Loading...
1993 01 26u U 4706 MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL January 26, 1993 Council Present:Wayne Rimple,JoAn Brown, Dick Collier, Richard Pearce,Bill Reese,and Roger Biallas Absent:Daryl Jackson MINUTES:Mrs. Brown noted that on page 2 of the minutes of the January 12 meeting,the name of Mr.Lee should be changed to Mr Melin and that the minutes of the meeting of January 12,1993 be approved as corrected,seconded by Mr.Pearce,and passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF BILLS.CHECKS.AND PREPAID CLAIMS Action Taken:Mr.Biallas moved that the bills,checks,and prepaid claims issued be approved,seconded by Mr.Collier,and passed with Mr.Biallas abstaining from voting forthat portion of the bills to A & H Printers and Mr.Rimpleabstaining fromvoting on that portion of the billsto Faber Industrial Supply. Vouchers audited and certified by the Finance Directoras required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certifiedas required by RCW42.24.090, have been recorded on a listingwhich has been made available to the City Council. Claims: The vouchers included on the below list as modified by the Council and noted upon said list for the Council meeting of January 26, 1993 for the funds listed below are approved in the amount of $156,895.44. GENERAL FUND STREET MID-PENINSULA BLK GRANT EQUIPMENT LEASES WATER/SEWER FUND 1985 BOND REDM 1990 BOND REDM 1992 BOND FUND WATER/SEWER CONSTRUCTION Prepaid Claims: Prepaid claims approved by the City Manager according to the process established by Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.030 and the internal control policy approved bythe CityCouncil have been recorded on a listing which has been made available to the City Council.The claims listed below are ap- i^_J proved in theamount of $203,645.23 for all funds. GENERAL $ 392.68 WATER/SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1,000.00 1985 BOND REDM 196,480.78 CENTRAL SERVICES 19.27 1990 BOND REDM 5,752.50 TOTAL $203,645.23 Checks:Checks 36320 through 36491 issued on January 13, 1993 were approved for payment at the Council meeting held on January 26,1993 in the total amount of $310,032.62. Payroll:The payroll issued on January 15, 1993 having been approved pursuant to the rule of the City Council set forth in Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.040,was paid by checks 77262 through 77408 inthe amount of $166,889.83. I.CITIZEN INPUT MOSES LAKE YOUTH TASK FORCE RETREAT Ted Lund stated that the Moses Lake Youth Task Force,which grew out of the "Safe Schools Project" is having a retreat in Leavenworth on February 24,25, and 26 and he requested representation from the City Council and city staff at this meeting. Mr.Rimple pointed outthat this date conflictswith the Legislative Conference inTacoma but that every effort will be made to have city representatives at the meeting in Leavenworth also. $25,097.13 W/S LEASES 1,075.79 9,121.63 SANITATION FUND 91.53 7.00 SELF-INSURANCE 1,096.47 3,923.86 CENTRAL SERVICES 14,998.07 15,884.43 EQUIP RENTAL-OPERATIONS 18,154.53 243.43 BUILD MAINT-OPERATIONS 62,345.37 106.16 FIREMANS PENSION 298.04 68.22 4,383.78 TOTAL $156,895.44 EMPLOYEE PRESENTATIONS -None III.CONSENT AGENDA Resolution -Abandon Easement -Moses Lake Medical Center:A resolution was presented whichabandons /O/J an easement on the Moses Lake Medical Center Plat. Resolution - Accept Utilities - Moses Lake Travel Plaza:A resolution was presented whichaccepts the //£Q? utilitiesconstructed in conjunction with the Moses Lake Travel Plaza Plat. TIB Grant -Valley Road:Staff requested authorization toapply for aTIB grant for Valley Road In association /0/<J with Grant County. Action Taken:Mr.Reese moved that the Consent Agenda be approved,seconded by Mr.Biallas, and passed unanimously. I*# )0» IQ\#% p^ \\{ff 4707 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:2 January 26, 1993 IV.CONSIDERATION OF BIDS SATELUTE FIRE STATION Bids were received for the satellite fire station. Action Taken:Mr.Colliermoved that this item be removed from the table,seconded by Mr.Pearce, and passed unanimously. Action Taken:Mr.Biallas moved that Matthews Construction beawarded the bid for the satellite fire station f~~*\ along with alternates 1,2,3,5, and 7,seconded by Mrs.Brown, and passed with Mr.Reese and Mr.Collier opposed. V.PETITIONS.COMMUNICATIONS.OR PUBLIC HEARINGS -None VI.ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 0 ORDINANCE -AMEND 1992 BUDGET -SINGLE READING An ordinance amending the 1992 budget was presented. The ordinance amending the 1992 budget forthe Cityof Moses Lake,Washington, was read by titleonly. Action Taken:Mr.Collier moved that the ordinance be adopted and the summary for publication be approved,seconded by Mr.Pearce,and passed unanimously. ^i-j ORDINANCE -RESOURCE LANDS AND CRITICAL AREAS -2ND READING An ordinance was presented which amends the Resource Lands and Critical Areas ordinance. The amendment provides that building permits, required on developments and/or subdivisions approved prior to the adoption of the ordinance,are exempt from the provisions of the ordinance for a period of 5 years. Developments and/or subdivisions approved after the adoption of the ordinancewould also be exempt from further review under the ordinance for 5 years. The ordinance amending Chapter 19.03 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled "Interim Classification and Designation of Resource Lands and Critical Areas and Regulations for the Interim Conservation and Protection of Resource Lands and Critical Areas"was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that the second reading of the ordinance be adopted and the summary for publication be approved,seconded by Mr.Reese,and passed unanimously. ORDINANCE -AMEND TAXICABS -1ST READING An ordinance was presented which amends the taxicab driver's regulations to allow a felon to drive a taxi after approval by the Police Chief. The ordinance amending Chapter 5.40 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled 'Taxlcabs"was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Biallasmovedthat the firstreading of the ordinance beadopted,seconded by Mr.Collier, and passed unanimously. x£,RESOLUTION -FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL -SiP #3 A resolution was presented which sets a public hearing on the final assessment roll for Sidewalk Improve ment District #3. The resolution of the City Council of the City of Moses Lake, Washington, establishing a final assessment roll for Sidewalk Improvement District No. 3 fixing the time and place for hearing upon said roll and providing for the giving of notice in the matter as required by law was read by title only. Action Taken:Mrs.Brown moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Pearce, and passed unanimously. VII.REQUESTS TO CALL FOR BIDS (J SEWER SYSTEM TELEMETRY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Staffrequested authorization to call forbids forthe Sewer System Telemetry Project which will replacethe outdated telemetry system presently used at the Central Operations Facility. Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that staff be authorized to call for bids,seconded by Mr.Collier,and passed unanimously. n r\ 4708 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: 3 January 26, 1993 STRATFORD ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT Staff requested authorization to call for bids for the Stratford Road Traffic Signal to be located where K-Mart )/l / and WalMart access Stratford Road. Action Taken:Mr.Collier moved that staff be authorized to call for bids,seconded by Mr.Pearce, and passed unanimously. WELL 14 PUMP AND PUMPHOUSE PROJECT \'Staff requested authorization to call for bids forthe Well 14 Pump and Pumphouse. Action Taken:Mr.Reese moved that staff be authorized to call for bids,seconded by Mr.Pearce, and passed unanimously. III.REFERRALS FROM COMMISSIONS ORDINANCE -MOULTON LANDING PURD PREUMINARY PLAT -1ST READING /)£(* Anordinance was presented which establishes the Moulton Landing PURD Preliminary Plat located at 1300 Marina Drive.Theareaiszoned R-3,Multi-family Residential,and L-l,Light Industrial.The development will be servedwith citywaterand sanitary sewerandwill require full streetimprovements on Marina Drive.The PURD will contain70 condominium units. The planneddevelopment district overlayis being requested to allow deviations from the maximum height requirements of the R-3 Zone. The Planning Commission recommended that the Moulton Landing PURD be approved withthe stipulation that the landscaping be provided as shown on the submitted landscape plan and that a no wake zone be enforced by the proponent. The ordinance creating a planned unit residential development district of Moses Lake pursuant to Moses Lake Municipal Code 18.22.020 (8)and Moses Lake Municipal Code 18.67 was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Reese moved that the first reading of the ordinance be adopted,the proponent be required to establish a no wake zone and landscaping be providedas shown on the submitted landscape plan,and the Findingsof Fact be accepted,seconded by Mr.Pearce, and passed unanimously. [^_J RESOLUTION -BUILD ON UNPLATTED PROPERTY -LARSON PLAYFIELD The Cityof Moses Lake has requested permissionto construct improvements to the Larson Playfleld before platting is completed.The area is zoned Public. The resolution allowing the City of Moses Lake to build on unplatted property was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Collier moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mrs.Brown,and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION - BUILD ON UNPLATTED PROPERTY -SATELUTE FIRE STATION . The City of Moses Lake has requested permission to beginconstruction onthe satellite fire station prior to completing the platting of the property. The area is zoned Public. The resolution allowing the City of Moses Lake to build on unplatted property was read by title only. Action Taken:Mrs.Brown moved thatthe resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Collier,and passed unanimously. HAGERTY FINAL PLAT Russell Hagerty has submitted afinal plat for a5.88 acre,3lot residential subdivision located on Peninsula ^J^ Drive.Thearea iszoned R-1,Single Family Residential.The area will be served with citywater and sanitary sewer. A covenant has been recorded which provides for street improvements to Peninsula Drive when \^j required by the city.The Planning Commission recommended that the Hagerty Final Plat be approved. Action Taken:Mr.Biallas movedthatthe Hagerty Final Plat be approved and the Findings of Fact be accepted, seconded by Mrs.Brown,and passed unanimously. LAKERIDGE VILLA PURD FINAL PLAT Ken Wiser has submitted a final plat for a 1.5acre,10lot planned unit residential development located on Division Street.The area is zoned R-3,Multi-family Residential.The subdivision will be served with city water andsanitary seweranda private street.The Planning Commission recommended thatthe Lakeridge Villa PURD Final Plat be approved. Action Taken:Mr.Biallas movedthatthe Lakeridge Villa PURD Final Plat be approved andthe Findings of Fact be accepted, seconded by Mr.Collier,and passed unanimously. //«6? \ol 1)93 •' 4709 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:4 January 26, 1993 IX.OTHER ITEMS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION MUSEUM AND ART CENTER USE The Adam East Museumand Art Center Directorhas proposed that the Center be made availableto groups for meetings,receptions,and small parties.This type of usage has been successful with other museums and art centers.A fee of $125 for using the facilities was proposed.Of the $125, $75 would go toward museum programs and $50 would be used to cover staffing and cleaning costs. The facility would be available from 5:30 p.m. to 10 p.m.Tuesday through Saturday for the activities. There was considerable discussion by the Council and itwas the consensus of the Council that a study session should be scheduled to discuss the matter. GRANT COUNTY SOLID WASTE FEES Grant County has increased its 1993 solid waste disposal fees. The city last increased its refuse collection rates in June 1991 and since that time county solid waste disposal fees have increased approximately 11.66%. Therewas considerablediscussion and a studysession was set forTuesday, February2at 7 p.m.to discuss garbage rates. X.COUNCIL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT AREA Mrs.Brown reported that every community inGrant County has opted intothe publictransportation benefit area project except Quincy and a representative from Moses Lake need to be appointed to the PTBA Board. Mr.Biallas moved that Mrs. Brown be appointed to the PTBA Board,seconded by Mr.Rimple,and passed unanimously. XI.CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND COMMENTS BUDGET REPORT Joseph K.Gavinski, City Manager,distributed the 1992 year end budget report regarding expenditures. AWC UPDATE AWC submitted a letter which outlined their concerns for 1993. BUILDING ACTIVITY A report on the building activity in Moses Lake from 1970 to 1992 was presented. SALES TAX/TRANSIENT RENTAL INCOME Joseph K.Gavinski, City Manager, informed the Council that the city will receive $145,755.86 in sales tax revenues on January 29. The city will also receive $8,294.19 in transient rental income on January 29. ,0^ -' \00° ]00^ l^t tip LEGISLATIVE ACTION CONFERENCE Joseph K.Gavinski,CityManager,stated that the Legislative ActionConference is scheduled for February 24 and 25,1993 in Olympia. SAMMONS COMMUNICATIONS Joseph K.Gavinski,CityManager, reported that Sammons is proposing to restructure the offered channels into two options -Lifeline and a tier.Lifeline will be the basic offering. AGCT MEETING Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that the AGCT meeting will be in Quincy on Thursday,January 28 at 7 p.m.Vehicles will be leaving City Hall at 6:15 p.m. WATER CONTAMINATION Joseph K.Gavinski, City Manager,stated that an ad the city ran concerning water contamination in the Montlake area was attached to an ad for water purifiers and send to residents of the Montlake area.He emphasized that the water purifierswould not take care of the contamination that was advertised as they will not take out bacteria. The regular meeting was adjourned at 8:40 ATTEST:/? Finance Director " u u BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF THE LAKERIDGE VILLA PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT LAKERIDGEVILLA PLANNED UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION. 1.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Commission on January 14, 1993. 1.2 Proponent. KenWiser is the proponent of this planned unit residential development. 1.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitted a planned unit residential development for property legally described as follows: Lots 10 -13 of the Hyland Park Addition Number 1 Plat as recorded in Book 7 of Plats,Page 70,Records of Grant County, Washington, lying in the northwest quarter of Section 26, Township 19 North,Range 28 East, W.M., Grant County,Washington,more particularly described as follows: Beginning from the most northeasterly comer of Lot 10 of said plat, said point being the true point of beginning;thence South 20°48'30"West,along the westerly right-of-way of Division Street,a distance of 250.00 feet;thence along the following courses and distances: North 69°11'30"West,a distance of 140.00 feet; North 20°48'30"East,a distance of 10.00 feet; North 69°11'30"west,a distance of 140.00 feet; North 20o48'30"East,a distance of 187.28 feet; South 89°49'30n east,a distance of 149.60 feet; Thence South 69°11'30n East, a distance of 140.00 feet to the true point of beginning; containing 1.49 acres,more or less. ^_J 1.4 Evidence.The Commission considered the following materials in reaching Its decision: A.The submitted planned unit residential development. B.Testimony from the proponent. C.Written comments from various parties. 2.FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Commission makes the following findings of fact: 2.1 The proponent is the owner of the property. 2.2 The property is currently zoned R-3,Multi-family Residential. 2.3 A planned unit development is permitted under city ordinances. 2.4 It is a less dense use of an R-3 zone. 2.5 It will meet the needs of a certain segment of the population. 3.CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. From the foregoing findings of fact the Commission makes the following conclusions: 3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authorityto recom mend to the CityCouncil the advisability of approvinga plannedunitresidential development. 3.2 The plannedunitresidential development is properly beforethe Commissionforitsrecommen dation. 3.3 It is proper at this time for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation on this planned unit residential development. 3.4 The Planning Commission declared this planned unit residential development, if granted, to have a non-significantadverse impact on the environment on March 26,1993.Therefore,there should be no undesirable environmental problems created. 3.5 It is in the best interests and welfare of the city's citizens to plat the property as proposed. 4.RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. On the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions,it is the recommendation of the Planning Commission of the City of Moses Laketo the City Council of the City of Moses Lake that the planned unit residential development be approved./—> 5.FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL 5.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Council on January 26,1993. 5.2 Proponent. Ken Wiser is the proponent of this planned unit residential development 5.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitted a final planned unit residential development for property legally described above: 5.4 Evidence.The Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision: A.The submitted planned unit residential development. B.Testimony from the proponent. 6.FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Council makes the following findings of fact: 6.1 The proponent is the owner of the property. 6.2 The property is currently zoned R-3,Multi-family Residential. 6.3 A planned unit development is permitted under city ordinances.-*-v 6.4 It is a less dense use of an R-3 Zone. 6.5 Itwill meet the needs of a certain segment of the population. 7.FURTHER CONCLUSIONS BYTHE CITY COUNCIL. From the foregoing findings of fact the Council makes the following conclusions: 7.1 The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to make a decision on a final planned unit residential development. 7.2 The planned unit residential development is properly before the Council for its decision. 7.3 It is proper at this time for the City Council to make a decision on this final planned unit residential development. 8.DECISION. The City Council of the City of Moses Lake agrees with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approves the final planned unit residential development. Dated:January 26,1993 u u u- BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF THE HAGERTY PLAT HAGERTY FINAL PLAT FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION 1.HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION. 1.1 Date.A publicmeeting was held upon propernotice before the Commission on January 14, 1993 1.2 Proponent. Russell Hagerty is the proponent of this plat. 1.3 Purpose. The proponent has submitted a plat for property legally described as follows: Battery Orchard Tract 38 1.4 Evidence. The Commission considered the following materials in reaching its decision: A.The submitted plat. B.Testimony from the proponent. C. Written comments from various parties. 2.FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Commission makes the following findings of fact: 2.1 The proponent is the owner of the property. 2.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single Family Residential. 2.3 It is consistent with surrounding property uses. 3.CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. From the foregoing findings of fact the Commission makes the following conclusions: 3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to recom mend to the City Council the advisability of approving a plat. 3.2 The plat is properly before the Commission for its recommendation. 3.3 Itis proper at this time for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation on this plat. 3.4 The Planning Commission declared this plat, if granted, to have a non-significant adverse impact on the environment on April 16, 1992..Therefore,there should be no undesirable environmental problems created. 3.5 It is in the best interests and welfare of the city's citizens to plat the property as proposed. 4.RECOMMENDATION OFTHE PLANNING COMMISSION. On the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions,it is the recommendation of the Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake to the City Council of the City of Moses Lake that the plat be approved. 5.FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. 5.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Council on January 26,1993. 5.2 Proponent.Russell Hagerty is the proponent of this plat. 5.3 Purpose. The proponent has submitted a final platfor property legallydescribed above. 5.4 Evidence.The Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision: A.The submitted plat. B.Testimony from the proponent. 6.FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Based upon the evidence presented to them, the Council makes the following findings of fact: 6.1 The proponent is the owner of the property.f~\ 6.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single FamilyResidential. 6.3 It is consistent with surrounding property uses. 7.FURTHER CONCLUSIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL. From the foregoing findings of fact the Council makes the following conclusions: 7.1 The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to make a decision on a final plat. 7.2 The plat is properly before the Council for its decision. 7.3 It is proper at this time for the City Council to make a decision on this final plat. 8.DECISION. The City Council of the City of Moses Lake agrees with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approves the final plat. Dated:January 26,1993 n u BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITYCOUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF THE MOULTON LANDING )MOULTON LANDPLANNEDUNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION 1.HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION. [)1.1 Date.A public meeting was held upon proper notice before theCommission onJanuary 14, 1993. 1.2 Proponent. Mike Leggeeand Hap Schnase are the proponents ofthis planned unit residential development district. 1.3 Purpose. The proponents have submitted a planned unit residential development district for property legally described as follows: That portion of Government Lot 5,Section 22,Township 19 North,Range 28 East, W.M., Grant County,Washington,lying southeasterly of the old Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad spur line right-of-way;southwesterly of that tract of land deeded to the Standard Oil Company of California in that certain warranty deed filed under Auditor's File No. 238249, Records of Grant County Washington;westerly of the existing Washington Central Railroad main line right-of-way; northerly of that portion of Marina Drive which lies northerly of Lot 1, Block 6,Sunset Park Addition as it is described in that certain warranty deed to the City of Moses Lake filed under Auditor's FileNo.543136 Records of Grant County,Washington;and northwesterly of the northwest line of that tract of land described inthat certain warranty deed filed under Auditor's File No.191874 Records of Grant County,Washington. 1.4 Evidence.The Commission considered the following materials in reaching its decision: A.The submitted planned unit residential development district. __^B.Testimony from the proponent. C.Written comments from various parties. 2.FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Commission makes the following findings of fact: 2.1 The proponents are the owners of the property. 2.2 The property is currently zoned R-3,Multi-Family Residential, and L-l,Light Industrial. 2.3 The area is currently used for residential uses. 2.4 It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2.5 The zoning is appropriate. 2.6 Provides for additional living units in the city limits. 2.7 The Light Industrial storage area will serve as a buffer between existing businesses and the proposed residential use. 2.8 The development conforms to the R-3 zone requirements except for the height restrictions. 2.9 There were no objections from the neighbors. LJ*3.CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. From the foregoing findings of fact the Commission makes the following conclusions: 3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to recom mend to the City Council the advisability of approving a planned unit residential development district. 3.2 The planned unit residential development district is properly before the Commission for its recommendation. 3.3 It is proper at this time for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation on this planned unit residential development district 3.4 The Planning Commission declared this planned unit residential development district, if granted,to have a non-significant adverse impact onthe environment on December 17,1992. Therefore,there should be no undesirable environmental problems created. 3.5 It is in the best interests and welfare of the city's citizens to plat the property as proposed. 4.RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. On the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions,it is the recommendation of the Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake to the City Council of the City of Moses Lake that the planned unit residential development district be approved. 5.FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL 5.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Council on January 26,1993 and a public hearing was held upon upon proper notice before the Council on February 9, 1993. 5.2 Proponent.Mike Leggeeand Hap Schnaseare the proponents of this planned unit residential development district. 5.3 Purpose.The proponents have submitted a preliminaryplanned unit residential development district for property legally described above: 5.4 Evidence.The Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision: A.The submitted planned unit residential development district. B.Testimony from the proponent. 6.FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE CITY COUNCIL Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Council makes the following findings of fact: 6.1 The proponents are the owners of the property. 6.2 The property is currently zoned R-3,Multi-family Residential,and L-l,Light Industrial. 6.3 The area is currently used for residential uses. 6.4 It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 6.5 The zoning is appropriate. 6.6 Provides for additional living units in the city limits. 6.7 The Light Industrial storage area will serve as a buffer between existing businesses and the proposed residential use. 6.8 The development conforms to the R-3 zone requirements except for the height restrictions. 6.9 There were no objections from the neighbors. 7.FURTHER CONCLUSIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL From the foregoing findings of fact the Council makes the following conclusions: 7.1 The CityCouncil of the Cityof Moses Lake is vested withthe authorityto make a decision on a preliminary planned unit residential development district. 7.2 The planned unit residential developmentdistrict is properly beforetheCouncil forits decision. 7.3 Itis properatthistime forthe City Council to make a decision on this preliminary plannedunit residential development district. 8.DECISION. The City Council of the City of Moses Lake agrees with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approves the preliminary plannedunit residential development district. Dated:January 26,1993 n n o