Loading...
1987 01 134042 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOSES LAKE January 13,1987 Members Present:Bill Frederlckson,Wayne Rlmple,Roger Blallas,David Chan dler,and Charles Edwards Absent:Norm Johnson and Bill Reese Mr.Edwards moved that Mr.Rlmple be elected Mayor Pro Tern,seconded by Mr. Frederlckson,and passed unanimously. The meeting was called to order at 8 p.m.by Mayor Pro Tern Rlmple. Mr.Edwards moved that the minutes of the meeting of December 23 be approved as submitted,seconded by Mr.Chandler,and passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF BILLS REGULAR BILLS AMOUNT GENERAL FUND $36,258.71 STREET 1,401.92 STREET REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION 362.86 STREET IMPROVEMENT 7,552.11 BUILDING AND EQUIPMENT 1,340.33 WATER/SEWER FUND 13,559.59 1985 BOND REDEMPTION FUND 256,838.33 WATER/SEWER CONSTRUCTION 2,058.16 SANITATION FUND 43,061.60 CENTRAL SERVICES 6,165.57 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,070.43 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3,828.35 FIREMANS PENSION 60.00 LID #53 451.39 TOTAL $381,408.27 Mr.Edwards moved that the bills be approved as submitted,seconded by Mr. Chandler,and passed unanimously. I.CITIZEN INPUT None II.CONSENT AGENDA None III.CONSIDERATION OF BIDS None IV.PETITIONS,COMMUNICATIONS,OR PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMUNICATION -JAPAN AIR LINES -DONATION A letter was read from Teruyoshi Asakawa,Director of the Japan Air Lines,jfW6> requesting time on the agenda for the presentation of the annual donation.' The resolution accepting a $2,000 gift from Japan A1r Lines to be used by the City of Moses Lake Park and Recreation Department was read by title only. Mr.Asakawa presented the city with a check for $2,000. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Chandler,and passed unanimously. ORDINANCE - WALKER REZONE -2ND READING - PUBLIC HEARING A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which pres-ll90 ented an ordinance for a zone change on Lot 45,Terminal Park Addition,from R-l to R-3. 0^ //k° /'l((j 4043 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:2 January 13,1986 The ordinance amending Section 18.09.020 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code was read by title only. The public hearing was opened.There were no comments. Mr.Edwards moved that the public hearing be closed,seconded by Mr.Chandler, and passed unanimously. Action Taken:Mr.Biallas moved that the second reading of the ordinance be adopted and the Findings of Fact be accepted,seconded by Mr.Frederickson, and passed unanimously. V.ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCE -AMEND SEWER REGULATIONS - 2ND READING A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which pres ented an ordinance amending Section 13.04.045 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code which would allow a developer to build on property without providing city sewer if approved by Council. The ordinance amending Chapter 13.04 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled Sewer Regulations was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Chandler moved that the second reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr.Frederickson,and passed unanimously. ORDINANCE -AMEND 1987 BUDGET -1ST READING A letter was read from Walter Fry,Finance Director,which presented an or dinance amending the 1987 Budget to provide for the grant from IAC for Montiake Park improvements. The ordinance amending the 1987 budget for the City of Moses Lake,Washington was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the first reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr.Chandler,and passed unanimously. ORDINANCE -REPEAL 6.08 -LIVESTOCK RUNNING AT LARGE - 1ST READING A letter was read from Joseph K.Gavinski,City manger,which presented an ordinance repealing Chapter 6.08 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled Livestock Running at Large.This particular prohibition was included in the ordinance on animal control. The ordinance repealing Chapter 6.08 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled Livestock Running at Large was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Chandler moved that the first reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr.Edwards,and passed unanimously. ORDINANCE -AMEND 3.16 -ADMISSIONS TAX - 1ST READING A letter was read from Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,which presented an ordinance amending the time for the remittance of admissions tax from the fifteenth day of the month to the last day of the month after the month in which the tax is collected. The ordinance amending Chapter 3.16 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled Admissions Tax was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the first reading of the ordinance be adopted,seconded by Mr.Chandler,and passed unanimously. 0 RESOLUTION -MONTLAKE PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND A letter was read from Walter Fry,Finance Director,which presented a resolu tion establishing a capital improvement fund for Montiake Park to account for the IAC grant received by the city. 4044 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:3 January 13,1986 The resolution establishing a capital improvement fund 311 or Montiake Park and establishing accounts 115,413,4314,and 491 to segregate portions of the expenses in the street,water/sewer,and sanitation funds as set forth in the 1987 budget was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Frederickson,and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION -LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPATION A letter was read from Walter Fry,Finance Director,which presented a resolu tion which permits the City of Moses Lake to participate in the Local Govern ment Investment Pool. The resolution authorizing investment of City of Moses Lake monies in the Lo cal Government Investment Pool was read by title only. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the resolution be adopted,seconded by Mr.Chandler,and passed unanimously. VI.REQUESTS TO CALL FOR BIDS FUEL SUPPLY A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which re-/O^y quested authorization to call for bids for the 1987 petroleum products supply. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that staff be authorized to call for bids, seconded by Mr.Chandler,and passed unanimously. VII.REFERRALS FROM COMMISSIONS SUNRISE RESORTS (PIER 4)BINDING SITE PLAN A letter was read from Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,which stated //£& that Sunrise Resorts has submitted a binding site plan for a proposed 5.6 acre,100 pad expansion to the existing Pier 4 RV Park.The site is zoned R- 3,Multi-family Residential and will be served with city water and sewer.In the future Sunrise Resorts plans to ask the city to vacate a portion of Sage Road east of Laguna Drive.The Planning Commission recommended that the bind ing site plan be approved with the fence landscape plan and additional plant material be on top of the berm,comments from the City Engineer be addressed, and a variance for a covenant be allowed for street and utility improvement on Laguna Drive to be installed by an LID when the city determines improvements are necessary. Gary Ekstedt of Boundary Engineering showed the Council the conceptual drawing of the sight obscuring fence required along Laguna Drive.He stated that ad ditional greenery will be planted on the berm along the lagoon as was request ed by the Planning Commission. Clyde Owen,resident of Laguna Drive,stated that only one of the Laguna Drive residents was able to be at the Planning Commission meeting when the landscape plan was approved.He stated that many of the residents are out of town on vacation and will not be back until the first of February and he requested that a decision by the City Council be delayed 30 days so that the residents could meet with the developers on the landscape plan.He felt that placing the gatehouse near the Laguna Drive intersection could cause a back up of peo ple wanting to get into the park.He wanted to know if there would be access to the lagoon from the development as people may locate there boats in the lagoon and just hike down through the berm to them.He also wanted to know if a bond could be required to guarantee the performance of the proposed improvements. Mr.Chandler wanted to know when construction would start on this project. Dave Downing of Boundary Engineering stated that the approval period for the conditional use permit runs out in January and if that happens before the binding site plan is approved,the developers would have to start the project //^ &0 )D^ ^ 4045 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:4 January 13,1986 over from scratch.He stated that no commitment was made to the Laguna resi dents to have a meeting.He pointed out that the elevation requirements have been met and the fence and landscaping have been professionally designed. Mr.Rimple felt that the developers have expended a great deal of effort to appease the neighborhood and the city. Mr.Owen wanted to know if a performance bond would be required for the project. Jim Whitaker,City Attorney,stated that under the binding site plan regula tions the site could be occupied when all required improvements are completed. He pointed out that a performance bond is not required under the ordinance. Jerry Hudson,Laguna Drive,stated that are people who swim and fish in the lagoon and he was concerned about the boat traffic.He stated that if the guardhouse is placed at the intersection of Laguna and Sage there could be a problem with traffic. Ms.Perstac stated that the developers have no plans to open up the lagoon to the residents of the park. Mr.Edwards wanted to know if staff has considered the possible traffic prob lem if the guardhouse is placed at the intersection of Sage Road and Laguna Drive. Ms.Perstac stated that the vacation question is another issue but has been discussed by the staff and the City Engineer has not indicated any concern about the traffic. Mr.Biallas felt that the developers have attempted to meet the needs of the residents and the requirements of the city. Action Taken:Mr.Biallas moved that the Sunrise Resorts Binding Site Plan be approved as recommended by the Planning Commission,with the stipulation that occupancy or use not be approved until all improvements and conditions have been met and #27 on the Findings of Fact be amended to include street,sewer and other utility improvements on Laguna,seconded by Mr.Frederickson,and passed unanimously. VIII.OTHER ITEMS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION POLICE/COURT FACILITY - LEASE AMENDMENT Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,requested authorization to execute a lease amendment between the city and county for the Police/Court Facility.This amendment reduces the amount the county pays to the city for the facility from $1,250 per month to $900 per month which includes utilities. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the City Manager be authorized to sign the agreement,seconded by Mr.Reese,and passed unanimously. LABOR AGREEMENT AMENDMENT -FIRE Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,requested authorization to sign the amend ment to the Fire Fighters labor contract.This amendment concerns salaries for 1987. Action Taken:Mr.Chandler moved that the City Manager be authorized to sign the amendment,seconded by Mr.Edwards,and passed unanimously. LABOR AGREEMENTS -POLICE AND GENERAL Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,requested authorization to sign the labor agreements between the city and the Police Department and the general em ployees for 1986,1987,and 1988. Action Taken:Mr.Edwards moved that the City Manager be authorized to sign the agreements,seconded by Mr.Chandler,and passed unanimously. n 4046 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:5 January 13,1986 INSURANCE Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,requested direction from the Council on the IO£c( procurement of public officials liability insurance and law enforcement liability insurance.He stated that Rogers and Norman has obtained a carrier for the law enforcement liability insurance in the amount of $500,000 per claim with a $1,000,000 aggregate with a $5,000 deductible for a premium of $12,300.The public officials liablity insurance premium has increased almost 100%from last year.He stated he talked with Rogers and Norman who is seek ing another carrier.He stated that a local broker had called with another option and would contact Rogers and Norman with the proposal.Mr.Gavinski recommended that the current insurance be retained until the options can be looked into. He recommended that no action be taken at this time. GOLDEN ACRES ANNEXATION Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,stated that the city has received a ^^* notice of intent to begin annexation from several property owners in the Gol den Acres Plat.This plat is located east of Westshore Drive and is con tiguous to the present city limits.The seven lots are served by private wells and septic tanks.The reason for the annexation is the property owners' desire to connect to city water. Action Taken:Mr.Chandler moved that January 27 be set as the date to con sider tnis annexation request and that the request be forwarded to the Plan ning Commission for a recommendation on whether or not the annexation should be accepted,seconded by Mr.Edwards,and passed unanimously. IX.COUNCIL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS -None X.CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND COMMENTS FIRE TOWER AND POLICE/COURT FACILITY Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,presented the reports from the structural )J10 engineer on the Fire Tower and Police/Court Facility.The reports indicate / that there is no structural damage to the Police/Court Facility and suggests several ways to cover up or repair the cracking.The reports stated that the Fire Training Tower is unsafe but could be fixed for $31,000.A new tower would cost about $90,000. No action was taken by Council. AWC LEGISLATIVE ACTION CONFERENCE Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that the AWC Legislative Action Con ference will be held on February 25 and 26,1987. SALES TAX Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,stated that the city has received over '&o'(l~ $248,000 in sales tax for the months of September and October 1986. INVESTMENT REPORT Joseph K.Gavinski,City Manager,distributed the investment report of Decern-JOOs ber 1986. The regular meeting was recessed at 9:50 p.m.and the Council met in an execu tive session to discuss litigation.The executive session was adjourned at 10:20 p.m.and the regular meeting was reconvened.The regular meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF THE REZONE REQUEST BY RAYMOND WALKER FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION This matter,having come on before the Moses Lake City Council for action on January 13,1987 now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1.Raymond Walker owns Lot 45,Terminal Park Addition,located at 1363 W. Lakeside Drive. 2.The property is presently zoned R-2,Single Family and Two Family Duplex, and the owners are requesting that it be changed to R-3,Multi-family. 3.The area is platted and served with city sanitary sewer and water. 4.At their meeting on December 11,1986 the Planning Commission declared this zone change to have a non-significant adverse impact on the environment. 5.Mr.Pray stated he would excuse himself from voting on this matter but if no one objected would sit in the audience to answer questions since he is familiar with the project. 6.A public hearing before the Planning Commission scheduled upon notice on the issue of rezoning the land in question was held on December 11,1986. 7.Gail Brown,1345 Lakeside,wanted to know if the zone change would be for Lot 45 only. 8.Mr.Collier stated that it would be. 9.Raymond Walker,proponent,stated that the reason for the zone change is because they wish to sell the house and the buyers cannot get financing unless the zone is changed to conform to the use. 10.Mr.Bernd wanted to know if it could be permitted as a conditional use in the R-2 Zone. 11.Mr.Pray stated that the possibility was looked into but it is contrary to what the Planning Commission has done in the past and the adjacent land is zoned R-3.The current area zoned R-2 is a mix of single family and duplexes.This particular home has been used as a tri-plex for many years. 12.Mr.Walker stated that they have a large basement which was rented out when their children left home.He stated that the apartment built behind the garage was for his wife's mother and when she passed away that was also rented out.The apartment was rented about 1970 and the basement about 1975. 13.The City Council considered the zone change request at their meeting on January 13,1987 CONCLUSIONS 1.The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority and has the jurisdiction under the law to entertain and grant a request to rezone land within the city's corporate limits if the criterion re quired by law is met. 2.There appears,after the public meeting before the City Council on the issue of rezoning the land owned by Ralph Walker,no opposition to rezon ing the said land from R-l to R-3. 3.Since the City of Moses Lake is cognizant of the need to serve the wel fare and best interests of the entire community,the City Council of the City of Moses Lake believes that rezoning the land owned by Ralph Walker from R-l,Single Family Residential,to R-3,Multi-family Residential, would serve the best interests of the residents of the City of Moses Lake and would not bear a substantial relationship to the public welfare of the entire community. DECISION 1.The zone change requested for Lot 45,Terminal Park Addition,owned by Ralph Walker,which is legally described in the herein Findings of Fact and which is presently zoned R-l,is hereby granted. Dated:January 15,1987 CITY OF MOSES LAKE 'Mayor Pro Tem\\ BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE,WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF SUNRISE RESORTS BINDING SITE PLAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION This matter,having come on before the Moses Lake City Council for action on January 13,1987,now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1.Sunrise Resorts has submitted a binding site plan for a proposed 5.6 acre,100 pad expansion to the existing Pier 4 RV Park. 2.The property is situated in Grant County and is legally described as fol1ows: A parcel of land in the northwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 32, Township 19 North,Range 28 East,W.M.,Grant County Washington described as follows: Commencing at the north quarter corner of said section 32;thence along the centerline of Sage Road south 89°3r00"east,490.00 feet to the east right-of-way line of Laguna Drive projected southerly;thence along said projected line south 00o05'51"west,30.00 feet to the point of begin ning;thence south 89o31'00"east,565.62 feet;thence south 00o29'00" west,265.42 feet;thence north 89o31'00"west,30.00 feet;thence south 66o40,09"west,116.76 feet;thence north 81045'23"west,126.84 feet; thence south 62036'28"west,114.31 feet;thence south 86026,22"west, 91.23 feet;thence south 52o28,00"west,157.83 feet;thence south 74o52'07"west,55.05 feet;thence south 48023'33M west,144.13 feet; thence north 77o35'00"west,63.86 feet to the easterly right-of-way line of Laguna Drive;thence along said right-of-way the following three cour ses:north 12o25'00"east,83.80 feet;thence north 17o47'00"east, 271.13 feet;thence north 31o09'00"east,244.03 feet;thence south 89o31'00"east,13.28 feet to the point of beginning. 3.The area is zoned R-3,Multi-Family Residential,and will be served with city water and sewer. 4.At their meeting on March 28,1985 the Planning Commission declared this project to have a non-significant adverse impact on the environment. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. At their meeting on April 25,1985 the Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit for the construction and operation of the proposed park. David Downing of Boundary Engineering,representing the project,stated that they have received a copy of the City Engineer's comments and are in agreement with the conditions.They are asking that Laguna Drive im provements be delayed until an LID is formed.Improvements are usually made when traffic increases and this project will not increase the traf fic on Laguna.Sage Road is requested to be vacated in the interior of the binding site plan. Gray Ekstedt of Boundary Engineering stated that the buffer between Lagu na Drive and the park has been designed to include a wall made of wood with stone or masonry pillars eyery 20'with evergreen pyramidal arborvi- tae,juniper shrubs,and some other shrubs in front of it to provide screening.The berm will be covered with Kentucky bluegrass and other grasses and a sprinkler system will be installed. Mr.Bernd stated that he liked the proposal as presented and wanted to know how long the fence would be. Mr.Ekstedt stated that it would be 560'along Laguna Drive and at the end of the property would make an approximate 90°turn for about 40'un til it meets the berm on the lagoon side. 10.A letter from Floyd and Gloria Swenson,residents of Laguna Drive,was read which requested the Planning Commission delay approval of the proj ect until a completed site plan could be considered by the Laguna residents. 11.Mr.Angell stated that he received a call from Clyde Owen who was also concerned about the berm and wall and requested that no action be taken by the Planning Commission until the Laguna residents have a chance to review it. 12.A public hearing scheduled upon notice before the Planning Commission on the issue of the binding site plan was held on December 11,1986. 13.Larry Petersen wanted to know if landscaping would be provided on the berm on the lagoon side of the project and if it would be high enough to obscure the project from the view of the residents in the Laguna Drive area. 14.Mr.Ekstedt stated that the project is partially screened by the area of undeveloped property between it and the Laguna residents.The Laguna area is about 1/2 mile from the project and the berm is at 1060*eleva tion while the interior of the park is at 1055'elevation.The berm will be planted with native grasses. 15. Mr.Pedersen wanted to know how far from the road the fence would be built. 16.Mr.Ekstedt stated that it is difficult to say for sure since the road is not constructed the complete width of the right-of-way but the fence should be about 27.5'from the existing street. 17.There was some discussion by the Commission on the elevations of the project and it was the consensus that the project is designed to the elevations requested by the Commission. 18.Mr.Brown felt that more than just native grasses should be planted on the berm along the lagoon. 19.Mr.Bernd wanted to know if people would be discouraged from using the area of the berm as a beach. 20.Dick Stuhr,one of the proponents of the project,stated that the area is not conducive to a beach since there is quite a steep slope but there is about 1,000'of beach area in the existing park.There is a trail that is used by fishermen to reach the lagoon and that will remain. 21.Mr.Collier stated that he would like to see additional planting on the berm. 22.Mr.Downing stated that additional planting on the berm would not create a problem.He also asked that the landscaping plan be included as part of the binding site plan approval.He also requested that if the binding site plan is accepted,that the proposed fence and landscaping plan be made a part of the site plan. 23.Mr.Brown stated that when the Corning development went in there was some discussion about redesigning Laguna Drive. 24.Rita Perstac,Municipal Services Director,stated that nothing has been done on Laguna because there is no city sewer there beyond the bridge. Sewer is parallel to Laguna for the length of this binding site plan but that the street would probably not be improved until sewer is put in the rest of the way. 25.The Planning Commission recommended to Council that the Binding Site Plan along with the fence and landscaping plan as presented by the developers at this meeting be approved with the stipulation that additional planting be placed on the berm on the lagoon side of the project and the comments from staff be addressed. 26.The Planning Commission also recommended to Council that the variance for street,sewer,and utility improvements on Laguna Drive be granted with the stipulation that a covenant run with the land for those improvements when an LID is formed. 27.On December 23,1986 the City Council set January 13,1987 as the date to consider this preliminary plat. 28.On January 13,1987 the City Council considered the Sunrise Resorts Bind ings Site Plan. 29.Gary Ekstedt of Boundary Engineering showed the Council the conceptual drawing of the sight obscuring fence required along Laguna Drive.He stated that additional greenery will be planted on the berm along the lagoon as was requested by the Planning Commission. 30.Clyde Owen,resident of Laguna Drive,stated that only one of the Laguna Drive residents was able to be at the Planning Commission meeting when the landscape plan was approved.He stated that many of the residents are out of town on vacation and will not be back until the first of February and he requested that a decision by the City Council be delayed 30 days so that the residents could meet with the developers on the land scape plan.He felt that placing the gatehouse near the Laguna Drive intersection could cause a back up of people wanting to get into the park.He wanted to know if there would be access to the lagoon from the development as people may locate their boats in the lagoon and just hike down through the berm to them.He also wanted to know if a bond could be required to guarantee the performance of the proposed improvements. 31.Mr.Chandler wanted to know when construction would start on this project. 32.Dave Downing of Boundary Engineering stated that the approval period for the conditional use permit runs out in January and if that happens before the binding site plan is approved,the developers would have to start the project over from scratch.He stated that no commitment was made to the Laguna residents to have a meeting.He pointed out that the elevation requirements have been met and the fence and landscaping have been pro fessionally designed. 33.Mr.Rimple felt that the developers have expended a great deal of effort to appease the neighborhood and the city. 34.Mr.Owen wanted to know if a performance bond would be required for the project. 35.Jim Whitaker,City Attorney,stated that under the binding site plan reg ulations the site could be occupied when all required improvements are completed.He pointed out that a performance bond is not required under the ordinance. 36.Jerry Hudson,Laguna Drive,stated that there are people who swim and fish in the lagoon and he was concerned about the boat traffic.He stated that if the guardhouse is placed at the intersection of Laguna and Sage there could be a problem with traffic. 37.Ms.Perstac stated that the developers have no plans to open up the lagoon to the residents of the park. 38.Mr.Edwards wanted to know if staff has considered the possible traffic problem if the guardhouse is placed at the intersection of Sage Road and Laguna Drive. 39.Ms.Perstac stated that the vacation question is another issue but has been discussed by the staff and the City Engineer has not indicated any concern about the traffic. 40.Mr.Biallas felt that the developers have attempted to meet the needs of the residents and the requirements of the city. CONCLUSIONS 1.The City Council of the City of Moses Lake is vested with the authority and has the jurisdiction under the law to approve a binding site plan within the city's corporate limits if the criterion required by law is met. 2.There appears after the public meeting before the City Council on the Sunrise Resorts Binding Site Plan some opposition to its approval. 3.The City Council is cognizant of the need to serve the welfare and best interests of the entire community,and believes that this binding site plan will serve the best interests of the residents of the City of Moses Lake and bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare of the entire community. DECISION 1.The Sunrise Resorts Binding Site Plan is approved with the stipulation that occupancy or use not be approved until all improvements and condi tions have been met and the Findings of Fact be amended to include street,sewer and other utility improvements on Laguna. Dated:January 15,1987 CITY OF MOSES LAKE ^Mayor Pro Temv n