Loading...
1986 10 284009 CITY COUNCIL • CITY OF MOSES LAKE October 28,1986 Members Present:Bill Reese,Bill Frederickson,Wayne Rimple,Roger Biallas, Norm Johnson,David Chandler,and Charles Edwards The meeting was called to order at 8 p.m.by Mayor Johnson. Mr.Edwards moved that the minutes of the meeting of October 14 be approved as submitted,seconded by Mr.Chandler,and passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF BILLS REGULAR BILLS AMOUNT GENERAL FUND $24,788.34 STREET 7,831.57 ARTERIAL STREET 18,982.00 STREET REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION -0- STREET IMPROVEMENT 235,198.74 BUILDING AND EQUIPMENT 150,181.21 WATER/SEWER FUND 37,741.09 WATER/SEWER CONSTRUCTION -0- SANITATION FUND 2,907.87 UNEMPL COMP.INS.-0- CENTRAL SERVICES 3,735.15 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 94.26 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 13,313.12 LID #53 539.09 TOTAL $495,312.44 Mr.Reese moved that the bills be approved as submitted,seconded by Mr.Ed wards,and passed with Mr.Biallas abstaining from voting for that portion of the bills to A &H Printers and Mr.Edwards abstaining from voting for that portion of the bills to Coast to Coast. I.CITIZEN INPUT None II.CONSENT AGENDA Mr.Chandler moved that the following items on the Consent Agenda be approved: 1.Accept work for 1986 overlay /o/9 2.Accept work for LID #53 /23f 3.LDS Final Plat - November n set as the date to consider //<P& 4.Municipal Tract No.11 Final Plat -November 11 set as the date to //.oC consider 5.Peninsula Estates Binding Site Plan -November 11 set as the date to //j^ consider seconded by Mr.Biallas,and passed unanimously. III.CONSIDERATION OF BIDS None IV.PETITIONS,COMMUNICATIONS,OR PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMUNICATION -GRANT COUNTY COALITION TASK FORCE A letter was read from the Grant County Coalition Task Force which requested time on the agenda to discuss their goals. 4010 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:2 October 28,1986 Lounell Williamson,representing the Coalition Task Force,stated that they have been organized since July 1,1985 and their funds come from an Indirect federal grant and donations and contributions.She informed the Council of their activities and accomplishments.She requested $2,150 from the city to continue their programs. It was the consensus of the Council to discuss this request during the budget study sessions. so ORDINANCE -VALLEY ROAD AND AIRWAY DRIVE ANNEXATION - 2ND READING -PUBLIC \(Pf HEARING A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which pres ented an ordinance annexing a small portion of land located at the intersec tion of Airway Drive and Valley Road. The ordinance providing for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Moses Lake,Washington,and incorporating the same within the corporate limits thereof,providing for the assumption of existing indebtedness and zoning was read by title only. The public hearing was opened.There were no comments. Mr.Reese moved that the public hearing be closed,seconded by Mr.Edwards, and passed unanimously. Action Taken:Mr.Rimple moved that the second reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr.Reese,and passed unanimously. /O? \\^ V.ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCE -AMEND PARKING REGULATIONS - 1ST READING A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which pres ented an ordinance amending the parking regulations to eliminate parking on Olive Street from Pioneer Way to Juniper Drive except for that portion in front of 704 Olive Street,eliminate parking on Lakeshore Drive at Wanapum Drive intersection,eliminate parking on northwest (lake)side of Marina Drive from Gibby to Burress,and allow on-street parking on Central Drive from Pine to Sage Bay Drive.Staff is also proposing the following alternatives for travel and parking on Central and Grape: 1.On Central,from Valley to Pine:2 travel lanes and 1 lane of on-street parking each direction (this is no change from existing condition); 2.On Central,from Pine to Sage Bay Drive:1 travel lane and 1 lane of on- street parking each direction (this is a change from the current ordinance); 3.On Grape,from Sage Bay Drive to Dale:1 travel lane and 1 lane of on- street parking each direction (this is a change from staff's May 1986 proposal);and 4.On Grape,from Dale to Highway 17:2 travel lanes and no on-street park ing each direction (this is no change from existing conditions). The ordinance amending Chapter 10.12 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled Parking Regulations was read by title only. There was some discussion on the proposed parking regulations on Central Drive. Action Taken:Mr.Frederickson moved that the first reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr.Rimple,and passed unanimously. ORDINANCE -CREATE CHAPTER 12.22 -SNOW REMOVAL -1ST READING A letter was read from Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,which presented an ordinance requiring citizens of Moses Lake to remove snow,etc.from sidewalks abutting their property within periods of time to be set by the Council. 4011 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:3 October 28,1986 The ordinance repealing Chapter 12.20 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code enti tled Snow Removal and creating a new Chapter 12.22 entitled Snow Removal was read by title only. Mr.Rimple stated that he was concerned it would cost the city more to enforce the ordinance than it would collect. Mr.Chandler did not see how it could be enforced. Mr.Gavinski stated that the enforcement would fall upon the existing staff and would probably be done in the same manner as the weed ordinance is enforced. After some discussion it was the concensus of the Council that a four'hour time limit be set and a $50 penalty be assessed. Action Taken: Mr.Frederickson moved that the four hours be inserted and a $bU penalty and the first reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr. Rimple,and passed with Mr.Reese opposed. RESOLUTION -DOWNTOWN LID A letter was read from Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,which presented a /tP3a resolution declaring the Council's Intention to Improve the Central Business District area in Moses Lake and creating an LID to pay for the costs of improvement. The resolution of the City Council of the City of Moses Lake declaring an in tention to improve the Central Business District area in the City of Moses Lake and creating an LID to pay for the costs of Improvement was read by title only. Mr.Gavinski pointed out to the Council that they have been provided with all the petitions,letters,etc.,pro and con,concerning the project and all in formation that was received by the city since distribution of the agenda. Harry Dano pointed out that the Task Force presented a overall plan for the first time on November 25,1981.This plan included sidewalks,traffic cir culation,and lake front development.The lake front has been developed and it is time to go ahead with the rest of the improvements.He stated that the city needs to adopt the resolution so that the necessary engineering can be done and an assessment roll be prepared so that the cost will be known. Bill Bailey stated that parcels 1101 and 1102 should not be included in the proposed LID.He stated that the Task Force is requesting the Council es tablish an LID for the following: 1.Sidewalk improvements to the designated areas 2.Install trees and landscaping in the same area 3.Enlarge block corners in the round node fashion with wheelchair ramps, etc. It is also recommended that the traffic on Third Avenue be decreased to two lanes and diagonal parking be initiated on one side of the street.It is recommended that the cost be assessed be levied on the square feet of property owned or an equal amount for each lot owned.The estimated cost of the proj ect is $3,500 per each lot.If the estimate is more than 15%over the proj ected cost 1t is recommended that the LID be dropped unless the property owners endorse the new estimate.The Task Force believes the project will en hance the city and is ready to help in eyery reasonable aspect of the endeavor. Eleanor Sorter stated that since the majority of the improvement will be on Third Avenue the banks control the majority of the assessed valuation.She suggested the improvement be for the Third Avenue property owners only since the majority of the Broadway property owners are opposed to it. Don Goodwin stated that it has been 40 years since anything has been done to the sidewalks in the downtown area.He felt it is a small price to pay for the improvement. 4012 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:4 October 28,1986 Don Bohnet,Expectations,stated that they are located on Third Avenue and are in favor of the improvement and felt the city should establish the cost fig ures for the project.He stated that his lease requires that he participate 40%in any such improvement. Mary Shinn,Nikkei Saaver,stated that she has spent a great deal of money recently putting up a new store front and replaced the sidewalk.The cost proposed by the Task Force is not unreasonable.She stated that she is in favor of the project. Chuck Lampe stated that the project is viable,the sidewalks are currently in need or repair,the customer will be paying for the project eventually,and the project should be increased by purchasing vacant lots in order to increase off street parking. Henry Monroe felt it is vital do to something in the downtown area. Allison Swartz felt that the project is \/ery necessary as the sidewalks 1n the downtown area are in need of repair. Pamp Maiers stated that he purchased a building downtown last year and is pre pared to put a good deal of money into it but would like the see the community help itself.He felt the improvement is needed. Alan McFadden felt that the businesses should invest in the downtown and felt the improvement would enhance the area. Shirley Kvamme stated that they have been in the city for 25 years and have provided parking and other things.She stated that they are out of the proj ect at this time but the boundaries could be easily extended.She stated that they have kept up their sidewalks and put in landscaping.She pointed out that semi trucks coming out of an alley need more than two lanes to make the turn and she also felt that the school buses may have a problem if Third is reduced to two lanes. Ann Fairbanks stated that they are no longer in the project and they have pro vided parking and sidewalks at their building.She did not feel sidewalks and trees make a beautification project.She felt the buildings themselves should be renovated.She also felt that passing a resolution with 40%in favor is not fair to the smaller property owners because the banks have such a larger assessed valuation.She did not feel the streets should be narrowed. Ron Baker stated that the downtown project is needed as the sidewalks are in very poor shape.He stated that he was opposed to using concrete pavers in stead of poured concrete and a corner lot could cost a great deal of money. He felt the Council should weigh the benefit received for the dollars paid out.He felt the brick would be more expensive than concrete.He stated that as a property owner he would like to know the method of assessment that would be used and perhaps have some cost alternatives.He also felt it is a com munity project not just a downtown project and perhaps the community could share some of the cost. Mr.Biallas stated that the people proposing the project are responsible busi ness people and will not benefit personally from the project.He felt the cost of the project should not unduly burden any property owner and the pas sage of the resolution would not force an LID on the property owners.He pointed out that the Task Force has also stated that if the cost exceeds the estimate by more than 15%they will move to stop the project.This project would be the first step in improving the downtown area.He pointed out that Bob Bernd of M.E.Mayflower stated that he would commit $50 per month for the ten year period to see the improvement take place.He further stated that he does not own downtown but would obligate his business for $50 per month for ten years if this project is approved.He pointed out the passage of the resolution does not guarantee the LID will be formed. Action Taken:Mr.Biallas moved that the resolution be adopted and the public hearing be set for January 27,seconded by Mr.Reese. Mr.Frederickson wanted to know what method of assessment would be used. 4013 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:5 October 28,1986 Mr.Bailey stated that the Task Force feels the project is a community one and not designed to benefit any single property owner in the affected area and has asked the method of assessment be on a per lot or per square foot of property owned so that everyone generally pays the same amount for the benefits to the area. Mr.Gavinski stated that the passage of the resolution give direction to city staff to prepare a preliminary assessment roll prior to the public hearing. After the public hearing the Council will consider the passage of an ordinance establishing the LID. There was some discussion about the proposed traffic flow and parking in the project.Mr.Gavinski stated that a design is needed before a preliminary assessment roll can be developed and that must be done before the public hearing. Mr. Dano stated that the Task Force decided not to address traffic flow or traffic lights. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION -INTERFUND LOAN A letter was read from Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,which presented a resolution authorizing a loan from the Firemen's Pension Fund to finance the construction costs for remodeling City Hall. The resolution authorizing an inter-fund loan was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Chandler,and passed unanimously. VI.REQUESTS TO CALL FOR BIDS FENCE -WELLS 8 AND 11 AND HUMANE HUT A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which re-/o^p? quested authorization to call for bids for the construction of fences around *{)& Wells 8 and 11 and,depending on Council's decision regarding fencing the ^^ Humane Hut's revised property line,fencing the Hut's revised property line. Action Taken: Mr.Edwards moved that staff be authorized to call for bids for fencing Wei is 8 and 11 and the revised property line for the Humane Hut, seconded by Mr.Frederickson,and passed unanimously. GRADING CONTRACT A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which re-/o/$ quested authorization to call for bids for a grading contract.This contract would be in lieu of the city's purchasing a new,used grader.The bids would be compared to the city's cost of providing the same services. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that staff be authorized to call for bids, seconded by Mr.Reese,and passed unanimously. VII.REFERRALS FROM COMMISSIONS WESTLAKE SHORES PHASE I FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which stated //£* that the Council approved an amendment for this plat,permitting a three year deferral of sidewalk installation along Tract B,during which time vegetation would grow to stabilize the shoreline.Re-evaluation of the need for the sidewalk was required at the end of the three year period.Jack Corning has requested an additional three year deferral of the sidewalk installation re quirement along Tract B.He proposes to continue using vegetation to stabi lize the shoreline and requests permission to place river rock in the low spots on the bank for erosion control.City staff evaluated the site and found erosion is not occurring as originally anticipated three years ago.The curb is still solid and there is about 5'of sand with vegetation between it and the lake.At its October 16 meeting the Planning Commission recommended /O/O -/) \o 0 4014 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:6 October 28,1986 to Council that the three year extension on construction of the sidewalk be granted with the stipulation that the city has the right to require the side walk be installed and the erosion taken care of at its option,that the developers be allowed to place river rock in the low spots between Sage Road and the lake,that vegetation be used for erosion control,and the covenants be updated. Action Taken:Mr.Rimple moved that the recommendation from the Planning Com- mission be approved and the Findings of Fact be accepted,seconded by Mr. Chandler,and passed unanimously. VIII.OTHER ITEMS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION -None IX.COUNCIL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS - None X.CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND COMMENTS SECOND LAKE CROSSING - PROPERTY ACQUISITION Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that some correspondence has taken place between Gary Mann and the city concerning the purchase of property by the city between Crestview Drive and Sage Bay for the eventual construction of the second lake crossing/Yonezawa Boulevard. HUMANE HUT FENCE LOCATION Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that the report from the Municipal Services Department indicates that if a new main is installed on Randolph Road and connected to Larson Lift Station #1 that Larson Lift Station #2 can be eliminated.If the #2 station is abandoned,the city would not need addition al property north of it.The site should not be leased to the Humane Society since the above-ground structure would remain and if it is ever used in the future the fence would not have to be relocated. GRANT COUNTY CITIES MEETING Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that there will be a Grant County Cities meeting at the Ephrata City Hall at 7:30 p.m.on Wednesday,October 29. BUDGET Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that he will be out of town on Thursday,October 30 and requested that the scheduled budget study session be rescheduled to Monday,November 3. SALES TAX Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that the city received almost $211,000 for the period of July and August. COUNCIL MEETING Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that the next Council meeting has been scheduled for Monday,November 10,since the city has November 11,Veter an's Day off. It was the consensus of the Council that the meeting be held on November 11. The regular meeting was recessed at 10:30 p.m.and the Council met in execu tive session to discuss personnel matters.The executive session was adjour ned at 11:30 p.m.and the regular meeting was reconvened.The regular meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. " v ; BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON ) IN THE MATTER OF ) ) WESTLAKE SHORES PHASE I )FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS, PLAT AMENDMENT ) AND DECISION ) This matter,having come on before the Moses Lake City Council for action on October 28,1986,now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1.The Findings of Fact,Conclusions,and Decision on the Westlake Shores Phase I Final Plat are incorporated herein. 2.John Corning of Wenatchee has submitted an amendment to the Westlake Shores Phase I Final Plat. 3.A previous plat amendment was submitted in August 1983 which allowed the developers to delay construction of the sidewalk on the south side of Sage Road through Tract B for three years.The developers proposed to use vegetation rather than riprap to stabilize the bank and requested a three year period to allow the vegetation to establish itself before reconsidering the sidewalk. 4.The developers have requested an additional three year deferral on the construction of the sidewalk and have also requested permission to place river rock in the low spots between Sage Road and the lake and to con tinue the use of vegetation for erosion control in lieu of the placement of riprap. 5.Mr.Law wanted to know if the area is eroding. j 6.Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,stated that she had looked at the site and the erosion is not occurring as was previously anticipated. *—'The curb is still solid and there is about 5'of fill between it and the lake. 7.The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the final plat be amended to allow the three year extension on construction of the sidewalk with the stipulation that the city has the right to require the sidewalk be installed and the erosion taken care of at its option,that the developers be allowed to place river rock in the low spots between Sage Road and the lake,that vegetation be used for erosion control,and the covenants be updated. CONCLUSIONS 1.The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority and has the jurisdiction under the law to amend a final plat within the city's corporate limits if the criterion required by law is met. 2.There appears after the public meeting before the City Council on October 28,1986,no opposition to the amended final plat. 3.The City Council is cognizant of the need to serve the welfare and best interests of the entire community,and believes that this plat will serve the best interests of the residents of the City of Moses Lake and bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare of the entire community. DECISION 1.The Westlake Shores Phase I Final Plat Amendment is approved as recommen ded by the Moses Lake Planning Commission. Dated:November 4,1986 CITY OF MOSES LAKE