Loading...
1985 06 113841 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOSES LAKE June 11,1985 Members Present:Norm Johnson,Bill Reese,David Chandler,Wayne Rimple,Bob Wallenstien,Norm Staat,and Charles Edwards The meeting was called to order at 8 p.m.by Mayor Johnson. Mr.Rimple moved that the minutes of the meeting of May 28 be approved as sub mitted,seconded by Mr.Wallenstien,and passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF BILLS REGULAR BILLS AMOUNT GENERAL FUND $13,364.63 STREET 711.72 ARTERIAL STREET 12.50 URBAN ARTERIAL 722.78 STREET IMPROVEMENT 117.21 WATER/SEWER FUND 14,092.48 WATER/SEWER CONSTRUCTION 370.76 SANITATION FUND 23,615.07 CENTRAL SERVICES 2,899.97 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.83 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 36,252.41 TOTAL $92,186.36 Mr.Edwards moved that the bills be approved as submitted,seconded by Mr. Rimple,and passed with Mr.Edwards abstaining from voting for that portion of the bills to Coast to Coast. I.CITIZEN INPUT None II.CONSENT AGENDA None III.CONSIDERATION OF BIDS JUNIPER DRIVE A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which recom-/O// mended that the city award the bid on the Juniper Drive storm drain and reconstruction project to Central Washington Asphalt. A letter was read from Philip Bloom,City Engineer,which stated that only two bids were received for the storm drain and reconstruction of Juniper Drive. Action Taken:Mr.Rimple moved that the bid be awarded to Central Washington Asphalt,seconded by Mr.Edwards,and passed unanimously. IV.PETITIONS,COMMUNICATIONS,OR PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMUNICATIONS -LANDFILL SITE A letter was read from Peter DeVries,President of Big Bend Community College,Jo<p-/. which objected to the city placing a landfill northwest of the Grant County Airport,adjacent to Highway 17. A letter was read from Peter C.Hammer,Chief Pilot of Big Bend Community Col lege,which objected to the city placing a landfill northwest of the Grant County Airport,adjacent to Highway 17,because of the potential danger from birds.This proposed site is directly in the flight path from GRant County Airport to Ephrata. 3842 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:2 June 11,1985 A letter was read from David Bailey,Executive Manager of the Port of Moses Lake,which stated that the Port was concerned about placing the landfill in this area because of the danger of birds to the aircraft. A letter was read from Vernon Kondra,Colonel,USAF,which stated that they are concerned about the negative impact a landfill would have if it is placed north of the Grant County Airport.The Grant County Airport is heavily used by the Air Force C-120's and C-141's and the incidents of birdstrikes would dramatically increase if a landfill is placed in this area. A letter was read from Katsuyuki Yasuda,Director of Japan Air lines,which stated that they were opposed to the placement of a landfill north of the Grant County airport adjacent to Highway 17 because of the danger of birds to aircraft.Since 1982 Japan Air Lines has had a total of 90 birdstrikes on its aircraft. Mr.DeVries stated stated that Big Bend has the largest flight training pro gram of its kind in the Pacific Northwest and one of the best in the nation. He stated that there are tens of thousands nesting in the Potholes and 0'Sullivan Dam areas and the seagulls frequent landfills.The concern is that the flight pattern of the seagulls would interfere with the flight pattern of the college's aircraft.The college's flight pattern is directly over the proposed landfill site.He stated that in the 7 1/2 years he has been presi dent they have not had any accidents caused by birds.He felt that placing a landfill in this area would increase the possibility of an accident. David Bailey,Airport Manager of Grant County Airport,explained the flight patterns of the various users of the airport.The proposed landfill is di rectly under a portion of the flight path.He stated that he had been in formed that the seagull population in the Potholes Reservoir has increased over the years and a landfill in this area would increase the possibility of collisions between birds and aircraft.He suggested the city and the county attempt to work out their problems about the use of the 1-90 landfill.He stated that if a new landfill site is necessary,they would prefer it below I- 90 and west of the existing facility or east of American Potato or Highway 17. A possible site is close to the existing facility and at a higher elevation or perhaps the city could look into incineration. Mr.Rimple wanted to know if the 1984 infestation of seagulls was do to the grasshopper problem and he wanted to know if the bird population has decreased since then. Jim Taber,Department of Game,stated that it has not;that the gull popula tion is increasing in the Moses Lake and Potholes Reservoir areas.He stated that there has been a minor increase in the migrant waterfowl population in the past year.He pointed out that the bird populations are dynamic and vary from year to year depending on a variety of reasons such as weather,hunting, etc.He stated that the two species of gulls in the Moses Lake are,the Cal ifornia Gull and the Ring-billed Gull,normally fly about 100'or less but under certain conditions they will utilize the thermals as a forging strategy and during migration could fly up to 2,000'to 3,000*.He stated that the gulls arrive in this area about March or April and fly south when the area starts to freeze up.He pointed out that the gulls are opportunistic feeders and are notorious for frequenting landfill sites,picnic grounds,etc. Colonel Vernon Kondra,USAF,stated that 62d military airlift wing,has en joyed a good relationship with Moses Lake and they are concerned about the safety of their aircraft if the landfill is placed on the proposed site.He stated that they have about 300 landings per month and spent over $700,000 in the area last year.He stated that they have a problem with the migratory birds during the spring and fall and additional birds in the flight path are not needed.He stated that all bird strikes have occurred below 3,000'and the traffic pattern altitude at the Grant County Airport is 1500'.He stated that in 1984 the Air Force had over 2,300 bird strikes and since 1964 the Air Force has lost 25 aircraft,10 pilots,and over $100 million worth of equip ment.He stated that they are very concerned about the safety of their pilots and aircraft and birds are a major problem. 3843 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:3 June 11,1985 Joe Gill,Manager of Grant County Tower,stated that the FAA is in opposition to a landfill that could potentially endanger the safety of aviation.He stated that the gulls like water,the asphalt because it is warm in the eve ning,and food.The only thing airports can control is the food source.He stated that they attempt to eliminate the food source in the vicinity of an airport to keep the bird population low. Rich Childress,Chamber of Commerce,stated that the Chamber of Commerce will not support a landfill site close to the landfill but would encourage the City of Moses Lake to reconcile any differences between the city and Grant County relating to the 1-90 landfill site. Captain Casson,JAL,stated that they appreciate having their jet flight crew training center at Grant County for the past 16 years and the support received from the city.He stated that JAL makes approximately 800 landings a month at the airport and spend over $11 million a year.He stated that he had experi enced a birdstrike in 1965 in England which caused the loss of two engines. He stated that it costs over $7 million to replace a 747 engine and over $100,000 just to have it taken off and inspected and maintained.He stated that there is another training area and efforts have been made to have JAL move there;if there is an increase in costs and safety problems because of the birds,efforts will probably be increased to have the JAL move.He stated that yesterday Capt.Yasuda had a gull strike at 3,000'which put a large dent in the strut of the engine.He stated that when the gulls migrate from the plowed fields to the lake they pass over Grant County Airport in limited num bers and at low altitudes.He stated that a landfill in this area would greatly increase the bird population in the area of the Grant County Airport. He requested the Council reconsider the location of a landfill in this area. Al Hollenbeck,Grant County Aviation,stated that they are in opposition to the landfill in this area.He stated that as a charter pilot he had visited a variety of airports and invariably if there is a landfill in the vicinity of the airport there is a bird problem. Charles Issackson,Rt.4,Box 64,Moses Lake,stated that no matter where you locate the landfill there is going to be a bird problem. Ty Brickner,ASB President at Big Bend,stated that JAL and the military fly at 1500'but the Big Bend students fly at 800'.He stated that the student pilots would like the Council to reconsider their decision to place the land fill near the Grant County Airport. Mr.Edwards stated that the city and county have no problems with the 1-90 landfill.He stated that the county leases the landfill site and the lease will probably not be renewed.He stated that the city wants a site that will be good for 20 to 30 years. Mr.Rimple stated that the DOE felt there is some problems with the 1-90 land fill site and the lease may not be renewed.He felt that the city did have a problem with the county as the county has not informed the cities in Grant County of the costs related to the operation of the 1-90 landfill.The city is looking into the possibility of their own landfill because there may be a problem with the county's landfill.He stated that the city has studied the sites in relation to land acquisition,transportation costs,etc. Mr.Chandler stated that he also felt there is a problem with the county.He stated that the report by R.W.Beck and Associates states that the city is getting the short end of the stick.He stated that there is going to have to be some major rehabilitation at the 1-90 landfill and the City of Moses Lake is not going to be responsible for those costs.He pointed out that the city has had no input into the costs assessed by the county at the landfill and the City of Moses Lake is paying in excess of $40,000 per year so that garbage can be transported from other areas of the county.The county has not provided the city with any information requested on the costs incurred at the landfill. Mr.Reese stated that he would like to see the city try to work with the coun ty and perhaps look into incineration. Ql 7b 3844 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:4 June 11,1985 Mr.DeVries stated that the Council has been talking about the economy of operating a landfill but he is not talking about economy,he is talking about life.He stated that because of the safety factor he would take every legal action possible to stop any landfill that would jeopardize the lives of the students. Mr.Johnson stated that the Council will take into consideration the comments made concerning this proposed landfill site. V.ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCE -ANNEXATION -KITTLESON ROAD AND HIGHWAY 17 - 1ST READING A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which pres ented an ordinance providing for the annexation of two small parcels of right- of-way located in Kittleson Road and Highway 17. The ordinance providing for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Moses Lake,Washington and incorporating the same within the corporate limits thereof and providing for the assumption of existing indebtedness was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the first reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr.Staat,and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION -ACCEPT EASEMENT -SIMMONS A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which pres ented a resolution accepting an easement for right-of-way so that the city may someday extend the bicycle path on Division Street. The resolution accepting an easement to the City of Moses Lake for right-of- way was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Rimple,and passed unanimously. VI.REQUESTS TO CALL FOR BIDS None VII.REFERRALS FROM COMMISSIONS BROADWAY ESTATES MOBILE HOME PARK - BINDING SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,stated that Patrick Carroll of Kirkland,Washington,owner of the existing Broadway Estates Mobile Home Park, is proposing to expand the park on an adjacent 10 acre parcel located at the intersection of Burress and Marina Drive.Mr.Carroll has submitted a binding site plan and a variance request of the requirement to construct full width street and utility improvements on Burress and Marina.The park expansion will house 53 units,be served with city water and sewer,and be accessed from Burress Street and through the existing Broadway Park entrance,next to Bill's Market.The Planning Commission recommended to City Council the Broadway Es tates Binding Site Plan and variance request be approved with the following conditions: 1.Mr.Carroll be allowed to develop the property over a three year period into an adult mobile home park. 2.Mr.Carroll donate to the city 10'of property the full length of his plat on Marina Drive and Burress Street. 3.Mr.Carroll construct an 8"sewer main down Marina Drive in city right-of- way and a reimbursement schedule be set up.The city will stub out sewer lines to the Carroll property and property across Marina Drive when the sewer is constructed. 4.Mr.Carroll agree to participate in an LID,if an LID becomes necessary, for water improvements on Marina Drive.It may be feasible to install the water main when the sewer main is installed to save cost and effort. 3845 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:5 June 11,1985 5.If the city's plans for reconstruction of Marina Drive do not materialize, the city will reimburse Mr.Carroll for the fair market value of the do nated property and he will participate in an LID for full width street improvements on Marina Drive including curbs,gutters,sidewalks,paving, etc. 6.Marina Drive be improved with a tentative design as follows:41'wide street within a 50'right-of-way;two 11'vehicle travel lanes,one lane each direction;one 8'on-street parking lane,on the Broadway side of Marina;one 8'bike path/sidewalk on the Broadway side of Marina;3'for curbs and gutters on both sides of the street. 7.Mr.Carroll agree to a covenant for an LID for street improvements on his side of Burress Street. 8.The City Engineer's comments be addressed on the final binding site plan. 9.All other applicable city codes and regulations will be met. Action Taken:Mr.Reese moved that the binding site plan and variance be ap- proved with the stipulations as recommended by the Planning Commission and the Findings of Fact be approved,seconded by Mr.Staat,and passed unanimously. VIII.OTHER ITEMS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION FIREWORKS DISPLAY -AGREEMENT WITH LIONS CLUB A letter was read from Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,which stated that the Council had agreed to pay to the Moses Lake Lions Club up to $1,500 toward a $4,200 4th of July fireworks display.The City Manager is requesting au thorization to execute the agreement. Action Taken:Mr.Chandler moved that the City Manager be authorized to sign the agreement,seconded by Mr.Reese,and passed unanimously. PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION Mr.Johnson stated that he had been informed by the Park and Recreation Direc tor that there is a vacancy on the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission. It was the consensus of the Council to appoint Jim Golly to the vacancy. IX.COUNCIL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS None X.CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND COMMENTS BOATING ORDINANCE Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that he received a letter from the Moses Lake Yacht Club requesting the city to consider drafting a simplified boating ordinance that would more fully meet the needs of the city. A study session was set for June 25 at 7 p.m.in the Council Chambers. FIRE DEPARTMENT Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that Russell Beeman,Moses Lake Fire 10% Chief,has submitted his resignation as it is his intention to retire about July 25,1985. The regular meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. ATTEST;^-^ry^fy^^f /OJtf /0 7/ S233 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF BROADWAY ESTATES II MOBILE HOME PARK BINDING SITE PLAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION 3845a This matter,having come on before the Moses Lake City Council for action on June 11,1985,now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1.Patrick Carroll of Kirkland,Washington,submitted a binding site plan for a proposed expansion of the Broadway Estates Mobile Home Park. 2.The property is situated in Grant County and is legally described as fol1ows: A portion of Lot 74,Plat of Battery Orchard Tracts as recorded in Acreage Plats,Page 31,located in the office of the Auditor,Grant County,Washington,and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the west line of said Lot 74 with the northerly right-of-way line of Broadway Avenue;thence along the said west line of said Lot 74,north 45052'51"west 350.00 feet to the point of beginning;thence continuing along said westerly line north 45°52'51"west 262.81 feet to an intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of Marina Drive;thence along said right-of-way north 30°13'28"east 1343.27 feet to the most northerly corner of said Lot 74;thence along the easterly line of said Lot 74 south 00°20'50"west 1354.91 feet to an intersection with the north erly right-of-way line of Broadway Avenue;thence parallel with the west line of said Lot 74 north 45°52'51"west 350.0 feet;thence parallel with the centerline of Broadway Avenue south 44°27'34"west 325.59 feet to the point of beginning;containing 10.08 acres more or less;subject to and including all easements and/or right-of-ways recorded or apparent. 3.Mr.Carroll also requested a variance of the requirement to construct full width street and utility improvements on Burress and Marina. 4.This proposed park is approximately 10 acres with approximately 53 mobile/manufactured home sites.The area is zoned C-2,Limited Commer cial,and R-3,Multi-family Residential.The park will be served with city sanitary sewer and water and access will be from Burress Street and through the entrance to the existing Broadway Estates Mobile Home Park on W.Broadway. 5.Patrick Carroll is requesting a variance of the requirement to construct full width street and utility improvements on Burress and Marina the length of the binding site plan.The cost of putting in interior streets and utilities in the development as well as the improvements on Burress and Marina would make the project unfeasible.He is requesting a variance for the development of this binding site plan over a three year period;not be required to improve Burress and Marina with full width streets,curbs,gutters and sidewalks on both sides of the street;and the on-site utilities be completed in stages consistent with good plan ning and safety concerns such as fire protection,traffic,etc.In re turn for the variance Mr.Carroll would agree to donate ten feet,at no cost to the city,along his property along on Marina Drive for the pur pose of the city's anticipated further widening of Marina Drive with the anticipated improvements such as curbs,sidewalks/bicycle or pedestrian path,and any parking be located on the Broadway side of Marina Drive;to join in a future LID for the sole purpose of extending the sewer and water from the intersection of Burress and Marina northeast for a dis tance of approximately 1,350'to complete the unsewered portion of Mari na;and to join in a future LID for the sole purpose of providing streets,curbs,and gutters along Burress between W.Broadway and Marina. The donation of land and the agreement to join the LID would be with the 3845b understanding that the other property owners along Burress would also be involved in the Burress Street improvements.If the city is unable to form the LID on Burress,Mr.Carroll would provide curbs,gutters,and sidewalks along his property line. 6.Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,suggested the Planning Commis sion consider the following when reviewing the binding site plan: a.Mr.Carroll donate 10'for right-of-way on Marina Drive and Burress Street. b.Mr.Carroll agree to a covenant for an LID for street,water,and sewer improvements on Marina Drive the length of his plat. A covenant agreement for Marina Drive street and utility improve ments attached to Mr.Carroll's binding site plan is a back-up fund ing source if,for some reason city funded street reconstruction plans fail to occur for Marina Drive. c.Marina Drive be improved with a tentative design as follows:41' wide street within a 50'right-of-way;two 11'vehicle travel lanes, one lane each direction;one 8'on-street parking lane,on the Broadway side of Marina;one 8'bike path/sidewalk on the Broadway side of Marina;3'for curbs and gutters on both sides of the street. d.Mr.Carroll agree to a covenant for an LID for street improvements on his side of Burress Street. 6.Mrs.Kvamme stated that the only complaints she has received about the existing park is the traffic problem at the entrance.With the entrance constructed on an angle to Broadway it makes it difficult getting in and out from Broadway. 7.Mr.Carroll stated that he had talked to the adjoining property owner, Mr.Clausen,about purchasing additional land to try to square up the entrance with W.Broadway but that Mr.Clausen is not willing to sell any additional land for improving this entrance.He stated that he does have an extra 4'that can be paved which will help some.The construction of the proposed expansion will help alleviate this traffic problem at the entrance on W.Broadway as the residents can enter the park from the Bur ress Street entrance. 8.Mr.Angell explained a binding site plan to the Commission.He stated that he has received a request from Pacific Northwest Bell and the PUD for provision of utility easements through the plat and the Fire Marshal has requested fire hydrants through the plat.He stated that these re quirements would be taken care of on the final Binding Site Plan. 9.Mr.Carroll stated that he is in agreement with the conditions suggested by the Municipal Services Director except for the one requiring him to participate in an LID for street and utility improvements on Marina Drive if the city's reconstruction plans fail to occur.He stated that he is planning to donate 10'of land on Marina and Burress to the city and that he is only required to install a 6"sewer line for his development but will be installing an 8"sewer instead.He pointed out that if the city puts in a sewer line in Marina Drive it would simply be a duplication of service and the property owners along Marina do not want to pay for this sort of thing.He stated that he would be putting the water lines in the interior streets and would like to develop the lots near W.Broadway and Burress first. 10.Ms.Perstac pointed out that if Mr.Carroll would install his sewer line in city right-of-way on Marina he could request a reimbursement schedule be developed so that he would be reimbursed when others hook up to the line.She pointed out that the city has not yet finalized engineering plans for Marina reconstruction so the exact placement of the sewer line is not known. 11.Mr.Carroll stated that he could see it would be to his benefit to con struct the 8"sewer line in Marina Drive right-of-way. 3845c 12.Mr.Carroll stated that he wished to develop the lots nearest W.Broadway and along Burress first so that would give the engineers time to get together on the placement of the sewer line on Marina.He stated that since he is donating the 10'of land on Marina and Burress and willing to construct the 8"sewer line on Marina at no cost to the city he would like to get away from having to improve Marina Drive or participate in an LID for the improvements to Marina Drive. 13.Ms.Perstac pointed out that the city is planning on reconstructing Mari na Drive in 1986 and she knows of no reason why this will not be done. The requirement for Mr.Carroll to covenant for an LID for street im provements is for back-up funding in case the city does not reconstruct Marina. 14.Mr.Carroll stated that he did not feel he should have to participate in an overlay of Marina Drive since his development will receive no benefit from it as the traffic will be onto Burress and W.Broadway. 15.Ms.Perstac wanted to know if Marina Drive is not reconstructed by the city if Mr.Carroll would be willing to accept monetary reimbursement for the donated land and then participate in an LID for that reconstruction. 16.Mr.Carroll stated that he would be agreeable to this.He stated that he is agreeing to an LID on Burress Street and the water line on Marina Drive but that he is putting in the sewer and does not want to have to participate in the Marina Drive street improvements. 17.A public hearing scheduled upon notice before the Planning Commission on the issue of the Broadway Estates II Binding Site Plan was held on May 16,1985. 18.The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the Broadway Estates II Binding Site Plan be approved with the following stipulations: a.Mr.Carroll be allowed to develop the property over a three year period into an adult mobile home park. b.Mr.Carroll donate to the city 10'of property the full length of his plat on Marina Drive and Burress Street. c.Mr.Carroll construct an 8"sewer main down Marina Drive in city right-of-way and a reimbursement schedule be set up.The city will stub out sewer lines to the Carroll property and property across Marina Drive when the sewer is constructed. d.Mr.Carroll agree to participate in an LID,if an LID becomes neces sary,for water improvements on Marina Drive.It may be feasible to install the water main when the sewer main is installed to save cost and effort. e.If the city's plans for reconstruction of Marina Drive do not materialize,the city will reimburse Mr.Carroll for the fair market value of the donated property and he will participate in an LID for full width street improvements on Marina Drive including curbs,gut ters,sidewalks,paving,etc. f.Marina Drive be improved with a tentative design as follows:41' wide street within a 50'right-of-way;two 11'vehicle travel lanes, one lane each direction;one 8'on-street parking lane,on the Broadway side of Marina;one 8'bike path/sidewalk on the Broadway side of Marina;3'for curbs and gutters on both sides of the street. g.Mr.Carroll agree to a covenant for an LID for street improvements on his side of Burress Street. h.The City Engineer's comments be addressed on the final binding site plan. i.All other applicable city codes and regulations will be met. 3845d CONCLUSIONS 1.The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority and has the jurisdiction under the law to approve a Binding Site Plan within the city's corporate limits if the criterion required by law is met. 2.There appears after the public meeting before the City Council on June 11,1985,no opposition to its approval. 3.The City council is cognizant of the need to serve the welfare and best interests of the entire community,and believes that this Binding Site Plan will serve the best interests of the residents of the City of Moses Lake and bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare of the entire community. DECISION 1.The Broadway Estates II Binding Site Plan and variance is approved with the following stipulations: a.Mr.Carroll be allowed to develop the property over a three year period into an adult mobile home park. b.Mr.Carroll donate to the city 10'of property the full length of his plat on Marina Drive and Burress Street. c.Mr.Carroll construct an 8"sewer main down Marina Drive in city right-of-way and a reimbursement schedule be set up.The city will stub out sewer lines to the Carroll property and property across Marina Drive when the sewer is constructed. d.Mr.Carroll agree to participate in an LID,if an LID becomes neces sary,for water improvements on Marina Drive.It may be feasible to install the water main when the sewer main is installed to save cost and effort. e.If the city's plans for reconstruction of Marina Drive do not materialize,the city will reimburse Mr.Carroll for the fair market value of the donated property and he will participate in an LID for full width street improvements on Marina Drive including curbs,gut ters,sidewalks,paving,etc. f.Marina Drive be improved with a tentative design as follows:41' wide street within a 50'right-of-way;two 11'vehicle travel lanes, one lane each direction;one 8'on-street parking lane,on the Broadway side of Marina;one 8'bike path/sidewalk on the Broadway side of Marina;3'for curbs and gutters on both sides of the street. g.Mr.Carroll agree to a covenant for an LID for street improvements on his side of Burress Street. h.The comments from the City Engineer's May 10,1985 memo to the Municipal Services Director be addressed on the final binding site plan. i.All other applicable city codes and regulations will be met. Dated:June 12,1985 CITY OF MOSES LAKE n