1994 05 104865
MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL
May 10,1994
Council Present:Wayne Rimple, Dick Collier,Bill Reese,Richard Pearce,Chet Paine,Daryl Jackson,and
Bob Chapman
MINUTES:Mr.Pearce moved that the minutes of the April 26 meeting be approved as submitted,seconded
by Mr. Collier,and passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF BILLS.CHECKS.AND PREPAID CLAIMS
Action Taken:Mr.Reese moved that the bills,checks,and prepaid claims issued be approved,seconded
by Mr.Pearce,and passed with Mr. Rimple abstaining from voting for that portion of the bills to Faber
Industrial Supply and Moses Lake Steel Supply.
Vouchers audited and certified by the Finance Director as required by RCW 42.24.080,and those expense
reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing which has
been made available to the City Council.
Claims: The vouchers included on the below list as modified by the Council and noted upon said list for
the Council meeting of May 10,1994 for the funds listed below are approved in the amount of $440,023.47.
GENERAL FUND
PATHS &TRAILS
STREET
STREET REPR/RECON
EQUIPMENT LEASES
STREET IMPROVEMENT
PARK &REC IMPROVEMENT
WATER/SEWER FUND
W/S CONSTRUCTION
W/S LEASES
Prepaid Claims: Prepaid claims approved by the City Manager according to the process established by
Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.030 and the internal control policy approved by the City Council have been
recorded on a listing which has been made available to the City Council. The claims listed below are ap
proved in the amount of $457,330.27 for all funds.
GENERAL FUND $ 615.91 WATER/SEWER FUND 9,416.50
STREET 10,000.00 SANITATION FUND 6,677.31
CAPITAL 425,000.00 CENTRAL SERVICES 1,196.53
PARK &RECREATION IMPROV 4,409.55 EQUIP RENTAL-OPERATIONS 14.47
TOTAL $457,330.27
Checks:Checks 40895 through 41241 issued on April 27,1994 were approved for payment at the Council
meeting held on May 10,1994 in the total amount of $457,893.82.
Payroll:The payroll issued on April29,1994 having been approved pursuant to the rule of the City Council
set forth in Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.040,was paid by checks 83432 through 83449 in the amount
Of $10,452.14.
Payroll:The payroll issued on May 6,1994 having been approved pursuant to the rule of the City Council
set forth in Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.040,was paid by checks 83450 through 83639 in the amount
of $193,730.68.
PROCLAMATIONS
A proclamation urging citizens to buy Buddy Poppies on May 13 and 14,1994 was read in its entirety.
A proclamation declaring May 15 through 21,1994 as National Public Works Week was read in its entirety.
I.CITIZEN INPUT -None
*v->CENTENNIAL AMPHITHEATER -MERIT AWARD
Joseph K.Gavinski, City Manager,stated that the American Institute of Architects presented a Merit Award
to architect Zeck Butler for the design of the Centennial Amphitheater and to the city for demanding and
recognizing the highest of architectural standards.
II.EMPLOYEE PRESENTATIONS -None
III.CONSENT AGENDA
Resolution -Accept Donation -Lioness Club: A resolution was presented which accepts $4,500 from the
Moses Lake Lioness Club for a picnic shelter at McCosh Park.
$47,240.56 AIRPORT 57.07
4.17 UNEMPL COMP INS 6,583.23
9,147.21 SELF-INSURANCE 104,564.31
71,272.27 CENTRAL SERVICES 12,875.97
601.03 EQUIP RENTAL-OPERATIONS 29,593.27
19.24 BUILD MAINT-OPERATIONS 11,099.77
104,329.62 FIREMANS PENSION 91.07
23,625.43 TOTAL $440,023.47
18,529.36
389.89
//3*
}Q^
;>/°
i/"
4866
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:2 May 10, 1994
Bicycle Path Grant Application: Staff to apply for grant for a bicycle path from the railroad crossing on
Marina Driveto Broadway and I-90.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that the Consent Agenda be approved,seconded by Mr.Jackson,and
passed unanimously.
IV.CONSIDERATION OF BIDS -None
V.PETITIONS.COMMUNICATIONS.OR PUBLIC HEARINGS
COMMUNICATIONS -ALDER STREET FILL NAME CHANGE
Gladys Hull and Glenna Bingham have requested that the Alder Street Fill be renamed Neppei Crossing.
Mrs.Hull stated that at a meeting to discuss the historical aspect of the city itwas suggested that the Alder
Street Fill be renamed Neppei Crossing.She suggested that three signs be erected - one at each end of
the fill saying Neppei Crossing and one that says Stratford Road on the west side of the fill.
Mollie Buche presented letters from Mitchell Delabarre,LynnTyler,Baskin and Robbins,and the Moses Lake
Development Task Force in support of the name change of the fill to Neppei Crossing. It was also
requested that the concretedivider at Baskin and Robbins and the attorney's office be removed and a center
turn lane be painted on the street.
Dick Deane,Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission,stated that the Commission is in favor of
the proposed name change.
Glenna Bingham felt that the name of the fill should be changed to Neppei Crossing.
Mr.Pearce stated that he was in favor of the name change and suggestedthat the entire length of Alder and
Stratford be changed to Neppei.
It was pointed out that changing the name of Alder Street and Stratford Road would involve the changing
of a great many existing addresses.
Mr.Collier stated that he is in favor of the request if Neppei Crossing would start after the railroad tracks /^"N
on Alder Street and then just across the fill.
There was some discussion by the Council.
Action Taken:Mr.Reese moved that the fill be named Neppei Crossing from the railroad tracks on Alder
to the north end of the fill and place signs at each end identifying the crossing as Neppei Crossing and a
sign indicating where Stratford Road begins,seconded by Mr.Paine, and passed unanimously.
COMMUNICATION -MAIN STREET VACATION - BEEMAN/HENDRICKS
Gordon Beeman and DavidHendricks have requested consideration of the vacation of Main Street between
Barbara and Schneirla Streets.
Mr.Beeman stated that abandoning the street would be a benefit since the city would not have to maintain
it.He mentioned that there is no sewer in Main Street at this time and the water is stubbed in from
Schnieria.
Joseph K.Gavinski, City Manager, explained the street vacation process.
Mr.Beeman stated that they may not havethe reserves to pay for the property ifthevacation is granted and
would like to have it granted provisionally until they have the funds availableto purchase the property.
Mr.Pearce pointed out that Main Street acts as a buffer between the C-2 Zone and the R-3 Zone.
There was some discussion by the Council and itwas suggested to Mr.Beeman that ifhe wished the street r~N
vacated, that he start the process forthe vacation.'
^ORDINANCE -WELL 17 ANNEXATION -2ND READING /PUBLIC HEARING
An ordinance was presented which provides for the annexation of an acre of property located in Section
21 on Road N NE,the location ofWell 17.
The ordinance annexing certainspecified territoryto the Cityof Moses Lake,Washington, and incorporating
the same within the corporate limits of the City of Moses Lake, and which provides for the assumption of
existing indebtedness and establishes the.zoning was read by title only.
The public hearing was opened.There were no comments.
n
u
V
4867
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:3 May 10, 1994
Action Taken:Mr.Chapman moved that the public hearing be closed,seconded by Mr.Jackson, and
passed unanimously.
ActionTaken:Mr.Chapmanmovedthatthe second reading ofthe ordinance beadopted, seconded by Mr.
Reese,and passed unanimously.
ORDINANCES -SITE PLAN REVIEWS -2ND READING/PUBLIC HEARING
Ordinanceswere presented whichbringintoconformance the city's proceduresand fees relating to site plan /1 w
reviews.
The public hearing was opened.There were no comments.
ActionTaken:Mr.Pearce moved that the publichearing be closed,seconded by Mr.Chapman, and passed
unanimously.
The ordinance amending Chapter 18.72 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled "Public Hearing
Procedures"was read by title only.
Action Taken:Mr.Chapman movedthat the second reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr.
Pearce,and passed unanimously.
The ordinance amending Chapter 3.54 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled "Development Review and
Permit Fees"was read by title only.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that the second reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr.
Chapman,and passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE -CRESTVIEW COURT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -2ND READING/PUBLIC HEARING //£&
Horton Dennis and Associates has submitted a preliminary major plat for a 20.5 acre planned unit
development which includes single-family, multi-family, and professional office uses,to be located at the
intersection of Grape Drive and Valley Road.The area is zoned R-1,Single Family Residential and R-3,
Multi-family Residential.The planned unit development would be served with city waterand sanitary sewer.
New street,utility,and storm water control infrastructure,constructed to city standards,will be required to
^*_y serve the proposed subdivision.A planned development district overlay zone change is being requested
to allow outright professional office uses within the underlying R-3 zoning district.
The residents of the existing Vista Village housing development objected to the extension of Village Avenue
to Grape Drive.The developers presented an alternate plan which would leave Village Avenue as a dead
end street but provide access to the proposed planned unit development from both Grape Driveand Valley
Road.Both the Fireand Police Departments have indicated that makingVillage Drivea through street from
its current dead ending would be advantageous because the increased accessibility to the neighborhood
would improve firesafetyand police protection response time.The Engineering staff hasalso recommended
that Village Avenue be made a through street at this time. This would allow the total area to have better
access to Grape Drive and improvethe general traffic flow.This becomes more important when the traffic
signal is installedat Grape Drive and SR-17 in 1995 and the future signal is installed at Grape Drive and
Valley Road.
Mr.Collierfeltthat the Council would be making a mistake by not extending VillageAvenueto Grape Drive.
Mr.Jackson pointed out that there will be an additional 1,000 people in this development and he wanted
to know the impact on Valley Road.
Gary Harer,Municipal Services Director,stated that a signal will be installed at Valleyand Grape and the
Dept.of Transportation will be installing a signalat Grapeand Highway 17.The city is attempting to route
more traffic through Valley and Grape since they are both 4 lane streets and should be more fully utilized.
Mr.Pearce feltthat the wishes of the current residents should be considered and theVista Village residential
area should not be connected with Grape Drive by the extension of Village Avenue.
The public hearing was opened.There were no comments.
The public hearing was closed.
The ordinance creating a planned unitdevelopmentdistrict ofMosesLakepursuant to MosesLakeMunicipal
Code 18.22.020 (8)and Moses Lake Municipal Code 18.67 was read by titleonly.
Action Taken:Mr.Jackson moved that the second reading of the ordinance be adopted and the Findings
of Fact be accepted,seconded by Mr.Reese, and passed with Mr.Collier opposed.
iO?
4868
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:4 May 10, 1994
£RESOLUTION -HOUSE MOVING -GWYN -PUBLIC HEARING
A resolution was presented which grants Jerry Gwyn permission to move a house into the city limits and
locate it on 2204 Peninsula Drive.
The resolution allowing Jerry Gwyn to move a house into the city limits was read by title only.
The public hearing was opened.
Carl Enderud,2141 Neppei,stated that he is in favor of allowingthis house to remain on this lot but wanted f)
to know how it could be placed on the lot before being officially granted permission by the Council.
Gary Harer,Municipal Services Director,stated that this was the first house moved intothe city in over 20
years and staff failed to notice the requirement for a public hearing before the Council until after all other
requirements were met.
ActionTaken:Mr.Pearce moved that the publichearingbe closed,seconded by Mr.Chapman, and passed
unanimously.
Action Taken:Mr.Jackson moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Collier,and passed
unanimously.
/Of*
VI.ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
ORDINANCE -TOURISM COMMISSION -1ST READING
Anordinancewas presented which amendsthe TourismCommission requirementsto allowa person owning
a business in the city limits to be eligible to sit on the Tourism Commission.
The ordinance amending Chapter 2.46 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled 'Tourism Commission"
was read by title only.
There was some discussion by the Council.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that the first reading ofthe ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr./^
Collier,and passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE -SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS -1ST READING
An ordinance and an alternate was presented which amends the regulations pertaining to signs and
billboards in the City of Moses Lake
The ordinance amending Chapter 18.56ofthe Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled"Signs and Billboards"
was read by title only.
Mr.Chapman made the following changes to the alternate provisionsof the proposed sign ordinance:
18.56.060 - 1st paragraph - change temporary to Reader Board and delete "as temporary and portable
signage. Reader boards may be used";2nd paragraph - inthe first linechange temporary to readerboard
and delete "temporary"in rest of paragraph;Section A - in first line delete "temporary"and add "for signs
inthis section"after permit,in second linedelete "temporary"and add "for use at the same address" after
applicant,in fourth linedelete "temporary"and add "in this section"aftersign; include a Section B to read
"Signs underthissection shall haveno blinking or flashing lights."Include the sectiononTemporary Signs
from the existing ordinance.18.56.120 D-change 12squarefeetto 16 squarefeet with the stipulation that
the sign shall not exceed 4' in height and 2' inwidth at the base.
Mr.Chapman wanted toknowwhythe Planning Commission andCity Council haveto review the placement
of a sign on city right-of-way.
James A.Whitaker,City Attorney,statedthatthe review wasto meetthe requirement thatany obstructions r-s
placed on sidewalks be approved by the Council in an effort to regulate what is placed on sidewalks
because of the city's liability.
Mr.Pearce statedthathe isopposedto signsoncityright-of-way.The sidewalks arealready cluttered with
stuff from the post office,trees,fire hydrants,light posts, etc. He felt it would be a disservice to the
community to allow additional obstructions onthe sidewalks.Hefelt the citywould be incurring too much
liability from the signs on city right-of-way.He pointed outthat there are noregulations on how the signs
shall be displayed or their construction.
Action Taken:Mr.Collier moved that the first reading ofthe ordinance be adopted and a public hearing be
set for May 24,seconded by Mr.Pearceand failed with Mr.Paine,Mr.Pearce,and Mr.Collier in favor.
There wassome discussion bythe Council anditwas felt thatthesizeofthe sandwich board sign should
be placed in the definition section of the ordinance.
)0$'l
^J
KJ
4869
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:5 May 10, 1994
Action Taken:Mr.Chapman moved that the ordinance be amended as discussed,the first reading be
adopted,and a public hearing be set for May 24,seconded by Mr.Jackson,and passed with Mr.Pearce
and Mr.Collier opposed.
RESOLUTION -SEWER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
A resolution was presented with adopts the Sewer Comprehensive Plan.
The resolution adopting the Moses Lake Sewer System Plan was read by title only.
Action Taken:Mr.Paine moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Jackson,and passed
unanimously.
VII.REQUESTS TO CALL FOR BIDS -None
VIII.REFERRALS FROM COMMISSIONS
ORDINANCES -C-1 &C-2 ZONES -TEMPORARY/SEASONAL USES -1ST READINGS //air
Ordinances were presented which amend the C-1 and C-2 Zone chapters of the Zoning Code to bringthem
into conformance with the city's current procedures for licensing itinerant vendors.The adoption of the
itinerantvendor ordinance outright permits "temporary or seasonal uses"no mattertheir duration,provided
they meet the performance standards of the ordinance.These types of uses were previously allowed in the
C-1 and C-2 zones through a conditional use permit if they exceeded 7 days in duration.
The ordinance amending Chapter 18.28 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled "C-1,Central Business
District Zone"was read by title only.
Mr.Chapman stated that he is opposed to these changes and the itinerant vendor ordinance requiring the
vendors to locate on a hard surface since it is difficultto enforce that requirement.
ActionTaken:Mr.Collier moved that the first readingof the ordinance be adopted and a publichearing be
set for May 24,seconded by Mr.Pearce, and passed with Mr.Chapman opposed.
C~.The ordinance amending Chapter 18.32 ofthe Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled "C-2,General Commer-
v_y cial and Business Zone"was read by title only.
ActionTaken:Mr.Pearce moved that the first reading of the ordinance be adopted and a public hearing
be set for May 24,seconded by Mr.Collier,and passed with Mr.Chapman opposed.
ORDINANCE -CHAPTER 16.04 AMENDMENTS -1ST READING
An ordinance was presented which adopts optional appendixes allowed under the state building code.The
proposed amendments will provide consistent review of the following:
a.Agricultural buildings
b.Chapter 12, Group R, Division3 Occupancies
c.Waterproofing and Dampproofing Foundations
d.Reroofing
e.Patio Covers
f.Excavation and Grading
There was some discussion by the Council and several of the Councilmen stated that they did not receive
the amendments and requested that consideration of the ordinance be tabled until the next meeting.
Action Taken:Mr.Jackson moved that the ordinance be tabled,seconded by Mr.Chapman,and passed
unanimously.
MCELWAIN SHORT PLAT -SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
PhilBloom,Columbia Northwest Engineering,has submitted a subdivisionvariance request forthe McElwain
Short Plat.The subject two (2)lot short plat is located off of Lakeside Drive.The subdivision variance
request is to allowthe proponent to defer constructing sidewalks extending through the length of the plat
as required by ordinance.The area is currently improved with full width streets, curbs, and gutters, but no
sidewalks. The Planning Commission recommended that the variance request be granted with the stipu
lation that a covenant run with the land for the sidewalk improvements at a future date.
ActionTaken:Mr.Jackson moved that the variance request be granted with the stipulation that a covenant
be required to run with the land for the sidewalk improvements at a future date,seconded by Mr.Pearce,
and passed unanimously.
J03^>
//£fr
)M
4870
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:6 May 10, 1994
(j WESTLAKE SHORES FINAL PLAT
Ron Baker,Boundary Engineering, on behalf of the owners,has submitted the Westlake Shores Final Plat
for a 70 acre, 86 lot residential subdivision to be located off of Sage Road. The area is zoned R-1,Single
Family Residential. The subdivision will be served with city water and sanitary sewer.Full width street
improvements have been constructed to serve the subdivision. A requirementofthe original preliminary plat
is that a landscaped buffer be providedalong the west propertylinethat is acceptable to the Department
of Wildlife.The proponents have provideda bond, approved by the CityAttorney, forthe buffer. The city
has received no written approval from the Department of Wildlife that the buffer is acceptable.In the ^^^
construction of some of the improvements of the plat,an adjoining property owner had property pins \\
removed and not replaced by the proponent. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the
proponent reset Jim Foley's property pins to their original condition.
The Planning Commission recommended to the Council that the Westlake Shores final platbe approved
providedthe comments of the CityEngineerare addressed and satisfiedand thatthe propertypinissue be
resolved before the plat is signed off by the city.
There was some discussion by the Council on the buffer area required by the Department of Wildlife as a
mitigation measure.
Action Taken:Mr.Chapman moved that the Westlake Shores Final Plat be approved provided the
comments of the City Engineer are addressed and satisfied, that the property pin issue be resolved before
the plat is signed off by the city, the city receive confirmation of approval of the buffer area by the
Department of Wildlife,and the Findings of Fact be accepted,seconded by Mr.Jackson,and passed
unanimously
IX.OTHER ITEMS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
MONROE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
The city has been requested to improve Monroe Street to Community Standards.Monroe Street is not on
the fiveyear street improvement planas sewer is not installed,the adjacent property is not platted, and there
are only two houses at the north end of this street.The city has no records of this street ever being oiled.
Amada Martinez, 1322 Monroe,as interpreted by GloriaQuintanilla,1179 Ramm Road,stated that she has
lived in this area since 1957 and there is a lot of traffic on Monroe Street.She wanted to knowwhy the city f~*\
does not put in the street since she is a tax payer.
Mr.Rimple pointed out that the taxes go for many other things than taxes.
Fouad Shaker,1316 Lakeway,and owner of property in the Monroe Street area,stated that the dust from
Monroe is terrible.There is a lot of traffic on this street.He wanted to know,if the street could not be
paved,if the traffic could be regulated.
Mr.Rimple pointed out that 90% of the traffic on Monroe is generated from the high school.He pointed out
the problem with improving the street is that the property is unplatted and there are no utilitiesin place.
Mr.Reese stated that the street is heavily traveled and something needs to be done.He wanted to know
ifthe street could be improved to county standards,oiling and gravel.That would keep thedust down and
when the unplatted property is development the street could be brought up to city standards.
Mr.Collier wanted to know ifthe city could put down lignite. Itwould eliminate the dust problem without
costing the city much.
Gary Harer,Municipal Services Director,stated that itwould cost between $1,300 and $1,500.
Mr.Rimple pointed out that lignite does not work on heavily traveled roads.
Ol«
D>°
Mr.Pearce pointed out that the city does not normally improve a street. That is the responsibility of the
property developer.
There was some discussion on the problem and staff was requested to bring backthe cost of a double shot
of the asphalt on the road.
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager, pointed out that ifthe property owners wished to institute an LID for the
utility improvements the city would place Monroe Street on the list for reconstruction.
REQUEST TO USE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY -GINNY'S
Mr.Paine stated that he had a conflict of interest and exited the Council Room.
Nancy Kellar,Dwinell'sVisual Systems,has requested permission fortwo signs at Ginny's, the old Barney
Googles,to extend intocity right-of-way.The "Ginny's"signwould have 15 feet verticalclearance and would
extend 3' into the right-of-way.The reader board sign has 10' of vertical clearance and extends 5'11"into
the right-of-way.
n
4871
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:7 May 10, 1994
ActionTaken:Mr.Chapman moved that the request to use city right-of-way be granted,seconded by Mr.
Jackson,and passed with Mr.Paine abstaining.
FRONTAGE ROAD -KITTLESON CORNER
The Department of Transportation presented additional information concerning the request for a variance I (~
to the city's standards for streets in order to construct a portion of the proposed frontage road in the
Kittleson Road area that is within the city limits to county standards.
Kirk Berg,Project Engineer with the Department of Transportation,stated that in conjunction with Grant
County it is proposed to extend the north frontage road in the vicinity of Kittleson Road from Road N to
Road L,extending through DNR property and adjoin Kittleson Road in the vicinity of Rammn Road. The
request is to build the portion of roadway in the city limitsto county standards rather than city standards.
He stated that he contacted the county about maintenance of the frontage road and under state law the
county cannot maintain a road inside the limits of the city.
There was some discussion by the Council and concern was expressed about permitting the construction
of a road to county standards inside the city limits.
Action Taken:Mr.Jackson moved that the variance request be denied,seconded by Mr.Chapman,and
passed unanimously.
GARBAGE COLLECTION CONTRACT
Authorization was requested for the City Manager to sign the ten year garbage collection contract with
Lakeside Disposal.
There was some discussion on the contract which needs some changes on dates and the equipment
schedule.
ActionTaken:Mr.Reese moved that the City Manager be authorized to sign the contract,seconded by Mr.
Collier,and passed unanimously.
ORDINANCES -WATER/SEWER RATES
Ordinances were presented which amend the water and sewer rates.
ActionTaken:Mr.Chapman moved that the item be tabled,seconded by Mr.Reese, and passed with Mr.
Pearce,Mr. Collier,and Mr. Rimple opposed.
Joseph K.Gavinski, City Manager,stated that the proposed ordinances are based on the samples presented
by the Finance Director several meetings ago.A letter was also distributed from CH2M Hill on impact fees.
X.COUNCIL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS -None
XI.CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
1993 FINANCIAL REPORT
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that this is the first time in over 20 years that the financial report
has been finished on time.Thanks go to Walter Fry,Finance Director, Ron Cone,Asst.Finance Director
for Accounting,and Bob Taylor,Accountant.
AQUATIC CENTER
Joseph K.Gavinski, City Manager,stated that invitations have been sent out for the grand opening on May
21.The painting and landscaping is essentially done.As soon as the paint drys the pool will be filled.
The regular meeting was recessed at 10:30 p.m.and the Council met in an executive session to discuss real
—estate.The executive session was adjourned at 11 p.m.and the regular meeting was reconvened.The
regular meeting was adjourned at 11 p.m.
oltLl v-tC
Finance Director
MS
/07cj
/#£
/ooo
u
u
u
BEFORETHE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCILOF THE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE CRESTVIEW COURT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CRESTVIEW COURT PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT PREUMINARY PLAT
FINDINGS OF FACT
2.
HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Commission on March 24,
1994 and continued on April 14,1994.
Proponent.Sage Real Estate Services,Inc. is the proponent of this planned unitdevelopment.
Purpose.The proponent has submitted a planned unit development for property legally
described as follows:
Those portions of Tracts 25,26,19,and 20, Park Orchard Tracts,according to the platthereof
recorded in Acreage Plats,Page 36,Records of Grant County,Washington,described as
follows:
Beginning at the west 1/4 corner of Section 15,Township 19 North,Range 28 E.W.M.;thence
South 89°35'01" East, a distance of 1,317.27 feet along the center line of the street known as
Valley Road to the center line of the street known as Grape Drive;thence North 00°09'00"
East, a distance of 30.00 feet along the center line of Grape Drive;thence South 89°53'01"
east,a distance of 40.00 feet to the true point of beginning;thence North 00°09'00"east, a
distance of 1,320.48 feet to the northerly boundary of Tract 26;thence North 89°56'26"East,
a distance of 882.98 feet along the northerly boundary of Tracts 26 and 19;thence South
00°10*05"West,a distance of 1,323.19 feet to the southerly boundary ofTract 20;thence North
89°53'01"West,a distance of 882.26 feet along the southerly boundary of Tracts 20 and 25
to the true point of beginning;except the north 300.00 feet of Tracts 19 and 26.
Evidence.The Commission considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted planned unit development.
B.Testimony from the proponent.
C.Testimony from the public.
D. Written comments from various parties.
FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Commission makes the following findings of fact:
2.1 The proponents are the owners of the property.
2.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single FamilyResidential, and R-3,Multi-Family Residen
tial.
2.3 The area is currently vacant.
2.4 It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2.5 The zoning is appropriate.
2.6 The project provides for additional living units in the city limits.
3.CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
From the foregoing findings of fact the Commission makes the following conclusions:
3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to recom
mend to the City Council the advisability of approving a preliminary plat and planned unit
development.
3.2 The preliminary plat and planned unit development is properly before the Commission for its
recommendation.
3.3 It is proper at this time for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation on this
preliminary plat and planned unit development.
3.4 It is in the best interests and welfare of the city's citizens to plat the property as proposed.
4.RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
On the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions,it is the recommendation of the
Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake to the City Council of the City of Moses Lake that
the preliminary plat and planned unit development be approved provided the proposed street does
not connect to the existing Village Avenue.
5.FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
5.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Council on May 10,1994.
5.2 Proponent.Sage Real Estate Services,Inc. is the proponent of this planned unit development
district.
5.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitted a preliminary planned unit development district for
property legally described above.
5.4 Evidence.The Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted planned unit development district.
B.Written comments from various parties.
6.FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Council makes the following findings of fact:
6.1 The proponent is the owner of the property.
6.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single Family Residential,and R-3,Multi-family Residen
tial.
6.3 The area is currently vacant.
6.4 It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
6.5 The zoning is appropriate.
6.6 The project provides for additional living units in the city limits.
7.FURTHER CONCLUSIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL
From the foregoing findings of fact the Council makes the following conclusions:
7.1 The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to make a decision on
a preliminary planned unit development district.
7.2 The planned unit development district is properly before the Council for its decision.
7.3 It is proper at this time for the City Council to make a decision on this preliminary planned unit
development district.
8.DECISION.
The City Council of the City of Moses Lake agrees with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approves the preliminary planned unit development district.
Dated:May 10,1994
"
u
^j
BEFORETHE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL OFTHE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON
)
IN THE MATTER OFTHE WESTLAKE SHORES ) WESTLAKE SHORES FINAL PLAT
FINALPLAT )
)
) FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS,
) AND DECISION
1.HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
1.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Commission on April 28,
1994.
1.2 Proponent.Properties Four, Inc. is the proponent of this plat.
1.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitted a plat for property legally described as follows:
That portion of the West half of Section 32,Township 19 North,Range 28 East, W.M., Grant
County,Washington,described as follows:
Commencing from a United States Bureau of Reclamation brass cap,accepted as the north
quarter corner of said section 32, also as a point on centerline of Sage Road;
thence North 89°46'10"along the north line of the northwest quarter of said Section 32 and
the centerline of said Sage Road, a distance of 1327.66 feet to a point on the westerly right-of-
way of Sand Dunes Road:
Thence South 00°41,32"West,along said westerly right-of-way, a distance of 1080.00 feet to
the true point of beginning;
Thence along the following courses and distances;
South 89°18'44"East,a distance of 550.00 feet;
North 75°12'13"East,a distance of 360.00 feet;
South 71°25,46"East,a distance of 174.00 feet;
South 24°26'38"East,a distance of 483.32 feet;
South 44°40'08"West,a distance of 611.66 feet;
"^South 34°35'32"East, a distance of 528.42 feet;
W South 03°48'51"West,a distance of 140.14 feet;
South 39°46'35"West,a distance of 222.02 feet;
South 00°35'05"West,a distance of 1333.31 feet;
North 89°52'15"West,a distance of 1003.35 feet;
North 00°41'42"East,a distance of 1333.94 feet;
Thence North 00°41'32"East, a distance of 1587.80 feet to the true point of beginning.
1.4 Evidence.The Commission considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted plat.
B.Testimony from the proponent's representative.
2.FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Commission makes the following findings of fact:
2.1 The proponent is the owner of the property.
2.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single Family Residential.
2.3 The plat conforms to the previously approved preliminary plat.
2.4 The issues of the buffer area for the Department of Wildlife and the replacement of property
pins will be resolved.
2.5 The project is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
2.6 The project is inthe public interest.
CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
From the foregoing findings of fact the Commission makes the following conclusions:
3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to recom
mend to the City Council the advisability of approving a plat.
3.2 The plat is properly before the Commission for its recommendation.
3.3 It is proper at this time for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation on this plat.
3.4 It is in the best interests and welfare of the city's citizens to plat the property as proposed.
4.RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
On the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions,it is the recommendation of the
Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake to the City Council of the City of Moses Lake that ^^^
the plat be approved,provided the comments of the City Engineer are addressed and satisfied and
that the property pin issue be resolved.
5.FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
5.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Council on May 10,1994.
5.2 Proponent.Properties Four is the proponent of this plat.
5.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitted a final plat for property legally described above.
5.4 Evidence.The Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted plat.
B.Written comments from various parties.
6.FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Council makes the following findings of fact:
6.1 The proponent is the owner of the property.
6.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single Family Residential.
6.3 The plat conforms to the previously approved preliminary plat.
6.4 The issues of the buffer area for the Department of Wildlife and the replacement of property
pins will be resolved.
6.5 The project is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
6.6 The project is in the public interest.
7.FURTHER CONCLUSIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL
From the foregoing findings of fact the Council makes the following conclusions:
7.1 The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to make a decision on
a final plat.
7.2 The plat is properly before the Council for its decision.
7.3 It is proper at this time for the City Council to make a decision on this final plat.
8.DECISION.
The City Council of the City of Moses Lake agrees with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approves the final plat.
Dated:May 10,1994
R.Wayne Rimple,Mayor
~