1992 05 12u
4633
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOSES LAKE
May 12, 1992
Members Present:Wayne Rimple,JoAn Brown,Daryl Jackson,Bill Reese,Dick Collier,Richard
Pearce,and Roger Biallas
MINUTES:Mr.Jackson moved that the minutes of the meeting of April 28 be approved,seconded by Mrs.
Brown, and passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF BILLS.CHECKS.AND PREPAID CLAIMS
Action Taken:Mr.Jackson moved that the bills,checks,and prepaid claims issued be approved,seconded
by Mr.Reese,and passed with Mr.Rimple abstaining from voting for that portion of the bills to Faber
Industrial and Moses Lake Steel Supply and Mr.Biallas abstaining from voting for that portion of the bills
to A & H Printers.
Vouchers audited and certified by the Finance Director as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense
reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090,have been recorded on a listing which has
been made available to the City Council.
Claims:The vouchers included on the below list as modified by the Council and noted upon said list for
the Council meeting of May 12,1992 forthe funds listed below are approved in the amount of $448,255.64.
GENERAL FUND
STREET
STREET REPR/RECON
MID-PENINSULA BLK GR
STREET IMPROVEMENT
WATER/SEWER FUND
WATER SEWER CONSTRUC
Prepaid Claims: Prepaid claims approved by the City Manager according to the process established by
Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.030 and the internalcontrol policy approved by the CityCouncil have been
recorded on a listingwhich has been made availableto the City Council. The claims listed below are ap
proved in the amount of $21,402.97 for allfunds..*
GENERAL $15,110.20
WATER/SEWER FUND 251.25
CENTRAL SERVICES 476.52
DEPOSIT 5.565.00 ..«>
TOTAL $21,402.97
Checks:Checks 33764 through 34084 issued on April 29,1992 were approved for payment at the Council
meeting held on May 12, 1992 in the total amount of $159,131.99.
Payroll:The payroll issued on April 30,1992 having been approved pursuantto the ruleof the CityCouncil
set forth in Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.040,was paid by checks 74100 through 74115 in the amount
of $10,160.03.
Payroll:The payroll issued on May8,1992 havingbeen approved pursuantto the rule of the City Council
set forth in Moses Lake Municipal Code 3.42.040,was paid by checks 74116 through 74264 in the amount
of $168,344.79.
PROCLAMATION
[^J The proclamation declaring May 10 to 16,1992 as Buddy Poppy Sales Week was read in its entirety.//SJ
I.CITIZEN INPUT -None
II.EMPLOYEE PRESENTATIONS
Police Department:Communications Officer Debbie Adamson received the Associated Public Safety /O/A
Communications Officer of the Year Award for 1991.
$31,524.28 SANITATION FUND 37,724.36
8,652.54 UNEMPL COMP INS 5,016.97
122,860.77 CENTRAL SERVICES 24,810.44
7.00 EQUIP RENTAL-OPERATI 10,717.80
12,896.91 BUILD MAINT-OPERATIO 16,152.73
16,952.85 FIREMANS PENSION 75.00
159,008.99 DEPOSIT 1,855.00
TOTAL $448,255.64
4634
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: 2 May 12, 1992
III.CONSENT AGENDA
.qj 3 Resolution -Accept Utility Easement -Suncrest Resort:A resolution was presented which accepts a utility
'easement on the Suncrest Resort Binding Site Plan.
nu Resolution -Accept Donation - Helmets: A resolution was presented which accepts the donation of 200
)0^helmets,valued at $3,398,from the North Central Trauma Prevention Council to the Police Department.
nd (j Resolution -Accept Donation -Hughes:Aresolution was presented which accepts thedonation of$50 from)^'Mr.&Mrs.Kenneth Hughes to the 911 system in the memory of Ben Barker.f^
Is\C)Dare Grant Application:Request to apply for a grant for the DARE program from the Department of
''Community Development.
,^f'Crack Seal Project -Accept Work:A&CRepairs has substantially completed the work on the 1992 Crack
'Seal Project and the work should be accepted.
jOl°l-
/oi9
r Seal Coat Project -AcceptWork: Blackline, Inc. hs completed the work on the 1992 Seal Coat Project and
the work should be accepted.
Action Taken: Mrs. Brown moved that the Consent Agenda be approved,seconded by Mr.Collier, and
passed unanimously.
IV.CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
ARTERIAL OVERLAY
Staff recommended that the bid on the arterial overlay project be awarded to Basin Asphalt.
Action Taken:Mr.Reese moved that the bid be awarded to Basin Asphalt,seconded by Mr.Collier,and
passed unanimously.
V.PETITIONS.COMMUNICATIONS.OR PUBLIC HEARINGS
,/pfr ORDINANCE -ZONE CHANGE -LAKERIDGE VILLA PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT -2ND ^-^
'READING -PUBLIC HEARING f )
Ken Wiser has submitted a preliminary short plat and zone change application for an 11 lot, 1.5 acre,
residential planned development districtto be located on DivisionStreet.The area is zoned R-3,Multi-family
Residential.The area will be served with city water, city sanitary sewer,and a private street.The following
subdivision variances have been requested:
1.A 50'wide private driveway/street to be constructed 27'wide back of curb to back of curb
2. Lots fronting upon an arterial street 54' in depth rather than the required 120'.
3.The cul-de-sac have a 35' radius instead of the required 40' radius
A planneddevelopment districtzone change is being requested to allowdeviationsto the lotsize and depth
and width requirements of the underlying R-3 Zone.The Planning Commission recommended to Council
that the planned residential development district zone change request and preliminary major platbe ap
proved as shown on the revised plat map and with the stipulation that covenants be presented to Council
whichaddress the maintenanceofthe private street, perimeterfence,sidewalk,storm drain system, andany
common areas.
Mrs.Jack Black,210 Linden,stated that they are not opposed to the development, justthe smalllot sizes.
John Black,3590 Road F NE,stated that the surrounding propertyowners object to the smalllot sizes.
Bob Fancher pointed out that this development is designed for senior citizens,many ofwhom do not want ^^
to have to take care of large lots.\)
Harry Moberg stated that the homes will cost between $100,000 and $150,000 each.The home will be
individually owned and each lotwill own 1/10 ofthe common property.The covenants will be enforceable.
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,statedthatJoyce Hoffman,ownerof Lago Vista Apartments,requested
that he inform the Council that she and herhusband have no problemswiththe concept butareconcerned
about the regulations and would like to see some sort of association - something like a condominium
arrangement.They are concerned about some of the maintenance issues.
Mr.Pearce wanted to know how the commons areas and common fence would be maintained.
Mr.Moberg stated that the covenants take care of the common areas and fence and the covenants are
enforceable.
4635
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:3 May 12,1992
Action Taken:Mr.Collier moved thatthe public hearing be closed, seconded by Mr.Biallas,and passed
unanimously.
The ordinance creating a planned development district of Moses Lake pursuant to Moses Lake Municipal
Code 18.22.020 (8)and Moses Lake Municipal Code 18.67was readby title only.
ActionTaken:Mr.Jackson moved thatthe second reading ofthe ordinancebe adopted andthe summary
for publication be approved, seconded by Mr.Reese, and passed unanimously.
/j Action Taken:Mr.Biallas moved that the Findings of Fact be accepted,seconded by Mr.Pearce,and
\^s passed unanimously.
VI.ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
ORDINANCE -PARKING -SINGLE READING
An ordinance was presented which eliminates that section of the parking ordinance which prohibits parking '/
inthe downtown area between 3 a.m. and 5 a.m. and includes a section prohibitingthe parkingof vehicles
on posted streets during special events.
The ordinance amending Chapter 10.12 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled "Parking Regulations"
was read by title only.
Action Taken: Mrs. Brown moved that the ordinance be adopted on a single reading and the summary for
publication be approved,seconded by Mr.Reese,and passed unanimously.
VII.REQUESTS TO CALL FOR BIDS
WATER METER READING SYSTEM
u
Staff requested authorization to call for bids for a new computerized water meter reading system.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that staff be authorized to call for bids,seconded by Mr.Collier, and
passed unanimously.
1992 DOWNTOWN SIDEWALK PROJECT
Staff requested authorization to call for bids for the 1992 downtown sidewalk project which includes the
parking lot at Ash Street and Third Avenue and completing the area between Third Avenue and Broadway,
Alder Street and Cedar Street with pavers,decorative street lights,and tree grates.
Action Taken:Mr. Biallas moved that staff be authorized to call for bids,seconded by Mr.Reese,and
passed unanimously.
III.REFERRALS FROM COMMISSIONS
DESERT HIGHLANDS PRELIMINARY PLAT
Maiers DevelopmentCorporation has submitted a preliminary platfora 20 acre, 81 lot, residential subdivision
to be located on Division Street.The area is zoned R-1,Single Family Residential. New subdivision streets,
water mains, sanitary sewer system extensions,and storm water control infrastructure will be required to
be constructed to city standards.
Under new state regulations,between 1995 and 2000,cities will be required to manage storm water runoff
and treatment will be required at the source or at the outflows into the lake. Maiers Development
Corporation is proposing to treat storm water through a biofiltration system to prevent contamination of
ground water by oiland other roadway pollutants. The biofiltration system consists of an 8' grassy swale
next to the curb and notched about every 20'. The storm water would enter this swale and the grass and
underlying soil would treat the water by trapping the pollutants.
M The developer has requested a varianceto allowa 4' sidewalkbehindthe biofiltration system instead ofthe
required 5'sidewalk.Variances have also been requested to allow lot angles greater than 20% of
perpendicular,and lot depths of 100'insteadof the required 120'for those lots adjacent Division Street.
Larry Ridge,one ofthe developers,statedthatthere will be covenants on each lot requiring the property
owner to maintain the biofiltration system.
Phil Bloom,former Municipal Services Director,statedthat state standardsarebeingchanged to require the
treatment of storm water.The storm water will haveto betreated with a biofiltration system on-site or some
kind of treatment at the out-flows to the lake.
//S&
/O^/J-'C
//£G>
w^
oil
/fob
\oo$
4636
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: 4 May 12,1992
There was some discussion by the Council on the proposed grassy swale biofiltration system to be used
fortreating storm water. The Council was concerned about the maintenance of the swale by the property
owner.
Jim Whitaker,City Attorney,stated that ifgrassy swales are to be the preferred methodto treat storm water,
the city may want to develop ordinances that deal with its installation and regulation.
ActionTaken:Mr.Biallasmoved that the preliminary plat be approved and the findings of fact be accepted,
seconded by Mr.Jackson,and passed unanimously.
HAGERTY SUBDIVISION
Russell Hagerty has submitted a preliminary major plat for a 3 lot, 5.88 acre, residential subdivision to be
located on Peninsula Drive.The area is zoned R-1,Single Family Residential, and will be served with city
water and sanitary sewer.Full width street improvements are required to Peninsula Drive.The Planning
Commission recommended to Council that,contingent upon the completion of the environmental review
process and the proponent obtaining a valid Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit,the
preliminary plat be approved with the stipulation that a covenant run with the land binding the property
owners to construct the required full width improvements to Peninsula Drivewhen deemed necessary by
the city and/or that the property owner be required to participate in an LID for those improvements.
Mr.Pearce felt that the city should take a look at Lakeside Drive and determine if it should be extended or
abandoned in this area. He mentioned that some previous plats were required to provide for the extension
of Lakeside Drive.
Action Taken: Mrs. Brown moved that the preliminary plat be approved as recommended by the Planning
Commission and the findings of fact be accepted,seconded by Mr.Biallas,and passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION -ABANDON EASEMENT -VFW
A resolution was presented which provides for the abandonment of a portion of an easement located in the
VFW Plat.
The resolution authorizing abandonment of an easement was read by title only.
Action Taken:Mr.Collier moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Biallas,and passed
unanimously.
IX.OTHER ITEMS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
REQUEST FOR WATER SERVICE -STREIB
Mr.&Mrs.Streib have requested water service fromthe city for approximately 100acres located atthe north
end of Cascade Valley,west of the Larson system.The proponents are willing to sign an annexation
agreement.
There was some concern expressed by the Council on the current water problems in the Larson area.
Action Taken:Mr.Pearce moved that the request for water service be tabled until the Larson water
problems are solved,seconded by Mr.Biallas,and passed unanimously.
X.COUNCIL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS -None
XI.CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
INVESTMENT REPORT
The city earned $60,792.50 in investment income during April 1992.
n
n
]0\1 fMEIRUCK
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,statedthatthe Fire Chief will be looking at a 1981 F.M.C.85'platform
laddertruck on sale for $250,000 by the CityofWest Jordan,Utah.Afterthe city stafflooks this truck off
a report will be given to Council.
])£(?REVENUE LEDGER
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,distributed the REV003 for the period ending March 31,1992,Revenue
Ledger,to the Council.
u
u
^J
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:5
BUDGET REPORT
4637
May 12,1992
Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager, distributed the WAR015 for the period ending March 31,1992,Budget
Report by Personnel and Other Expenses,to the Council.
AQUATIC CENTER MEETING
Joseph K.Gavinski, City Manager,stated that a meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday,May 13, at
the Frontier Junior High social room to answer any questions the public may have on the family aquatic
center.
The regular meetingwas recessed at 8:45p.m. andthe Council met inan executive session to discuss real
estate. The executive session was adjourned at 9 p.m. and the regular meeting was reconvened. The
regular meeting was adjourned at 9 p.m.
ATTEST:
-pfirJ^
Finance Director
//SO
u
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL OFTHE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE LAKERIDGE VILLA
PLANNED UNITY DEVELOPMENT
LAKERIDGE VILLA PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS,
AND DECISION
HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
1.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Commission on April 16,
1992.
1.2 Proponent.Ken Wiser is the proponent of this plat.
1.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitted a planned unit development for property legally
described as follows:
NEED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
1.4 Evidence.The Commission considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted plat.
B.Testimony from the proponent.
C. Written comments from various parties.
D.Comments from the public
2.FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Commission makes the following findings of fact:
[)2.1 The proponent isthe ownerof the property.
2.2 The property is currently zoned R-3,Multi-family Residential.
2.3 A planned unit development is permitted under city ordinances.
2.4 It will be a less dense use of an R-3 zone.
2.5 Itwill meet the needs of a certain segment of the population.
2.6 It is not an environmentally sensitive area.
3.CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Fromthe foregoing findings of fact the Commission makes the following conclusions:
3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authorityto recom
mend to the City Councilthe advisabilityof approving a planned unit development.
3.2 The planned unitdevelopment is properly beforethe Commission for its recommendation.
3.3 It is properat this time for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation on this
planned unit development.
3.4 The Planning Commission declared this planned unit development,ff granted,to have a
^J non-significant adverse impact on the environment on March 26,1992.Therefore,there should
be no undesirable environmental problems created.
3.5 Itis inthe best interests and welfareof the city's citizens to platthe propertyas proposed.
4.RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
On the basisof the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions,it is the recommendation of the
Planning Commission ofthe City of Moses Lake tothe City Council ofthe City of Moses Lake that
the planned unit development be approved.
5.FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL.
5.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Council on May 12,1992.
5.2 Proponent.Ken Wiser is the proponent of this plat.
5.3 Purpose. The proponent has submitted a final plat for property legally described above.
5.4 Evidence.The Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted plat.r"V
B.Testimony from the proponent.
C. Written comments from various parties.
D.Comments from the public.
6.FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Council makes the following findings of fact:
6.1 The proponent is the owner of the property.
6.2 The property is currently zoned R-3, Multi-family Residential.
6.3 A planned unit development Is permitted under city ordinances.
6.4 It will be a less dense use of an R-3 zone.
6.5 It will meet the needs of a certain segment of the population.
6.6 It is not an environmentally sensitive area.
7.FURTHER CONCLUSIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL
From the foregoing findings of fact the Council makes the following conclusions:\)
7.1 The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authorityto make a decision on
a planned unit development.
7.2 The planned unit development is properly before the Council for its decision.
7.3 Itis properat this time forthe City Council to make a decision on this planned unitdevelop
ment.
8.DECISION.
The City Council of the City of Moses Lake agrees with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approves the planned unit development.
Dated: May 12, 1992
R.Wayne Rimple,
n
BEFORETHE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE HAGERTY PLAT ) HAGERTY PLAT
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS,
AND DECISION
O1 1.HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
1.1 Date.A public meeting was held upon proper notice beforethe Commission on April 16,
1992.
1.2 Proponent. Russell Hagerty is the proponent of this plat.
1.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitteda plat for property legally describedas follows:
Battery Orchard Tract 38
1.4 Evidence. The Commission considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted plat.
B.Testimony from the proponent.
C.Written comments from various parties.
2.FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Commission makes the following findings of fact:
2.1 The proponent is the owner of the property.
[I 2.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single Family Residential.
2.3 It is consistent with surrounding property uses.
3.CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
From the foregoing findings of fact the Commission makes the following conclusions:
3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authorityto recom
mend to the City Council the advisabilityof approving a plat.
3.2 The plat is properly before the Commission for its recommendation.
3.3 It is proper atthistime for the Planning Commission to makea recommendation onthis plat.
3.4 The Planning Commission declared this plat,if granted,to have a non-significant adverse
impact on the environment on April 16, 1992. Therefore, there should be no undesirable
environmental problems created.
3.5 Itis inthe best interests and welfare of the city's citizens to platthe propertyas proposed.
4.RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
On the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions, it is the recommendation of the
Planning Commissionof the Cityof Moses Laketo the CityCouncil ofthe City of Moses Lakethat^J the plat be approved.
5.FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
5.1 Date.A publicmeeting was held upon proper notice before the Councilon May 12,1992.
5.2 Proponent. Russell Hagertyis the proponent of this plat.
5.3 Purpose. The proponenthas submitteda preliminary platforpropertylegally described above.
5.4 Evidence.The Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted plat.
B.Testimony from the proponent.
C.Written comments fromvarious parties.
6.FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Council makes the following findings of fact:/—\
6.1 The proponent isthe owner of the property.
6.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single Family Residential.
6.3 Itis consistent with surrounding property uses.
7.FURTHER CONCLUSIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL
From the foregoing findings of fact the Council makesthe following conclusions:
7.1 The City Council ofthe City of Moses Lake isvested with the authority to makea decision on
a preliminary plat.
7.2 The plat is properly before the Council for its decision.
7.3 It is proper atthistime for the City Council to makea decision onthis preliminary plat.
8.DECISION.
The City Council of the City of Moses Lake agrees with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approves the preliminary plat.
Dated: May 12,1992
R.Wayne Rimple,Maydr/\^**^
n
U
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE DESERT HIGHLANDS
PRELIMINARY PLAT
DESERT HIGHLANDS PRELIMINARY PLAT
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS,
AND DECISION
1.HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
1.1 Date. A public meetingwas held upon proper notice before the Planning Commission on April
16,1992.
1.2 Proponent.The Maiers Development Corporation is the proponent of this plat.
1.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitted a preliminary plat for property legally described as
follows:
NEED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
1.4 Evidence.The Commission considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A.The submitted plat.
B.Testimony from the proponent.
C. Written comments from various parties.
D.Comments from the public.
2.FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Commission makes the following findings of fact:
^)2.1 The proponent is the owner ofthe property.
2.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single Family Residential.
2.3 Additional housing is needed in Moses Lake
2.4 Storm water will be handled in an environmentally sound manner
2.5 No opposition from neighbors
2.6 Will enhance the area
2.7 It is not an environmentally sensitive area
3.CONCLUSIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
From the foregoing findings of fact the Commission makes the following conclusions:
3.1 The Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to recom
mend to the City Council the advisability of approving a preliminary plat.
3.2 The plat is properly before the Commission for its recommendation.
3.3 Itis properat this time forthe Planning Commission to make a recommendation on this plat.
K^J 3.4 The Planning Commission declared this plat,if granted,to have a non-significant adverse
impact on the environment on March 26, 1992. Therefore, there should be no undesirable
environmental problems created.
3.5 Itis in the best interests and welfare of the city's citizens to plat the property as proposed.
4.RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
On the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions, it is the recommendation of the
Planning Commission of the City of Moses Lake to the City Council of the City of Moses Lake that
the plat be approved.
FURTHER HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
5.1 Date. A public meeting was held upon proper notice before the Council on May 12,1992.
5.2 Proponent.The Maiers Development Corporation is the proponent of this plat.
5.3 Purpose.The proponent has submitted a preliminaryplatfor propertylegally described above.
5.4 Evidence.The Council considered the following materials in reaching its decision:
A. The submitted plat./™N
B.Testimony from the proponent.
C. Written comments from various parties.
FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT BYTHE CITY COUNCIL.
Based upon the evidence presented to them,the Council makes the following findings of fact:
6.1 The proponent is the owner of the property.
6.2 The property is currently zoned R-1,Single Family Residential.
6.3 Additional housing is needed in Moses Lake
6.4 Storm water will be handled in an environmentally sound manner
6.5 No opposition from neighbors
6.6 Will enhance the area
6.7 It is not an environmentally sensitive area
FURTHER CONCLUSIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL
From the foregoing findings of fact the Council makes the following conclusions:
7.1 The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority to make a decision on
a preliminary plat.
7.2 The plat is properly before the Council for its decision.
7.3 Itis proper at this time forthe City Council to make a decision on this preliminary plat.
8.DECISION.
The City Council of the City of Moses Lake agrees with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and approves the preliminary plat.
Dated: May 12,1992
'R.Wayne Rimple
n
n