The history of the property.
C.Testimony from the proponent.
D.Testimony from the public.
6.FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
6.1 The proponent is the owner of property legally described above.
6.2 The property is unplatted.
6.3 The zone change would be detrimental to the existing housing development.
7.FURTHER CONCLUSIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
From the foregoing findings of fact the City Council makes the following conclusions:
7.1 The City Council ofthe City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to make a decision
on a proposed change in zoning.
7.2 The rezone request of the proponent is properly before the Council for its decision.
7.3 It is proper at this time for the City Council to make a decision on this rezone request.()
8.DECISION OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
The City Council of the City of Moses Lake disagrees with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and denies the zone change request.
Dated:March 28,1995
R. Wayne Rimple^Mtayor
r>
<J
^J
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE COVE WEST PHASE
II FINAL PLAT
COVE WEST PHASE II FINAL PLAT
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS,
AND DECISION
1.HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
1.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Commission on March 16,
1995.
1.2 Proponent.Vic Jansen is the proponent of this plat.
1.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitted a plat for property legally described upon the plat.
City staff has confirmed the property described on the plat is the property submitted for
platting.
1.4 Evidence. The Commission considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted plat.
B. Written comments from various parties.
2.FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Commission makesthe following findings of fact:
2.1 The proponentis the owner of the property.
2.2 The property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential.
2.3 The development is consistent with adjacent uses.
2.4 The development is an extension of an existing use.
2.5 The development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2.6 The development creates no environmental concerns.
2.7 The development benefits the public welfare.
3.CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
From the foregoing findings of fact the Commission makes the following conclusions:
3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lakeis vested with the authority to recom
mend to the City Council the advisability of approving a plat.
3.2 The plat is properly before the Commission for its recommendation.
3.3 It is proper atthistime for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation onthis plat.
3.4 It is in the best interests and welfare of the city'scitizensto plat the property as proposed.
4.RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
On the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions, it is the recommendation of the
\^J Planning Commission ofthe City of Moses Lake tothe City Council ofthe City of Moses Lake that
the final plat be approvedwiththe stipulation that the City Engineer's comments be addressed.
5.FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
5.1 Date. A publicmeeting was held upon propernotice before the Council on March 28,1995.
5.2 Proponent.The Vic Jansen is the proponent of this plat.
5.3 Purpose. The proponent has submitted a final plat for property legally described above.
5.4 Evidence. The Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted plat.
B. Written comments from various parties.
6.FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Based upon the evidence presented to them, the Council makes the following findings of fact:
6.1 The proponent istheowner ofthe property.f"^\
6.2 The property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential.
6.3 The development is consistent with adjacent uses.
6.4 The development is an extension of an existing use.
6.5 The development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
6.6 The development creates no environmental concerns.
6.7 The development benefits the public welfare.
7.FURTHER CONCLUSIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
From the foregoing findings of fact the Council makes the following conclusions:
7.1 The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to make a decision
on a final plat.
7.2 The plat is properly before the Council for its decision.
7.3 It is proper at this time for the City Council to make a decision on this final plat.
8.DECISION.
The City Council of the City of Moses Lake agrees with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approves the final plat.
Dated: March 28,1995
R.Wayne RimpleOMayor
r>
r\