Loading...
03102015 Part 2March 5, 2015 TO: City Manager for Council Consideration FROM: Community Development Director SUBJECT: Ordinance -Amend 17.12 -Major Subdivisions - 1st Reading Attached is an ordinance amending MLMC 17.12, Major Subdivisions, in order to come into compliance with RCW 58.17, Plats -Subdivisions -Dedications, which was amended by the 2013 Legislature. In essence we have gone back to our previous approval and extension process. Prior legislation extended the time limitations for approved plats but those provisions were removed with the 2013 legislative amendments. The proposed amendments are also part of the City Council's request that plat extensions be reviewed. The Council made the request at their December 23, 2014. The ordinance is presented for Council consideration . This is the first reading of the ordinance. Respectfully submitted ~ Gilbert Alvarado Community Development Director GA:jt ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17.12 OF THE MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 17 .12 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled "Major Subdivisions" is amended as follows: 17.12.100 Expiration of Preliminary Major Subdivision Approval: A. A preliminary major subdivision approval shall expire and become null and void seveA (7) five .{§} years after the date of final action by the City Council. B. The City Council may grant one (1) extension of the preliminary subdivision approval for a period not to exceed one (1) year, provided that the applicant submits a written request for an extension at least thirty (30) calendar days before the expiration date, and the applicant has attempted in good faith to submit the final subdivision application. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days after its passage and publication of its summary as provided by law. Adopted by the City Council and signed by its Mayor on March 24, 2015. Dick Deane, Mayor ATTEST: W . Robert Taylor, Finance Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: Katherine L. Kenison, City Attorney CONSTRUCTION I, INC. January 7, 2015 Anne Henning, Senior Planner City of Moses Lake 401 S. Balsam St. Moses Lake, Washington 98837 Dear Anne: RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JAN 16 2015 PLAN NING AND BUI LDING CITY OF MOSES LAKE Corporate Office SS 12 NE 109th Ct, Ste. 101 Vancouver, WA, 98662 t.360.2S4.0493 f.360.254.6998 As a follow up to the discussion at the December 23, 2014, City Council Meeting regarding the city's ability to allow additional preliminary plat extensions, Aho Construction I, Inc, understands that there are no current provisions in the city's code to allow an extension beyond January 8, 2016, for Sun Terrace No 1 Major Plat. In this meeting Mel Aho expressed concern that due to the slow housing recovery, the one-year final extension would not allow adequate time to develop the remaining phases in Sun Terrace when considering the current absorption rate. The council directed staff to explore the possibility of allowing additional extensions. Mayor Deane stated that Aho clearly has the council's support. We are committed to working with the City of Moses Lake to help provide an adequate supply of affordable housing for residents in the community. Aho has incurred sizeable investment in this project, and if the current preliminary plat were allowed to expire it would cause undue stress on both Aho and the City to start the process over again. Therefore, to allow for sufficient economic recovery to take place in the housing market, when the State of Washington enacted RCW 58.17.140 under which Sun Terrace No. 1 Major Plat was extended through December 31, 2014, the law stated, that "nothing ... shall act to prevent any city, town, or county from adopting by ordinance procedures which would allow extensions of time ... " Aho appreciates your consideration of its request for the city to adopt an ordinance to allow for an additional extension of preliminary plat approval for up to five years. We are grateful for your attention in this matter. Sincerely, ~/~- MelvinAho President, Aho Construction I, Inc. Aho Construction I, INC. www.AhoConstruction.com To: From: Community Development Director Senior Planner ~ MEMORAND UM Subject: Plat Extensions Date: March 3, 2015 As requested, following is some information on how various Eastern Washington cities address extensions to preliminary plats. Of the 12 cities, 4 do not allow extensions, 4 allow a one-time one- year extension, and 4 either allow additional extensions or do not specify. Some codes have provisions for updating approval requirements when an extension is requested. City Preliminary Plat Notes plat extensions approval allowed? time frame Cheney 5 years Yes May be extended by Planning Commission East 3 years 1 time Wenatchee 1 year Ellensburg per RCW No 58.17.140 Kennewick 5 years Yes City may allow extensions, no procedure listed in municipal code Pasco 5 years No No extension provisions in code Pullman 3 years 1 time Planning Commission may hold a public hearing on 1 year renewal request if conditions in the area have changed. The renewal can be appealed. Richland 5 years Yes Staff may extend approval period or may require preliminary plat to be resubmitted after expiration Spokane 5 years 1 time Staff approval, must meet one of these: Valley 1 year 1. Show that some portion has been finalized 2. Have taken substantial steps toward finalizing, such as surveying. public services, financing, completing required studies 3. Public services are not available to connect to Sunnyside 3 years 1 time 1 year Walla Walla 5 years No "No extensions shall be allowed" Wenantchee per RCW No 58.17.140 West 5 years Yes Must complete utilities within 1 year of prelim plat Richland approval or resubmit utility plans for review. Council can grant a 1 year extension. City can allow additional extension not to exceed 5 years. but can have additional or altered conditions and reauirements MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL December 23, 2014 DRAFT Council Present: Dick Deane, Bill Ecret, Karen Liebrecht, Jason Avila, Jon Lane, David Curnel, and Todd Voth The meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. by Mayor Deane. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Briar Ivory, Boy Scout, led the Council in the pledge of allegiance. PRESENTATION AND AWARDS-None CONSENT AGENDA Minutes: The minutes of the December 9 meeting were presented for approval. Approval of Claims. Prepaid Claims. Checks. and Payroll: Vouchers audited and certified by the Finance Director as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims, certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing which has been made available to the Council for approval and is retained for public inspection at the Civic Center. As of December 23, 2014 the Council does approve for payment claims in the amount of $728,898.80; prepaid claims in the amounts of $56,886.32 and $44, 118.39; claim checks in the amount of $1,830,313.96; and payroll in the amount of $309,589.28. Resolution -Boundary Line Adjustment -Dress: A resolution was presented which approves a boundary line adjustment between the City and William Dress by exchanging property at the intersection of West Broadway and West Third Avenue. Accept Work -204 Drywell Project: Cutting Edge Earthworks, Inc. has completed the 2014 Drywell Project. The work should be accepted and the 60-day lien period entered into. Action Taken: Mr. Voth moved that the Consent Agenda be approved, seconded by Mr. Avila, and passed unanimously. COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS -None CONSIDERATION OF BIDS AND QUOTES-None PETITIONS. COMMUNICATIONS. OR PUBLIC HEARINGS AHO CONSTRUCTION -SUN TERRACE PHASES 2 THROUGH 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT -EXTENSION OF APPROVAL Aho Construction has requested a one year extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Sun Terrace Preliminary Plat, Phases 2 through 8. Anne Henning, Senior Planner, stated that a one year extension of the preliminary plat approval can be granted by the Council. Mel Aho, Aho Construction, stated that the plat has over 200 undeveloped lots and because of the economy the one year extension will not be time enough to market them all so the property will be replatted in the future. Action Taken; Mr. Ecret moved that the request be granted for a one year extension, seconded by Mr. Lane, and passed unanimously. Mrs. Liebrecht requested that the regulations concerning plat extensions be reviewed. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCE -AMEND 2014 BUDGET -2N° READING An ordinance was presented which amends the 2014 budget. The ordinance amending the 2014 budget for the City of Moses Lake, Washington was read by title only. RCW 5 8 .1 7 .140: Time limitation for approval or disapproval of plats -Extensions. Page 1of1 RCW 58.17.1 4 0 T ime limitation for approval or disapproval of plats -Extensions. (1) Preliminary plats of any proposed subdivision and dedication shall be approved, disapproved, or returned to the applicant for modification or correction within ninety days from date of filing thereof unless the applicant consents to an extension of such time period or the ninety day limitation is extended to include up to twenty-one days as specified under RCW 58.17 .095(3): PROVIDED, That if an environmental impact statement is required as provided in RCW 43.21C.030, the ninety day period shall not include the time spent preparing and circulating the environmental impact statement by the local government agency. (2) Final plats and short plats shall be approved, disapproved, or returned to the applicant within thirty days from the date of filing thereof, unless the applicant consents to an extension of such time period. (3)(a) Except as provided by (b) of this subsection, a final plat meeting all requirements of this chapter shall be submitted to the legislative body of the city, town, or county for approval within seven years of the date of preliminary plat approval if the date of preliminary plat approval is on or before December 31, 2014, and within five years of the date of preliminary plat approval if the date of preliminary plat approval is on or after January 1, 2015. (b) A final plat meeting all requirements of this chapter shall be submitted to the legislative body of the city, town, or county for approval within ten years of the date of preliminary plat approval if the project is not subject to requirements adopted under chapter 90.58 RCW and the date of preliminary plat approval is on or before December 31 , 2007. (4) Nothing contained in this section shall act to prevent any city, town, or county from adopting by ordinance procedures which would allow extensions of time that may or may not contain additional or altered conditions and requirements. [2013 c 16 § 1; 2012 c 92 § 1; 2010 c 79 § 1; 1995 c 68 § 1; 1986 c 233 § 2; 1983 c 121§3; 1981 c 293 § 7; 1974 ex.s. c 134 § 8; 1969 ex.s. c 271 § 14.] Notes: Applicability --1986 c 233: See note following RCW 58.17.095. Severability--1981c293: See note following RCW 58.1 7.010. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=58. l 7.140 3/5/201 5 February 4, 2015 TO: City Manager for Council Consideration FROM: Community Development Director SUBJECT: Ordinance -Create MLMC 18.53 -Vacation Rental Dwellings -151 Reading Attached is an ordinance creating MLMC 18.53, Vacation Rental Dwellings, which would permit the rental of a single-family dwelling for less than thiry (30) days within all residential zoning districts. The proposed ordinance is a follow-up to the 2014 City Council Retreat where staff was directed to work with a stakeholders group to develop language permitting a vacation rental. It should be noted that the Planning Commission did hear from staff with regards to the requirement of a fire-sprinkler system with a vacation rental occupancy. This position comes from the Building Official and his consideration of a 2006 IBC/IRC State Building Code Interpretation No. 10-02. This matter is not unique to the City of Moses Lake. Currently the City of Spokane is considering a similar ordinance to what has been proposed by staff to the Council and they too have considered the fire-sprinkler system issue. The ordinance is presented for Council consideration. This is the first reading of the ordinance. Respectfully submitted Gilbert~ Community Development Director GA:jt ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE CREATING CHAPTER 18.63 OF THE MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "VACATION RENTAL DWELLINGS" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 18.73 of the Moses Lake Municipal Code entitled "Vacation Rental Dwellings" is created as follows: 18.63.010 Definitions: For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply. A. "Condominium dwelling" means a dwelling unit, established under the Horizontal Regimes Act of the State of Washington, owned separately from any other unit within the same building, if any, and the lot on which the building is located is owned in common by all dwelling unit owners. B. "Dwelling, Single-Family or One-Family" means a building containing one dwelling unit on a lot, intended for occupancy by one family which may be either the lot owner or a renter. C. "Dwelling unit" means one (1) or more habitable rooms for one (1) family with facilities for living, sleeping, cooking, and eating. D. "Full-time" means at least eleven (11) months out of the year. E. "Parking space" means a hard surface or porous pavement space of at least nine feet (9') by twenty feet (20') that is reserved for vehicle parking purposes. F. "Short-term" means th irty (30) calendar days or less. G. "Vacation rental dwelling" means the use of an approved vacation rental dwelling by any person or group of persons who occupies or is entitled to occupy a dwelling unit for remuneration for a period of less than thirty (30) calendar days, counting portions of days as full days, but in no event for less than twenty-four (24) consecutive hours. H. "Remuneration" means compensation, money, rent or other bargained for consideration given in return for occupancy, possession or use of real property. 18.63.020 Intent: It is the intent of this chapter is to establish the terms, criteria and procedures by which vacation rental dwellings may be permitted to ensure the safety and convenience of renters, owners, and neighboring property owners; protect the character of the residential neighborhoods; and address potential negative effects such as excessive noise, overcrowding, illegal parking, nuisance activities, and the accumulation of refuse. 18.63.030 Permitted Zones: A vacation rental dwelling use is a permitted use in all zoning districts that allow single-family residences as a permitted use. 18.63.040 Eligible Dwellings and Limitations: A vacation rental dwelling may be located in a single-family dwelling, an accessory dwelling unit, or a condominium dwelling. No more than one (1) vacation rental shall be allowed on a single parcel, except that this limitation shall not apply to condominium dwellings. 18.63.050 Application for Vacation Rental Approval: An application for vacation rental use of an eligible dwelling unit must be completed and submitted to the Community Development Director for review. Applications shall be submitted on forms provided by the Community Development Department. If compliance with the provisions of this chapter is demonstrated, an endorsement for a vacation rental use will be issued. A business license for a vacation rental business will not be issued by the City until an endorsement for vacation rental use of the dwelling has been issued. 18.63. 060 Criteria for Endorsement: The following criteria shall be met in order for approval of a property to be authorized by the City as a vacation rental dwelling. A. Business License Endorsement: A business license endorsement shall be applied for and obtained prior to any use of property as a vacation rental dwelling. Endorsements are specific to the owner of the dwelling unit. When the holder of an endorsement sells or transfers the real property, the new owner shall obtain an endorsement before using the dwelling unit as a vacation rental dwelling. Vacation rental dwelling endorsements shall remain in effect so long as a valid business license is maintained for the rental use and the property is not sold or transferred. B. Occupancy: Maximum occupancy of the rental shall be no more than two (2) persons per sleeping room plus two (2) additional persons per unit. The property owner shall be responsible for ensuring that the dwelling unit is in conformance with its maximum occupancy. C. Compliance: The vacation rental dwelling must comply with the requirements of the International Building Code and International Residential Code. D. Parking and Vehicles: At least one (1) additional off-street parking space shall be provided for the vacation rental use, in addition to all other parking required for the dwelling. Parking on-site along the front property line shall not exceed forty percent ( 40%) of the front-yard frontage. The number of vehicles at a vacation rental residence shall not at any time exceed the number of available parking spaces on the subject property. However, this limitation shall not apply to condominium dwellings. All overnight occupant parking shall be on site or immediately in front of the vacation rental dwelling. E. Signage: No outdoor advertising signs related to the vacation dwelling shall be allowed on the site. F. Solid Waste Collection: Weekly solid waste collection is required during all months. In the event that normal weekly collection is insufficient for the use, the property owner or local property representative shall make arrangements for additional solid waste removal. G. Local Property Representative: Where the property owner does not reside full-time within thirty (30) minutes driving distance of Moses Lake, a local property manager shall be designated. The local property manager shall reside full-time within thirty (30) minutes driving distance from Moses Lake and shall be available twenty-four (24) hours a day to respond to complaints, questions, or concerns. The local representative or property owner shall be responsible for responding to complaints about the rental. The name, address, and telephone contact number of the property owner or local representative shall be kept on file at the Community Development Department. Additionally, a notice that states the name, address, and telephone number of the property owner or local representative will be sent to all property owners within two hundred feet (200') feet of the vacation rental property. If the local representative changes, the owner of the vacation rental property shall be required to send out new notices to all property owners within two hundred feet (200') of the subject property. H. Informational Sign: A sign shall be posted conspicuously inside the dwelling to provide information on maximum occupancy, location of off-street parking, contact information for the property owner or local representative, evacuation routes, and the renter's responsibility not to trespass on private property or to create disturbances. I. Responsible Person: A responsible person (aged twenty-five (25] or older) who is an occupant of the vacation rental dwelling and is legally responsible for ensuring that all occupants and/or their guests comply with all laws and regulations during their stay shall be identified for each rental. J. Inspection: A dwelling unit proposed for a vacation rental dwelling shall be inspected by the Building Official or designee to determine its conformance with the endorsement standards of this chapter and basic health and safety elements as required by any applicable code. Any corrective action required shall be completed before the dwelling unit can be rented. Vacation rental dwellings shall be subject to periodic re-inspection by the Building Official or designee at the City's discretion to ensure compliance with the provisions of this chapter. The time frame for such inspections is subject to the City's discretion and available resources. K. Other Standards: The vacation rental dwelling shall meet all applicable requirements of the zone in which it is located, including but not limited to setbacks, maximum height, and lot coverage standards. 18.63.070 Notice requirements: Upon issuance of an endorsement, the City shall provide notice to property owners within two hundred feet (200') of the subject property (or outline of property that is held in common), advising that an endorsement for a vacation rental dwelling has been issued. Such notice shall include the address of the dwelling unit that received the endorsement, a location where additional information can be obtained about the nature of the endorsement, and the name, phone number, mailing address, and email address (if available) of the owner or designated contact. 18.63.080 Business License Required: Vacation rental dwellings shall meet all local and state regulations, including those pertaining to business licenses and taxes. 18.63.090 Continued Compliance With This Chapter: A City approved vacation rental dwelling shall be in compliance with the standards of MLMC 18.63.060 and 18.63.080 at all times, or shall be subject to the provisions of MLMC 18.63.110. The owner of the vacation rental dwelling is responsible for compliance with the provisions of this chapter. The failure of the local property manager or representative to comply with this chapter shall be deemed non-com pliance by the owner. 18.63.100 Non-Transferability: A vacation rental dwelling approval is issued to a specific ownerof a dwelling. If the property owner sells or transfers the real property, the new owner shall apply for and must receive a vacation rental dwelling approval from the City before using the dwelling as a vacation rental. 18.63.11 O Violations: Penalties, as specified in subsection 18.63.120, may be imposed for one (1) or more of the following violations: A. Advertising, renting, using, or offering for use, occupancy, or rent a vacation rental dwelling where the owner does not hold a valid endorsement issued pursuant to this chapter. B. Advertising, renting, using, or offering for use, occupancy, or rent a vacation rental dwelling in a manner that does not comply with the endorsement requirements of section 18.63.050. C. Failure by the owner to pay the special excise tax required by MLMC Chapter 3.28. D. Failure of the owner's designated contact to respond to tenant, citizen, or City complaints or inquiries. "Failure to respond" occurs if City staff is unable to reach the designated contact after three (3) attempts, using the information that the owner has on file with the City. 18.63.120 Enforcement, Penalties. and Appeal: A. Enforcement: This chapter may be enforced by any authorized representative of the City including, but not limited to, the Police Chief, Building Inspector, Code Enforcement Officer, Community Development Director, City Manager, or designee. B. Penalties: 1. For the first two (2) violations within a twelve (12) month period, the City shall issue a written warning to the owner. This written warning may also be accompanied by the issuance of a Notice of Violation and/or Notice of Infraction as may be appropriate pursuant to MLMC Chapter 1.20. 2. For the third violation within a twelve (12) month period, the Community Development Director shall revoke the owner's vacation rental dwelling endorsement. 3. Penalties under this section shall be deemed to be separate from any other applicable penalty provisions including license and tax penalties. C. Appeal: Any owner wishing to appeal the revocation of the vacation rental dwelling endorsement may request an appeal to the City Manager by filing a written notice with the City Manager within ten (10) calendar days after the date of revocation. Any endorsement that has been revoked cannot be reapplied for or issued for a period of at least one (1) year from the date the endorsement was revoked. 18.63.130 Severability: If any term or provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this chapter or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days after its passage and publication of its summary as provided by law. Adopted by the City Council and signed by its Mayor on March 24, 2015. Dick Deane, Mayor ATTEST: W. Robert Taylor, Finance Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: Katherine L. Kenison, City Attorney STATEOFWASttNGTON ST ATE BUILDING CODE COUNCIL 128-10th Avenue SW • P.O. Box 42525 • Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 (360) 725-2966 • fax (360) 586-9383 • e-mail sbcc@cted.wa.gov • www.sbcc.wa.gov STATE BUILDING CODE INTERPRETATION NO. 10-02 CODE: SECTION: QUESTION: ANSWER: SUPERSEDES: 2006 IBC/IRC IBC 101.2 & 310.1/IRC 101.2. Would a structure designed with permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation intended to be rented on a nightly, weekly or roonthly basis for occupants that are primarily transient in nature be classified as an R-1 under the IBC or a single family dwelling under the IRC? The local code official must classify the structure, depending on the specifics of the application. If the structure is a single unit not accessory to a single family home, but meeting the definition of dwelling unit, and meeting IRC 101.2, the structure could be permitted under the IRC. R-1 occupancies contain "sleeping units" with provisions for cooking or sanitation but not both, as defined in the IBC. However, the key differentiating characteristic of Group R-1 is the occupant's transient status. Historically, the reasoning is based on the typical transient's lack of familiarity with their surroundings that in turn leads to confusion and disorientation when a fire occurs while the occupants are asleep. As long as the units are offered for rent with an option that includes nightly or weekly accommodation, it would be most appropriate to classify them as R-1. In this regard, the IBC commentary notes that "extended-stay hotels" that may well have the characteristics of dwelling units still ought to be classified as Group R-1, except for those that require a stay of roore than 30 days. None REQUESTED BY: Okanogan County March 4 , 2015 TO: City Manager for Council Consideration FROM: Community Development Director SUBJECT: Ordinance -Hansen Zone Change -151 Reading Mick Hansen has requested a zone change for 20.5 acres from C-2 General Commercial and Business to Light Industrial south if 1-90. The Land Use designation for this property was changed from General Commercial to Industrial in the 2014 Comprehensive Plan amendments. The ordinance rezoning the subject property is presented for Council consideration. This is the first reading of the ordinance. Respectfully submitted , Gilbert ~ Community Development Director ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.09.040 OF THE MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the zon ing map of the City of Moses Lake shall be changed as follows: That the following described property shall be changed from its C-2, General Commercial and Business, to L-1, Light Industrial: Tax #9205 and All south of Highway less road and Tax #9205 in the south half of the southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 19 North, Range 28 East, W.M. Grant County Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days after its passage and publication of its summary as provided by law. Adopted by the City Council and signed by its Mayor on March 24, 2015. Dick Deane, Mayor ATTEST: W. Robert Taylor, Finance Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: Katherine L. Kenison, City Attorney PROPOSED ll -LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE LEOt:ND 8 C:n"l.ll1llTI .,......,,..,_ ZONING ._.,...&MQ.l,AWl.1111ES R:>-atr'ICUltWO,ML,.Jl:H IQ.MLLJI FMl,U'MS«Hf~ 0 40'UIA:. CC*UEACW. c.-c:onlVil..Ml«ISCiff a..Mn...-C t., Ll-UGl(TIHOUlflltAL -~-M(JiYY'IN)Uft'R""'­ ",,.,,. .._N:MATRW.A&Alt U.UGHTll"'DUSnrw,..()R0221t • .-. ...... 11;,JC .................................................................................. -~--M------~-----M----__,--- ~----BADGER"'.S'I' --· ---·-.. PROPOSED u:oo.o BOTl'UYtH ..... ..,.__ MlltCU ""'"'" "1·MOt.lfil.Mt.YM:t ltl..-Olf/TWOf/i#U lU A).61Ll..TIF...,,.llYJl:UCOllllil.. Q.oGOIEltAl.COWWEROAJ. C\-Cl~ltAL .... t.'tUo.sT u..&.Ot'T HDl.CTJl:W. ... .....,IJOAntW. / /i .... N>W1'tW.. PIUllC LJ..LOl(T ..oJSTllW..ORD :ms ....... ..., lilJHltPM.AIA90RT i.c>tell.A~ ~--~~ ................................................................ ------.... -----------------.... ------1 CURRENT CITY OF MOSES LAKE I ZONE CHANGE Attachment 1 THIS MAP WAS PRODUCED BY THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY THE ACCURACY OF Al l INFORMA.TION SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH CITY STAFF. Document Patti: \\Gis-server\gis\Map Requests\COMPREHENSIVE PLAN\Zone Change Compare mxd D•too 111a1201s March 3, 2015 TO: City Manager for Council Consideration FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: Acceptance of Donation from John Laughery and Pipe Fitters Local Pasco Attached for Council approval is a resolution accepting donation from John Laughery and Pipe Fitters Local Pasco for 51 bicycles and helmets. The new bicycles will be given to designated children in different programs sponsored by the police department and the park and recreation department. The Moses Lake Police Department and Park and Recreation Department would like to thank John Laughery and Pipe Fitters Local Paso for their generous donation. Respectively submitted, Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 3 S-D Lf A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION TO THE MOSES LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Recitals: 1. John Laughery and Pipe Fitters Local Pasco has made a donation to the Moses Lake Police Department of 51 bicycles and helmets 2. The bicycles and helmets will be given to designated children in different programs sponsored by the Moses Lake Police Department and the Parks and Recreation Department. Resolved: 1. The City of Moses Lake accepts the donation for the Moses Lake Police Department and Parks and Recreation Department. 2. The City of Moses Lake expresses appreciation to John Laughery and Pipe Fitters Local Pasco. Adopted by the City Council on March 10, 2015. Dick Deane, Mayor ATTEST: W. Robert Taylor, Finance Director March 5, 2015 TO: City Manager for Council Consideration FROM: Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution -Nuisance Abatement Costs -Markova Living Trust Attached is a resolution which affirms the Council's prior authorization to staff to collect the funds expended for the nuisance abatement at 2003 S. Beaumont Drive .. The property is owned by the Markova Living Trust. Respectfully submitted ~ Gilbert Alvarado Community Development Director GA:jt RESOLUTION NO. ? ')t)c;- A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE BILLING TO BE IMPOSED AGAINST MARKOVA LIVING TRUST AS THE OWNER OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY UPON WHICH THE CITY CAUSED ABATEMENT OF A NUISANCE TO BE PERFORMED AFTER A FAILURE OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO ABATE THE SAME. RECITALS: 1. Real Property Location and Ownership. The records of Grant County show that Markova Living Trust is the owner of property within the city limits located at 2003 S. Beaumont Drive. The parcel number of this property is 101624000. Markova Living Trust was provided notice of a hearing held before the City Council on September 23, 2014, to consider the allegations of the Code Enforcement Officer that a nuisance requiring abatement existed on property owned by Markova Living Trust. 2. On September 23, 2014 the City Council conducted a hearing to determine if a nuisance existed on the property at 2003 S. Beaumont Drive. At the conclusion of that hearing , the City Council adopted Resolution No. 3466 which provided a nuisance existed on the property at 2003 S. Beaumont Drive, that the owner had fifteen (15) days to abate such nuisance and if the nuisance was not abated within fifteen (15) days of adoption of that resolution, the City would cause the nuisance to be abated and the costs of that abatement to be charged against the property owner. 3. The nuisance identified in Resolution No. 3466 was not abated by the property owner within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of that resolution. On January 26, 2015 the City caused the nuisance identified to be abated through the use of contracted and/or City labor and equipment. RESOLVED: 1. The costs to the City to abate the nuisance identified in Resolution 3466 on the property at 2003 S. Beaumont Drive are set forth below. Those costs are derived from the attached documents which detail the costs incurred. 2. The costs to be recovered from Markova Living Trust are: City labor and equipment costs Contracted labor and equipment (Tatum Lawn Care) Sales Tax $0.00 $150.00 $11.85 Total $161.85 3. This charge is certified by the City Council as due and owing the City. This charge shall be forwarded in writing to Markova Living Trust for payment. If payment is not received within thirty (30) days of submittal, the same shall be submitted for collection with other unpaid billings of the City and collected or reduced to judgment on the rolls of the Grant County Clerk. Adopted by the City Council on March 10, 2015. ATTEST: Dick Deane, Mayor W. Robert Taylor, Finance Director Tatum Lawn Care P 0 Box 155 Moses Lake, WA 98837 www.tatumlawncarewa.com I City of Moses Lake Attn: P 0 Box 1579 Moses Lake WA 98837 Service Provided P.O. No. Clean up & remove weeds on vacant lot at 2003 Beaumont Moses Lake Invoice# 51008 I t/26/2015 As our effort to help with going green, we would like to offer emailing our invoices. For those with email, please, feel free to include an email address with your payment. Due Upon Receipt Quantity (#, sq ft, lbs, gal) RE: 2003 Beaumont Rate (per) 150.00 Total Plus Tax Below Item totals 150.00 Balances 30 days past due are subject to 1.5% interest charge per month. Subtotal $150.00 Sales Tax (7.9%) $11.85 Thank you for allowing us to be of service. Total $161.85 Qyestions? Call 509-762-6771 March 3, 2015 TO: City Manager For City Council Consideration FROM: Municipal Services Director SUBJECT: Request to Call for Bids Larson Water Improvements -2015 Staff is nearing completion of the plans and specifications for the Larson Water Improvements - 2015 project. The project includes replacing hydrants, installing valves, installing pads, and associated work on the existing water mains in the Larson area The estimated construction cost for the project is $250,000. Plans and specifications will be available at the engineering office for review. Staff requests authorization to advertise this contract for bids. Res~ly Submitted, Gary Harer, :1 ~ \\ ~ Municipal Services Director February 3, 2015 TO: City Manager for Council Consideration FROM: Community Development Director SUBJECT: Craig's First Short Plat -Deferral Request Western Pacific Engineering , on behalf of Craig Jungers, submitted a request for a deferral of street and utility improvements for a proposed 1-lot short plat currently under review by staff. Street and utility improvements currently exist but do not meet current Community Standards. The short plat is located at 720 Burress Avenue. The owner was previously granted permission to build on unplatted property with the condition that the property be platted within one year. The plat has been submitted but the curb and gutter do not meet current standards, so a request for a deferral has been requested to delay the improvements until after construction is complete, which is anticipated to be December 2016. The Planning Commission recommended thatthe deferral be approved with the stipulation that the City repair or replace the curb. Respectfully submitted ~ Gilbert Alvarado Community Development Director GA:jt ~ Qi () :::r 3 CD 2. N j l • ~ • r • • 1 A CRAIG'S F IRST SHORT PLAT A REPLAT OF PORTION OF THE RANGE 28 A PORTION NE 1/4 OF EAST, W.M., OF TRACT 26. BATTERY ORCHARD TRACTS, TOWNSHIP 19 WASHINGTON SllR Vl:\OI! ,.; 0 T E '')"'"-' ..-... -o '""'"""'<'fl p._"-'""-'O °"° e ·~ 1..-... .-.-.e .. "IMt"H" ,.... •• crJ "'~I'(! .. tt-t. ..._,. o•• ...,, ,,,..., tor t .. ;. • ,...-, ..,.~. t· .. l ,.,. U<.1h.Ot or t,.... t .. 1t ''' Kt<n•~ THE SE 1/4 MOSES LAKE, r fi-.CHQ :Z.$ --1\ J' C•~ni Cea ~-'"~l I , r,,,_ I ~-/ I / ~''\'· I , OF SECTION 28, GRANT COUNTY, LE GE ND • ~/fl -'"cl'! rOI\ P'" wh~ -w)'QI'"• r ap ..,~..­ • .~ l2•9~~ ,.,~t Ht Mc:i)I. 2(tt4 4 ff(tl en~ W'l.,.._ morlo~d ·l~ •1•':f•• ..,..,.......,~: •et Wuy. U>H NORTH, L I N E 0 A T A .. I I ,./l • I ;r,. fl-. t.ilO"l.,...e! .t •• P'oh d -toi•,.. o• ~\. ,_, r~.10'1 ':-. 2tf'• ~ tP. r ~tfji '\Qr ::;-~~ a S/• -~ti ""--"' -~VI Sl.lr',..yot"• cco '"''Y1'e-"" ·ls 1'S110· ....,or•v••Hti"lt '~ f"<W>~ '1. '°'"' ~.r . .,, . ~>~· •. I /.!/~· ! Co'""°'~d peo •I O"lly • ,.,.. ~""9"1t ~'7''Mt .rr,,,__ .. ';'/1 •• ,~..f1 NE 1/4. Of THF. SE 1/ij <> "-~.....,.1,.,,.u,,it<t1n•..-c-t>c.n1r0""'tt.. -~.\' f ~· / "')' -~ ':>'ot#bry WO'TOftt)' Oe,•d c-. rtt.,.c«I u..,!,.. ~S'...\,' .. , ~;.", ' ...... c PA.Cll .IC ~ .. Al IN j Cron1 c-t>-iYdOfor • I h 1-1• 12:.~328 -11~ ... ~ .. ', . ·' ._. .... "-•1ERfCtaf't . t 1 ~;;.;' ... ~.::~~~' ir::.,~;:::-.,:09::' t~~':-ry · -9 '~>;-r 31 tCP-Pl AT I c:.c.unt,. A...dt-·, n:e: No, 1•2•t /F-, ... ,. ... ,, I • . -.::!_!· ..... , • i I ""'"'""""fi)' ·~"'°"''~ i->'41fT"C'.lli~ """",., ..f.itl(Ql\dt C> / ' j ' ' -. '-!?' .,, ' I ~ .,at o,. I~ .._.,d ... Gn:.,t <:o..."t' -V I ........ ' ~.P,... .., .... .._,.,.,. rt11 No. IOX;Mll ~!'-;--;' . , '--0 ·..... '...........-s. .......... I <. > ~,."'°""~" u-"'l~ff! "''°"...--o\Jeh "-,... _ _..t / '!,."-..., · ' '>-,.. V-~· et. lou"C ..,,...._ c;ir-t c...rity ~-1 '" ... /, .-0, l·\.: • "'-'J"q,.:...t,... (; . '1dlt...,.·a rte !il.o. 1~491' ,,J' Ii! 1 ',. --"""' ~' ... ~"" ' '-.....~~ ' Q ""t H•t--~e ~·•t 'ot J t;t '~-:;,/.!)1 '--o ·.,J,, 1~ 1. 0 r01· TRAl.T 21 ,;..·~~y·,, ~ ~ '-/ ' _,f . / '°::f~o / &'\-,, ."-.... ,) '·1:><1,:--.._~ ~v-1>., • ' I..-~;''/ ;'--1','>I" o.p <1, .~,J?~S'S '....._...._ SEt SllEt"T :! Of 3 roR LOT DETA!I. c.,.,......,. ~> Uo'"'d.')(J' lctl'P•c.t lJrt.o. 11: • .,. •• .~'I /'J • '~.'1 °'•~ .. ..,I~,' -·---T-tl --<? -__:_, -,..'"Y::Y_ . .i...__ . • (4• J' ,' Q, -/, ' Lr>T ·. /;J~· /•>I~ 1· '. -·-·~ ~ ... (r 'V _eo-.-. le L ( K E /:1 ··~ ~ ~.~4_, "..,· ~1 ' ~ e LE G E N D "' I ,_ ,. l\il> I ~ I l<f r~·, . ....... .1 .... ~ '"'.s I <)' ... ___ Flot Y.:)Ut>.'7'01")' , 1~ , ~ -...... or .-.,_"" , ' 1 <' I" .,, /...' . ~ . ........._ )(:SS _e;. ~ A..._ "'-._ ./ I , .J· -·-·-S.Ct'°" l;..• 'r , '-' '-!'f·o ::., '-_). '.J U -'.. ~ '-0 ~ "--v 0"~.;;J~ll .F >YI ~ • , ----:.:: c; i..' ~ •· -~' I '.t "' ' _) fr "'" <.. 7 . "-I' W.y SU R \EY O R'S p t r L A R A T I ON I r\•rvtqr ~t'"'tlry t,,.t tl\U Ol•~ Ir> !! t ,.ut at·d correct t'•Dl"l'9«"'1'1.•l.1Cln :)f lf\• l•1"4tt +cl\111}))' SurY8'rOd : h•"rtr• o•~liv-• u.•t t~ crea2t t ~,..~ ~' P\~t ,.._ ai1t'l41: 0., • "(;lUal t ut'\lltJ ••.C SIJOdl\ll•tM Df • CIO"tlO"I Ctf sect ion I\. T""'",."'"' 19 'b"'th. fito'"'9" "9 l •al, W. 't : Vutl. lilt O\.r"V11Y WIU t:llJfC>letcd 0)' N or ~,. "• d11"'~t';l ll'll"I .'1"0 t....,.t t,..111-01•t•n C&?•. (.f·Yr'"" NtO a"tlr e·q •h°""n t "•'"•Ori t.Cl"'"•<tlr \o tl111 "--~ o' .,,_" ;ria.,..led91t l~tct"is<t:1.n. ~ ~li•f ~ t .. •t tll"CD-e .. .-.e"'u"t.."ts h•"• teer •n tt ...-ie lot <~ ..-. •t•li.•a Gl'I ~--.. Q""01.-d f~c!,/~ . rrl'"1•r1c.-C. "kt,.-...r-f~I ~-t S. "'•'"""~tort lA'-'«1 ~"'l'tt"r ha l? .. Wt NL"'5fftt'f 0-'Cl> 1C !:,HG Ihf!l.OllllQ,, >."l() ~vt'.·. tHC. O\Ol\eO"" ll3y Proras•1C•r•1 Ce"1t .... 1.Jl& •<Ultt9., PhoCll Mo•~• 1..~\:o, ">· 90(!!7 ~ •I ... '""1 ...._ '"......_ J) ,-\ I '"'Jt ......._ 4' 1 • lc••1reft\ ,..,.TJCUM~T urf1> l!QXXJ~G UATA U-\'9¥"JUlt P°""• l.ri• <l'. . / ~-~ 1 . " .. ,ti/~ .f,~~ $/ ' ' -, . . I °<'+ I 1~...., '-! tit;-"' I( r.t· •" / ' • s~. ·~ / ' .j-1~ I I'"'' J-..... .,,. A.t-1. I ........ ~'f.O ..._/ "' I . -.. ~.,C'/t: t'J>~. / $1~ / • tnl'Dtil• ,, .. er; '"'e-11~ .. ,,.. m I ' I 0------' ~ 0~l , 5 ,' . 'f <t, \( ·,; . ._ .... , '• 'o"-.~ ' ~t I ' I c.,,::_..;,,.._ •' '• ">'J>:I: 6 ll . ., <lo·~ .... .,.. ">1 , A U 0 I E R T ~•.or;iit L- T 0 R ' S Fl CATE ~~ ;;,_~.~?•,. '-I·,~.. 1 4 ,t 0#~\i ~ ~............ 1 v•.t'<J F thO fv f'H:Ot'O \.ft•• r-,. GO :sC'l o c:o \'.:O 100 '-...., / v"r-· . ,,, • .,. &f '·"°' .. ~----. ,~ -i1.,, e::g I I "-"-.._;' '.f • SCALI.. L~ f"tCf ( t' 0 A ~ I S r> }' IJFARTNG S ,.,.. b•#'n; I'. 1 tr. Cr••r U""" d F'rin• .. '• (le"-....,,.., S "ZQ!t. 4-C~ W. .-,ok...._,. It"• ...-w It«" lt\e ~ « iw..tf"') o-~t-1,,d 1r<>.·t9 c:s found WW:. ~~\Or, n" Mo 1n•t ll A S I S 0 I" ELEVAT!O~ ~bW'l'd 2~ Br.-C. '" ilOfM.l""""'t Cc:M ot "'~'°" o' P11~-, 0-~ n...-tt-cc ~U• J'eC City --' "'"H Loh: Dct11~ ti...,.t\oil' • 1~0J O'c ia-e~ .. 1"' Ooc" . of ~hC,.t. Clh l.C •t. P•~C(; ••••• , \ftJ"111Vr;;tl •••• ,.eCO('CS of Sr"''ll C':w.t"1°y. •U the t-eci••••t 01 th• City nf MO•a• l•J.:t:, a.: ~t. (~;,;.iy ""'Oltor .. . .. . . IJy C;e:putv A 1u1tor ,.,.,...,.n .. a ... ,n~ w,~u S.\ac<:t•r"'" '''" WAC "\.."\J-1)0-tl-ta $?3 T HIN Rier. IYF.:,/'ERN PACIFIC EVCJNE£R/Nc; Al\'D SUHVEI' INC ... n.-... KU..11 .. 'K .. 1" ""'~ ~~---..,. r'""""rr 1'•!1" Profr'lldun~l Ccnlf"r 1:ize lhmtu Pl•<• (~00)76~-1~13 """ J.a.k,., w.-.f\, 1, CRAIG'S FIRST SHORT PLAT -------·- • RY.PIJIT or A l"t!'I or Tl<ACT za. ~-· lUT'TtR\' OR~HARD TRACT'S. A PTN. Of Tiit N~1' l/4 Of TUE S£ 1/4 or ~f!.C. ~. T19S. R28. 'ff.N..'"' CRAIG'S nnsT Sl!Ol\T pJ_\T " • 'J (;r.nl W1.1n'-.r ..-.uhtf?.4' " '..g 'un-er11 by Ut1J Data ~ l4 Su.Ir t • • 4b Dr11.'1Fl\ b' rml/W\IH rt•t• os-1<1 $hf'o::t 1 Gt 3 Cb•e;ked h7 f'C'S D•Ll• 0:'.>•l4 rt-ui'l!rt No. CSllll .... c; ..... ~ n .- .... ;_ t....c.;::w ~:;~ ==;; ~·~~ -~ ;:: / ,,_ -·,,. ---__ ... :=c: w 0 March 2, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Moses Lake City Council Gentlemen CITY OF MOSES LAKE Attached is a proposed contract between the City of Moses Lake and Western Display Fireworks, Ltd . With this contract the city agrees to pay Western Display Fireworks $16 ,000 for the 2015 4 th of July fireworks display. Western Dispaly has also provided an optional $1,500 addition by separate contract. The proposed contract and optional addition are presented for Council consideration. If the Council finds the contract(s) acceptable, authorization should be given to the City Manager to sign the contract(s) on behalf of the City of Moses Lake. ~\~ainski ~~anager JKG:jt City Manager 764-3701 City Attorney 764-3703 • Community Development 764-3750 Finance 764-3717 Fire 765-2204 Municipal Services 764-3783 Municipal Court 764-3701 Parks & Recreation 764-3805 • Police 764-3887 • Fax 764-3739 401 S Balsam St. P.O. Box 1579 Moses Lake, WA 98837-0224 • www.cityofml.com Mr. Joe Gavinski City of Moses Lake PO Box 1579 Moses Lake, WA 98837 Dear Joe, WESTERN DISPlAY FIREWORKS LTD February 4, 2015 Thank you for allowing Western Display Fireworks the opportunity to be a part of your upcoming celebration. We are pleased to present our proposals for the 2015 Moses Lake 4th of July fireworks display. Please review the enclosed programs and call us if you have any qu estions or if we can be of further assistance at this time. As discussed, your proposals are written as a $16,000 main show with an optional $1500 addition. If the main show is approved as written, please sign the enclosed main show contracts, retain one for your records and return one to Western by fax, e-mail or in the envelope provided. This will allow us to proceed with all other arrangements for your show. Because permits require exact product totals, please confirm the status of your addition by May 1st to allow enough time to process the permit application. We appreciate your business and look forward to providing another spectacular fireworks display for your event. Sincerely, Heather Gobet Marketing Director 0 p.o. box 932 canby oregon 97013 office 503.656.1999 fax 503.656.6628 info@westerndisplay.com ~ ~ (!:: ~ w (!:: u_ >-3 0.... U) 0 z (!:: w 1-- U) ~ CONTRACT AND PuRCHASc 0KDtR THIS AGREEM ENT between WESTERN DISPLAY FIREWORKS, LTD and the undersigned here and after shall be referred to as WESTERN and the CITY OF MOSES LAKE here and after shall be referred to as the SPONSOR. WESTERN agrees to supply fi reworks and pyrotechnic operators for the sum of: SIXTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND N0/100 ($16,000.00) on the following designated date(s) and location: JULY 4, 2015 FROM BANK OVER MOSES LAKE, NEAR S. EASTLAKE STREET & WEST HILL AVE, MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE FOR PROPOSAL *** 15-4759 *** INCLUDES: : Merchandise as described, use of company owned mortars and equipment, Washington sales tax, City of Moses Lake Fire Department permit, delivery and firing by a licensed pyrotechnician and crew covered under worker's compensation insurance and $5,000,000 display liability insurance. • CITY TO PROVIDE CROWD CONTROL-MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) PEOPLE, 20 YARDS OF SAND, AND FRONT END LOADER TO ASSIST WITH SECURING EQUIPMENT FOR SHOW • SPONSOR FURTHER AGREES TO WATER FALLOUT AREA PRIOR TO SHOW WESTER N'S RESPONSIBI LITIES: WESTERN agrees that it shall be the responsibility of the pyrotechnic operator in charge, acting on behalf of the party of the first part, to cancel or delay said display if in his/her judgment circumstances beyond the control of either parties poses an extraordinary risk to the health and safety of any persons or property within the vicinity of the display. SPONSOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES: SPONSOR agrees to perform their requirements in accordance with NFPA 1123 OUTDOOR DISPLAY OF FIREWORKS 2014 Edition {National Fire Protection Association) 8.1 General Req uirements. The sponsor of the display shall make provisions for fire protection for the display. 8.1.1 The sponsor shall consult with the AHJ and the operator to determine the level of fire protection required. 8.1.2 The following shall apply to crowd control: (1) Monitors whose sole duty is the enforcement of crowd control shall be located around the display site and at other locations as determined by the sponsor. (2) The AHJ and the operator shall approve the provisions for crowd control. 8.1.2.1 Monitors shall be positioned around the display site to prevent spectators or any other unauthorized persons from entering the discharge site. 8.1.2.2 Where required by the AHJ, approved delineators or barriers shal l be used to aid in crowd control. 8.1.2.3 Portions of the display site, other than the discharge site(s), shall be permitted to be open to the public prior to the display as long as the provisions of 4.2.2.2 are maintained. 8.1.2.4 Unescorted public access to the discharge site shall not be permitted where pyrotechnic materials are present during the period before the disp lay. 8.1.2.5 The discharge site shall be restricted throughout the display and until the discharge site has been inspected after the display. TERMS: TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE OF SIXTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AN D N0/100 ($16,000.00) IS TO BE PAID AS FOLLOWS: 25% OF THE TOTAL CONTRACT ($4,000.00) IS DUE BY MAY 1, 2015; THE REMAINING BALANCE OF ($12,000.00) IS DUE IN FULL ON OR BEFORE JULY 14, 2015. IF THE DISPLAY IS CANCELLED PRIOR TO DEPARTURE FROM OUR FACILITY AND CANNOT BE FIRED DUE TO CONDITIONS OR REASONS BEYOND THE CONTROL OF WESTERN, THE SPONSOR AGREES TO PAY 50% OF THE TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE ($8,000.00) FOR COSTS INCURRED. IF THE PHYSICAL SETUP OF THE SHOW IS COMPLETED AND THE SHOW MUST BE CANCELLED DUE TO CONDITIONS OR REASONS BEYOND THE CONTROL OF WESTERN, THE SPONSOR AGREES TO PAY 100% OF THE CONTRACT PRICE ($16,000.00) FOR COSTS INCURRED. SPONSOR UNDERSTANDS THAT THE ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CONTRACT WERE CALCULATED BASED ON COSTS AND FEES AS OF TH E DATE THE PROPOSAL WAS GENERATED. IN THE EVENT THESE ITEMS INCREASE PRI OR TO THE DATE OF THE DISPLAY WESTERN RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJUST THE PRODUCT CONTAINED IN THE DISPLAY TO ACCOUNT FOR THE INCREASE. SPONSOR RECOGNIZES THAT BECAUSE OFTHE NATURE OF FIREWORKS, AN INDUSTRY ACCEPTED LEVEL OF 3% OF THE PRODUCT USED IN ANY DISPLAY MAY NOT FUNCTION AS DESIGNED AND THIS LEVEL OF NONPERFORMANCE IS ACCEPTABLE AS FU LL PERFORMANCE. INTEREST at 11/2% per month (AN ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF EIGHTEEN PER CENT PER ANNUM APR 18%) will be charged on all accounts 30 days past due, and buyer agrees to pay the same. Buyer also agrees to reimburse WESTERN DISPLAY FIREWORKS, LTD for its attorney fees incurred in collection if this account is delinquent. CONTRACT VALID WHEN SIGNED BY SPONSOR REPRESENTATIVE Sponsor Representative (print) Sponsor Representative Signature Western Display Fireworks, Ltd. Robert L. Gobet, President Judith A. Gobet, Vice President For: ___________________________________ (Organization) Date ________________ _ Date ___ .z+-/__.4-+U-L.......ao')_-____ _ r I 0 p .o. box 932 canby oregon 97013 office 503.656.1999 fax 503.656.6628 info@westerndisplay.com ~ (/) ~ 0::: ~ w 0::: LL >-3 Q_ (/) 0 z 0::: w 1- (/) ~ CONTRACT AND PURCHASE ORDER -ADDITION THIS AGRE EMENT between WESTERN DISPLAY FIREWORKS, LTD and the undersigned here and after shall be referred to as WESTERN and the CITY OF MOSES LAKE here and after shall be referred to as the SPONSOR. WESTERN agrees to supply fireworks and pyrotechnic operators for the sum of: ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND N0/100 ($1,500.00) on the following designated date(s) and location: JULY 4, 2015 FROM BANK OVER MOSES LAKE, NEAR S. EASTLAKE STREET & WEST HILL AVE, MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON. TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE FOR PROPOSAL **"' 15-4968 *** INCLUDES: : Merchandise as described, use of company owned mortars and equipment, Washington sales tax, City of Moses Lake Fire Department permit, delivery and firing by a licensed pyrotechnician and crew covered under worker's compensation insurance and $5,000,000 display liability insurance. • SEE MAIN CONTRACT AND PURCHASE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES WESTER N'S RESPONSIBILITIES: WESTERN agrees that it shall be the responsibility of the pyrotechnic operator in charge, acting on behalf of the party of the first pa rt, to cancel or delay said display if in his/her judgment circumstances beyond the control of either parties poses an extraordinary risk to the health and safety of any persons or property within the vicinit y of the display. SPONSOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES: SPONSOR agrees to perform their requirements in accordance with NFPA 1123 OUTDOOR DISPLAY OF Fl REWORKS 2014 Edition (National Fire Protection Association) 8.1 General Requirements. The sponsor of the display shall make provisions for fire protection for the display. 8.1.1 The sponsor shall consult with the AHJ and the operator to determine the level of fire protection required. 8.1.2 The following shall apply to crowd control: ( 1) Monitors whose sole duty is the enforcement of crowd control shall be located around the display site and at other locations as determined by the sponsor. (2) The AHJ and the operator shall approve the provisions for crowd control. 8.1.2.1 Monitors shall be positioned around the display site to prevent spectators or any other unauthorized persons from entering the discharge site. 8.1.2 .2 Where required by the AHJ, approved delineators or ba rriers shall be use d to aid in crowd control. 8.1.2.3 Portions of the display site, other than the discharge site(s), shall be permitted to be open to the public prior to the display as long as the provisions of 4.2.2.2 are maintained. 8.1.2.4 Unescorted public access to the discharge site sha ll not be permitted where pyrotechnic materials are present during the period before the display. 8.1.2.S The discharge site shall be restricted throughout the display and until the discharge site has been inspected after the display. TERMS: TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE OF ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND N0/100 ($1,500.00) IS TO BE PAID AS FOLLOWS: 25% OF THE TOTAL CONTRACT ($375.00) IS DUE BY MAY 1, 2015; THE REMAINING BALANCE OF ($1,125.00) IS DUE IN FULL ON OR BEFORE JULY 14, 2015. IF THE DISPLAY IS CANCELLED PRIOR TO DEPARTURE FROM OUR FACILITY AND CANNOT BE FIRED DUE TO CONDITIONS OR REASONS BEYOND THE CONTROL OF WESTERN, THE SPONSOR AGREES TO PAY 50% OFTHETOTALCONTRACTPRICE ($750.00) FOR COSTS INCURRED. IFTHE PHYSICAL SETUP OF THE SHOW ISCOMPLETEDANDTHESHOW MUST BE CANCELLED DUE TO CONDITIONS OR REASONS BEYOND THE CONTROL OF WESTERN, THE SPONSOR AGR EES TO PAY 100% OF THE CONTRACT PRICE ($1,500.00) FOR COSTS INCURRED. SPONSOR UNDERSTANDS THAT THE ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CONTRACT WERE CALCULATED BASED ON COSTS AND FEES AS OF TH E DATE THE PROPOSAL WAS GENERATED. IN THE EVENT THESE ITEMS INCREASE PRIOR TO THE DATE OF TH E DISPLAY WESTERN RESERVES THE RIGHTTOADJUSTTHE PRODUCT CONTAINED IN THE DISPLAY TO ACCOUNT FOR THE INCREASE. SPONSOR RECOGNIZES THAT BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF FIREWORKS, AN INDUSTRY ACCEPTED LEVEL OF 3% OF THE PRODUCT USED IN ANY DISPLAY MAY NOT FUNCTION AS DESIGNED AND THIS LEVEL OF NONPERFORMANCE IS ACCEPTABLE AS FULL PERFORMANCE. INTEREST at 11/2% per month (AN ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF EIGHTEEN PER CENT PER ANNUM APR 18%) will be charged on all accounts 30 days past due, and buyer agrees to pay the same. Buyer also agrees to reimburse WESTERN DISPLAY FIREWORKS, LTD for its attorney fees incurred in collection if this account is delinquent. CONTRACT VA LI D WHEN SIGNED BY SPONSOR REPRESENTATIVE Sponsor Representative (print) Sponsor Representative Signature Western Display Fireworks, Ltd . Robert L. Gobet, President Judith A. Go bet, Vice President For: ___________________________________ (Organization) Date _______________ _ Date __ i--+-./_'7._,/~;<~------ STANDARD & POOR'S RATINGS SERVICES McGRAW Hill FINANCIAL February 26, 20 15 City of Moses Lake P.O. Box 15 79 40 I S. Balsam St. Moses Lake, WA 98837 Attention: Mr. W. Robert Taylor, CGFM, Finance Director One California Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 -5432 tel 415 371-5000 reference no.: 40209971 Re: City of Moses Lake, Washington, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds Dear Mr. Taylor: Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("Ratings Services") hereby affirms its rating of "AA-" for the underlying rating (SPUR) on the above-listed obligations and stable outlook. A copy of the rationale supporting the rating and outlook is enclosed. This letter constitutes Ratings Services' permission for you to disseminate the above rating to interested parties in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. However, permission for such dissemination (other than to professional advisors bound by appropriate confidentiality arrangements) will become effective only after we have released the rating on standardandpoors.com. Any dissemination on any Website by you or your agents shall include the full analysis for the rating, including any updates, where applicable. To maintain the rating, Standard & Poor's must receive all relevant financial and other information, including notice of material changes to financial and other information provided to us and in relevant documents, as soon as such information is available. Relevant financial and other information includes, but is not limited to, information about direct bank loans and debt and debt- like instruments issued to, or entered into with, financial institutions, insurance companies and/or other entities, whether or not disclosure of such information would be required under S.E.C. Rule l 5c2-l 2. You understand that Ratings Services relies on you and your agents and advisors for the accuracy, timeliness and completeness of the information submitted in connection with the rating and the continued flow of material information as part of the surveillance process. Please send all information via electronic delivery to pub fin statelocalgovt@standardandpoors.com. If SEC rule l 7g-5 is applicable, you may post such information on the appropriate website. For any information not available in electronic format or posted on the applicable website, Please send hard copies to: Standard & Poor's Ratings Services Public Finance Department 55 Water Street New York, NY 10041 -0003 PF Ratings U .S. (7/18/14) Page j 2 The rating is subject to the Terms and Conditions, if any, attached to the Engagement Letter applicable to the rating. In the absence of such Engagement Letter and Terms and Conditions, the rating is subject to the attached Terms and Conditions. The applicable Terms and Conditions are incorporated herein by reference. Ratings Services is pleased to have the opportunity to provide its rating opinion. For more information please visit our website at w ww.standardandpoors.com. If you have any questions, please contact us. Thank you for choosing Ratings Services. Sincerely yours, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services sb enclosure PF Ratings U .S. (7/18/14 ) STANDARD & POOR'S RATINGS SERVICES McGRAW HILL FINANCIAL Standard & Poor's Ratings Services Terms and Conditions Applicable To Public Finance Credit Ratings General. The credit ratings and other views of Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("Ratings Services") are statements of opinion and not statements of fact. Credit ratings and other views of Ratings Services are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities and do not comment on market price, marketability, investor preference or suitability of any security. While Ratings Services bases its credit ratings and other views on information provided by issuers and their agents and advisors, and other information from sources it believes to be reliable, Ratings Services does not perform an audit, and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification, of any information it receives. Such information and Ratings Services' opinions should not be relied upon in making any investment decision. Ratings Services does not act as a "fiduciary" or an investment advisor. Ratings Services neither recommends nor will recommend how an issuer can or should achieve a particular credit rating outcome nor provides or will provide consulting, advisory, financial or structuring advice. Unless otherwise indicated, the term "issuer" means both the issuer and the obligor if the obligor is not the issuer. All Credit Rating Actions in Ratings Services' Sole Discretion. Ratings Services may assign, raise, lower, suspend, place on CreditWatch, or withdraw a credit rating, and assign or revise an Outlook, at any time, in Ratings Services' sole discretion. Ratings Services may take any of the foregoing actions notwithstanding any request for a confidential or private credit rating or a withdrawal of a credit rating, or termination of a credit rating engagement. Ratings Services will not convert a public credit rating to a confidential or private credit rating, or a private credit rating to a confidential credit rating. Publication. Ratings Services reserves the right to use, publish, disseminate, or license others to use, publish or disseminate a credit rating and any related analytical reports, including the rationale for the credit rating, unless the issuer specifically requests in connection with the initial credit rating that the credit rating be assigned and maintained on a confidential or private basis. If, however, a confidential or private credit rating or the existence of a confidential or private credit rating subsequently becomes public through disclosure other than by an act of Ratings Services or its affiliates, Ratings Services reserves the right to treat the credit rating as a public credit rating, including, without limitation, publishing the credit rating and any related analytical reports. Any analytical reports published by Ratings Services are not issued by or on behalf of the issuer or at the issuer's request. Ratings Services reserves the right to use, publish, disseminate or license others to use, publish or disseminate analytical reports with respect to public credit ratings that have been withdrawn, regardless of the reason for such withdrawal. Ratings Services may publish explanations of Ratings Services' credit ratings criteria from time to time and Ratings Services may modify or refine its credit ratings criteria at any time as Ratings Services deems appropriate. Reliance on Information. Ratings Services relies on issuers and their agents and advisors for the accuracy and completeness of the information submitted in connection with credit ratings and the surveillance of credit ratings including, without limitation, information on material changes to information previously provided by issuers, their agents or advisors. Credit ratings, and the maintenance of credit ratings, may be affected by Ratings Services' opinion of the information received from issuers, their agents or advisors. Confidential Information. Ratings Services has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received from issuers, their agents or advisors. For these purposes, "Confidential Information" shall mean verbal or written information that the issuer or its agents or advisors have provided to Ratings Services and, in a specific and particularized manner, have marked or otherwise indicated in writing (either prior to or promptly following such disclosure) that such information is "Confidential." Ratings Services Not an Expert, Underwriter or Seller under Securities Laws. Ratings Services has not consented to and will not consent to being named an "expert" or any similar designation under any applicable securities laws or other PF Ratings U.S . (02/16/13) regulatory guidance, rules or recommendations, including without limitation, Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933. Rating Services has not performed and will not perform the role or tasks associated with an "underwriter" or "seller" under the United States federal securities laws or other regulatory guidance, rules or recommendations in connection with a credit rating engagement. Disclaimer of Liability. Ratings Services does not and cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information relied on in connection with a credit rating or the results obtained from the use of such information. RATINGS SERVICES GIVES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. Ratings Services, its affiliates or third party providers, or any of their officers, directors, shareholders, employees or agents shall not be liable to any person for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions, in each case regardless of cause, actions, damages (consequential, special, indirect, incidental, punitive, compensatory, exemplary or otherwise), claims, liabilities, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in any way arising out of or relating to a credit rating or the related analytic services even if advised of the possibility of such damages or other amounts. No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in any credit rating engagement, or a credit rating when issued, is intended or should be construed as creating any rights on behalf of any third parties, includ ing, without limitation, any recipient of a credit rating. No person is intended as a third party beneficiary of any credit rating engagement or of a credit rating when issued. PF Ratings U.S. (02/16/13) STANDARD & PO OR'S RATINGS SERVICES McGRAW HILL FINANCIAL RatingsDirect® Summary: Moses Lake , Washington; Water/Sewer Primary Credit Analyst: Paula E Costa, New York(!) 212-438-4754; paula.costa@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: James M Breeding, Dallas ( 1) 214-8 71-1407; james.breeding@standardandpoors.com Research Contributor: rahul dedhia, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT FEBRUARY 27, 2015 1 138G<l20 I 302116802 Summary: Moses Lake, Washington; Water/Sewer Credit Profile Moses Lake Wtr & Swr Rev Bnds Long Term Rating AA-/ Stable Moses Lake wtr & swr rev bnds ser 2004 dtd 10/01/2004 due 09/01/2007-2024 Unenhanced Rating AA-( SPUR)/ Stable Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. Rationale Affirmed Affirmed Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'AA-' long-term and underlying rating on Moses Lake, Wash.'s outstanding water and sewer revenue bonds. The outlook is stable. The rating reflects our view of the city's: • Practice of adopting annual rate increases based on inflation changes; • Strong financial performance, evidenced by historical strong total debt service coverage (DSC) and strong liquidity position; • Ample operational capacity to meet demand over the medium-term horizon; and • Manageable five-year capital improvement plan (CIP). The revenue bonds are secured by a pledge of net revenues of the city's water and sewer systems. In our opinion, the legal provisions are adequate. The bonds are additionally secured by a debt service reserve funded at the lesser of maximum annual debt service (MADS), 125% of average annual debt service and 10% of initial par. The rate covenant requires the city to set rates and charges to generate 1.25x debt service coverage. The additional bonds test requires 1.25x MADS, with adjustments allowed for some projected revenue. Moses Lake encompasses 13 .6 square miles, serves a population of 21,479, and is located in Grant County. The city is located in Eastern Washington along the state's main east-west highway and adjacent to a lake that serves as a regional tourist draw. The area economy is also primarily on manufacturing, food processing and agricultural production. The city's affordable utility rates, due to its proximity to the Grand Coulee Dam's hydroelectric facility, have attracted technology and alternative energy companies into the city and county. Household income levels are good in our view, with the city's median household effective buying income (MHEBI} representing about 99% of the national levels. The unemployment rate in Grant County was 10.6% as of December 2014, which was above the state unemployment rate of 6.2% and nation's rate of 5.4%. In our opinion, the system's customer base is primarily residential, stable, and very diverse. The system currently serves about 7,932 water accounts and 7,697 sewer accounts. Historically the growth in customer has been stable, with management projecting the customer base to grow by approximately 3% annually. Historically, we have observed WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT FEBRUARY 27, 2015 2 1386420 I 302116ao2 Summary: Moses Lake, Washington; Water/Sewer that customer base concentration has been very diverse. Operationally, the system has sufficient treatment capacity to meet existing demand for at least the next 10 years. The city's water source is groundwater pumped by the system's 19 wells. As per management, the current water supply is adequate to meet the average daily demand at 9.1 million gallons per day (mgd) and a peak daily demand of 18.0 mgd in fiscal year 2014. Sewage is treated at the city's two treatment plants, which have a combined average capacity of 4.4 mgd and a peak flow capacity of 4.46 mgd. The sewer treatment plant has ample capacity, with an average daily flow 2.2 mgd and a peak daily flow of 2.6 mgd. Water and sewer rates were last increased in fiscal 2014 by 1.15% and 1. 71 %, respectively. Based on the current rate schedule, an average combined monthly water and sewer bill totals $59.10. Under the city's municipal code, utility rates are increased annually based on the change in the All West City Average consumer price index (CPI). We consider current rates to be affordable given area income levels. representing just 1. 7% of the city's median household EBI and thereby providing additional revenue-raising flexibility. Management anticipates rates increases in line with the CPI as outlined in the municipal code. We consider the financial performance to be strong and likely sustainable. Based on the audited financial statements, the senior lien DSC has been strong at 4.12x in fiscal 2013, though declined from 14.6 lx in fiscal 20 11. After considering the junior lien state loans, total DSC has historically not been below 2.45x, which represents fiscal 2013 results. We understand the decline in coverage is primarily due to substantial increase in debt service payments due to issue of 2011 bonds, which was offset by savings in operating expenses on account of settlement of a lawsuit associated with environmental contamination at the decommissioned Larson Air Force Base. The system also made annual transfers to general fund in the nature of payment in lieu of taxes (PILOTS) in fi scal 2012 and 2013, constituting $1.9 million and $500,000, respectively. After including these transfers the total DSC was 1.58x and 2. l 9x for fiscal years 20 12 and 2013, respectively, levels we consider as strong. Fiscal 2014 draft results are similar to fiscal 2013 while management does not anticipate any material deviation for fiscal 2015. In our opinion, the system has strong liquidity position though it has declined in the recent years. The unrestricted cash balance at the end offiscal 2013 was $3.8 million or 240 days' cash in hand, a decline from$ 5.9 million in fiscal 2011or387 days' cash. Management states the decline in liquidity is due to utilization of funds for capital expenses. Management anticipates there will be no further draw down of cash. We consider the city's leverage position to be low, with a debt to plant ratio at 21.4% at the end offiscal 2013. The city maintains a long-term capital improvement program for the system, which includes $8 .2 million in capital projects in fiscal years 2015 through 2019. We understand these will be funded through internally generated funds and available reserves. According to management, no additional debt is planned during the next five years. Outlook The stable outlook reflects our view of the system's continued strong financial performance, which we believe to be sustainable. It also reflects our view of system's service rates, which provide management with revenue-raising flexibility, and ample operational capacity to meet demand during the medium term. We do not anticipate taking either WWW .STANDARDANDPOORS .COM/RA TJNGSDIRECT FEBRUARY 27, 2015 3 1386420 I 302116802 Summary: Moses Lake, Washington; Water/Sewer a positive or a negative rating action during the outlook period, although a significant departure from current financial results could lead to a rating change in the longer term. Related Criteria And Research Related Criteria • USPF Criteria: Key Water And Sewer Utility Credit Ratio Ranges, Sept. 15, 2008 • USPF Criteria: Standard & Poor's Revises Criteria For Rating Water, Sewer, And Drainage Utility Revenue Bonds, Sept. 15, 2008 • USPF Criteria: Methodology: Definitions And Related Analytic Practices For Covenant And Payment Provisions In U.S. Public Finance Revenue Obligations, Nov. 29, 2011 Related Research • U.S. State And Local Government Credit Conditions Forecast, Dec. 10, 2014 • U.S. Municipal Water And Sewer Utilities 2014 Sector Outlook: Learning To Do More With Less, Jan. 9, 2014 • 2014 Review Of U.S. Municipal Water And Sewer Ratings: How They Correlate With Key Economic And Financial Ratios, May 12, 2014 Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of Ratings Direct at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. WWW.ST ANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RA TINGSDIRECT FEBRUARY 27, 2015 4 1386420 I Jo211sao2 Copyright© 2015 Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC, a part of McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause. for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs. expenses. legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions. analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites. www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT FEBRUARY 27, 2015 5 1386420 I 302116802 March 3, 2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Manager for Coun.mJ l Consideration Finance Director //.~ Ambulance Cash Report for February Please find the attached Cash Ambulance Report for the month ending February 28, 2015. Cc: Fire Chief AMBULANCE CASH OPERATION 2015 difference Prior yr JAN FEB Y-T-D from prior yr comparison REVENUE Collected on ALS/BLS/mileage 102,450.80 92,235.05 $ 194,685.85 16,218.97 178,466.88 prior adjustments Utility charge 104,846.43 91,461.06 196,307.49 46,530.28 149,777.21 State grant -Stay at work State grant -EMS Reimbursement from police Reimbursement from fire 24,904.55 24,904.55 6,614.83 18,289.72 Emergency Aid fees Other Fees -MRI 4,800.00 4,800.00 4,800.00 misc cash from operations 212,097.23 208,600.66 $ 420,697.89 74,164.08 346,533.81 EXPENDITURE labor 140,431.81 88,992.84 $ 229,424.65 (18, 718.11) 248,142.76 benefits 42,390.58 57,929.13 100,319.71 15,075.58 85,244.13 supplies 170.99 7,377.76 7,548.75 (1,146.43) 8,695.18 services/repairs 26,114.95 17,405.29 43,520.24 (3,016.71) 46,536.95 transfers (previously 09xx) 32,540.00 32,546.00 65,086.00 (2,619.00) 67,705.00 capital purchases interest total expenditures 241,648.33 204,251.02 $ 445,899.35 (10,424.67) 456,324.02 Net income (loss) before contrib. (29,551.10) 4,349.64 (25,201.46) 84,588.75 (109, 790.21) contribution from general fund 0.0 (45,962.00) 45,962.00 net income (loss) (29,551.10) 4,349.64 $ (25,201.46) 38,626.75 (63,828.21) Cash position normal account 59,736.15 74,714.51 179,802.59 reconcile to deposit 77,992.79 93,985.63 98,793.75 137,728.94 168,700.14 (140,867.40) 278,596.34 change in cash from prior mnth (15,778.79) 30,971.20 lnterfund Loan balance 400,591.00 400,591.00 SAAS ($3.30) 2,670 222 billed ($21.50) 2,226 193 March 5, 2015 TO: City Manager for Council Consideration FROM: Community Development Director SUBJECT: February Building Activity Report Please see the attached building activity report for the month of February 2015. Also included is the building activity for the 2015 year to date. The following are highlights of the attached report: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Building permits revenue generated for the month of February: Building permits revenue generated for the year to date: Building permits estimated valuation for the month of February: Building permits estimated valuation for the year to date: $12,367 $27,935 $903,382 $2,263,761 For the purpose of comparing February 2015 building activity numbers to February 2014 and February 2013 building activity numbers, the following 2014 and 2013 highlights are provided: 2014 6. 7. 8. 9. Building permits revenue generated for the month of February: Building permits revenue generated for the year to date: Building permits estimated valuation for the month of February: Building permits estimated valuation for the year to date: 2013 10. 10. 11. 12. Building permits revenue generated for the month of February: Building permits revenue generated for the year to date: Building permits estimated valuation for the month of February: Building permits estimated valuation for the year to date: $30,748 $66,764 $4,031 ,799 $5,651 ,638 $7,972 $24,168 $473,786 $9,165,155 March 2, 2015 TO: Community Development Director 0 FROM: Planning and Building Technician ~ SUBJECT: February Building Activity Report Attached is the February 2015 building permit statistics for your information. February 2014 and 2013 is attached for comparison. Please call me at Extension #3756 with any questions. cc: City Manager Building Official Municipal Services Director County Assessor File *XBPRPI'l RUN BY: kwoodwortb C I T Y 0 P M 0 S B S L A X E BUILDING DBPARTMBNT ISSUED BUILDING PBRMIT STATISTICS PROM: 02/01/2015 TO: 02/28/2015 PAGE: 1 DATE: t«>N, MAR 2, 2015, 9:16 AM =========::::::::::::::::::::::::::=================================================================================c============== DESCRIPTION I OF PBRMITS ISSUED 02/2015 # OF PERMITS ISSUED YTD 02/28/2015 BSTIMAl'BD VALOATION 02/2015 ESTIMATED VALUATION YTD 02/28/2015 =============c•=========================::;;:::::::::::::::::::•=================================================================== A434 RBSIDBNTIAL ADD ARD ALT 1 1 34,203 34,203 A437 NONRBSIDRHTIAL ADD ARD s 8 251,000 505,580 C320 INDUSTRIAL l l 175,000 175,000 C322 SERVICE STATIONS & RBPA 0 1 0 15,000 C324 OFFICE, BANKS & PROFESS l l 41!1,879 419,879 D328 DBMOLISH OTHER NON-RBSI 1 l 0 0 M329 STRUCTURES OTHER THAN B 4 7 23,300 25,300 M801 MECHANICAL COMMERCIAL l 2 0 0 M901 PLlJMBING COMMBRICAL 0 l 0 0 M902 PLlJMBIKG RBSmBNTIAL 0 5 0 0 . RlOl SINGLE PAMILY·DBTATCHBD 1 l 0 0 R102 SIKGLB-PAMILY A'lTACHBD 1 7 0 1,088,799 ==========================================================================================================:c:ccc:::c:::::c::::::::: PERMIT TOTALS: 16 36 903,382 2,263,761 ================z======•=•=•====•=============•==••=•••==========================================••••============================== *XBPRPTl RUN BY: kwoodworth CITY OF MOSES LAKE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ISSUBD BUILDING PBRMIT STATISTICS FROM: 02/01/2014 TO: 02/28/2014 PAGE: l DATE: MON, MAR 3, 2014, 9:49 AM :::::::::::::cac=================================================================================================ca:ca:c::::::::::: DBSCJUPTION #OF PBRMITS ISSDED 02/2014 # OF PERMITS ISSUED YTD 02/28/2014 ESTIMATED VALUATION 02/2014 ESTIMATED VALUATION YTD 02/28/2014 sss============•=••====:=====================================•=========================c:;::c::::::::c:cc::::::::::::c::::::cc:cc:c: A434 RBSIDBHTIAL ADD ARD ALT 0 3 0 154,000 A437 NONRBSIDBNTIAL ADD AND 5 8 254, 811 1,053,708 C326 SCHOOLS & OTHER BDUCATI l 1 1,699,840 1,699,840 C327 STORES & COSTOMBR SERVI 2 2 779,283 779,283 M329 STRUCTURES OTHER THAN B s 10 7,293 25,848 M802 MECHANICAL RESIDENTIAL 2 2 0 0 M90l PLUMBING COMMBRICAL 2 3 6,000 6,000 M902 PLtJMBING RESIDENTIAL l 4 0 0 RlOl SINGLE FAMILY-DBTATCHBD 3 3 0 0 R102 SINGLE-FAMILY ATI'ACHBD 3 6 546,181 1,194,568 Rl03 00 FAMILY BUILDIBGS 1 l 258,644 258,644 Rl04 THREE & FOOR FAMILY BUI l l 479, 747 479,747 ======================================~============================================================================================ PERMIT TOTALS: 26 44 4,031,799 5,651,638 ===============c====•==============================================:=============:===============================•================= *XBPRPl'l C I T Y 0 F M 0 S E S L A K E PAGE: 1 BOILDING DEPARTMENT RUN BY: kwoodworth ISSUED BUILDING PERMIT STATISTICS DATE: FRI, HAR 1, 2013, 8: 17 AM FRCll: 02/01/2013 TO: 02/28/2013 DESCRIPTION #OF PERMITS i OF PERMITS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ISSUED ISSOED YTD VALUATION VALVATION YTD 02/2013 02/28/2013 02/2013 02/28/2013 A434 RESIDENTIAL ADD AND ALT 2 2 12, 457 12,457 A437 NClmESIDENTIAL ADD AND 5 8 156,216 168, 716 C323 HOSPITALS & INSTITUTION 0 1 0 442,000 C326 SCHOOLS & OTHER EDUCATI 0 1 0 6,838,301 M329 STRUCTURES OTHER THAN B l 10 673 444,073 M801 MECHANICAL CCMMERCIAL 2 2 0 0 M802 MECHANICAL RESIDENTIAL 0 1 0 0 M901 PLUMBING C<M4ERICAL 0 1 0 0 M902 PLUMBING RESIDENTIAL 3 6 0 0 RlOl SINGLE FAMILY-DETATCHED 1 1 0 0 Rl02 SINGLE-FAMILY ATrACHED 2 5 304,440 779,861 Rl04 THREE & FOOR FAMILY BUI 0 1 0 479, 747 PERMIT 'l'Ol'ALS: 16 39 473, 786 9,165,155 *XBPMTH2 RUN BY: kwoodwortb C I T Y 0 F M 0 S E S L A K E BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS PROM: 02/01/2015 TO: 02/28/2015 PAGE: 1 DATB: 03/02/2015 ===========================c=====================================:::2s:s~:s:::ac:::.:::::::::ac:c:::::::c:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PERMIT NOMBBR 20150028 20150029 20150030 20150031 20150032 20150033 20150034 20150035 20150036 20150037 20150038 20150039 20150040 20150041 20150042 20150043 20150044 20150045 20150046 PBRMIT TYPB D328 A437 M329 A437 C320 R438 A434 R102 A437 C328 A437 M329 A437 RlOl M329 M329 C320 R102 A434 BSTIMATBD VALUATION 1,000 3,000 225,000 175,000 183,222 5,038 126,259 215,232 5,000 9,700 15,000 9,000 4,500 30,000 214,765 15,768 RBVIBW·FBBS CHARGED .00 .oo .oo 1,105 .16 923.16 955.92 .00 .00 748.44 1,072.40 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo .00 150.00 .00 STATB·FBBS CHARGED 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 .oo 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 .00 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 PERMIT FBBS APPLICATION CHARGED DATB 150.00 02/02/2015 45.25 02/05/2015 89.75 02/10/2015 1,700.25 02/10/2015 1,420.25 02/10/2015 1,470.65 02/13/2015 131. 75 02/18/2015 128.00 02/20/2015 1,151.45 02/12/2015 1,799.35 02/20/2015 117.75 02/23/2015 187.75 02/23/2015 257.75 02/24/2015 350.00 02/24/2015 173.75 02/25/2015 117 .75 02/25/2015 448.25 02/26/2015 1,878.25 02/26/2015 271.75 02/26/2015 ======================================================================================c============================================ REPORT TOTALS: 1,237,484 4,955.08 76.50 11,889.70 =================================================================================================================================== TOTAL FEES CHARGED: 16,921.28 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• *XBPSTAT2 RUN BY: kwoodworth C I T Y 0 F M 0 S E S L A K E BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION STATUS FROM: 02/01/2015 TO: 02/28/2015 PAGE: 1 DATE: 03/02/2015 =======--=====================~=======================================================================·============================ PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT TYPE SERVICE ADDRESS APPLICATION DATE ISSUE DATE --------------------------·--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------·-----20150028 D328 3645 BROADWAY AVB 02/02/2015 02/02/2015 20150029 A437 530 VALLEY RD 02/05/2015 02/06/2015 20150030 M329 821 BROADWAY AVB 02/10/2015 02/23/2015 20150031 A437 1765 KI~N RD 02/10/2015 02/24/2015 20150032 C320 3322 RD N HE 02/10/2015 02/19/2015 20150033 R438 1015 WESTSHORE DR 02/13/2015 I I 20150034 A434 728 WANAPOM DR 02/18/2015 I I 20150035 Rl02 2141 SPRUCE ST 02/20/2015 02/20/2015 20150036 A437 6082 22ND ST 02/12/2015 I I 20150037 C328 950 BROADWAY AVB 02/20/2015 I I 20150038 A437 102 THIRD AVB 02/23/2015 02/23/2015 20150039 M329 301 BROADWAY AVB 02/23/2015 I I 20150040 A437 831 PIONEER WAY 02/24/2015 I I 20150041 RlOl 4000 LONGVIEW ST 02/24/2015 02/26/2015 20150042 M329 801 WHEELER RD 02/25/2015 I I 20150043 M329 1790 KITTELSON RD 02/25/2015 I I 20150044 C320 3322 RD N NE 02/26/2015 I I 20150045 R102 736 REES ST 02/26/2015 I I 20150046 A434 904 HAYDBN DR 02/26/2015 I I Build., Struct. & Equip. Plan Checking Fees Total Build., Struct. & Equip. Plan Checking Fees Total Build., Struct. & Equip. Plan Checking Fees Total Build., Struct. & Equip. Plan Checking Fees Total Build., Struct. & Equip. Plan Checking Fees Total Building Permit Fees 2015 YTD January February March April May June 23,177.26 13,409.76 9,767.50 4,758.53 2,158.22 2,600.31 27,935.79 15,567.98 12,367.81 2014 YTD January February March April May June 472,501.67 26,096.35 20,583.05 13,925.26 43.776.73 138,369.50 21,288.20 234,021.94 9,920.48 10,165.02 5,116.73 17,509.00 77,649.37 12,596.79 706,523.61 36,016.83 30,748.07 19,041.99 61,285.73 216,018.87 33,884.99 2013 YTD January February March April May June 380,287.21 12,421.85 5,378.95 27,659.65 21,085.32 31,956.56 15,794.73 102,146.63 3,774.24 2,593.90 4,757.01 7,081.98 4,353.01 14,338.40 482,433.84 16,196.09 7,972.85 32,416.66 28,167.30 36,309.57 30,133.13 2012 YTD January February March April May June 319,218.25 1,130.40 8,233.40 18,798.95 11,101.35 22,155.50 23,465.15 95,988.16 35.36 720.02 3,428.29 1,719.87 4,663.26 22,746.88 July August September October July August September October 27,353.15 52,445.85 26,337.14 56,184.37 7,612.76 21,347.27 13.074.72 40,284.18 34,965.91 73,793.12 39,411.86 96,468.55 July August September October 35,913.25 14,509.50 23,209.45 59,877.45 5,038.31 8,730.59 6,879.73 30,986.10 40,951.56 23,240.09 30,089.18 90,863.55 July August September October 24,658.90 70,791.95 32,467,18 65,593.64 7.480.46 9,297.58 5,976.55 33,687.68 November November 29,082.92 4,776.58 33,859.50 November 111,595.15 7,797.63 119,392.78 November 29,309.75 4,779.80 December Budget Over (Under) 300,000.00 -276,822.74 100,000.00 -95,241.47 400,000.00 -372,064.21 December Budget Over (Under) 17,059.15 240,000.00 232,501.67 13,969.04 75,000.00 159,021.94 31,028.19 315,000.00 391,523.61 December Budget Over (Under) 20,885.35 230,000.00 150,287.21 5,815.73 75,000.00 27,146.63 26,701.08 305,000.00 177,433.84 December Budget 11,512 .08 275,000,00 1.452.41 85.000.00 Over (Under) 44,218.25 10,988.16 415,206.41 1,165.76 8,953.42 22,227.24 12,821.22 26,818.76 46,212.03 32,139.36 80,089.53 38,443.73 99,281.32 34,089.55 12,964.49 360,000.00 55,206.41 2011 YTD January February March April May June 222,114.90 18.336.45 15,519.95 26,936.21 21,968.40 13,566.55 38,552.75 73,099.03 4,124.46 8,790.29 9,482.98 6,588.61 5,571.29 10,092.66 July August September October 12,985.60 13,571.68 15,331.15 19,583.81 3,893.82 2,824.60 11,380.84 8,954.85 November 9,674.10 1,394.63 December Budget Over (Under) 16,088.25 300,000.00 -77,885.10 0.00 80,000.00 -6,900.97 295,213.93 22,460.91 24,310.24 36,419.19 28,557.01 19,137.84 48,645.41 16,879.42 16,396.28 26,711.99 28,538.66 11,068.73 16,088.25 380,000.00 -84,786.07 Files\Buifding Permit Check 3/3/2015 9:43 Aflo